RipVanWinkle retweeted
Your personality predicts how happy you are with your life. A giant review covering 334,567 people found that three traits matter most: how easily you get upset, how outgoing you are, and how organized you are.
Decades of research, 462 groups of people in all, went into the review by Jeromy Anglim's team at Deakin University in Australia. Psychological Bulletin published it in 2020. It used the Big Five, the most common way psychologists measure personality, plus a newer six-trait version that adds honesty and humility.
Getting anxious, sad, or irritated easily, a trait psychologists call neuroticism, was the biggest drag on happiness. The biggest boosts came from being social and energetic, and from being organized and reliable. In the six-trait version, being outgoing was the strongest predictor of all. Smaller pieces inside each trait, like cheerfulness inside being outgoing, predicted well-being about 20 percent better than the broad traits did.
People rated both their own personality and their own happiness, so some overlap comes from how people see themselves. Personality can also shift: a 2017 review in the same journal found that traits, especially emotional stability, changed in measurable ways after things like therapy. The traits most tied to a happy life are also traits people can work on. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3194…
RipVanWinkle retweeted
Bonnie Li
24 岁,署名过 Gemini、Genie 和 SIMA,现在去了 OpenAI。
Bonnie Li,9 月 16 日宣布加入 OpenAI 做 research scientist。她的原话是:第一次"felt the AGI",那天晚上再也睡不着了。
往回看她的起点有点离谱。2019 年她 17 岁,在蒙特利尔的 Mila 做强化学习研究,Yoshua Bengio 指导;同年登上 RE•WORK 峰会讲台,入选 30 Under 30 AI 女性新星。而她入门的方式是一门 Udacity 的网课——她 GitHub 上那几个仓库(Reacher、Tennis、Pyramid)正是那门课的作业。
之后在 McGill 读数学与计算机,在 Joelle Pineau 门下做本科科研,一作发了篇零样本泛化的强化学习论文。2022 年 1 月进 Google DeepMind,同年 12 月才本科毕业,2023 年 10 月转研究科学家。
在 DeepMind 她做的是世界模型和具身智能:Genie 2 的官方博客把她列为关键贡献者,SIMA 2 具名作者,Gemini 2.5 与 3 的技术报告上都有她。
现在她去 OpenAI 做"对齐的超级智能"。从一门网课到这里,七年。
Excited to share that I’ve recently joined @OpenAI!
“Felt the AGI” for the first time - and couldn’t fall asleep afterwards.
Honored to work towards aligned superintelligence. We live in extraordinary times, and the next few months will be critical.
RipVanWinkle retweeted
I wrote an article about all the math you need to know for machine learning in under 4000 words.
Trust me, you want to bookmark this:
thepalindrome.org/p/the-road…
RipVanWinkle retweeted
Yesterday I uploaded my auto insurance policy to Meta @Muse and asked for a better rate with identical coverage. In ~5 minutes, it found a policy saving me $3,500 /year, bought it, and canceled my old one.
I knew I was overpaying. I’d abandoned several attempts to switch because insurance websites and aggregator portals are so painful.
Why fill out forms, compare quotes, and field sales calls when an agent can finish the entire job in five minutes? Killer product.
Some real diversity of opinion at Google DeepMind: @alexolegimas joins the bet while his colleague @SamuelAlbanie takes the other side increasing his existing stake!
Total size of pot now $425,000!
benjaminmoll.com/growth_bet/
Thanks to @willmacaskill, @SamuelAlbanie, @tomcohen for taking the other side of this bet at 4:1 odds and to @andrewho03 for joining on my side.
Here are the final terms we agreed on benjaminmoll.com/growth_bet/
More (within) ~7 years from now 😃
RipVanWinkle retweeted
Replying to @deathrater03 @GaryMarcus
Neurosymbolic means combining highly capable but unreliable ML ("neuro") with highly reliable but less capable deterministic software ("symbolic") to get the best of both worlds. williamtp.substack.com/p/the…
RipVanWinkle retweeted
There are seven main steps for your company to go from tool adoption to agentic org.
Most companies sit on step one, shopping for step seven technology. They need step four discipline.
Step one: tool adoption. AI tools exist across the org, humans run each one. Developer closes the lid, automations die. Somebody goes on vacation, the workflow goes with them.
Step two: context layer. Knowledge graphs per department, each behind its own API gateway. Sales queries engineering through an API. Separated domains keep agents from hallucinating across departmental boundaries.
Step three: harness engineering. Build evaluation criteria, routing logic, and quality gates before you pick a model. The LLM comes in last. Your harness is your IP and your capex. The model underneath is a commodity you swap when something better ships. If changing the LLM breaks your system, you built a dependency, not a platform.
Step four: go headless. Host every automation outside a laptop. It fires on schedule, on conditions, without a human logging in at 9 AM. Companies stall here because nobody forces the migration from "script on my desktop" to "service that runs on its own."
Step five: governance. RBAC on every knowledge structure from day one. TTL on every agent. Dead agents are tech debt with active API keys. Past 100 tools, you need lifecycle management. Retire anything that hasn't run in 90 days. Deprecate anything whose eval scores drop below threshold.
Step six: agent-to-agent. Stitch headless instances together within a value chain. Agent A finishes, hands off to Agent B. An LLM sits between them as a quality gate, judging every handoff before it passes through.
Step seven: step functions. Orchestrated, semi or fully automated workflows. Agents handle volume. Humans handle exceptions. The org runs on agent output.
We walked a VP of Engineering through all seven.
Told him: "You're on step one. But over a hundred tools means step four is closer than you think."
RipVanWinkle retweeted
AI diffusion is far more rate limited by having good evals than most realize. The kind of evals that you see for every model release are incredibly helpful, but only tell you the shape of general AI progress and the relative capability level of models.
The far bigger space over time are evals on all the major workflows that enterprises do, down to the specifics of an individual company.
This will be a huge space over time because you can’t automate what you can’t assess the progress on. Enterprises will not be able to go just on vibes.
Not enough!
It is insane how many enterprises I meet that are spending $100M / year on inference and don't have offline evals to determine which model to use.
RipVanWinkle retweeted
THIS REALLY GAVE ME GOOSEBUMPS 💥 💥
I have never seen Javed Akhtar this emotional & vulnerable before.
In this clip from the Salim-Javed documentary, he talks about his life & struggles from early days of sleeping hungry and travelling in general compartments of trains.
He says that he still can't believe that he's able to live this life.
YOU CAN SEE THE EMOTIONS ON HIS FACE. 🥺
(📽️: Angry Young Man)
RipVanWinkle retweeted
The AI economy is real and substantial.
$110 billion in revenues in a sector that didn't exist four years ago.
And it's growing 3x faster than the internet, the mobile phone and cloud computing.
Here's an 8-minute Q&A about the state of the AI economy
cc @erikbryn @ClementDelangue @levie @GavinSBaker @pmarca @Noahpinion
This video is larger than Cloudflare's 512 MB cache, so it can't be played through. More donations are needed to cover a larger cache. Donate