
Just your friend who loves to read & write. I like dismantling Zionist horseshit in free time. #FreePalestine
Joined November 2019
- Tweets2.4K
- Following71
- Followers12
- Likes8
Pinned Tweet
Replying to @richimedhurst
thejc.com/lets-talk/so-what-…
People may not want to hear it, but like it or not, Islam is what saved Jewry—an inconvenient truth the modern world loves to ignore.
According to @yudapearl, Ben-Gurion supported Palestinian right for self-determination. Could anything more ignorant and absurd possibly be said than this?
@_ZachFoster @History__Speaks @m4xim1l1an
unavailable
Imagine celebrating Balfour Day and then lecturing Palestinians about coexistence. There is something profoundly shameless about celebrating a declaration that promised a national home to one people while leaving the political rights of Palestine’s existing majority unrecognized.
unavailable
Zionists like @yudapearl are still peddling colonial-era propaganda in 2026 and acting shocked that people see through it. You can dress up dispossession as “coexistence” and occupation as “self-defense,” but changing the vocabulary doesn’t change the reality. Your talking points are stuck in 1948, and your moral superiority is built on refusing to confront what Palestinians have actually endured. Get real.
unavailable
This is a tacit admission that they always wanted to colonize Palestine.
Go back to Russia and claim your indigenous rights there, Russian.
Replying to @NateTh3Gr34t
The Soviet Union didn't reject the Jews, the Jews rejected the Soviet Union.
How did these lands become Christian before Islam even existed? Did Christianity fall from the sky?
Wrapping your Islamophobia in words like “freedom,” “democracy,” and “civilization” doesn't make it sophisticated. It just makes the prejudice easier to market.
Fact: The riots in France have nothing to do with “Globalize the Intifada.” That’s your genocidal nature at play, Russian.
Only in an ignorant universe are “European Jews,” artificially shipped to Palestine to establish a bastard state in a Muslim and Arab majority land, considered indigenous.
ARSALAN AHMED retweeted
PSA: Navi Pillay also led the Commission of Inquiry's investigation of war crimes committed by Hamas et al on and after 10/7.
Interestingly, the Commission faced no accusations of bias or "blood libel" for that.
The killing of non-combatants is neither permissible nor acceptable. But the loss of life on October 7 was a consequence of Israel’s occupation and siege of millions of Palestinians.
I won’t condemn October 7 while decades of occupation, blockade, dispossession, and denial of Palestinian self-determination remain uncondemned.
Yes, people should learn about Al-Aqsa Mosque from an ex-Muslim, pro-Israel imbecile desperately trying to stay relevant in the West by playing the self-appointed savior of civilization from Islam.
Most people have no idea about the real history of Al-Aqsa Mosque, because they’ve only been fed the Islamic Palestinian propaganda version of events.
They believe that Al-Aqsa has always been Islam’s third holiest site, that it has belonged to Muslims since the dawn of time, and that Israel is the oppressor for merely existing near it.
None of that is true.
The Temple Mount in Jerusalem was the holiest site in Judaism for over a thousand years before Islam even appeared in history. It housed the First and Second Jewish Temples, the center of Jewish worship and pilgrimage.
When the Romans destroyed the Second Temple in 70 AD, they built pagan shrines over it, but its Jewish identity never disappeared.
In the 7th century Islam emerges and expands through conquest, and begins hijacking Jewish and Christian sites, prophets, and narratives.
At first, Jerusalem had no major significance in Islam. Muhammad never set foot there. There was no mosque. There was no pilgrimage. There was no Islamic history tied to the city.
But that changed during the brutal power struggle between Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan and Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr.
By the late 7th century, Islam was deeply divided. Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr controlled Mecca and Medina, the two holiest cities in Islam. And Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan, the Umayyad Caliph, controlled the Levant.
But Abd al-Malik had a problem, he didn’t want the people of the Levant traveling to Mecca for pilgrimage, because that would give power to his rival.
