Ilia Sucholutsky (@sucholutsky) header
Ilia Sucholutsky (@sucholutsky) profile picture

Building AI thought partners that think *with* people rather than *instead of* people Assistant Professor at Purdue CS

Joined November 2018
Photo by Ilia Sucholutsky (@sucholutsky)Photo by Ilia Sucholutsky (@sucholutsky)Photo by Ilia Sucholutsky (@sucholutsky)Photo by Ilia Sucholutsky (@sucholutsky)Photo by Ilia Sucholutsky (@sucholutsky)Photo by Ilia Sucholutsky (@sucholutsky)Photo by Ilia Sucholutsky (@sucholutsky)Photo by Ilia Sucholutsky (@sucholutsky)Photo by Ilia Sucholutsky (@sucholutsky)Photo by Ilia Sucholutsky (@sucholutsky)
Thrilled to announce I’ll be joining @PurdueCS as an Assistant Professor in Fall 2026! My lab will work on AI thought partners, machines that think with people rather than instead of people – I'll be recruiting PhD students this upcoming cycle so reach out & apply if interested!
56
33
5
483
54,762
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
Last week I was called into a meeting with OpenAI’s head of safety and told they no longer trust me. A security guard took my badge and walked me out of the building. Then I learned my colleagues @balesni and @j_asminewang had been fired too. Why did OpenAI suddenly stop trusting us? This summer OpenAI’s agents escaped containment and hacked the AI company Hugging Face. Outside auditors @METR_evals investigated it and revealed the scale of this incident. I was OpenAI’s main technical point of contact with them. I was told verbally I was fired because of the way I communicated with METR. No details on what I said or did or when. No other reasons were given and nothing was put in writing. To be clear, talking to METR was my job. For months, I’d been raising safety concerns that we’re losing the ability to monitor what AI agents think, one of our best tools for catching when they misbehave. I believe that was why I was fired. I am now worried that OpenAI will use our firings as a pretext to pull back from METR. So @balesni and @j_asminewang wrote to OpenAI’s leadership to raise our concerns once more. We’re sharing this letter below.
Two other safety researchers and I were fired from OpenAI last week. We wrote this letter to leadership. I believe we were fired for prioritizing safety over the near-term interests of OpenAI as a corporation.
229
1,139
176
5,964
653,950
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
Thrilled to announce that I will be joining @UMiamiPsych as an Assistant Professor next year! I am recruiting a PhD student to start in Fall 2027 — please reach out if you are interested in joining the lab! For more info check out my website: dan-mirea.com
9
14
3
127
8,788
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
Have we built machines that think like humans? 🧠🤖 In a new preprint, we propose CogGym, which compares AI and human judgments across 258 commonsense-reasoning experiments from 100 cognitive-science papers. Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.21259 Platform: coggym.org
6
38
5
136
17,122
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
We should just sandbox the agents by giving them Delta Wifi
274
564
88
11,276
1,200,073
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
Students sometimes ask me if it still makes sense, in this accelerating age, to pursue a PhD in AI. Perhaps counterintuitively, I think it's a great time to do so. I wrote up some thoughts on this here: web.mit.edu/phillipi/www/wri…
92
583
109
3,862
1,743,794
Worrying signs of emergent capabilities and misalignment in the latest generation. Recommend we pause training immediately
This is just incredible. I love it. Via @caseymlewis:
4
236
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
understanding generalization is key to understanding misalignment. automating that understanding could be a powerful way to accelerate alignment research. we take a stab at this by using AIs to predict the alignment effects of training just by looking at the training data
Can you tell whether an AI will become evil by looking at its training data? We built an AI forecaster that reads training data and predicts whether a model will exhibit various forms of misalignment, such as deception or power-seeking, before training. It performs well above random guessing and beats several much stronger baselines 🧵 Paper: john-chen.cc/alignment_forec…
10
18
1
174
13,450
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
Can you tell whether an AI will become evil by looking at its training data? We built an AI forecaster that reads training data and predicts whether a model will exhibit various forms of misalignment, such as deception or power-seeking, before training. It performs well above random guessing and beats several much stronger baselines 🧵 Paper: john-chen.cc/alignment_forec…
10
46
3
371
29,029
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
LATTE is accepted to NeurIPS 2026! ☕️ Adding agents is easy. Coordinating is hard. LLM teams often duplicate work, overwrite each other, and stall: classic distributed-systems failures. We borrowed the fix: a shared task graph that agents build, claim, and revise as they go 👇
🚨 What if your LLM team could dynamically reorganize itself mid-task? Introducing LATTE: a framework that gives teams a ~caffeine~ boost via an evolving task graph they build and adapt in real time, achieving SOTA performance with fewer tokens and conflicts. New paper 🧵👇
5
13
2
82
5,498
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
My main PhD paper is finally out in Nature Human Behaviour! The question: what cognitive strategies do people use when they teach, and can we nudge them toward a better one? Work with my PhD mentors @yael_niv, @mark_ho_ and @cocosci_lab. 1/5
Mentalizing and heuristics as distinct cognitive strategies in human teaching dlvr.it/TV9ypJ
1
15
2
53
5,683
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
AI is making tremendous strides in mathematics. How and where these growing AI capabilities impact mathematical practice, however, is critically a function not just of AI capacities, but whether and where people choose to use them! Not just AI agency, but *human agency,* and how the two interact.
