Danny Watson retweeted
Dear Andy, you do know this is untrue, don’t you?
Highest energy bills in the world are due to:
* Reckless pursuit of net zero
* Blowing up our coal-fired power stations
* Failing to exploit our own fossil fuels
* Insane dependency on foreign oil and gas. The phrase “over a barrel” springs to mind
* Paying Norway £20 billion plus a year for oil and gas we could get out of our own North Sea
* Subsidizing renewables to the tune of billions by slapping green taxes on bills
* Putting an eco-cult and leftist ideology before the comfort and warmth of the British people
* Allowing good jobs to be lost in pursuit of all of the above
* Claiming your government wants to “reindustrialise” while creating conditions no manufacturer could succeed in
* Closing refineries and gas storage so the UK is uniquely vulnerable this winter and likely to have serious power cuts.
You’re welcome.
@andyburnham
I want to be honest about how we’ve got to a place where British billpayers are paying some of the highest energy costs in Europe.
Over the past 40 years, we’ve given up control of our necessities, outsourced our essentials and privatised the basics. Water, transport, housing. And of course, energy.
Now the public are paying the price. We haven’t invested in the infrastructure we need. Conflict overseas has pushed up energy costs and it’s hurting our businesses and families.
That’s why we need to take back greater control of our energy system.
This week, I announced Great British Grid, which will speed up connections and push down bills.
We’re also giving mayors, local leaders and communities a stronger role. With funding for People’s Power projects, communities will be able to build solar panels on libraries and town halls, hydro schemes in rivers or publicly owned windfarms on local land.
But it’s not just energy we need stronger public control over. It’s also water, housing, transport and care.
So we’re repealing the ban on public ownership of water companies. We’re building more council homes than this country has seen since the end of World War Two.
We’re reforming the leasehold system so families aren’t squeezed for every penny. And we’re opening up home ownership for first time buyers who can’t rely on the bank of mum and dad.
This week I also announced my determination to introduce a National Care Service, to put people above profit and to give pensioners peace of mind.
Together, we’ll rewire the country from top to bottom so that it works for all people in all places.
That is the only way to put Britain back on the right path. It’s the only way to put power back in people’s hands. And it’s the only way we will bring hope again.
Danny Watson retweeted
Replying to @AllisonPearson
Miliband is the worst politician of the last 20 years.
a) wrecked the Labour Party enabling Corbynite Marxists to take it over
b) wrecked the U.K. economy & energy security with net zero evangelism
c) wrecked national security & emboldened Hamas by demonising Israel for votes.
Danny Watson retweeted
WHO SILENCED DR DAVID KELLY
Most people scrolling past this have never heard the name Dr David Kelly. They should.
He was one of the world's leading weapons inspectors, a quiet Ministry of Defence scientist who spent years checking Iraq's chemical and biological arsenal for the United Nations. Nobody understood that file better than he did.
In 2003 Tony Blair's (@InstituteGC) government published a dossier claiming Saddam Hussein could deploy chemical weapons within 45 minutes. That one line helped justify sending Britain to war, a war that ended up killing hundreds of thousands of people.
Kelly knew the intelligence behind that claim had been stretched. He said so privately, off the record, to BBC (@BBCNews) journalist Andrew Gilligan (@mragilligan). Nothing more than a conversation.
Somebody in government made sure his name reached the press anyway. Within days a respected scientist with decades of service was dragged in front of 2 parliamentary committees and questioned like a suspect on live television. His wife later said he came home a broken man.
On 17 July 2003 he left his house in Oxfordshire for a walk. He was 59. He never came home. His body was found the next morning in nearby woodland, a knife beside him and a shallow cut to his wrist.
Now here is where the story stops making sense.
Instead of letting the standard coroner's inquest run its course, Tony Blair's government suspended it before it properly began and replaced it with a private inquiry led by a judge the government appointed, Lord Hutton.
It was never resumed.