Abd al-Malik declared the Temple Mount as Alaqsa mosque that was mentioned in the quran, and he made it an alternative place of pilgrimage.
He ordered the construction of the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque to divert attention from Mecca.
And just like that, Islam manufactured a holy site for political gain.
The real Masjid Al-Aqsa referred to in the Quran was not in Jerusalem, it was between Mecca and Ta’if. There was no mosque in Jerusalem at the time. There was no Islamic presence there.
Yet, centuries later, after Islam had conquered the city, the Islamic narrative retroactively applied this Quranic verse to Jerusalem, again, for political convenience.
If Israel wanted to act like Islamic conquerors, it could have easily done to Al-Aqsa what Turkey did to the Hagia Sophia.
It could have converted the mosque into the Third Temple, banned Muslim prayer on the site, erased any trace of Islamic history, as Muslims did to Christian and Jewish sites throughout history.
But Israel didn’t do that. Israel allows Muslims to pray there freely. Israel protects Al-Aqsa, even as it is used to spread anti-Semitic propaganda and incite violence.
Yet, despite this, the world condemns Israel for merely existing in its own capital.
ARSALAN AHMED retweeted
Replying to @JacobALinker
Only in the Zionist worldview is a Palestinian’s right to return to the home they were expelled from absurd, while a Jew can claim an absolute right to return after 2,000 years. Apparently, history has a double standard.
“First we vaccinated the children, then we blasted them into smithereens.”
How will Palestinians ever repay Israel for such extraordinary mercy?
I wonder how they managed to win so many Nobel Prizes with an IQ apparently below Dead Sea level.
The anti-Israel propaganda film Naza unintentionally debunked the Gaza genocide hoax. The movie claims the IDF is willing to accept high collateral damage in targeting legitimate military targets. However, if the goal was to kill as many civilians as possible, then the term "collateral damage" would have been meaningless since the civilians themselves would have been the targets. For example, Hamas would never make the calculation of how many civilians would be hurt as collateral damage in an attack such as a suicide bombing at a children's party or a massacre at a music festival or lobbing rockets at a city because the civilians are the target. Even the Allies during WWII didn't consider "collateral damage" when they deliberately bombed residential areas for the sake of bombing residential areas. Just like Balaam, the creators of Naza came to curse and ended up blessing.
If your “Law of Return” applies to Jews but excludes Palestinian Arabs, it's called “apartheid”.
If the majority of Jews are Zionists who support the colonial dispossession of Palestinians, then it’s a moral failure on your part. Nazis couldn’t dismiss hatred by claiming people hated Germans simply because they were German. Hatred of an ideology and its supporters isn’t inherently hatred of an ethnicity.
Jews: “We accepted the 1947 UN Partition Plan for Palestine.”
Also Jews: “The so-called ‘1967 borders’ are indefensible.”
The fact is, there has been one consistent Jewish goal in Palestine from the beginning: acquiring as much land as possible while leaving as few Palestinians as possible. In 1948, Israel could not have sustained a viable Jewish majority without the mass displacement and expulsion of Palestinians from their homeland.
The so-called “67 borders” are indefensible.
Reagan said it to the country in 1982.
Begin said it to Carter’s face in 1977.
On those lines, Tel Aviv is a tank column away.
Abba Eban called them the “Auschwitz lines.”
Begin’s oath was clear: in the Holocaust, Jewish men had to deliver their women and children to their executioners. Never again.
The 1949 armistice lines did not get wider.
Not in 1977. Not in 1982. Not today.
Recognition of the State of #Palestine has nothing to do with #Hamas or the events of October 7, 2023. It is about affirming the legitimate sovereign over illegally occupied land under international law.
Israel is an apartheid state that actively persecute millions of #Palestinians under a draconian military occupation. Such a state has no right to exist and there is absolutely nothing #antisemitic about such stance. #FreePalestine #Gaza_Genocide #Jews #Israel #Zionism #Zionists