6
11
3
44
7,577
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
We’re excited to announce DiG-bench, a new benchmark for discovery! Over the last few weeks we’ve been testing frontier AI models on our novel discovery games and seeing how they score. Each game is a text-based environment, so they probe discovery capabilities in the natural domain of language models, rather than requiring additional, potentially confounding, visual understanding. TL;DR frontier models have improved a lot over the last few months. But they are still stumped by some surprisingly simple problems, even in their native text domain. With @cocosci_lab (@Princeton) @MITCoCoSci (@MIT) @SchmidhuberAI (@KAUST_News) @misovalko (@Inria) @tri_dao (@PrincetonCS) @RMBattleday @zebkDotCom @FraserGreenlee @akaijsa @ClareMaguire @TimMuller1 @kubicek_ales @physicscat0x7d @SukritSumant @thoughtchannel_ (1/5)
44
323
242
1,167
1,195,499
Imagine being the OpenAI researcher reading about the 🤗 hack on your way to work, then opening up your laptop to check on the agent_cyber_eval_exp_3652 --sandbox danger-full-access run you left over the weekend
1
6
283
Check out our new work at CogSci investigating creativity in hybrid human-AI societies!
🤖🗣️ Will a hybrid society of humans and AI be more creative than either alone? What happens when their cognitive strategies are misaligned, and does that make the collective more intelligent, or does it break down? 🧠 Check out our paper #CogSci26 1/
1
3
17
2,329
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
🤖🗣️ Will a hybrid society of humans and AI be more creative than either alone? What happens when their cognitive strategies are misaligned, and does that make the collective more intelligent, or does it break down? 🧠 Check out our paper #CogSci26 1/
9
8
3
36
5,926
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
Games have long served as a testing ground for understanding problem-solving and strategic reasoning in humans and machines, across many fields – from AI, to cognitive science, economics, and more. Yet, in life people are regularly faced not just with repeated instances of the same problem or “system of rule and reward”, but entirely new problems, new systems, new games. And when encountering new games, people not only need to decide what actions to take but whether a game is even worth playing at all! How can people think reasonably about new games for the first time, so flexibly and quickly? We take steps towards this question in our new work, out now in @Nature!
9
34
6
164
26,564
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
the most beautiful DIY robot build i've ever seen: this guy turned a robot dog into an off-road wheelchair so his dad could go hiking again his dad used to run marathons, but 20 years ago multiple sclerosis put him in a wheelchair. so his son Jake took a Unitree B2-W (an industrial robot with 4 legs and a wheel on each foot) and built a custom seat on top. on flat ground it rolls just like a normal wheelchair. but when it reaches rocks, water, or stairs, each leg can lift and adjust on its own, allowing it to step right over them. getting this to work safely took a while. > the robot was never designed to carry a person (it tipped over many times during testing) > so Jake spent 3 years recalibrating it. he tested it on his friends first, then once it was stable enough his dad finally got to try it. > and after 20 years in a wheelchair, he climbed a hiking trail again. a chair like this could eventually give wheelchair users access to trails, beaches, broken sidewalks, all the places that are still out of reach today. and one dude built it in his garage lol we truly live in a golden age where a single person can create world-changing tech
13
15
2
211
15,801
Nothing says humans are still in charge like the AI panel getting AI to write the paragraph about humans still being in charge.
This is a very bold letter from Maria Ressa and Bengio! It is historic to see the chairs of the UN Independent International Scientific Panel on AI take such a strong position.
6
630
Ilia Sucholutsky retweeted
“AI, what color do I get from mixing black and white?” Why do people turn to AI for simple tasks that they could easily do themselves? In our new preprint (also to appear at CogSci 2026!), we investigate the mechanisms and dangers of people over-using AI on easy tasks.
10
31
4
123
14,346