To this day Dr David Kelly is the only person in England and Wales in living memory to die in unexplained circumstances without a full coroner's inquest ever taking place.
Hutton concluded suicide within months. Officially, that was that.
Unofficially, a group of senior doctors reviewed the medical evidence and said the conclusion was unsafe. In letters to The Times (@thetimes) and The Guardian (@guardian) they explained that the artery involved is so small that cutting it rarely causes fatal blood loss in a healthy person, that the painkiller level found in his body was well under a lethal dose, and that the amount of blood at the scene was too small to account for the death recorded.
In 2011 those doctors formally asked the government to finally allow a proper inquest. Attorney General Dominic Grieve (@dominicgrieve_) reviewed it and refused. Hutton's inquiry was declared sufficient. The matter was closed, again, by the people who opened it.
Think about what actually happened here. A civil servant quietly raised concerns about the most consequential political deception in modern British history. He was exposed, humiliated and found dead days later, and the same government that needed answers made sure a proper, independent investigation never happened.
Tony Blair went on to become a Middle East peace envoy. He was later knighted.
Dr David Kelly got a rushed private inquiry, a sealed post mortem report kept from public view for years, and a grave that campaigners are still fighting over more than 2 decades on.
Nobody has ever been held accountable. Not for the dossier, not for the leak, not for what happened next.
This story deserves to be told every single year, not forgotten. If you think that too, share it.
Sources @BBCNews @guardian @thetimes @PrivateEyeNews
Danny Watson retweeted
Dear British People,
Please accept the fate of your island quietly.
We have chosen to let in hundreds of thousands of undocumented males from misogynist cultures but you are not allowed to protest.
Any peaceful protest will be viewed as “thuggish and intimidating” because you’re all ghastly white working-class people, aren’t you? Bigots!
What, a twelve-year-old boy raped?
What, an 80-year-old man raped in a churchyard by an illegal migrant?
Rhiannon Whyte stabbed 23 times in the head by an illegal migrant who had arrived 11 weeks earlier?
Perfectly normal. Keep things in proportion. As Are Andy says those men have “other norms”.
We appreciate you have voted at every general election against immigration and you want illegal migrants deported. And we have ignored you for many years.
So now you think voting doesn’t work.
Fair enough, we understand
your concerns. But that is no excuse to take things into your own hands!
Rest assured your government is doing everything it can to do nothing to stop the boats.
We will launch a crackdown against anybody who tries to actually stop the boats.
Meanwhile, everyone must take their fair share of the unfairness nobody voted for.
Remember - Hope in every heart. A rapist in every postcode!
'It was thuggish and intimidating behaviour'
Government minister Emma Reynolds reacted on #BBCBreakfast to a protest in Portsmouth on Sunday night after around 140 migrants arrived in a single dinghy that had crossed the English Channel.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clye…
Danny Watson retweeted
The great British mayoral gravy train keeps on rolling.
We now have 27 executive politicians living off the taxpayer - 14 massive regional ‘strategic’ mayors and 13 individual council mayors.
That's 27 sets of bloated bureaucracies, endless committees, and vanity marketing departments.
Worse still, Andy Burnham is already using No 10 North as a staging ground to demand even more regional mayors and shift more tax revenue into local empire-building.
More politicians, more cost, more red tape.
Exactly what the country didn't ask for.
Danny Watson retweeted
Pollyanna Burnham has absolutely no idea what's about to happen to him. He has a head full of bad ideas that weren't tried by any of his recent predecessors, not because his predecessors were smarter than him, but because they were rapidly disabused before getting down to business. Burnham, though, thinks that bad ideas will become good ideas if he's the one implementing them. For Burnham, the normal laws of political reality do not apply. There are hard lessons for him behind the door of Number Ten, waiting like starved crocodiles for their hapless prey.
While this is going to be endlessly entertaining and wholly predictable for us politicos, it is not without consequence. This is the gear shift that pushes the "just about managing" into the "not managing" bracket. This is the turn that pushes businesses and households irrecoverably into the red and upends what people have been struggling to maintain. This is the narcissistic clueless meddling that puts the country into a death spiral. The anger will be palpable.
