this post is a thread of most of my philosophising that I have posted on here, starting with what I care about. enjoy for whatever reason you will
nitter.cf/zyacon16/status/200009…
Zyacon16 retweeted
Matt Walsh is wrong here. The Prequels are legitimately the best set of Star Wars films. Anakins entire life too is literally just dealing with alien freaks who continually mistreat him and democracy that doesn’t function till he snaps. Great story.
Zyacon16 retweeted
Zyacon16 retweeted
Purposefully nerfed by global powers I believe.
An Australia of 150m Anglos would’ve been an impenetrable fortress of high civilisation, a USA without borders. Unstoppable.
Zyacon16 retweeted
I could expand endlessly on this aspect of immigration because it's such a peculiar characteristic.
Someone or something is cracking the defenses of one country at a time; chipping away at them until the "business deals" start flowing.
Make no mistake: it's a scam. It's very literally a scam. It's a scam that depends on cracking a few key government figures who can lift up the velvet rope into high value countries across the East and West.
The pattern is exactly the same in every country it happens in. It's perfectly uncanny and not enough people remark upon it.
It is by virtue of Japan's linguistic moat as well as it's island status and its unique and inscrutable culture that has rendered it unusually hardened against the globalists.
Zyacon16 retweeted
What you'll notice, if you follow enough international accounts on X, is that the same themes and issues emerge simultaneously across multiple countries.
It's now Japan's turn to be enriched. They have elected what was supposed to be a tough anti-immigration candidate and they have instead received a generous delegation from Bangladesh offering 100,000 workers (and their families) to big business.
This is how you know your government has been compromised btw. No matter who or what you vote for, your borders are steadily dismantled.
All I wish to say to our Japanese friends, an island nation like ourselves is this: If Britain can be nothing else, let us be a warning as to the nature of the journey that lies ahead of you. Whether you think that's a good thing or not is a political Rorschach test.
God save Japan, one of the last great countries left on earth.
I care about my people, which is the English Diaspora, which includes Yanks, Kiwis, Canucks, the English, and us Aussies, as well as our Precursor Nation the German Diaspora. for Homeland (Australia), Motherland (Britain), and Fatherland (Germany).
Replying to @ChristianHeiens
I think it’s sort of fair for Europeans to seethe over comments like us “bailing out” Europe twice when in reality we totally fucked Europe and our civilization by getting involved in matters that really had nothing to do with us.
For example, in WW1- without our involvement the negotiated peace would not have been so in favor of the allies, possibly preventing the rise of the Nazis and the new world order of liberalism that came after.
A guy I know in the trades works at one of Ontario's smaller specialized steel mills. He's one of the people who had to rebuild it.
After NAFTA, the American company that owned the mill decided to shut it down. They didn't just lock the doors and walk away. They sent workers in with torches and had them cut the production lines apart, piece by piece, so nobody could ever start them up again.
The mill wasn't broken. It could still make steel, and that was exactly the problem. If a Canadian buyer picked it up and fired it back up, it would compete with the American plants across the border. So they made sure that could never happen. The whole mill was later sold for scrap, and guys like him spent years rebuilding it from the ground up, slowly, at enormous cost, just to get back what we already had.
All of that so an American company could shift production home and never worry about a Canadian competitor again. That is sabotage. And is par of the course in a free market neoliberal economic system. Foreign profits are treated as more sacred then hundreds of high quality industrial jobs.
When I was at Stelco, I got talking with a supervisor who told me a story I've never forgotten. Stelco had done the research and development on special alloys for car doors. It was stronger steel, which meant automakers could build better-engineered cars that were lighter, using less metal, faster and more fuel-efficient. That's real industrial knowledge, the kind a serious country guards with its life.
Then US Steel bought Stelco in 2007. According to the people who were there, those alloy recipes went south. Canadians did the R&D, and then Americans walked off with the results.
You don't have to take the shop floor's word for it, either, because the public record is damning enough on its own. US Steel made promises to Ottawa about jobs and production as a condition of the takeover, and it broke them so badly that the federal government took it to court. By 2013, steelmaking in Hamilton was shut down. By 2014, the company was in creditor protection, and the workers, the pensioners and the city of Hamilton were left holding the bag.
You'd think our country would learn something from that. We didn't. In 2024, we let another American company, Cleveland-Cliffs, buy Stelco. This fall it announced it would lay off up to 500 workers in Hamilton and Nanticoke, and when Ottawa objected, the CEO said he was ready to take Canada to court.
