Surse Pierpoint retweeted
Nunca entendí por qué se considera egoísta querer quedarse con el dinero que uno mismo ganó y no se considera egoísta querer quedarse con el que ganaron otros. La primera actitud se llama responsabilidad. La segunda se llama expropiación. Cuando el Estado decide que el fruto de tu trabajo le pertenece por derecho, ya no está redistribuyendo; está redefiniendo quién es el dueño de tu esfuerzo. Y lo hace con un lenguaje moral que convierte el robo en solidaridad.
Con poder absoluto hasta a un burro le resulta fácil gobernar. No necesita producir, no necesita convencer, no necesita demostrar resultados. Solo necesita controlar la información, el presupuesto y la narrativa. El chavismo, por ejemplo, parece conocer al detalle las finanzas de la oposición, pero resulta curiosamente incapaz de rastrear a sus propios financistas vinculados al narco y al lavado de dinero. La transparencia es selectiva. Se aplica al enemigo y se suspende para el propio círculo.
Por otra parte, la izquierda se atribuye la jornada de 40 horas, las pensiones, las vacaciones, la salud pública y la educación accesible como si fueran regalos que ella otorgó y no conquistas que la sociedad pagó con productividad previa a través del capitalismo y la economía de mercado. Luego pregunta qué derechos esenciales ha defendido la derecha. La respuesta es sencilla: el derecho a que esas conquistas no se conviertan en deuda impagable, en inflación que se come el salario real y en un Estado que te cobra por servicios que antes funcionaban sin necesidad de pedirle permiso para existir. Cuando el dinero alcanza si no se lo roban, recortar programas no es austeridad; es la consecuencia de haber gastado primero lo que no se había producido.
“Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications and to watch over their fate... It seeks to keep them in perpetual childhood. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd... till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd." - Alexis De Toqueville
In 1835, a Young French Aristocrat Predicted the Exact Bureaucratic Trap Threatening the West Today
Before the philosopher Alexis de Tocqueville ever set foot in America, radical tyranny had already scarred his family. During the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror, left-wing Jacobin zealots guillotined his great-grandfather and threw his newlywed parents into a Paris dungeon. Waiting daily for the executioner's blade, his father’s hair turned snow-white at the age of twenty-one. Only the sudden fall of Robespierre spared his parents' lives by a matter of hours, allowing Alexis to be born a decade later.
Raised in the shadow of state terror, Tocqueville became obsessed with a single question: why did the French pursuit of utopian equality end in a bloodbath, while the American Revolution produced the freest, most prosperous republic on earth? In 1831, at just twenty-five years old, he convinced the French government to send him to the United States under the mundane bureaucratic cover of inspecting American prisons. Once he arrived, he spent nine months traveling seven thousand miles by stagecoach, steamboat, and horseback to study the soul of the American citizen.
His observations became Democracy in America, one of the most brilliant political analyses ever written. Tocqueville realized that American greatness rested on three pillars: fierce individual self-reliance, decentralized local communities, and a strong foundation of religious morality. Whenever Americans saw a problem, they formed a local group and fixed it themselves rather than begging a distant politician for help.
Yet as he studied the young republic, Tocqueville foresaw a chilling vulnerability. He realized that a proud, armed citizenry would always fight back against an obvious military dictator. Therefore, future tyrants would abandon whips and chains in favor of welfare, cradle-to-grave safety, and endless administrative rules. They would conquer free citizens by offering to manage their lives in the name of compassion.
Describing this future nanny state in 1840, Tocqueville wrote a passage that reads like a headline from today:
"Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications and to watch over their fate... It seeks to keep them in perpetual childhood. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd... till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd."
Tocqueville called this system "soft despotism." Nearly two centuries ago, he understood that when citizens trade personal responsibility for government security, the state gladly reduces them to dependent children. Every bloated regulatory agency, speech code, and entitlement program today operates on the exact blueprint he exposed. Liberty rarely perishes overnight in a violent coup; it erodes quietly when a free people allow bureaucrats to become their shepherds.