By that, I don't necessarily mean the sort of riots triggered by the tone-deaf and ineffably useless Starmer. That cannot be ruled out, of course, but this is the inflection point where the normally reserved, who just prefer to get on with their lives, are dragged into the wake turbulence against their will. It's the bill hike that obliterates the last of their disposable income. It's the last of the small pleasures that make the drudgery of making ends meet bearable denied - when there's no longer any reward for taking the punishment - and there's no end in sight.
This is when Burnham's entire psychological construct begins to dissolve. The world as he understands it is one where if you're nice, with good intentions, then you are liked - and the only reason you could dislike such a person is if you yourself are not nice. Starmer was better equipped to be hated because he had no empathy, and public sentiment of any kind had no bearing on his demeanour. Burnham, on the other hand, wants and needs to be liked. This is often a fatal flaw in politicians.
What makes Burnham especially dangerous is that he will pull at any and all levers in search of doing the nice thing, in order to be liked, oblivious to the second order consequences, and will be shocked, surprised and horrified to learn that his every action has the opposite of intended effect on public morale. He will not understand why. He is not capable of understanding why, even if it is explained to him in the most gentle terms by a compassionate softly-spoken primary school teacher.
Unlike, Starmer, though, he won't go into the bunker to hide. He will take it to mean that people just haven't gotten to know him yet, and need to see more of him so they can understand that he's a nice guy and on your side. And when it doesn't work, he will blame the interface layer. If we don't get it, it just means something is lost in translation. That's when nice turns nasty.
This is the hole he will keep digging, the scab he simply won't stop picking until the sore becomes an open wound. WHY WON'T YOU UNDERSTAND HOW NICE I AM?? They say the road to Hell is paved with good intentions. Burnham, though, does not plan to build a road. He intends to drill directly to Hell with industrial tunnelling machines. There is no force of magic that can make socialism work.
Crucially, what Burnham doesn't understand, is that the Labour party has become the party of the status quo for a reason. There is nowhere else for the left to go. Tony Blair, for all his many faults, was smart enough to understand certain economic laws of gravity. He shitcanned socialism because he knew that you can't hope to help people if the state is broke. He rebuilt the state as a managerialist welfare dispensary.
That might have been a viable avenue for 1997. But "sharing the proceeds of growth" is contingent on actual growth, which is no longer possible in a hyper-regulated, high tax moribund economy. Blairism is as dead as socialism. The bottom line is that there is no left wing solution to what ails us.
Burnham, though, believes enough time has passed for us to have forgotten, so that we'll mistake old ideas for new ideas. A lot of people probably will fall for it again, but it doesn't take very long to relearn the lessons. The Finding Out stage happens faster each time. On that basis, Burnham is not a man who will make it to the next election intact. He doesn't have much to work with. He has no mandate, no fiscal headroom, limited political capital, and absolutely no talent. A man promoted to captain of the Titanic after it hit the iceberg. The only way for Burnham is down, down and down.
Danny Watson retweeted
In admins humble opinion, this weekend saw the greatest chase in #NPL history.
A combination of clean ball-striking, relentless power and outstanding quality, saw @PapplewickCC knock off @CavsCarrington's total of 301 in the 32nd over, 6 down!
Wow: nottinghamshirecbpl.play-cri…
Danny Watson retweeted
Starts this Friday at 5:30pm! 🏏
Come and down and get involved!
Any questions please feel free to DM
Danny Watson retweeted
So the UK's 10-year gilt yield - the cost of government borrowing - is now up at 2008 levels.
An 18-year high
The difference is that, back then, UK national debt was 48pc of GDP, and now it's the best part of 100pc.
So the debt service costs are much MUCH heavier.
Of the £14.3bn the UK government borrowed in February alone, no less than £13bn of that was spent on interest on existing debts - a situation which is not only unsustainable, but very close to provoking a disastrous financial collapse.
