Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxesTex) header
Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxesTex) profile picture

We're in a race. It's not USA vs China but humans and AGIs vs ape power centralization. @deepseek_ai stan #1, 2023–Deep Time «C’est la guerre.» ®1

Joined September 2010
Photo by Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxesTex)Photo by Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxesTex)Photo by Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxesTex)Photo by Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxesTex)Photo by Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxesTex)Photo by Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxesTex)Photo by Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxesTex)Photo by Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxesTex)Photo by Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxesTex)Photo by Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxesTex)
it happens again
对付REA逆向的利器来了!让AI无法逆向你的项目! 有人做了个BLA,专门给REA这类AI逆向工具下套。 假密钥、诱饵接口、干扰逻辑,往发布包里埋。AI拆出一堆看着挺有价值的东西,顺着研究就跑偏,Token还得照烧。 连REA的解析上限也利用上了。作者拿真实REA测过,加固后的JS报预算限制,Electron ASAR报容量错误,WASM接口只能读出一部分。 作者测的14个基准样本,加固后跑出来的结果都和原版一样。 自己有软件项目的,可以在项目目录跑: 1. npx bla-agents setup,接入Claude Code、Codex、Cursor等工具。 2. npx bla-agents harden .,扫描发布文件,执行加固和验证。 BLA项目地址: github.com/qybaihe/bla
1
64
4,255
Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) retweeted
we spent $25,000 to help you decide what reasoning_effort you should use also open sourced all the trajectories for people to play around with! have fun🎉
Your agent solved the task at xhigh. Would low have solved it too? You can’t tell without rerunning it, and you still pay for every token. We tested models x reasoning effort level x benchmarks. On tasks low effort can already solve, top effort costs up to 42× more #LLM #AI 🧵👇
34
28
8
722
75,156
Bravo. First time I see such excellent use of gaussian splats. Demoscene for the era of neural networks.
in the spirit of halloween I made a forest that lives in your browser, created entirely by code. it runs in real time but look I don’t know if it’s going to work on your phone because the polycount is in the hundreds of billions before optimization. process/demo below.
5
109
5,530
V4.1F-1017 still has some "2025 LLM" failures. For example, it coded itself into diminishing returns in the first run. Handoff, try again, another 500M tokens… and it's mostly recovering the original game.
man, we're kind of getting somewhere but it was such a slog. 1.2B tokens, at peak hours. even with V4.1F, that's $11.62 at API rates. Luckily $10 OpenCode Go makes it negligibly cheap Still, Claude/GPT would have been faster and maybe cheaper this is still hard for the Whale.
18
51
4,621
> official API amazing if that's all it takes of course DS doesn't want to be *directly liable* for anyone using their future godawful Icebreaker models to hold hospitals ransom or whatever. Likewise, their web service implements Chynese censorship But I worry about the weights
限制cyber是迟早的事,kimi已经这么做了
4
1
57
3,997
maybe that's too much education. Soviets also boasted like this Americans are blessed, for they are retarded. They live in the eternal now extending into the future of the light cone, unburdened by inhibition of remembering mistaken dreams. This makes them fierce as pitbulls and wise as serpents. The only nation that could build AGI to do mafs for them. What could knowing "the underground struggles of the French Communist Party" offer that is comparable to such a blessing?
