
@thepxprogrammeri
iAccount based inCanada
About this account
- Account based in
- Canada
- Connected via
- Canada Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Just a guy that learned to code.
Calgary, Alberta
Joined March 2009
- Tweets27.4K
- Following598
- Followers677
- Likes193K
Pinned Tweet
Responsibility drives prosperity.
In a world where government takes all responsibility off your plate, you will be starving for prosperity.
Joseph McMurray retweeted
I wonder if @angertab @JoelWBerry @marklevinshow @DanCrenshawTX or any of the other hacks who knowingly shared this pure bullshit will show an ounce of integrity and admit it.
The post about Ukrainian strikes on Russian data centers causing Tucker Carlson’s views to drop is fake news.
It ignores October 7 when Tucker had two posts over 2 million views, and leans on one or two viral posts in the "before" week.
Tucker's average views fall only 10%, not 71%. The post skipped Oct 7, which was his best day of the whole stretch.
Macgregor's 62% drop comes almost entirely from one viral post on Oct 5, and his typical post barely moved (the median is down 7%).
TCN does show a real dip of about 27%, but that's from only 8 posts, and its views were already sliding before Oct 7. Nothing in the data ties any of it to the strikes. Both full-data charts are below.
Mark Levin and Laura Loomer are so retarded and/or Boomer brained they don't know that there are legitimate bots that go and crawl the web for information. Yandex, like Google, has bots that crawl websites to help index and rank them for their search engine among other tools.
These were not Russian troll bots. They were web crawlers you fucking tools.
Not only that but they can't even read graphs where the blue graphs include more days and excluded October 7 entirely.
There are levels to retardation you couldn't achieve if you tried and Laura Loomer does it naturally.
Joseph McMurray retweeted
I was mid-hip thrust when I found out @Shanemgillis had called me a whore. Technically I found out four hours later, when I reviewed the footage of Saturday Night Live. My tripod was on the bench, my ring light was clamped to the squat rack and my boyfriend Tanner was holding the back-up phone for the side angle. Tanner films all my content. He is not allowed to look at me.
The “joke” was about how women dress at the gym. I know it was about me, because everything is. So I did what any survivor would do. I went to my car and filmed myself crying. It took 11 takes, because the lighting in a Range Rover is unforgiving, and grief is no excuse for a bad shot. In the final cut, you can see a single tear land on my sports bra right over the logo, which clicks through to an affiliate link. My caption: “I’m literally shaking.”
Then I put on the shortest shorts I own, went back inside, and filmed my ass from three angles with the caption, “Does this outfit work for you, Shane Gillis?” I wanted to send him a message that my body is not for men. To make sure Shane got the message, I tagged him. Then I tagged every man I follow. Some people say my response proved his point. These people are rapists.
✍️ @BridgetPhetasy
Article: spectator.com/article/shane-…
Joseph McMurray retweeted
Watching the backlash to Shane Gillis’ SNL monologue is kind of hilarious because people are doing the exact same thing that helped make him huge in the first place.
Gillis was hired by SNL in 2019 and fired just days later after old podcast clips resurfaced. Instead of disappearing, his career exploded. Netflix specials, TIRES, arena shows, and now he’s gone back and hosted SNL three separate times.
So when Gillis goes on SNL and does a very Shane Gillis monologue, jokes about women at the gym, gay dudes, Hitler, and whatever else, what exactly did everyone think they were getting?
Now Dan Levy and other celebrities are publicly condemning him, the headlines are multiplying, and suddenly Gillis owns another news cycle.
You don’t have to like the guy. You don’t have to like the jokes.
But Shane Gillis has built a career partially on people loudly insisting Shane Gillis shouldn’t have a career.
And every time people do this, they hand him more attention, more fans, and probably another house.
Kudos, morons.
Joseph McMurray retweeted
To those implying that Kremlin-controlled social media bot/troll farms became silent after Ukraine hit a Yandex data center, posting this CloudFare chart (radar.cloudflare.com/bots/as…):
Hate to disappoint you all ⤵️
Joseph McMurray retweeted
Today Trump clarified what he meant when he posted on Truth Social that Russia and Ukraine had agreed to an energy ceasefire, after both sides denied agreeing to anything. Trump said they agreed because "I said you agree, that's why." In other words, Trump simply imagined a deal.
Its amazing to read the comments under Glenn's post. Ideologues are very easy to spot. Whether you agree or disagree with Glenn here, you can't argue against his consistency. Glenn was against the Russia collusion hoax and the right leaning dimwits are accusing him of ignoring it or even supporting it among many other things Glenn was actively and publicly against during the Biden administration or Trumps first term. All because Trump is in office now doing similar things.
