no (@sumsof1) profile picture

Full time prediction markets trader

Joined April 2018
Polymarket is making users sign a very broad non-disparagement agreement in order to get their money back from the hack. It covers more than just the immediate incident.
BREAKING: POLYMARKET FORCES USERS AFFECTED BY THEIR ‘SECURITY INCIDENT’ TO DOX THEMSELVES AND SIGN A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT BEFORE RELEASING FUNDS DESPITE SAYING EVERYONE WOULD BE MADE WHOLE THIS CAN’T BE LEGAL, RIGHT?
16
29
5
356
24,041
Replying to @theMacroChip
At least they take feedback seriously
4
168
Replying to @dan_bernstein_
It's always funny how people get mad about fake Kalshi markets when there were real ones like this. Most prediction markets journalists don't do any original research.
6
245
After the addition of maker fees on Kalshi combos, market makers have widened their spreads meaning that takers are bearing the cost of the fees. Exactly what you'd expect from standard economic incidence analysis!
6
18
2
252
20,627
Polymarket US seems to be going well...
1
4
426
Kalshi has created a new website that encourages users to submit AI generated comments to the CFTC supporting prediction markets.
4
1
1
37
9,599
Fees on Polymarket have effectively doubled with zero warning. They quietly updated the formula in the docs to remove the p factor. On average fees will be twice as high, but in some cases the difference will be nearly 100x
27
13
1
212
24,728
Replying to @tomkysar
Would you consider this to be a good project thing to do?
52