Code Doctor 🇺🇸

I disagree with @mattpocockuk that the code should be the source of truth when building with AI. - The intent in our minds is the true source - How we capture that in English is 2nd - Code is an implementation, and it's actually 3rd Writing is closer to thought than code. danielmiessler.com/blog/writ…

I feel like everyone is going to figure out at the same time (in 1-4 months or so) that our biggest problem today with AI isn’t actually an AI problem. The problem is we’re not giving our AIs clear enough definitions of what we want. So our AIs basically go off and build in some direction, but not exactly the direction you want to go in. This problem has three main parts: 1. You knowing what you want 2. You being able to articulate that thing thoroughly and accurately 3. Your AI being able to do that thing Everyone assumes the problem is with number 3, but it’s usually a combination of 1 and 2. The next biggest advancement in AI (or one of them anyway) is going to come from harnesses building this concept of ideal state, evals, and hill-climbing directly into their DNA. In the model providers can help as well by eliciting this from the user and building this before any work is done. Ideal State, Evals, and hill-climbing. This is where it’s at.