Same story, new owner. When push comes to shove, a foreign company's loyalty is to its own plants back home. Of course it is. That's what foreign ownership means, and the only people who ever seem surprised by it are our politicians.
And it doesn't stop with buying our companies. Sometimes foreign capital doesn't even bother with ownership. It just pays someone to stand in the way. Most of our oil goes to a single customer, the United States, at a discount, because every attempt to build our way to other markets gets buried in protests, lawsuits and delays. Vivian Krause has spent years following the money behind those campaigns, and much of it leads back to American foundations. Alberta's public inquiry found more than a billion dollars in foreign money flowing to Canadian environmental groups.
So American money pays Canadian activists to keep Canadian oil landlocked, and American refiners get to buy it cheap. Nice arrangement, if you're American.
Which raises the obvious question: why do our politicians keep letting all this happen? Some of them are too stupid to understand what's going on. But the bigger reason is that the people running this country have never really seen industry as something to build. To the Laurentian class, industry is something to skim.
They look at Canadian industry the way an extractive feudal lord looks at a peasant's harvest. Over decades, they've built an entire economy of progressive make-work on top of it. Credentialed consultants, compliance officers, diversity offices, environmental reviews that run for years and produce nothing but paperwork and legal fees, sustainability reports nobody reads. None of it is tied to results. A mill doesn't make better steel because it filed another impact assessment, and a factory doesn't ship more product because it hired a diversity coordinator.
That was never the point. These jobs exist to employ the Laurentian class's own people, reward its allies and keep its grip on power. It's patronage dressed up as virtue.
And our industry pays for all of it. Every Canadian company carries a stack of indirect fiefdom taxes, from environmental payments that work more like extortion than protection, to the HR and DEI overhead, to the consultants hired to navigate rules written by other consultants. Every dollar spent feeding that machine is a dollar not spent on equipment, on workers or on research. Then the same people turn around and ask why Canadian industry can't compete.
Compare that with China. Say what you want about it, but China cares about building things. It judges its officials by what gets built. We judge ours by what gets announced. Our system rewards siphoning, so siphoning is what we get, and the progressives drain the wealth out of our industry year after year and call it governance. When Chinese officials get caught siphoning they get executed. Being a corrupt official in China is very dangerous.
If you were hoping Mark Carney would change any of this, he hasn't. He can't, because he doesn't even perceive the problem.
Carney is a banker, and to a banker every problem looks like something a bank can fix. His answer to a hollowed-out industrial base is more loans, more funds and more financing vehicles. What he won't touch is the environment that's strangling our industry in the first place: the fiefdom taxes, the regulatory maze, the foreign ownership. He isn't putting out the fire. He's pouring more fuel on it and calling it "investment".
The best example is his enthusiasm for a defence bank, as if rearming a country mostly comes down to financing government procurement. But a military isn't a balance sheet, and you can't rearm a society that no longer believes in itself. For generations, the Laurentian class has poisoned the cultural legacy of this country. They taught Canadians to be embarrassed by their history, to apologize for their ancestors and to treat their own nation as a problem to be managed. Then they act surprised when young Canadians feel no real attachment to the country they're being asked to defend.
You can't fix that with a loan. You fix it by giving people a country worth believing in again, and that starts with taking back control of what we build.
So ask the obvious question. Why are people demoralized? Why are young Canadians dying of fentanyl in the same towns their grandparents built? Look at what was done to those towns. The jobs that paid a living wage are gone, the kind that let a man who showed up and worked hard buy a house and raise a family. They were shipped south or cut apart with torches. The communities themselves have been transformed by immigration at a pace nobody ever voted for. And the homes on their streets have been inflated far beyond their reach, so an entire generation could be bled dry in one massive wealth transfer to baby boomers and existing homeowners.
Then Ottawa wonders why the Forces struggle to recruit. Defend what, exactly? A country that took your job, priced you out of your hometown and remade your community without asking you? What the Laurentian class has done to this generation is worse than losing a war. At least a defeated country knows who its occupier is.
That means cutting off the foreign money first. Remember those American foundations bankrolling the fight against our pipelines? That ends. No more foreign funding for Canadian NGOs, full stop. These groups can raise their money from Canadians or not at all. And if you take foreign money to physically stop Canadian industry, chaining yourself to the bulldozers on a pipeline site, you go to prison like any other industrial saboteur. Dress it up in whatever cause you like. The cell is the same size.
