tobyelliott (@tobyelliott) profile picture

Mostly Magic content and in-jokes with people I have known for far too long. Mastodon: @telliott@trivia.to

Joined August 2008
Photo by tobyelliott (@tobyelliott)Photo by tobyelliott (@tobyelliott)Photo by tobyelliott (@tobyelliott)Photo by tobyelliott (@tobyelliott)Photo by tobyelliott (@tobyelliott)Photo by tobyelliott (@tobyelliott)Photo by tobyelliott (@tobyelliott)
This isn't what I wanted to happen for Commander, but it's what's necessary at this point. When you can't make difficult decisions without worrying about your safety and well-being, you can't run a format, especially one with a nontraditional point of view. (1/4)
25
23
612
52,196
My deepest thanks to everyone - my fellow RC members, the CAG, the folks on Discord and all the players who've found resonance in what we've tried to do over the years - for coming along with us on this crazy journey. (3/4)
1
174
11,156
I look forward to working with the team at WotC to help carry the torch that Sheldon lit 20 years ago, and will continue to be a tireless advocate for social play. (4/4)
6
192
10,162
New IPG and MTR for Duskmourn! Some small but sweet updates to Missed Triggers, Decklist Errors, and one of the GRV partial fixes. Article (along with links to the docs) is up at blogs.magicjudges.org/tellio…
4
3
1
22
6,974
UPDATE: Changes to the banned list: Dockside Extortionist is banned Jeweled Lotus is banned Mana Crypt is banned Nadu is banned. Additional details: mtgcommander.net/?p=1729. or magic.wizards.com/en/news/an…
1,593
493
1,141
2,142
3,991,879
I'm not going to comment on the exact facts of the IDW case over the weekend. I wasn't there. If the player couldn't take any action and was just shortcutting to the next draw, then I might treat is as such, even if a strict reading of IDW could also be supported. But... 1/2
10
7
3
69
30,459
Consider how quickly it goes downhill. What if they were able to take some actions, look at the card and decide not to concede? That's really problematic all around at that point, and not a situation we want folks to find themselves in. 2/3 (oops)
6
1
45
7,142
And it would be too easy to accidentally end up there. I don't think it's healthy to have a policy that tries to navigate fine distinctions here, especially in the minefield that is IDW. 3/3
7
42
6,664
Wizards is being surprisingly quiet about this, but depending on how you consider Aftermath, either MKM or OTJ is the 100th standard-legal expansion set. That seemed to demand a Commander Commander deck and I threw together archidekt.com/decks/7412501/… It's very silly.
5
2
48
6,160
Very happy with how this turned out.
Our quarterly update is live. No changes to rules or banned list. We've released an important update of the philosophy page, clarifying the RC's vision for the format. No change of direction, but a better explanation of what we're trying to accomplish. mtgcommander.net/index.php/2…
1
8
1,455
New MTR and IPG posted! Nothing too radical; mostly wording tweaks to be clearer and a bit of new policy around open decklists. Summary and explanation of the changes at blogs.magicjudges.org/tellio…
7
11
2
35
12,150
Spent quite a bit of time putting together a large @StarCityGames order. At 250 cards, it informed me I couldn't add any more to my cart. OK, I check out with that. I try to submit the order. 1/x
2
8
5,421
Happy news: 249 checkboxes manually selected later, the order went through. So the fixes for all this pain are pretty easy, but there's a lot of cleanup to do.
1
4
1,201
And to make it clear - I just submitted another order (with like 242 cards in it) to SCG, so I don't bear them any ill will. They're a bunch of awesome folks who - like the rest of us - need to watch out for the edge cases. Better guardrails would have made the experience fine.
1
678