Not even AI can help the retards gain a few IQ points if they refuse to do the basic level of research. For how often AI is caught hallucinating, it is no match for how often the average partisan hack hallucinates.
For all of Glenn's haters, here is the evidence he was against the hoax: youtu.be/rZLivPgNZjU?si=3kOE…
It doesn't matter though, when proven wrong, the goal posts must move for these people because it is not truth they seek.
Any minimally honest person would acknowledge that this raid is a flagrant abuse of state power and the domestic authorities of DHS against one of Trump's most outspoken critics, right near an election.
The scurrilous claims about @IlhanMN have never had any basis in fact or evidence. Omar has lived in the US for more than 30 years: longer than Melania Trump, or Sebastian Gorka, or Steve Hilton, or countless GOP luminaries. She's lived in the US since she was 13. She's been a US citizen for more than 25 years.
This has as much to do with immigration enforcement as the Trump/Rubio policy of deporting people for the crime of criticizing Israel: which is to say, none at all. It's all about feeding the MAGA base something to excite them and, especially, persecuting one of the most vocal critics of Trump and Israel.
This is something a Pro Democrat account would post
"You said Russia and Ukraine agreed to a ceasefire, but both sides say they have not agreed to that..."
@POTUS: "They agreed. You know why? Because I said, 'You agree' — that's why. They agreed because I said they agreed, and that thing has to get settled."
on the vibecoded adobe suite
i think both the effort and the expectations are completely misplaced. illustrator is 39 years old, photoshop 36. people really did expect to catch up in two weeks.
attacking the full suite makes no sense. if you’ve been using photoshop, indesign, or illustrator for 20 years, you’d have opinions. you’d notice even the smallest inconveniences and have ideas for how to improve your workflows. with ai, you’re finally in a position to make bespoke software that serves you perfectly and brings you joy.
look at aseprite, which specializes in pixel art. losslesscut, which does one thing premiere makes unnecessarily complicated. photopea, which started as a browser-based psd viewer and grew into a serious editor over 14 years. figma, which rethought design around collaboration.
each of these projects has a point of view. each understands something about how people actually work.
instead, we get seven adobe-shaped applications, recreating the surface without understanding what led to the underlying decisions. not an alternative vision for creative software, just a checklist of features to imitate.
it’s slopware, and it trivializes decades of genuine attempts to free people from adobe.
the tragedy is that we finally have the tools to make the software we actually want, and instead we’re making the software we already have.
and if you needed any more evidence that this was never about making better software, having finished 40 years of adobe development in two weeks, he’s now moving on to microsoft office.
Joseph McMurray retweeted
The Marshmallow Test – Why Civilizations Live and Die on Patience
At Stanford, around 1970, a psychologist put a marshmallow in front of a four-year-old and offered a deal: eat it now, or wait fifteen minutes and get two. Then he left the room. Years later, the children who waited did better at school, at work, and in life. Everyone took the lesson to be about children. The real lesson is about civilizations.
1. The test. Watch the videos and you will laugh. Children cover their eyes, sing to themselves, kick the table, and lick the marshmallow without biting it. Some eat it before the door closes. You know these people – some of them are your colleagues, and one of them is you at 11 pm in front of the fridge.
2. The twist. In 2012, researchers ran the test again with one change. First, an adult promised the children better crayons and came back with nothing. Then came the marshmallow, and those children barely waited. Children whose promise had been kept waited four times longer. Patience is not only character. It is trust: you wait only if you believe the second marshmallow will really come.
3. Economists call this time preference: how much you value now over later. The interest rate is simply the price of waiting. Every civilization is a marshmallow test at scale. You plant a tree whose shade you will never sit in, you build a cathedral over three generations, you save for children you have not yet had.
4. The broken promise. Communism was the crayon experiment run on a whole nation. In Poland, money lost its value, savings vanished, and the state could take what you built. So people learned to eat now. If something appeared in the shop, you bought it, whether you needed it or not. It wasn’t because Poles were impatient. It was because they had learned the adult never comes back.
5. The four-year child. A politician has four years, and the bill arrives after he leaves. Public debt is a simple trick: we eat the marshmallow, and our children pay for both.
6. Money that rots. Inflation tells you that waiting is for fools. A decade of near-zero interest rates told every saver in Europe that the second marshmallow had been cancelled. So we got "buy now, pay later", credit for holidays, and an economy built around eating it now. Then the phone finishes the job: one-click buying, endless scrolling, a new reward every few seconds. It’s a machine designed to make sure you never have to wait for anything again.
7. The lesson. Civilization is not having more marshmallows. It is the ability to wait for them, and that ability rests on trust: stable money, safe property, promises kept. Destroy that trust and you get a nation of four-year-olds eating sweets, which is exactly what you then complain about.
