Dan Oksnevad (@Trollstein) header
Dan Oksnevad (@Trollstein) profile picture

Director of Digital Strategy @Strive (Nasdaq: $ASST | $SATA | $SATS) | Building @TNorth | Bitcoiner since $1,200 | Views are my own. NFA.

🇺🇸
Joined January 2025
Dan Oksnevad retweeted
Bitcoin's cheap, we want more.
132
227
36
2,449
98,974
Dan Oksnevad retweeted
Bitcoin is at its 200-week moving average tonight of ~$68k. Historically, that’s been one of the best times to increase risk exposure to Bitcoin. It’s also when the way a Bitcoin company is built matters most. Investors in Strive know our amplification comes only from preferred equity, and that we keep large cash reserves. They also understand we have no encumbered Bitcoin and are uniquely positioned to withstand dips. What I think is less understood is the value of having two deeply liquid preferred equities already trading, and how that lets us turn dips into a higher amplification ratio when Bitcoin recovers. Said another way, these dips can make us even more valuable because of the engines and structure we have in place. Think about the three ways a Bitcoin company with amplification could go through a drawdown: 1. Bad debt terms. A drawdown can force you to sell Bitcoin at the worst possible time. You don’t just round-trip when Bitcoin recovers. You permanently impair shareholder value. 2. No engine. Bitcoin falls, your stock falls, Bitcoin recovers, and you end up roughly where you started. 3. Liquid preferred equity with real demand already in the market. You can issue more preferred while Bitcoin is cheap, and come out the other side with a higher amplification ratio than you went in with. That third path is what Strive has done over the last year. Last Dec 31, Bitcoin was ~$87.5K and our amplification ratio was 30%. By Sep 30, Bitcoin was back near that level at ~$83.6K. Our amplification was 55%. Similar Bitcoin price, but with almost double the amplification. Even as Bitcoin rose 43% off the June low, which on its own should have cut our amplification from 67% to ~47%, we held at 55%. After launching SATS and with tonight’s dip, our amplification ratio is now over 70%. Year to date, ASST is up ~51% while Bitcoin is down ~19%. I believe this performance is primarily due to the structure we’ve very intentionally built with no debt and no pledged Bitcoin. That means no margin calls or debt maturities, and it lets us think long term and act opportunistically when Bitcoin dips. I don’t think the market properly values this yet, and additionally rarely uses discounted forward-return modeling when assessing what a Bitcoin treasury company is worth. On a forward view of total returns under reasonable Bitcoin bull scenarios, I believe our common equity is undervalued, even though most mNAV calculations would show over 1x. There is a lot more to discuss on this, but it’s why we removed mNAV calculations from our dashboard over the past week. mNAV captures a single moment in time and treats our operating company as if it were just a passive fund. The discount we see in our equity is why we haven’t issued common equity over the past couple of weeks. We had some excess cash above our 18-month dividend reserve, and at these levels we’d view common issuance as dilutive, even with an mNAV over 1x, and ideally minimized unless we viewed it as necessary to invest in the long term success of our Digital Credit business. Bitcoin dips and down years are rough for many investors, especially if you’re not used to Bitcoin’s volatility. As long-time Bitcoiners, we’ve always understood it. We built Strive on purpose not just to withstand that volatility, but to add value for our common shareholders through it. We remain very constructive on Bitcoin risk going into 2027 and view these dips not only as an opportunity but as a blessing. We’ve used them to create additional value for our shareholders several times over the past year. It’s time to do it again. $ASST $SATA $SATS
90
151
28
1,348
69,258
If you only have 1min, just watch the intro… 🔥
Parker White used to deny Bitcoin's four-year cycle. Now he says the next top comes in Sept 2029. @TheOtherParker_ is back with @IIICapital on The Income Show to talk $STRC's return to par, the Bitcoin cycle, and where Digital Credit goes next. Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 1:24 - STRC Is Back At Par 4:46 - The Midterms And Affordability 10:29 - Does Money Printing Cause Inflation? 16:15 - Why People Hate Data Centers 26:02 - Liquidity Is The Enemy Of Convexity 31:34 - The Bear Case For $BTC 33:10 - Why Rates Don't Matter For Digital Credit 35:07 - Strategy's $MSTR STRC Buybacks 38:23 - Digital Money Vs Digital Yield 42:08 - The Binance Hack 45:24 - AI And The Scam Problem 48:47 - When Bitcoin Tops Next Cycle 50:57 - Closing Thoughts
4
454
Dan Oksnevad retweeted
As part of our commitment to SATA’s price stability, we have increased the dividend from 13.0% to 13.25%, effective starting Dec 1.