Next, we sharply restrict foreign ownership of strategic industry. Where foreign owners have already gutted our assets, we nationalize them and settle the account. They get what the asset is worth, minus everything they owe us: the broken promises, the subsidies, the pension holes and the cleanup bill. For some of them, that comes to zero. Let them hold the bag for once.
Nor is that some radical new idea. Conservatives built Ontario Hydro. Quebec nationalized its power companies under the slogan "maîtres chez nous," masters in our own house. Both founding peoples of this country have done it before, and only the Laurentian class pretends it's unthinkable.
From there, we protect what we invent. Stelco's alloy recipes should never have been allowed to leave the country, and stealing Canadian industrial secrets should be treated as the crime it is. The Ministry of Industry to map every factory in Canada and what it can produce, quickly and without a decade of consultations, because we can't rebuild an industrial base that we haven't even counted. And we make sure no one ever takes a torch to a Canadian mill again. If a company wants to gut a mill's capacity, it asks permission first, and the Crown or a Canadian buyer gets first refusal. Close a plant if you have to. But you don't get to destroy one.
Above all, we need to put builders back in charge. That means scaling up our engineering programs and putting engineer-minded people at the head of our companies instead of lawyers and consultants. We design our economy around technical advancement and efficient production, and we reward the people who actually make things. Do that, and Canada would kick everybody's ass.
Instead, look at what we have. Foreign owners torch our mills and walk off with our research. Foreign money pays activists to block our pipelines. A domestic elite taxes what's left to fund its own patronage. And a banker prime minister thinks the cure is more credit.
That is the record of the Laurentian class. They inherited a country that built a railway across a continent and steel mills that could compete with anyone in the world, and they turned it into a fiefdom with a branch plant economy.
It's a total failure, and they should be held accountable fore it.
Zyacon16 retweeted
A guy I know in the trades works at one of Ontario's smaller specialized steel mills. He's one of the people who had to rebuild it.
After NAFTA, the American company that owned the mill decided to shut it down. They didn't just lock the doors and walk away. They sent workers in with torches and had them cut the production lines apart, piece by piece, so nobody could ever start them up again.
The mill wasn't broken. It could still make steel, and that was exactly the problem. If a Canadian buyer picked it up and fired it back up, it would compete with the American plants across the border. So they made sure that could never happen. The whole mill was later sold for scrap, and guys like him spent years rebuilding it from the ground up, slowly, at enormous cost, just to get back what we already had.
All of that so an American company could shift production home and never worry about a Canadian competitor again. That is sabotage. And is par of the course in a free market neoliberal economic system. Foreign profits are treated as more sacred then hundreds of high quality industrial jobs.
When I was at Stelco, I got talking with a supervisor who told me a story I've never forgotten. Stelco had done the research and development on special alloys for car doors. It was stronger steel, which meant automakers could build better-engineered cars that were lighter, using less metal, faster and more fuel-efficient. That's real industrial knowledge, the kind a serious country guards with its life.
Then US Steel bought Stelco in 2007. According to the people who were there, those alloy recipes went south. Canadians did the R&D, and then Americans walked off with the results.
You don't have to take the shop floor's word for it, either, because the public record is damning enough on its own. US Steel made promises to Ottawa about jobs and production as a condition of the takeover, and it broke them so badly that the federal government took it to court. By 2013, steelmaking in Hamilton was shut down. By 2014, the company was in creditor protection, and the workers, the pensioners and the city of Hamilton were left holding the bag.
You'd think our country would learn something from that. We didn't. In 2024, we let another American company, Cleveland-Cliffs, buy Stelco. This fall it announced it would lay off up to 500 workers in Hamilton and Nanticoke, and when Ottawa objected, the CEO said he was ready to take Canada to court.
Same story, new owner. When push comes to shove, a foreign company's loyalty is to its own plants back home. Of course it is. That's what foreign ownership means, and the only people who ever seem surprised by it are our politicians.
And it doesn't stop with buying our companies. Sometimes foreign capital doesn't even bother with ownership. It just pays someone to stand in the way. Most of our oil goes to a single customer, the United States, at a discount, because every attempt to build our way to other markets gets buried in protests, lawsuits and delays. Vivian Krause has spent years following the money behind those campaigns, and much of it leads back to American foundations. Alberta's public inquiry found more than a billion dollars in foreign money flowing to Canadian environmental groups.
