In the NFL, you see mutual respect between opponents when someone goes down. @USC @USC_Athletics @GoDucks @bigten
chalker retweeted
The man who called $MNTS SHORT SQUEEZE before it ran 300%+ just said $AMPG is next.
The timeline is real.
Here are the receipts:
📅 Apr 1: @barbell_ideas posts he bought a big chunk of $MNTS at ~$3.60, "waiting for this nano-cap to explode."
Source:
➟ nitter.cf/barbell_ideas/status/2…
📅 Apr–May: he tracks it the whole way. Citadel's 13G stake, the going-concern warning erased, the volume patterns. "The writing's on the wall."
Source:
➟ nitter.cf/barbell_ideas/status/2…
➟ nitter.cf/barbell_ideas/status/2…
➟ nitter.cf/barbell_ideas/status/2…
📅 Late May: MNTS rips from the mid-$4s to a high of $22+. A multi-bagger in under two weeks. He called it. He held it.
📅 Jun 8–9: now he turns to $AMPG. "A large cohort of shorts are trapped here… this fully reminds me of the price development of $MNTS in the weeks leading up to the 300%+ surge."
Source:
➟ nitter.cf/barbell_ideas/status/2…
Same playbook.
Same setup.
Same guy.
Now let me be honest, because I always am: a squeeze thesis is speculative
One great call doesn't guarantee the next, and MNTS's run was as much low-float momentum and catalysts as it was trapped shorts.
Pattern-matching isn't a promise.
But here's what makes $AMPG different, and arguably better.
MNTS ran on almost no fundamentals.
Deeply unprofitable, ~39x sales, a move "built on future potential."
AMPG?
Real revenue across AI-RAN, quantum, space and defense.
48% gross margins.
Debt-free.
Designed into Telus.
The only American 64T64R AI-RAN radio, inside the DoD-funded hub.
So if AMPG ever gets an MNTS-style move, it has something MNTS never did underneath it: an actual business.
A trapped-short setup sitting on top of real fundamentals.
That's the combination that turns a squeeze into a re-rating.
Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR.
$AMPG told you - did you listen? Can we now trigger the short squeeze ?!? Thanks 🙏 🚀 🧨
chalker retweeted
$Vine - I never post anything, but this time I’m making an exception…
Don’t be fooled by the token re-lock.
The stage looks set for a bold move.
Initial unlock at 16:20 UTC
→ 49.8M VINE tokens from Rus technically became liquid.
But 5 hours later, they were re-locked until December 18, 2025.
A late move… but clearly calculated.
Rus’s cryptic 🌱 tweet at 19:00 UTC
→ No words, just the Vine symbol.
Why tease before re-locking?
Once again, this feels calculated.
Binance Intern post at exactly 19:00 UTC
nitter.cf/Binance_intern/status/…
→ Euphoric tone, Dexter in confetti… same 🌱 symbol.
Hard to believe it’s just a coincidence.
This account is known for subtle teasers ahead of announcements.
⸻
But what if the re-lock isn’t a block — but a setup?
A beta launch before December 18 is still very possible:
•The re-lock reassures holders: no tokens will be dumped.
•A public beta (via TestFlight, APK, or embedded in X Premium+) could trigger major traction.
•This allows a phased rollout, followed by a full-scale launch around the holidays.
⸻
Bottom line, I could be wrong…
But my intuition tells me that something is going to happen soon 👀
chalker retweeted
The TikTok ban is inevitable.
Vine is inevitable. 🌱 $Vine
