Say a PR adds an admin endpoint. Tests pass, code looks clean.
The 9 admin endpoints before it all call the same permission check. This one skips it.
A linter won't flag it. Someone who knows the repo will.
Revix checks every PR against the rules your repo already follows.
Harvard study, 718 companies with AI coding agents:
Code: +30%
Review time: +49%
PRs needing changes: almost 2x
PR size: about the same
The PRs aren't bigger. They need more fixing.
On my team that fixing is mostly "we don't do it like this here". We check our rules first.
Revix AI already on Sonnet 5.5.
> Better comments.
> Less waiting.
> Same lane: useful review over noise.
revix.ai
Introducing Jira Context.
A PR review that only sees the diff is reviewing half the story.
It knows "what" changed. It should know "why".
Revix now finds the Jira ticket, validates code against acceptance criteria, and updates the ticket when the PR merges.
Available today.
Not ours, it's an open standard: Conventional Comments
Revix AI applies it automatically. Every review comes pre-tagged by intent and severity.
Try it → userevix.com. 14 day trial, no card.
Just a sneak peek at the level of details you can find at Revix AI 💅
"Are you sure?" modals don't really work. Nobody reads the warning, everyone just clicks through.
We replaced it in @userevix with hold to confirm. And I think everyone should start using this pattern.

