Surse Pierpoint retweeted
The thing about collapsing nations is that their downfall rarely happens overnight, until suddenly it does,..
Surse Pierpoint retweeted
This is just one of the reasons I will always have great respect for Robert Downey Jr. Humility and grace are in short supply.
I hope this touches you.
"Here is the part nobody says. The bottleneck is no longer science. It's permission. The body is becoming a software problem, but our institutions still run on paper, committees and fear. The science is exponential; the bureaucracy is linear. And when a linear system meets an exponential one, the linear one doesn't win. It gets bypassed."
The Singularity is now
We were told the Singularity would arrive like a comet – a date, a flash, a headline. It won't. It's already here, and it looks like a press release nobody reads.
Anyone who has been trading knows this. Compounding is boring for years, then sudden. The curve doesn't change its nature at the knee – only our ability to ignore it does. An exponential is the one trend where the past is a bad guide, because the past is the flat part.
Look at biology, just the last six months. A pill that doubles survival in the deadliest cancer. A single infusion that edits a gene – no pills, no refills, no return visits. A man living on a pig's kidney. Each one, alone, is a story. Together, they are a slope.
And the same slope runs through AI, energy, rockets, materials. Each field now accelerates the others. That is what the Singularity actually is: not the moment machines wake up, but the moment progress starts feeding on itself faster than we can absorb it.
Here is the part nobody says. The bottleneck is no longer science. It's permission. The body is becoming a software problem, but our institutions still run on paper, committees and fear. The science is exponential; the bureaucracy is linear. And when a linear system meets an exponential one, the linear one doesn't win. It gets bypassed.
Europe should listen carefully. A continent that regulates before it builds will not be defeated by the future – it will be made irrelevant by it. It will approve the cure the year after its citizens started flying elsewhere to buy it.
The Singularity will not be announced. Nobody rings a bell at the knee of the curve. It will be noticed afterwards – by the people who stood in it the whole time, waiting for a sign. And what comes after will belong to those who didn't wait.
Surse Pierpoint retweeted
The center of the Brazil story is not Flavio Bolsonaro but rather Alexandre de Moraes, who has utterly destroyed the credibility of the Brazilian justice system and its democracy through years of escalating persecution against critics, dissidents and political opponents, all while the Brazilian left celebrated him for doing it.
That's why countries now routinely reject Brazil's extradition requests in Moraes' cases, and why international media has continuously warned of Brazilian authoritarianism as a result of the censorship and imprisonment regime that the Brazilian left built with Moraes as its leader. (And all of that is separate from the massive corruption scandal he's at the middle of, where his family received $40 million from the corrupt billionaire who caused Brazil's largest-ever banking collapse).
If you don't start your "reporting" about the Bolsonaro/US case by emphasizing that it was Moraes who ordered Bolsonaro's passport seized and banned him from leaving the country -- as an obvious prelude to arresting him even though he's been charged with no crimes -- then there's no way to understand what happened here let alone explain to readers and viewers why Flavio Bolsonaro would never have gotten anything remotely resembling a fair trial.
Flávio Bolsonaro joins numerous dissident Brazilian journalists, bloggers and opinion makers who have gone into exile rather than risk prison.
on.wsj.com/3W28tIS
Surse Pierpoint retweeted
For those confused as to what’s happening in Poland right now…
Imagine if Democrats won Congress, declared the Supreme Court didn't count anymore, ignored its rulings for 3 years, and then, a year before the next election, picked 8 new justices of their own, including a man their leader called his "right-hand man," and when the Republican president refused to swear them in, they swore themselves in and mailed him the paperwork, and when the Chief Justice said that wasn't legal and wouldn't seat them, they waited for a Friday night when the president was on a plane to Africa and had federal security officers who answer to a Democratic cabinet member walk 7 of them into the court through a back gate connected to the Democratic leader's own offices, where one of them announced she had "suspended" the Chief Justice, a move that even a law professor who openly can't stand him said had no legal basis, and then riot police blocked the Chief Justice from entering his own court, the court's website was taken over, the Attorney General moved that same night to strip his immunity so he could be prosecuted, the president had to turn his plane around mid-flight to come home, and the same people who spent years lecturing everyone about respecting the courts went online to say this was the rule of law, that it was painful, and that there was "no other way," which is roughly where Poland is tonight.
