Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” (@wereness) header
Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” (@wereness) profile picture

cypherpunk, arthoe, placemaker. cybernetic restorationist; discriminating degenerate. ⚣

Stockholm
Joined November 2015
Photo by Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” (@wereness)Photo by Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” (@wereness)Photo by Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” (@wereness)Photo by Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” (@wereness)Photo by Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” (@wereness)Photo by Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” (@wereness)Photo by Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” (@wereness)Photo by Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” (@wereness)
my political ideology is a Kalmar Reunion with nuclear weapons and where Swedes aren’t allowed to vote
8
2
2
54
6,688
Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” retweeted
If you're in a verifiable domain, pivot to an unverifiable one.
119
246
138
3,204
727,230
the community note here is so rich. "yeah so it's not exactly that bad but it's bad"
🚨 PSA for anyone running a Linux server, node, or relay CVE-2026-98432 is a critical Linux kernel bug (CVSS 9.8). Someone on the internet can send crafted TCP packets and take over your machine. No login needed. Ubuntu and Red Hat haven't shipped a fixed kernel yet. Debian, SUSE, Oracle and Amazon have. What to do today: 1. Check your kernel: uname -r Fixed versions: 6.1.190+, 6.6.159+, 6.12.113+, 6.18.56+, 7.2.10+ or 7.3+. Below that, you're exposed. 2. If your distro has a fix, update and reboot. 3. If not, block the attack. It needs TCP packets with "IP options," which normal traffic never uses. One nftables rule drops them. Log what gets dropped so you can see if someone's probing you. 4. Turn off MPTCP unless you need it: sysctl -w net.mptcp.enabled=0 Programs built with Go 1.24+ use MPTCP automatically, and that's how the known exploit gets in. 5. Make it survive a reboot, and check it still works after one. If you run a Bitcoin node, a Lightning node or a Nostr relay, your machine is on the internet by design. Do this today. Self-hosting is freedom. Patching is part of the job. πŸ›‘οΈ
11
1,112
Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” retweeted
"Our competitive advantage as a software company? We use AI. This is how we're going to get ahead"
5
5
75
1,464
Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” retweeted
btw sorry that i didn’t follow back, you were just too many too fast please rest assured that given the opportunity i would be very impressed with you in particular, and you should start interacting with my tweets to draw my attention to that. please and thank you
1
1
15
932
i'm sorry, i really do need to stop leaking alpha publicly πŸ˜”
1
1
19
514
Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” retweeted
Hyped up vibe coders on X, token maxxing, celebrating the commoditization of the very thing they hope to sell..
1
1
166
Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” retweeted
"When I asked their AI assistant to enable this feature on my account, it told me the feature doesn't exist. When I pointed it to the company blog post announcing the feature, it began responding in Chinese." We are not ready for how weird it's going to get.
Currently arguing with a company over whether their blog post advertising a feature implies that their platform should include that feature. Their support emails are AI-generated, even after I asked for a human. The entire website is AI-generated. Their API docs tell me not to bother reading them, just paste their "integration prompt" into my AI. The founder posted an AI-generated article on Twitter talking about how AI runs the company. I'm growing increasingly confident that their AI made up a feature that does not exist and wrote dozens of articles advertising this feature in various countries that they do not support. When I asked their AI assistant to enable this feature on my account, it told me the feature doesn't exist. When I pointed it to the company blog post announcing the feature, it began responding in Chinese. This company received $6 million from Y Combinator.
1
4
121
subagents are an insane antipattern btw. scheduling and delegation is solved extremely well by deterministic software and wasting tokens and context to imitate it poorly is insane. what are we even doing here
65
25
6
1,137
74,873
"let's have the agents model a human organization" uuh no i'd rather not
1
3
135
8,586
a "software factory" might be the thing i least desire to use LLMs for. i want a semantic workbench for supercharging artisanal software production. i want maximum leverage, not maximal throughput.
23
12
4
259
10,527
Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” retweeted
Saying ”I hope you’re happy” after agreeing with something is a great way to inject dramatic tension into an otherwise uncontroversial conversation
2
1
9
556
Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” retweeted
I don’t think people realize how selfless and wonderful the StackOverflow’s founders were. Unlike reddit, x etc they insisted ALL of their content will be 100% open, nothing will ever be locked up in walled garden. They made it a point by even offering structured data downloads! They didn’t cared people cloning the website. They didn’t worry about putting the whole monetization thing at risk. It was a true hacker spirit in it’s purest form. Most folks won’t be able to grasp how hard this is. You are on top of the world. Millions of people depend on you daily. You have the rarest opportunity to rack in billions. And you still stay true to your principles. This exactly in turn later enabled AI revolution. I still remember downloading entire SO archives and preparing it for pre-training while Reddit and others went onto lawfare and firewalling the content. Note that this was the content their users - not reddit employees - had created for free and voluntarily to help others and the world. But they locked it all up for profiting from it personally. SO did none of that. I think they knew they will be sacrificed at the altar. Yet it will exactly serve the intent of their founding principles to help others and the world, now through AI, even at bigger scale. All of today’s models are built upon efforts of such true pure hackers who spent their days and years to create training data for AIs. I was a proud SO contributer for many years and there are couple of times while testing models I did felt that models might have used my answers πŸ˜‡. Hats off to @codinghorror and @spolsky and so many builders and hackers at SO for moving the world forward, one revolution at a time 🫑.
New record for Stack Overflow: <1000 questions posted last month
103
404
41
4,869
184,453
Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” retweeted
Guy Debord argued that modern life was increasingly being replaced by representations of itself. In 1994, he died by suicide. David Foster Wallace proposed sincerity as an escape from recursive irony. In 2008, he died by suicide. Mark Fisher wrote about the ghosts of futures that never arrived. In 2017, he died by suicide. Now it is our turn to solve postmodernism.
96
637
93
6,333
149,193
Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” retweeted
oh my god
73
303
88
5,689
279,793
Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” retweeted
Hello. You are probably leaning forwards slightly. Without changing anything, I'd like to remind you that there is space above and behind you. What if you let your body expand into that space above and behind? Have a nice day!
16
26
4
400
11,989
Jack πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ πŸŒ” retweeted
Presented without comment.
If you had an exponential amount of compute you could solve simulate biology exactly and wouldn't need to run any experiments. Some of you will think "of course, but that's an unrealistic assumption" and others will think "no, you need experiments even with that much compute. That's just How It's Done". You would of course need evaluations once you have a solution, but you don't in principle need experiments to find it: Experiments are a way to save compute, dating from a time when it was much more expensive. And I think the presentation is exponential but real systems aren't irreducibly exponential. AlphaFold worked, after all.
1
8
317