So American money pays Canadian activists to keep Canadian oil landlocked, and American refiners get to buy it cheap. Nice arrangement, if you're American.
Which raises the obvious question: why do our politicians keep letting all this happen? Some of them are too stupid to understand what's going on. But the bigger reason is that the people running this country have never really seen industry as something to build. To the Laurentian class, industry is something to skim.
They look at Canadian industry the way an extractive feudal lord looks at a peasant's harvest. Over decades, they've built an entire economy of progressive make-work on top of it. Credentialed consultants, compliance officers, diversity offices, environmental reviews that run for years and produce nothing but paperwork and legal fees, sustainability reports nobody reads. None of it is tied to results. A mill doesn't make better steel because it filed another impact assessment, and a factory doesn't ship more product because it hired a diversity coordinator.
That was never the point. These jobs exist to employ the Laurentian class's own people, reward its allies and keep its grip on power. It's patronage dressed up as virtue.
And our industry pays for all of it. Every Canadian company carries a stack of indirect fiefdom taxes, from environmental payments that work more like extortion than protection, to the HR and DEI overhead, to the consultants hired to navigate rules written by other consultants. Every dollar spent feeding that machine is a dollar not spent on equipment, on workers or on research. Then the same people turn around and ask why Canadian industry can't compete.
Compare that with China. Say what you want about it, but China cares about building things. It judges its officials by what gets built. We judge ours by what gets announced. Our system rewards siphoning, so siphoning is what we get, and the progressives drain the wealth out of our industry year after year and call it governance. When Chinese officials get caught siphoning they get executed. Being a corrupt official in China is very dangerous.
If you were hoping Mark Carney would change any of this, he hasn't. He can't, because he doesn't even perceive the problem.
Carney is a banker, and to a banker every problem looks like something a bank can fix. His answer to a hollowed-out industrial base is more loans, more funds and more financing vehicles. What he won't touch is the environment that's strangling our industry in the first place: the fiefdom taxes, the regulatory maze, the foreign ownership. He isn't putting out the fire. He's pouring more fuel on it and calling it "investment".
The best example is his enthusiasm for a defence bank, as if rearming a country mostly comes down to financing government procurement. But a military isn't a balance sheet, and you can't rearm a society that no longer believes in itself. For generations, the Laurentian class has poisoned the cultural legacy of this country. They taught Canadians to be embarrassed by their history, to apologize for their ancestors and to treat their own nation as a problem to be managed. Then they act surprised when young Canadians feel no real attachment to the country they're being asked to defend.
You can't fix that with a loan. You fix it by giving people a country worth believing in again, and that starts with taking back control of what we build.
So ask the obvious question. Why are people demoralized? Why are young Canadians dying of fentanyl in the same towns their grandparents built? Look at what was done to those towns. The jobs that paid a living wage are gone, the kind that let a man who showed up and worked hard buy a house and raise a family. They were shipped south or cut apart with torches. The communities themselves have been transformed by immigration at a pace nobody ever voted for. And the homes on their streets have been inflated far beyond their reach, so an entire generation could be bled dry in one massive wealth transfer to baby boomers and existing homeowners.
Then Ottawa wonders why the Forces struggle to recruit. Defend what, exactly? A country that took your job, priced you out of your hometown and remade your community without asking you? What the Laurentian class has done to this generation is worse than losing a war. At least a defeated country knows who its occupier is.
That means cutting off the foreign money first. Remember those American foundations bankrolling the fight against our pipelines? That ends. No more foreign funding for Canadian NGOs, full stop. These groups can raise their money from Canadians or not at all. And if you take foreign money to physically stop Canadian industry, chaining yourself to the bulldozers on a pipeline site, you go to prison like any other industrial saboteur. Dress it up in whatever cause you like. The cell is the same size.
Next, we sharply restrict foreign ownership of strategic industry. Where foreign owners have already gutted our assets, we nationalize them and settle the account. They get what the asset is worth, minus everything they owe us: the broken promises, the subsidies, the pension holes and the cleanup bill. For some of them, that comes to zero. Let them hold the bag for once.
Nor is that some radical new idea. Conservatives built Ontario Hydro. Quebec nationalized its power companies under the slogan "maîtres chez nous," masters in our own house. Both founding peoples of this country have done it before, and only the Laurentian class pretends it's unthinkable.
