Pinned Tweet
“I deeply appreciate the valuable work performed by UN Watch. Informed and independent evaluation of the United Nations’ activities will prove a vital source as we seek to adapt the Organization to the needs of a changing world.”
— Kofi Annan, United Nations Secretary-General
Iconic exchange from Hillel Neuer's debate against two Harvard professors:
Replying to @UNWatch
Harvard Professor Patrick Vinck: “Just want to flag that for UNRWA, clearly there are major problematic individuals, and they need to be held accountable. As an institution it has been, you know, a different story.”
Hillel Neuer: “What's a different story? I don’t understand.”
Harvard Professor: “But as an institution, UNRWA is not biased. The investigation has cleared UNRWA.”
Hillel Neuer: “Which investigation? Who was cleared?”
Harvard Professor: “Look, I don't want to engage in litigation of all the numbers and facts...”
Neuer: “The head of the UNRWA Teachers' Union was Hamas. The head of the Teachers' Union in Lebanon was Hamas. Who was cleared?”
Harvard Professor: “I mean, not cleared, but the individuals had been held accountable, they've been fired...”
Neuer: “Who was fired?”
Harvard Professor: “Those individuals were either removed... look, I don't want to engage in litigation of all the numbers and facts. The question that I'm interested in is accountability...”
Hillel Neuer: “I agree, and we have no accountability. Philippe Lazzarini in Switzerland was the head of UNRWA for five years. He was informed repeatedly that the heads of the schools were Hamas leaders.He did nothing.
“A recent dispute tribunal of UNRWA issued an opinion a few weeks ago, and they said that UNRWA is obliged to pay death benefits to [the family of] Fathi Sharif, who was the Hamas commander in Lebanon — because UNRWA never fired him. He was never fired.”
BREAKING: 🇳🇿 New Zealand stops funding to UNRWA, joins 🇺🇸🇸🇪🇫🇮. FM: “We want to know our money is going for a legitimate purpose. And you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to work out it certainly was not. We're not financing cases where they actually engage with terrorists.”
UN Watch retweeted
"האו"ם באובססיה": ככה עוד לא שמעתם בכיר באו"ם מדבר על האנטי ישראליות של הארגון.
אליס ג'יל אדוארדס, הדווחית לענייני עינויים ב4 השנים האחרונות, מדברת על ההטייה, ההשתקה ותרבות הגינויים באו"ם בכל הקשור לישראל. כזה - עוד לא ראיתם ושמעתם.
youtu.be/bZRqY8SPWZc?si=jk_-…
UN Watch retweeted
The Harvard professor who debated Hillel Neuer on whether the UN treats Israel equally asked that no clips be shared.
So Hillel respected that.
He posted all 58 minutes instead.
When your side of a debate only wins if nobody sees it, you already lost the debate.
UN Watch retweeted
I predict that within one year Cuba’s dictatorship will crumble and its people will reclaim their freedom.
UN Watch retweeted
Here — I am posting my entire Harvard debate, on whether the U.N. treats Israel equally. I decided to ask Harvard University why they repeatedly host and support U.N. rapporteurs who justify terrorism, including Francesca Albanese, Tlaleng Mofokeng, and Michael Fakhri.
🇺🇸🇮🇹🇦🇷🇷🇴🇧🇬🇨🇿🇫🇯 rebuke U.N. rapporteur.
Francesca Albanese: “The U.S. called me a lunatic. I take it very seriously... Accusing me of violating the Code of Conduct, impartiality, and objectivity, is disingenuous. It would be so very useful if you provided some concrete example...”
UN Watch retweeted
The Harvard Kennedy School professor that I debated this week on the topic of the U.N. and Israel is requesting that we not post any social media clips from the debate. I never agreed to such a condition. What do you think, should we share video clips from the debate, or not?
Today's @Harvard live-streamed seminar featuring @HillelNeuer (@UNWatch) is worth watching for a number of reasons. Neuer is a world class speaker and expert on the UN's role in demonizing Israel & promoting antisemitism. Previously, the @CarrCenter led by Mathias Risse hosted @FranceskAlbs - the top UN Jew-hater, among other propagandists. But Risse is not chairing Neuer's event. Why? >>
“In May 2026, the Geneva-based watchdog UN Watch published a 104-page investigation, From Watchdogs to Ideologues, examining alleged ideological bias, conflicts of interest, and external funding across 13 UN Special Procedures mandates.
The investigation raised questions about Saul’s independence, citing Chinese funding and what UN Watch described as his failure to issue statements condemning Beijing’s persecution of Uyghur Muslims prosecuted itself under the pretext of counterterrorism.”
usun.usmission.gov/ambassado…
Cuban Regime Thug Expelled: The U.S. has expelled the Cuban diplomat caught smacking an American diplomat’s cellphone as Cuba’s delegation stormed the UN dais in a bid to shut down @USAmbUN Mike Waltz. Havana's attempts to silence the truth backfired. nitter.cf/USAmbUN/status/2115133…