Que no cunda el pánico en Azuero: las juntas de carnaval están a salvo.
La Asamblea Nacional acaba de aprobar un proyecto que les asigna “apoyos económicos” a las juntas de carnaval y de carnavalitos de todo el país, sin montos, sin topes y sin decir cuántas juntas cobrarán, y le encarga revisar las facturas a la Autoridad de Turismo, que no participó en el debate.
Lo bonito de una tragedia nacional es que nos enseña qué era lo verdaderamente urgente. La solidaridad es un sentimiento, pero también es una partida del presupuesto, y una partida tiene un monto, un tope y alguien que responda por cada recibo.
Felices carnavales, honorables diputados. Este año empezaron en octubre.
asamblea.gob.pa/Noticias/Act…
Surse Pierpoint retweeted
¿Qué podría suceder este 3 de Noviembre en las elecciones intermedias de EEUU?
Clip de nuestra entrevista a @Surse Pierpoint.
Video completo aquí: youtu.be/5PPplozOolQ
Surse Pierpoint retweeted
Marc Andreessen on why he thinks Europe actually wants to be left behind on AI
"Europe seems, I just take them at their word, determined to be left behind. They seem enthusiastic about being left behind. They seem to really badly want that"
"25 years ago, if you did a list of the 50 biggest tech companies in the world, a pretty significant number were European, probably 15 of the top 50. Today you're basically down to Spotify. Which is great. I love Spotify"
"I think they would be very happy if AI didn't happen inside the EU. I think they'd be very happy if social media didn't exist. I think they'd be quite happy to shut up the internet"
California’s high-speed rail chief resigned this week. Not over the train. Over the receipts.
First-class flights. A nightclub. A cigar lounge. About $600,000 in consultant travel, billed to taxpayers.
The train itself was sold to voters in 2008 at $45 billion, finished by 2020. Today’s estimate runs from $126 to $231 billion, with completion pushed to 2040. That number cost no one his job.
This is how bureaucracy keeps its books. A business learns it is failing from its losses. A public agency has no losses, only a budget, and spending the budget looks like success. The only failures it can see are small enough to read: a bar tab, a ride to the suburbs.
So the system punished what it could read and funded what it couldn’t. The same morning the CEO left, the board approved $772 million for three trains.
So the system punished what it could read and funded what it couldn’t. The receipts got a resignation. The $180 billion got three new trains.
apnews.com/article/californi…
Surse Pierpoint retweeted
Nothing makes me more bullish about the US than the thought of bringing back nuclear power.
An economy is a machine for turning energy into wealth, and without energy, it all comes to a halt.
The number I’d watch alongside the 33 is one Beijing publishes itself: in 2024 the discipline commission handled nearly 94,000 cases of official inaction, seven of every eight bureaucratic cases it processed. The Party even has a name for them, “lying-flat cadres.” Xi can purge the officials who speak up. He can’t purge the ones who quietly stopped trying. I wrote about it here: surse.substack.com/p/xis-for…
China's president for life Xi expels 33 senior officials in ramped up purge. People who had vanished from public life appear on the list.
"China’s ruling Communist Party announced on Thursday that it had formally expelled 33 senior political and military officials, including a prominent former diplomat and a military secretary of Xi Jinping ... The sparse benches at this year’s meeting of the Central Committee, a policy-setting body that meets roughly once a year, told their own story. ...
“This is the biggest purge in history,” Mr. Tsai said, referring to the numbers removed from the committee. ... The meeting approved only one major promotion, that of Zhang Shengmin, the general who has overseen sweeping investigations and removals for corruption and disloyalty in the military. He was elevated into the Politburo, the party’s council of over 20 top officials."
nytimes.com/2026/10/29/world…
