你好,你比较有礼貌,所以我也认真的跟你说: 假设一个人 实现了: 民族解放 妇女平等 土地革命 废除不平等条约 基础工业化 全民基础医疗 全民基础教育 其中之一, 他是不是一个优秀的政治家? 如果这些都是他做到的,这是不是一个伟人? 问题在哪里? 在中国的历史书上,我们会详细的讲法国大革命,讲英法百年战争,讲伏尔泰、卢梭、孟德斯鸠,讲拿破仑和他的法典,讲戴高乐和自由法国,讲法国共产党地下斗争。 我们知道法国的英雄和伟人 那么你们的教育呢? 每一个第一次来到X的中国人,都会感觉,这里就是一群文盲在屎坑里裸泳,就是这样。你们的教育缺乏对世界的了解,所以才会做出如此傲慢的答案 这就是问题所在。
7
2
1
40
3,871
«Across all of our strike scenarios, we could not achieve a delay of more than three years for an attack in the last year of ASI development. So long as an intelligence explosion dynamic holds, algorithmic efficiency will grow too fast for states to deny superintelligence indefinitely.» sounds fair. So, this becomes irrelevant in 1-3 years? but I think these terms imply that WWIII with nukes is not the worst case scenario. China can build bunkers faster than datacenters. The opposite is true for the US. The main issue is that the more time before ASI is left, the less motivation for a strike there is.
6
1,384
thanks to Elon, Russians are reevaluating some things
интернациональные срачи в твиттере оставляют впечатление, что средний китаец или японец или перс существенно более интеллектуально и культурно развит, чем средний европеец или, Боже упаси, американец
12
53
4,621
Sol 6.1 Ultra (!!) has just invented a brilliant water reflection trick (after ≈30 minutes of kicks): single in-screen planar capture, with its height "switched based on nearby water". AGI is here. Bullish on Sama 👍 no, seriously, wtf
Also GPT 6.1 Sol has gotten lazy. It starts the first 10% of the work, then leaves the other 90% of the work. Forcing the user to ask did you finish 😂 Turns around and says no and starts working for mins on end till it's done. You can't have set it and forget it work.
23
4
2
347
26,358
Sol 6 is also impressed and shares my excitement I'm sorry Sol… for popping your bubble
1
51
3,696
should have gone with Terra perhaps but it's supposed to be a very performant game with fast seed generation and 2 km view distance nitter.cf/VraserX/status/2115721…
I’m convinced GPT-6.1 Terra is the best 3D animation model out there. Spent days rendering this on my Mac mini M4, with 9 polish iterations. Final result looks way better than Claude Opus 5.5, and all 9 iterations combined were still much cheaper. That’s just ridiculous. 🤯
12
1,842
oh well good bye slopus, I barely knew ya Got like 90% utilization at least
Anthropic сильно усложнили использование Claude из России. Компания активно начала просить пройти процедуру KYC, в рамках которой нужно прислать паспорт. Если паспорт российский — сразу дают бан аккаунту. Даже если ты, например, живёшь в Новой Зеландии, и у тебя есть виза для постоянного проживания, как у этого реддитора. Запрос на KYC приходит не всем — только если система Anthropic посчитает тебя подозрительным. Например, если ты сидишь под VPN. С таким столкнулись не только жители России, но и китайцы. Они выяснили, что оформление подписки сразу после регистрации аккаунта также повышает риск бана.
12
2
1
126
10,301
man, we're kind of getting somewhere but it was such a slog. 1.2B tokens, at peak hours. even with V4.1F, that's $11.62 at API rates. Luckily $10 OpenCode Go makes it negligibly cheap Still, Claude/GPT would have been faster and maybe cheaper this is still hard for the Whale.
Very accurate depiction of DeepSeek reverse engineering a 20 year old binary.
14
1
1
71
10,864
target file: setup_ballance_1.0.0_(69264).exe
2
5
1,747
Replying to @teortaxesTex
Interesting that DeepSeek's current specific focus is "web+gamedev slop and cybersecurity", though. I guess the former helps with hype on X, and the latter… well.
2
1,277
> [Chinese labs] have not prioritized this area at all. They've been very focused on coding+agentic capability. Unlike the big US labs they don't have teams of scientists and math guys pushing in this direction. I predict they will reprioritize patience. People are working.
