Pinned Tweet
Replying to @Makko0007 @neoconsbuttplug
Actual photo of a Whiteman about to fck a black woman POV
unctom lucrestein retweeted
I regularly clean the beaches when I go and a funny observation I've made is that the further you walk, the less cigarette butts there are. Ya'll can't make it that far because ya'll can't breave 🤭
unctom lucrestein retweeted
🫨🤣
unctom lucrestein retweeted
If you go to your preferred search browser and enter T-Rex Arms Field Manual Vault, there is a website that allows you to search/view and download 4,000+ manuals on a variety of subjects. Better to have them and not need them, than to need them and not have them.
unctom lucrestein retweeted
@ samanth54032102
@ FrancoCarati
@ BoogyCP_O_2
@ goldframedpepe
@ dirtyframedpepe
@ darkframedpepe
@ si_gaspar
@ Rattle_Head03
@ DeityJshie52138
Cyberstalking laws prohibit using electronic communications to harass, intimidate, or threaten someone, causing substantial emotional distress or fear for safety. Key legal frameworks include federal interstate statutes and specific state codes, such as Washington’s state cyberstalking and harassment provisions. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
Federal Laws
Interstate Stalking (18 U.S.C. § 2261A): Prohibits using any interactive computer service or electronic communication device to engage in a course of conduct that causes reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury, or inflicts substantial emotional distress.
Penalties: Punishable by up to 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine for standard violations, scaling up to a life sentence if the conduct results in the death of the victim. [3]
Washington State Laws
Cyberstalking (RCW 9.61.260): Prohibits making electronic communications anonymously, repeatedly, or using lewd/indecent language with the intent to harass, intimidate, torment, or embarrass another person. Classified typically as a gross misdemeanor (up to 364 days in jail and a $5,000 fine).
Cyber Harassment (RCW 9A.90.120): Criminalizes online threats that cause reasonable fear for safety or severe emotional distress. It is a gross misdemeanor normally, but escalates to a Class C felony (up to 5 years in prison) if there is a threat to kill, a violation of a protective order, or a repeat offense. [1, 8]
Core Legal Elements
Course of Conduct: Requires a pattern of two or more connected acts or repeated messages rather than a single isolated remark.
Intent: The offender must act knowingly and willfully to track, threaten, or distress the target.
Impact: The behavior must objectively induce fear of physical harm or severe psychological trauma in a reasonable person. [3, 5, 9, 10]
AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses
[1] app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.a…
[2] law.justia.com/codes/washing…
[3] fbi.gov/news/stories/sentenc…
[4] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybers…
[5] duimiamilawyer.com/blog/2020…
[6] onlineharassmentfieldmanual.…
[7] domestic-violence-lawyers.ne…
[8] jenniferhorwitzlaw.com/pract…
[9] duimiamilawyer.com/blog/2023…
[10] womenslaw.org/laws/vi/statut…
unctom lucrestein retweeted
When you realize you’re in the jungle to put down a revolution while the jews launch a revolution back home:
I want you all to consider our experience in the Vietnam war.
This was a war fought by men who were tempered out of the Second World War both in Europe and the pacific plus the Korean War against Ho Chi Minh who had been struggling for his nation’s independence first against the imperial Japanese, then the French who came back after end of WW2 and finally us after the French were driven out.
The Vietnamese were by no means technologically equal to us, not even remotely. They were an agrarian society who mainly had small arms.
We dropped more bombs in Vietnam than we did the entire Second World War in both theaters combined.
We had Cobra and AC130 gunships, B52s, Fighter jets, you name it. It didn’t make a damn difference. Why? Because the Vietnamese were absolutely determined to seize their independence at all costs and their costs were substantial and they paid it without hesitation.
They knew the land, they had the will, they seized victory against the greatest superpower in the world. Just as we did after 1776.
War isn’t always dictated by sheer technological superiority, force of will is a defining factor.
unctom lucrestein retweeted
My 3rd account has been permanently suspended. I am starting over yet again like many of you have had to do. Please help me find my frens.
unctom lucrestein retweeted
Several very prominent members of the local Oakland, CA community attempt to help a jeweler to get rid of their Rolex's for free.
The jewelers kindly respond with a firm "no".
A gentlemanly kerfuffle takes place shortly thereafter.
The jewelers were victorious in the aforementioned kerfuffle.
unctom lucrestein retweeted
Friends, we have a friend in need!
@PennyDread88
My pleas don't go far, apparently, so I am appealing to the bigger accounts.
@OVOttermark420
@gerrygiblet
@Jamie147493622
@Ragnar71115
Will you please help your sis?
We victimized Kushner yesterday🫡
Operation Gay Kushner was launched Sunday November 8th at 2100 hours EST. Check the QT to go like your favorite memes from the campaign, and give everyone you see in the replay a follow. Special thanks to @unctomswindler for last week's target.




































