Vlad Stan 🔭

Applications are now open for the Anthropic Residency, a paid, fixed-term research program for academics, technical founders, and staff-level engineers who want to make AI safe and beneficial for everyone. No ML background is required. Apply by November 22: alignment.anthropic.com/2026…

Calling it now. AI is going to usher in a whole new era of software development. I’m calling it Software as a Service. People will want to use these tools but they’ll realize they don’t want to spend the time to maintain and update them over time. This will create a whole new category of businesses and entrepreneurs that can take on that task for businesses that would rather work on their core products. AI is changing everything. This is a whole new paradigm of thinking about the way we interact with software.

Absolutely great AI video animation

Stop having your agent write features from scratch and use this, made for solo devs: 280 game mechanics, each broken into its core loop and a small prototype to build first. It's called Gameplay Atlas, and it's free. Farming, for example, splits into planting and watering, growth timers, and picking the next crop. Every mechanic also lists what the player weighs up and which games do it well. I wish I'd had it before Bolt Pit. It averaged 2 minutes 17 seconds of playtime on CrazyGames, and almost nobody came back the next day. The game worked, but the loop ran out fast. Next time I'm handing Claude Code a list like this before the first milestone. Made by @onefifthblue. Link in the first reply. Which mechanic would you prototype first?

Hey @grok, if AI replaces millions of jobs over the next 5 years, how will people pay their rent, mortgages, and groceries?

New essay: andrewchen.substack.com/p/ne… NEW FOUNDER ARCHETYPES IN THE AI AGE Solo founders - Why: Solo founders can do 100x with AI, so they can ship a v1 when previously they couldn’t have before - Why not: Maybe a team of cofounders still makes more progress. Maybe you can agentically code but someone still needs to do a million meetings with customers. Maybe coding was never the main bottleneck for startups in the first place? Non-technical founders - Why: There’s elite talent that comes from areas like finance, consulting, who can’t code but are passionate about business. There’s also folks in creative industries who create all day but just not in code. Now they can build - Why not: Why not: Maybe AI makes it easier to build a prototype, but there’s still a big gap between a demo and a reliable product that can scale. If everyone can build the first version, maybe technical judgment becomes more important in deciding what to build, what’s actually possible, and how to stay ahead as the product gets more complex. (especially true for product categories like dev tools/etc) Domain experts - Why: A doctor who works at a hospital understands all the problems they face each day. A real estate broker really gets the subtleties of their markets, their clients. Same with a soldier, teacher, etc. What if they could use software to solve their own problems and build business along the way? - Why not: Hoteliers didn’t create Airbnb and the finance industry didn’t create Kalshi. Sometimes you just need an outsider’s view in order to reinvent an industry, versus building incremental improvements Kids, high schoolers, college students - Why: Young people have already been building products early on. Start with a Minecraft mod, a Roblox game, a Discord bot, and suddenly you’ve learned how to make something that thousands of other people use. Now add AI, and a kid with an idea can build way more, way earlier - Why not: Building something your friends love is very different from building a company. You still have to hire, raise money, manage people, and figure out how to make money. And maybe young founders have an advantage in consumer products because they understand their peers, but much less of one when it comes to enterprise software, healthcare, or other industries where experience and relationships really matter. Sometimes you just need domain expertise Content creators - Why: They’re already creating. So instead of creating videos, maybe the same skills can go into creating software. Plus, they have distribution. They know what their followers care about, how to get their attention, and how to reach them without paying for ads. In the past, turning that audience into a software product meant finding a technical cofounder or hiring a team. Now a creator could build and launch something themselves, and immediately put it in front of millions of potential users. - Why not: Having followers helps with a spike of distribution, but building a sustainable growth engine is something else. The most valuable products aren’t memes - they are long-running, long-growing products that need to be endlessly tweaked and iterated on. Does the DNA work?

Software ate the world, now it's learning to run it. View article

Big companies are learning to run with fewer employees. Somewhere in this round of buyouts, a few future founders just got their first check.