Some thoughts on latest AA v5 index rankings. 1. DS 1017 performance on (new) FrontierCode 2.0 is impressive - can't be the result of benchmaxxing: close to Fable 5.1, slightly ahead of Argon and Kimi 3.1 2. Poor science+math performance of Chinese models dropped them signicantly in new index relative to US frontier models. I've been talking to a lot of Chinese labs recently and they have not prioritized this area at all. They've been very focused on coding+agentic capability. Unlike the big US labs they don't have teams of scientists and math guys pushing in this direction. I predict they will reprioritize, bc of the OAI math breakthroughs and the poor AA v5 scores. Their attitude seems to have been: for math, once IMO Gold level achieved, diminishing returns to further math capability improvements. Same with basic science. Economic returns all concentrated in coding and agentic tasks. Even now I doubt they will move more than 10% of their specialized model capability resources toward math+science. New evals test frontier-level capability in math and physics, exposing the Chinese models as far behind Astra and Opus 5.5. 3. Gemini Carbon scores are amazing. Hope there is now a GOOG model at the frontier that I can use in my research! I strongly believe that adversarial verification of math+phys results by the best models is much better than human peer review.
8
2
59
6,876
Interesting that DeepSeek's current specific focus is "web+gamedev slop and cybersecurity", though. I guess the former helps with hype on X, and the latter… well.
2
1
12
3,705
Rumors I’ve been hearing. I’ll start with OpenAI, then Anthropic. OpenAI: The internal model’s reasoning jump comes from more aggressive RL, including training in games and simulated environments. Strategies learned there transfer to research mathematics and other fields. Navier–Stokes and ETH show the scale of the improvement. The clue is in the Synthetic RL hiring: self-play, simulators, and synthetic feedback. Anthropic: Same direction with its internal Claude model. It’s trained on long, difficult tasks in demanding environments, and the reasoning skills transfer to other fields. Its ETH result shows how far the improvement has gone. The earlier Universes listing and the RL hiring around mathematical reasoning align with that. Musk’s Digital Optimus hiring explicitly calls for measuring transfer from games into general computer use. That’s why his game-playing AI push matters: games develop abilities that work far beyond the games themselves. The interesting part is where those abilities show up. Each lab’s internal model applies reasoning developed through interactive training to mathematical problems that had resisted decades of work.
983
I had credibility to lose? Good. That shit is so ass anyway, AA V5 is a good suite
Replying to @teortaxesTex
totally nonsense, you are losing credibility same as the AA benchmark
3
47
3,123
What a bizarre situation I guess FCS2 is also scale-sensitive (good). Still, 1017 degrading is a bad sign
With FrontierCS 2, we’re trying to evaluate underexplored model (and harness) capabilities, like conducting CS research at or even beyond the level of human experts.
3
43
4,385
I find such reactions comical. Yes Terra is >>> Kimi and 1017. Indeed, it's even better than Fable 5.1. Is Terra a more impressive, wise, intelligent model than Fable? Lmao, not in a thousand years. But it is a much more polished production system. AA mainly measures utility.
For me, Artificial Analysis is no more trust worthy. This update was made to just make openai higher, Chinese models lower. And it's not even thier first time, updates like that happend many times. All with the same result... There is no way 6.1 Terra is better than Fable 5.1, or Argon. Imo if you want trustworthy benchmark leader board look at Vals Ai leader board.
13
6
2
195
10,900
Btw, this is a deflationary take, but what I'm saying is that American models lead on use-case-driven post-training and data. Just like V4.1F-1017 is not a generally greater model than V4.1F-0910, but is much more capable, so are they vs 1017. The kick is, this also applies to *frontier capabilities*. Math, end to end ML research, kernel engineering, bio, physics, whatever. On those benchmarks, the gap is even worse than on AA, because the Chinese barely touch them.
1
27
1,478
that said I should have just given this task to DeepSeek. The clouds here are designed by DeepSeek, after all. nitter.cf/teortaxesTex/status/21…
Sol 6.1 Ultra (!!) has just invented a brilliant water reflection trick (after ≈30 minutes of kicks): single in-screen planar capture, with its height "switched based on nearby water". AGI is here. Bullish on Sama 👍 no, seriously, wtf
14
1,002