Replying to @TeamYouTube
@TeamYouTube As of today, October 22, 2026, it has been 115 days since June 29, 2026.
That’s 16 weeks and 3 days, or 3 months and 23 days since my channel was unfairly targeted by @YouTube AI moderation. I strongly believe it believed the video successfully appealed was mistakenly believed to be another violation.
This is not a standard policy denial; it is an internal desk conflict. As shown in the attachment, Trust & Safety reviewed the content, upheld my appeal, and cleared the strike. The channel was terminated immediately after with no new videos uploaded. Please escalate this specific discrepancy to Tier-2 Safety for verification
Hello YouTube team,
It’s day 121 since my channel (c.gle/AOPyDKTG6qYQywGnQYvP0X…) was terminated for bullying and harassment my appeal was rejected. Im respectfully requesting a manual review of whether the termination is consistent with my enforcement record. Can a Tier-2 specialist check if an automated circumvention hash triggered this by mistake? Evidence attached.
Thank you for your time.
@YouTubeCreators @YouTube
Carey retweeted
nudes in a relationship are important.
yes, I wanna see your pussy while I'm at work for the 37th time.
If your content involves fucking with other people then it isn’t content it’s just you fucking with people. People will learn to leave people alone
All they have to do is provide creators with genuine human reviews @TeamYouTube
The FTC is preparing to sue YouTube over suspended & demonetized accounts.
The FTC's probe examines whether YouTube violated its own user policies by banning or demoting content. The investigation is also looking into whether users may have been misled by YouTube's content policies into signing up for the service, believing they were allowed to post certain content, only to have that content later removed or their accounts suspended, according to Bloomberg. share.google/pBGOGA9RghTSF1i…
ALLOW 3–5 APPEALS PER CHANNEL. YouTube gives creators very limited chances to challenge a termination, sometimes leaving them with just one appeal that can be rejected by an automated system. Creators then spend months fighting on X just to prove their channel was terminated by mistake. Give them multiple opportunities to explain their case and provide evidence. This could help correct many wrongful terminations before creators have to spend months begging for someone to listen. @TeamYouTube
🚨 YOUTUBE NEEDS TO CHANGE. CREATORS DESERVE BETTER. 👇 @YouTube
YouTube wouldn't be where it is today without its creators. Yet when creators lose their channels, income, or years of hard work because of a potentially wrong decision, getting REAL help can feel impossible.
Here’s what urgently needs to change:
1. LESS AI. MORE REAL PEOPLE. There should be enough qualified human support agents to handle serious creator issues instead of leaving everything to automated systems.
2. STOP PRETENDING AI IS HUMAN. Telling a bot to write “Human here” doesn't make it human. If it gives the same appeal instructions you've followed 10 times and rejects your appeal minutes later, that's NOT meaningful support.
3. ACTUALLY READ WHAT CREATORS SEND YOU. If someone emails YouTube about a wrongful termination, READ THE EMAIL. Don't respond by asking about an unrelated YPP issue, then ignore the creator when they clarify what the problem actually is. Every appeal and email deserves proper attention.
4. STOP CALLING EVERYTHING A “FINAL DECISION.” Creators have seen supposedly final decisions reconsidered after persistent efforts finally reached someone who properly examined the case. If a mistake can still be corrected, there must be a meaningful way to review it.
5. REFORM THE CIRCUMVENTION POLICY. A terminated creator shouldn't automatically mean innocent family members, roommates, or other people sharing a device or internet connection must lose their opportunity to create. Connections should be investigated in context, not treated as automatic proof of wrongdoing. One mistake shouldn't automatically destroy someone else's future. The most serious repeat or deliberate abuse deserves strict enforcement, but innocent people deserve fair treatment.
6. STOP LETTING AI MAKE LIFE-CHANGING MONETIZATION DECISIONS WITHOUT PROPER OVERSIGHT. Creators can lose their income overnight after investing months or years of work. Every serious demonetization or termination should have access to a genuine human review. Creators deserve due process, not an automated verdict.
YouTube has every right to enforce its rules. But enforcement without meaningful accountability puts innocent creators at risk, too. A system that can make mistakes must have a real way to correct them.
📢 WHAT WOULD YOU CHANGE?
If you've experienced this yourself, share your story in the comments. If you have another idea, add it. Quote this post with your own experience.
Let's get this conversation in front of @TeamYouTube and as many creators as possible.
THIS ISN'T ABOUT PROTECTING BAD ACTORS. IT'S ABOUT PROTECTING INNOCENT CREATORS FROM BAD DECISIONS.
Creators helped build YouTube into what it is today. We deserve support that reflects that. @nealmohan @FTC
Hello YouTube team,
My channel (c.gle/AOPyDKTG6qYQywGnQYvP0X…) was terminated for bullying and harassment my appeal was rejected. Im respectfully requesting a manual review of whether the termination is consistent with my enforcement record. Can a Tier-2 specialist check if an automated circumvention hash triggered this by mistake? Evidence attached.
Thank you for your time.
@YouTubeCreators @YouTube
































