James S retweeted
something interesting just happened on @Starknet 👀
developer 0xjuno demonstrated post-quantum wallet migration on s
Starknet Sepolia.
the interesting part?
> same wallet address, same funds.
> ECDSA + Falcon-512 transaction succeeded.
> ECDSA-only transaction was rejected.
> 11 wallet account classes reportedly tested.
It's still an unaudited testnet experiment, not a mainnet upgrade.
but this is why Starknet's programmable accounts matter.
security isn't just about protecting what exists today. It's about having the flexibility to adapt to tomorrow's threats.
And Starknet is showing what that flexibility could look like.
Built to Adapt.
Sam Altman (Founder OpenAI)
has everyone talking about how fast AI is moving.
meanwhile, @starknet is building for a future where blockchain need to do more than just process transactions.
> scaling ethereum
> programmable accounts and now
> exploring post-quantum security.
still early, but I'm bullish on the bigger picture.
are you paying attention?
James S retweeted
THE BLOCK: Starknet ethereum:0xca14007eff0db1f8135f4c25b34de49ab0d42766 holders overwhelmingly backed research into transitioning from an Ethereum Layer 2 to an independent, post-quantum Layer 1.
More than 93.5% of voting power supported the proposal, with StarkWare targeting a draft whitepaper in November. Further governance approval would be required for the transition.
James S retweeted
The Starknet community has voted to research whether Starknet should become an independent, post-quantum L1.
Starting today, a joint @StarkWareLtd × @StarknetFndn working group will lead the research and publish a paper in the coming months.
James S retweeted
Private options trading is live on @SuperVegaXYZ.
You can now open and manage options positions on SuperVega without publicly linking your trading activity to your main wallet.
Powered by STRK20 Shadow Accounts.
James S retweeted
A new Starknet-native wallet featuring built-in privacy, multisig, and account abstraction.
Maintained by the Starknet Foundation and tailor-made for the quantum & AI bunker.
nitter.cf/Bramble_fi/status/2112…
Very proud of the @StarknetFndn team for the huge amount of work involved in shipping this. Not the last product you will see from us 💥
James S retweeted
Private money is only one use case.
@Starknet’s VP of Growth @thedamooo on what programmable privacy enables in the age of Zcash.
James S retweeted
THE BLOCK: Starknet is launching a seven-day, non-binding initial governance poll on whether to explore becoming an independent post-quantum Layer 1.
A yes vote would trigger further research, followed by more detailed proposals and polls. A no vote would see post-quantum development continue on Starknet as an Ethereum Layer 2.
James S retweeted
Starknet is exploring a path towards becoming an independent post-quantum L1.
A governance post is now live with a non-binding poll for STRK holders to share their views.
community.starknet.io/t/shou…
James S retweeted
Starknet L1
vote now!
ethereum:0xca14007eff0db1f8135f4c25b34de49ab0d42766
governance.starknet.io/#/s:s…
James S retweeted
FULL CONVERSATION: Starknet Is The ZK Bunker For The Quantum Era
@EliBenSasson @StarkWareLtd @Starknet @robbieklages @andyyy
Timestamps:
00:00 Intro
02:29 Starknet May Become L1
04:48 AI May Break Keys
08:08 Starknet Is ZK Bunker
10:39 Agility Is Everything
12:55 A VPN For Polymarket
15:30 Retail Options On Starknet
James S retweeted
Shadow Accounts are live on Ekubo 🥷
You can now trade, provide liquidity, and manage your LP positions, all without publicly linking them to your main wallet.
Same pools, zero liquidity fragmentation.
James S retweeted
Listened this morning to @danboneh on @a16zcrypto talking about Lattice-based vs hash-based signatures security/usability tradeoffs, and how recursive proofs could fit in but they are complicated and we don't yet understand their theoretical security well enough.
If only we had a company that deployed recursive proofs in production for years, is led by cryptographers, and built @Starknet , which allows you to choose your own signatures to best leverage your usecase, and is now also looking at solving PQS.
Know someone like that? 👀
"What’s interesting too is that some of Ethereum’s own quantum plans will make it look more like Starknet."
James S retweeted
1/ Every app should have a private mode. So we shipped it 🥷
Introducing Shadow Accounts, now live on Starknet.
A new STRK20 privacy primitive that lets apps offer a Public → Private switch, without publicly linking users' activity to their main wallets 🧵
James S retweeted
1/ A quantum-safe Bitcoin transaction now costs ~$59.
From $320 to $59 in just a few weeks: an 82% reduction driven by developers and AI agents.
Our $20,000 QSB Autoresearch Challenge with @yukonresearch and @eigenlabs has officially ended 🧵
James S retweeted
Sorry guys, you got this one wrong. Up until a week ago we never said anything like that.
What we did do was build Starknet the way we thought best served its vision. Ethereum labeled it as "misalignment".
We built Starknet as an L2 for Ethereum, but we did it our way: with ZK-STARKs, with Cairo instead of Solidity, and with native AA instead of EOAs. These were, and still are, the best design choices.
We aligned Starknet's architecture with Starknet's vision. For some reason, Ethereum kept treating these choices as misalignment.
Whether Starknet should become an L1 is a new discussion.
Starknet says they are "Activity considering becoming an L1", because Ethereum might not being ready for Q-Day
@TrustlessState is skeptical: "okay guys... @Starknet been posturing about leaving Ethereum as long as I can remember 🤣"
Do you think Starknet will actually do it this time?