44
112
28
818
40,651
Dan Oksnevad retweeted
True North Ep. 86: They Want To Build A Bitcoin Bank Featuring @PunterJeff, @AdamBLiv and @ZynxBTC. Timestamps: 00:00 - Intro 01:07 - A Wild Week In Markets 07:55 - $BTC Has Never Lost Over 4 Years 22:04 - Strategy Balance Sheet $MSTR $STRC 25:12 - Buybacks Or Bitcoin? 44:59 - Strive Balance Sheet $ASST 52:35 - Reinsurance And Uncorrelated Yield 01:08:16 - Is Strategy Building A Bitcoin Bank? 01:18:56 - Anthropic IPO Or $BTC? 01:28:56 - Final Thoughts
13
27
3
161
28,706
Dan Oksnevad retweeted
Digital credit fixes this.
"As lifespans increase, people have to prepare, mentally and financially, to work well into their 70s and 80s," per WSJ
1
1
12
555
Digital credit fixes this.
"As lifespans increase, people have to prepare, mentally and financially, to work well into their 70s and 80s," per WSJ
1
1
12
555
Dan Oksnevad retweeted
The performance of $SATA is going under the radar right now. I have been impressed by how it has held the $95-$98 range, even with Bitcoin falling below $75k. Not a penny spent on buybacks either. Very good sign for $ASST.
A quiet week but a telling one. Last week, $ASST added 29 BTC, taking the total to 43,153. With Bitcoin at $75k, amplification sits at around 65%. I'm happy with that. What stands out is the restraint on the common stock ATM. The fears were overblown and the team has barely used it, even with the stock trading at a premium. That tells you they believe the stock is undervalued and they are acting like it. I like how the balance sheet is being managed.
9
11
1
281
7,313
Dan Oksnevad retweeted
Same Bitcoin. Three very different rides. 2026 YTD annualized volatility: $ASST common: 104% Bitcoin: 44% $SATA preferred: 24% Same days, same scale. Structured finance turns one asset’s volatility into a choice:
8
16
5
192
22,638
Dan Oksnevad retweeted
Bitcoin has dropped roughly $10,000 since $SATS started trading last month. The fact that this fixed-rate preferred remains well above its IPO price suggests that distribution is reaching investors who specifically seek high yield and are not motivated to sell merely to purchase Bitcoin at the now-lower price. It's working.
24
43
1
764
46,394
2024 $76k vs 2026 $76k Same price, orders of magnitude different market structure. Few.
You have been given a second chance 🚀
1
15
696
Exactly. $40.5T in debt means deflation is off the table, regardless of who won last night. Prices aren't coming down. The dollar is. Nothing stops this train. Bitcoin is the exit.
Voters are going to realize Democrats can’t actually lower the cost of living. Deflation is not an option because of debt. The Russian and Iranian governments are the causes of global high energy prices, meanwhile the US is producing more than ever.
2
17
854
“I’ve never once seen someone out there on X actually correctly call ATM usage in the market.” - @Werkman
A falling chart is not proof of ATM selling, argues @Werkman. He explains why he wants strong liquidity and price action before selling shares. "I think the reason is because people are fitting narratives to what they're seeing."
3
2
40
1,820