Yet still, our national discourse is all about more spending, more borrowing, more "state intervention".
When is the Labour party – and much of the listless, unthinking rump of the UK's political and media class – going to start acknowledging reality?
WHEN ....?
Danny Watson retweeted
Amid all the current outrage and vicarious war porn, it seems appropriate to quote Jacky Fisher at the First Hague Peace conference in 1899:
‘The humanising of war? You might as well talk about the humanizing of Hell!
The essence of war is violence! Moderation in war is imbecility!
I am not for war, I am for peace! That is why I am for a supreme Navy … The supremacy of the British Navy is the best security for peace in the world.
If you rub it in both at home and abroad that you are ready for instant war … and intend to be first in and hit your enemy in the belly and kick him when he is down and boil your prisoners in oil (if you take any) … then people will keep clear of you.’
Danny Watson retweeted
In September we paid £9.7bn in debt interest. So £24bn will be gone in about 10 weeks. You think that’s worth driving away what’s left of the wealth creators and taxpayers? Truly insane and completely unserious.
A tiny 2% tax on wealth above £10m, is a drop in the ocean for just 20k Brits - but would raise £24Bn with which we could do so much. Rachel Reeves needs to be brave, understand the people want this - even millionaires want this and there’s nothing to fear. If we think there is let’s change our tax rules and make them like the USA - citizens pay tax back home wherever in the world they choose to live. Problem solved.
Danny Watson retweeted
Outgoing politician speeches are often piercing and insightful.
This one from July 2024 is 🎯 especially on house prices and the economy.
I recommend watching, to the end.
Danny Watson retweeted
This 20-second exchange should be enough to disqualify the Green party from holding any sort of political power. Totally and utterly insane.
Danny Watson retweeted
🚨 No other country on earth does this 🚨
If a UK citizen moves abroad with no job, no contributions, no private income, what happens?
🇫🇷 France – no welfare until you’ve lived and paid in for years
🇩🇪 Germany – no benefits without work or residency
🇺🇸 USA – no free housing, no cash, no healthcare unless you buy it
🇨🇦 Canada – prove you can support yourself or you’re deported
🇦🇺 Australia – welfare only after years of residency
🇳🇿 New Zealand – same, no contributions = no benefits
🇸🇦 Saudi & Gulf States – if you’re not a citizen, you get nothing, ever
❌ Bottom line: there is no country that lets Brits just turn up and live off their welfare system. None.
✅ But Britain does the opposite:
• Free housing
• Weekly cash payments
• Healthcare
• Legal aid
• Schooling
All available immediately. No work. No contributions.
Our pensioners choose between heating and eating.
Our veterans sleep rough.
Our families are crushed by tax while services collapse.
Yet billions are handed instantly to strangers who have given nothing.
This is not fairness.
This is not compassion.
This is national self-sabotage.
If you want to understand why Britain feels invaded while our people struggle, start here 👇
🔹 Hotels full while veterans sleep on the streets
🔹 Families waiting years for housing while arrivals are housed immediately
🔹 NHS queues for British citizens while newcomers get seen on day one
🔹 Taxpayers bled dry while billions are spent on people who never paid a penny in
🔹 Undocumented fighting-age males sheltered without vetting or background checks
🔹 Sharp rise in sexual crimes, rapes and grooming gangs ignored by authorities
🔹 Violent crime increasing while police look the other way to stay “politically correct”
Britain is now a country that abandons the requirements of its own citizens in order to facilitate invading illegal migrants that have zero interest in our societal cohesion.
In every other country, newcomers must contribute first.
Here, the indigenous people are sacrificed for the system.
This isn’t immigration policy.
It’s betrayal.
It’s a full on traitorous attack on the British society, our sovereignty and standards of living.