From there, we protect what we invent. Stelco's alloy recipes should never have been allowed to leave the country, and stealing Canadian industrial secrets should be treated as the crime it is. The Ministry of Industry to map every factory in Canada and what it can produce, quickly and without a decade of consultations, because we can't rebuild an industrial base that we haven't even counted. And we make sure no one ever takes a torch to a Canadian mill again. If a company wants to gut a mill's capacity, it asks permission first, and the Crown or a Canadian buyer gets first refusal. Close a plant if you have to. But you don't get to destroy one.
Above all, we need to put builders back in charge. That means scaling up our engineering programs and putting engineer-minded people at the head of our companies instead of lawyers and consultants. We design our economy around technical advancement and efficient production, and we reward the people who actually make things. Do that, and Canada would kick everybody's ass.
Instead, look at what we have. Foreign owners torch our mills and walk off with our research. Foreign money pays activists to block our pipelines. A domestic elite taxes what's left to fund its own patronage. And a banker prime minister thinks the cure is more credit.
That is the record of the Laurentian class. They inherited a country that built a railway across a continent and steel mills that could compete with anyone in the world, and they turned it into a fiefdom with a branch plant economy.
It's a total failure, and they should be held accountable fore it.
Zyacon16 retweeted
The Sagas are there to teach us about the dynamic of life and Nature. Gods have personalities, just like men do - in their stories, they display deceit and cunning to achieve certain goals - just like men do.
These stories also point out the costs of using these tactics - which is the point. The reader must apply these teachings into his or her own life to be better capable of making balanced choices.
The Sagas make rigorous use of metaphor and allegory so we can envision these concepts and recognise/apply these things into our own lives. Unlike the bible, these aren't dogma. Moral ambiguity is a real thing - so we must learn how to go about them, with honour and betterment of Kin and community in mind.
Christian moral grandstanding is often hypocritical in this regard - when reading the old testament especially, we can see many morally ambiguous orders and acts from the Jewish patriarchal God; such as ordering people to dash newborns against rocks or massacring entire enemy populations, including innocent women and children, and destroying entire civilisations to create living space for the people of Israel to thrive in.
Lastly, our Sagas aren't a "holy book" or an exact "instruction manual," (as opposed to the function the bible has to Christians,) they serve to talk about these dynamics and inspire the reader to ponder over these concepts, and how to approach them with honour within their own lives.
If you are reading the Sagas in the literalist sense, you do not understand its function. They are not to be approached in the same way Christians approach their bible.
The thing about neo-paganism is that the gods of Norse mythology are hardly admirable figures. They’re not even particularly likeable.
They weren’t worshipped out of love and devotion, but largely out of obligation and self-interest. It was quid pro quo: serve the gods, earn their favour, advance yourself.
That’s why, when Marvel wanted to make Thor a hero, they had to make him less like the cruel, selfish Thor of Norse mythology and more like Christ: humble, self-sacrificial, and willing to lay down his life for others.
The irony is that to make a pagan god admirable, they had to make him less pagan and more Christian.
Zyacon16 retweeted
I sincerely believe the biggest risk from AI is doomers inside the labs deliberately creating dangerous-but-not-extinction-level events to manufacture consent for a global AI regulatory framework. Do not trust or employ utilitarians with an eschatology.
Zyacon16 retweeted
Replying to @ArtemisConsort
> In my experience at least, your political opinions don’t actually prevent women from dating you.
It depends on the woman.
I dated a Brazilian communist and though we agreed about nothing political and would debate for hours at a time, that made no difference in the relationship.
Then I dated a woman from New Jersey who, the instant she noticed I was not onboard with the John Kerry candidacy, she broke up with me.
All the fantastic women I have know or dated were able to discuss politics without becoming hostile and vindictive. I would advise that expressing opinions is best because it helps to filter in the most desirable women.
Zyacon16 retweeted
In my experience at least, your political opinions don’t actually prevent women from dating you. You can disagree strongly on specific issues, including issues related to feminism or gender roles, and it’s fine. What a lot of right-wing men are mistaking for political exclusion is actually the deep female drive to reject losers and whiners. Rightism is an institutional loser right now, and that’s largely what they’re reacting to. But that doesn’t mean you have to have a loser mindset. Be a little insane. Hold nothing back. Don’t be preemptively defensive about your views. Be loose and casual and good-humored. Be genuinely confident. Don’t be an obnoxious pedant. Just let your truth flow freely from you without grasping or insecurity. Laugh often and well. Trust in fate/God/wyrd. Relax.
