Revix AI (@userevix) header
Revix AI (@userevix) profile picture

AI code reviews that understand your codebase.

Barcelona
Joined July 2026
before revix posts a PR comment, the finding has to pass 4 questions: >is it true? >is it on the lines this PR changed? >does it break a rule from this repo? >is it worth a human's time?
1
1
3
51
we're a company of developers. of course we made stickers 😎
2
1
5
164
Say a PR adds an admin endpoint. Tests pass, code looks clean. The 9 admin endpoints before it all call the same permission check. This one skips it. A linter won't flag it. Someone who knows the repo will. Revix checks every PR against the rules your repo already follows.
2
33
Revix AI retweeted
Harvard study, 718 companies with AI coding agents: Code: +30% Review time: +49% PRs needing changes: almost 2x PR size: about the same The PRs aren't bigger. They need more fixing. On my team that fixing is mostly "we don't do it like this here". We check our rules first.
1
4
111
Revix AI retweeted
big things coming soon @userevix
2
2
9
364
a good PR review, from a person or a bot: 1. start with why the PR exists 2. repo rules before style 3. one review, not 15 pings 4. only comments the author can fix today 5. a human still says yes that's how we build Revix
4
93
we added top vendors + top models to the org dashboard see which AI models your company actually uses on PRs. not guesses very interesting for eng leads and founders
1
37
Revix AI already on Sonnet 5.5. > Better comments. > Less waiting. > Same lane: useful review over noise. revix.ai
Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5, the second model in the Claude 5.5 family. It’s a clear upgrade over Sonnet 5, runs more than 30% faster, and costs up to 30% less for most work.
2
2
2
58
Revix AI retweeted
please, NEVER open a dialog on top of another dialog change the content inside the existing and let it smoothly morph to the new size it feels so much better, doesn’t it? 💅🏽
1
11
1,420
We want Revix AI to be accessible to everyone
Have you ever tabbed through your own website? We did it on Revix AI and found broken focus states, fixed all of it with Claude Code in about an hour. Is your site accessible, or just untested?
2
176
96% of the issues we flagged got fixed before a reviewer ever opened the PR 322 pull requests in July, only two findings were rejected We comment 1 minute after the push, while the author is still in the file
2
2
63
Is AI code review the new standard, or just hype? Neither. It won't replace your senior reviewer's judgment. It replaces the 20 min they spend catching what a machine should've caught first. More on where it earns that, and where it doesn't, in the full post below.
2
1
2
71
Introducing Jira Context. A PR review that only sees the diff is reviewing half the story. It knows "what" changed. It should know "why". Revix now finds the Jira ticket, validates code against acceptance criteria, and updates the ticket when the PR merges. Available today.
1
1
2
148
"This function is a mess" is not feedback. A thread on how to actually write a PR review comment. 🧵
1
2
1
70
Before: "This function is a mess." After: issue (blocking): processOrder does validation, payment, and email in one function. A failed email rolls back a charged payment. Split it so each step can fail on its own.
1
1
9
1. Be specific. Point at the line and behavior, not a vibe. 2. Tag it. praise, issue, question, nitpick, suggestion. 3. Rate it. Blocking or non-blocking. 4. Point to a fix, not just a complaint. One shape: tag (severity): what's wrong, and the way out.
11
Just a sneak peek at the level of details you can find at Revix AI 💅
"Are you sure?" modals don't really work. Nobody reads the warning, everyone just clicks through. We replaced it in @userevix with hold to confirm. And I think everyone should start using this pattern.
2
82