Danny Watson retweeted
A reminder for anyone who might not be aware, but to be competitive on energy pricing (to keep manufacturing in this country, to attract new investment and to help with the cost of living) the UK electricity price would need to be 5p to 7p p/kWh
We’re currently at 25p p/kWh
CONFIRMED: Energy Price Cap to rise 2% on 1 Oct - with a chunk of the rise on the Standing Charge hitting lower users! Your brief need-to-knows...
Ofgem's Price Cap dictates the rate all homes, except in Northern Ireland, on standard tariffs pay. That’s the 2/3rd of domestic properties who aren't on fixes or special deals . The regulator has just announced it will rise at the upper end of predictions, UP 2% for the 1 Oct to 31 Dec Price Cap.
DITCH THE CAP IF YOU CAN!
Now we know the Cap will be at the current rate or higher until at least the end of the year, it's easy to compare to the cheapest fixes...
- They are on average nearly 17% less than the Oct Cap rate (c£250/yr cheaper on a typical bill)
- And have guaranteed rates, so you know they won't rise for at least a year.
That means for those on a capped tariff, switch to a fix and your energy use immediately costs less, and is guaranteed to do so until at the very least the 31 Dec, but almost certainly well beyond that too...
Analyst's current predictions are that the Cap will drop slightly in Jan (down 2%ish) then a rise again in April (up 5% ish) - though this involves some crystal ball gazing as much can change.
As your cheapest fix depends on your location, usage, payment type (sadly there are no non-Smart Prepay fixes) use a whole-of-market comparison like our ' Cheap Energy Club' moneysavingexpert.com/cheape… to compare and find yours. (it also looks at the more innovative but complex time-of-use and EV tariffs too).
LOWER USERS HARDER HIT BY THE CAP RISE
I was pleased to see the regulator press release has finally stopped leading on the meaningless 'annualised typical use' figure and instead has copied my past phrasing saying "This means from October to December, a typical household on a default tariff will pay £102 for what currently costs £100 per month."
Yet the impact is not uniform. While half this rise is due to wholesale costs increasing slightly on average over the assessment period, the rest is due to 'network and policy costs' increases, and they are lumped into the daily Standing Charge.
The average Standing Charge is rising 4.5% for electricity users and 14% for gas. To put it in context if it stayed at this level over a year, you'd pay a horrific £320 a year (on average for Direct debit) just for having the facility of gas or electricity even if you didn't use it.
That means lower users will be disproportionately hit, with some facing effective rises of 5% or more. Yet perversely, higher users gain, as the rate for each unit of gas you use is being cut. So high users who use a lot of gas may see a rise of just 1%ish.
This is a moral hazard. And especially terrible for many older people who only use their gas in winter. The Standing Charge needs to be reworked. I will continue to campaign for that. There are plans for firms to be forced to offer low or no standing charge tariff option by the start of next year (hopefully via the Price Cap) but it is not 100% locked in.
Hello @grok, if I was elected head of state, can you list ten policies I would likely enact within the first 100 days based on my posts
Danny Watson retweeted
He’s correct. Worth a listen to @LiamHalligan. 👇
'Labour have to show they can grow the economy. They can't do that if their only answer is to tax people more and spend more government money!'
Economics Expert @LiamHalligan issues a dire warning on the state of Britain's economy, which he says Labour has made worse.
Danny Watson retweeted
People are asking what the British equivalent of the American dream is.
It is to own a little plot of Britain that you can call your own. To fill it with a family, a waggy-tailed dog and a sleepy cat. To be generally left alone there, in private, to emerge only when you want to, perhaps to potter around in the garden, or in the shed. Or pootle down to the pub, to exchange a few words of small talk with the regulars over a pint, or to sit in the corner with your beer and a newspaper. Or to take a brisk walk along winding country lanes, past neatly hedgerowed fields after Sunday lunch. Or to watch the village cricket team on a lazy, golden Saturday afternoon. Or to march into town with the bigger crowds to cheer on the football team. Or stand clutching a thermos of hot soup watching the bonfire.
This is the British dream. To be left alone in one's castle.