The West blames its people for living for today. But it was never the children who failed the test. It was the adults who broke the promise – and then sold them more marshmallows on credit.
"Socialism heroically fights problems unknown in any other system."
Yes – this guy was one of our most brilliant intellectuals. Meaning a guy producing real understanding – not vapid commentary dressed up as depth. One sentence of his explains more than a shelf of political science.
1. The law. First the system creates the problem. Then it creates an office to fight the problem. Then it blames the people for the problem. Then it asks for more power to fight harder. Every step looks like a solution, and the whole thing is a trap.
2. The proof. In Poland we lived under these absurdities for 45 years. The state fixed the price of meat, so meat disappeared. Then came ration cards for meat. Then people sold meat privately at its real price, so the state made that a crime called "speculation" and set up special bodies to hunt the speculators. It was a problem unknown in any other system, and the state fought it heroically.
3. The queue. We got to know the machine deeply, from the inside, standing in line. You queued first and asked what was being sold later. People walked home wearing toilet paper rolls on a string around their necks, like trophies. And we learned to laugh about it. A man walks into a shop: "No meat?" "No, sir, here we have no fish. No meat is across the street."
4. The merriest barrack. We were called the merriest barrack in the communist camp. Other barracks were grimmer. We laughed at the queues, at the Party, and at ourselves, with jokes whispered at work and told loudly at weddings. The system had the army, the police and the press. We had the punchline.
5. The joke as knowledge. The laughter was not an escape. It was understanding. A good joke is a model of the system that fits into ten seconds. "They pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work" is a whole economics textbook in one line. The communists could censor newspapers, but they could never censor the joke.
6. The man. Stefan Kisielewski, known as Kisiel – the name of a sweet fruit jelly. He was a composer and a columnist, and readers opened the Catholic weekly from the last page, where his column was. He was the only public figure in communist Poland to openly praise capitalism from the parliament rostrum. In 1968 he called the regime a dictatorship of dimwits. Days later, "unknown attackers" beat him in the street. The tongue out was his method: a regime that demands to be taken seriously fears nothing more than a man who laughs at it – and is right.
7. The West today. Germany shut down its nuclear plants, then fought an energy crisis. Berlin capped rents, then fought a shortage of flats. Brussels writes rules that strangle industry, then launches plans to save European competitiveness. Each time, the problem is new to them. It was not new to us.
We laughed because we knew. The West does not laugh yet, because it still believes. The jokes come later – right after the queues.
Joseph McMurray retweeted
The Cornell incident happened:
• under Biden
• in a Democrat-controlled state
• in a deep, deep blue city
• at a leftist university
• by progressives
Every. Single. Person. Involved. Is. A. Democrat.
The Trump administration’s lack of action on the Cornell case highlights an apparent drop from the president's first term in resolved investigations of sexual assault. trib.al/9bKGHE2
No. I am arguing on the side of Trumps objectives you have laid out. I am not arguing against what he is trying to achieve but merely how he goes about achieving it.
The only thing that I wrote that has some ambiguity to it was the point about threatening tariffs. I didn't mean actually implementing tariffs, I mean threatening tariffs to countries he's already made a deal with over silly shit. (ie: the Greenland stuff)
So my point is his strategy is awful and is working against him. If he wants to have less friction making deals with countries leaders to benefit the US, he needs to stop antagonizing the people of those countries. The leaders have an incentive to get elected and if polling suggests that the people are becoming more anti-Trump and/or anti-US, then that would make it more challenging for Trump to achieve his goals.
A great example of this is Canada. Carney campaigned on being tough on Trump to win the election but he was actually trying to make a deal with Trump at the very beginning after winning the election. He was even mocked by many conservative influencers for being soft instead of tough.
Trumps antics have now pushed the voters to support a trade war even if it goes against their own best interests. He has rallied a country to go against him and now its politically popular if you want to win an election. I don't see how that helps the US or Trump at all.
Europeans approval of Trump means nothing to the US directly but indirectly this will have consequences with deal making
nitter.cf/ianbremmer/status/2107…
trump’s net favorability w/ europeans:
denmark: -91% (seems high)
germany: -78%
italy: -76%
uk: -75%
spain: -74%
france: -67%

ALT This line graph shows the popularity of Donald Trump in Western Europe over time, from April 2025 to September 2026. The graph includes data for France, Spain, Britain, Italy, Germany, and Denmark, with each country represented by different colored lines. The vertical axis measures net favorability, which ranges from -100 to 0, and all lines show a negative favorability trend. The data source, YouGov, is noted at the bottom.







