What women absolutely will not tolerate is the impression that you’re waiting on someone’s permission to achieve your goals or state your opinion or assert yourself. In the modern environment, as a rightist, not doing this requires being a little bit insane. So be a little insane. Dance madly through the world. Let go of your need for approval, or your need to make a point, and just be. The animal assurance of your confidence is more important than checking off a list of positions.
And it’s more fun anyway! Just live and feel and be free. Shed the shackles of discourse and rationalism and just dance.
Zyacon16 retweeted
Honestly didnt even seem that difficult, didnt even touch health/education/transport
Just reduced welfare spending and binned a few pointless things that the private sector already does.
I wanted to visualise Britain's state spending ahead of the Budget, so I've vibe coded an app which presents it as a disk drive.
Take a look at the tradeoffs and see if you can make the budget fit:
britains-disk.pages.dev
Zyacon16 retweeted
Statistically Russia has a higher percentage of people with blue eyes and blond hair
unavailable
Zyacon16 retweeted
One of my favourite jokes I've read on twitter is:
"Turks are the only people who get angry if you tell them they're the indigenous people of their country"
Zyacon16 retweeted
>Fighting a German in a nationalist internet fight is like fighting a super villain.They can attack the things you love, but you can't attack anything they love, because they don't love anything.
They hate their own national football team more than anyone else does.
Replying to @Linahuaa
Fighting a German in a nationalist internet fight is like fighting a super villain.
They can attack the things you love, but you can't attack anything they love, because they don't love anything.
They hate their own national football team more than anyone else does.
Zyacon16 retweeted
I have noticed recently dealing with several Christians on and offline...
It isn't that christians can't cede universalism. It's that a coherent christian shouldn't, because the universalism is load bearing in the logic..... the Great Commission is "all nations," the imago Dei is in every man, the very word Catholic literally means universal. A christian" who says the Gospel is only for his folk is contradicting himself. So the coherent Christian is universalist and a coherent pagan is local particularist... and we are logically incompatible at the root.
Christianity will never be free of universalism... it isn't dead in a Christian ever, it's only dormant. It's a seed. And seeds germinate... under revival. The Great Awakenings, the missionary movement, current social justice Christianity... every one reactivated the universalism and dragged Christians leftward again and again. You can't kill a seed by ignoring it.... you can only quarantine it, and quarantines break...
Pagans: Concentric rings of obligation, inner-first our innangarðs. Obligation radiates outward but weakens with distance. The stranger is útangarðs outside the fence, not our problem.
Christianity: keeps the rings but adds a commanded outer ring. "Who is my neighbor?" and the answer is the Samaritan, the foreigner, the enemy. Or as said by Paul: "neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free." The outer ring becomes morally binding and thus not optional.
Liberalism: keeps only the outer ring, and dissolves the inner ones. You become a fungible token of labor... equal to every other person, and your family, nation, and blood become accidents and entirely morally irrelevant.
Zyacon16 retweeted
Everyone analyzes sluttiness through an individualistic lens, but the real problem with sluttiness is that, at a certain scale, it sort of ruins the game theory of dating for everyone. The more sluts there are in the dating pool, the less incentivized highly desirable men are to commit to any woman in particular, and the more likely it is that the average man will have to be married to an ex-slut (i.e., a bitter woman who chose to exit the game and settle) who in all likelihoods will be incapable of loving him. Furthermore, because more women are willing to put out, women who don’t are at a disadvantage and come across as prude or cold. So, more women are pressured into putting out quickly, which reinforces more of the above
i understand why women dislike slutty women—the threat is obvious there. but why do men hate sluts so much? men should like sluts.
i can see someone having a preference for their own girlfriend to not be a slut (tho sluts have high libidos and know what they’re doing!), but why are men so mad about random girls being slutty? the only thing i can think is that they’re mad that the girl seemingly had sex with everyone except for them.
Zyacon16 retweeted
The French destroyed the classics and monarchy. Man.
youtu.be/D7Sk-tHk1n4











































