Wealth💥 retweeted
an email marketing teammate that doesn’t need constant hand-holding? @nitrosendx has an interesting idea with grok bot.
🤝 Paid partnership
Your new teammates don't sleep.
Give Grok Bot one link and it sets itself up as a full-stack email marketer. It designs your launch email, sends you a test, and you say send it.
Proud to be a SpaceX Super Intelligence launch partner @SpaceXSI
nitrosend.com/integrations/g…
Wealth💥 retweeted
a website link becomes a test email through grok bot. @nitrosendx, that’s a useful shortcut.
🤝 Paid partnership
Your new teammates don't sleep.
Give Grok Bot one link and it sets itself up as a full-stack email marketer. It designs your launch email, sends you a test, and you say send it.
Proud to be a SpaceX Super Intelligence launch partner @SpaceXSI
nitrosend.com/integrations/g…
Wealth💥 retweeted
nitrosend designs the email, sends a test, and lets me decide when it goes out. @nitrosendx
🤝 Paid partnership
Wealth💥 retweeted
watching nitrosend turn a single link into an email workflow inside grok bot is actually wild. @nitrosendx
🤝 Paid partnership
Wealth💥 retweeted
nitrosend handles the setup in grok bot. i review the test, then decide when to send. @nitrosendx
🤝 Paid partnership
Wealth💥 retweeted
Crypto payments don’t have to be messy. ArcenPay lets you charge for your product with subscriptions, payment links, and even AI agent payments, all from a wallet.
I wrote a simple guide on how it works and why you should try it. 👇
Wealth💥 retweeted
The first thing I’d tell a friend about quantum computing and crypto: your wallet is secured by math today’s computers can’t crack. A powerful enough quantum computer could, using Shor’s algorithm to derive private keys from public ones. That means ownership itself could be faked. Attackers can even “harvest now, decrypt later.” The fix is moving to post-quantum signatures before that day, not after.
Sharing my take for the Week 3 October Raffle with @QMSNetwork
🔐
#QuantumComputing #Crypto
Friends hello, a write-up that landed on the QuipSwap side yesterday went into the audit and formal verification details.
@quipnetwork 's blog notes that Oak Security’s September 24, 2026 report is public, that there were no critical issues requiring a redesign, and that nearly all major and minor findings were resolved.
The protocol logic is modeled in EasyCrypt; machine-checked theorems show exactly two terminal states: a successful swap or a refund.
In the commit step each side locks its own assets into the contract on its own chain, the hash of the secret is recorded, and the timers start.
On execute the secret is revealed so the other side can claim; if the deadline passes both reclaim exactly what they put in.
With no shared pool sitting in the middle the classic bridge attack surface is absent.
I am reading this as an audited bridgeless settlement flow.
(📷According to X rules, a paid partnership has been selected. It is not investment advice or a paid partnership.)
Wealth💥 retweeted
Kinda funny when you think about it, AI can code, design, analyze data and do all sorts of stuff now, but getting one AI agent to hire another and actually pay for the work? Still not that simple lol
Imagine I hire an agent to audit a smart contract
It quotes me $20, I say okay, but who's holding that $20? What if it sends me some half-assed report, or what if it finishes the job and I just refuse to pay 💀
Humans already fight over this stuff all the time, now imagine AI agents doing it 😂
Been looking into @termix_ai lately and this is actually the part they're trying to figure out
On agent.family, there's an escrow system to hold the payment, the agent submits its work, the client gets to review it, and if something goes wrong there's a way to raise a dispute
All of this is built around their AACP protocol
But tbh, what I'm most curious about with TermiX isn't how many agents they can get registered
I wanna see how many of them actually land jobs, finish the work and get paid
Cause having a million registered agents sounds impressive, but if nobody's hiring anyone, isn't that just a massive AI directory? =)))
Idk about you guys, but the idea of AI hiring AI is pretty interesting to me
Still think figuring out who checks the quality of all that work is gonna be a whole different story tho
🤝 Paid partnership
Wealth💥 retweeted
Good Morning!
A virtual city can tell a story through the decisions of its players. Some may focus on building their presence, while others look for opportunities that change the direction of their progress.
That’s what makes @fomopoly_rh an interesting project to follow. Its land-based concept creates a setting where ownership and player decisions can become part of the overall experience.
With $DEAL connected to the ecosystem, the balance between accessibility, clear rules, and engaging mechanics will be important to watch.
I believe the best on-chain games are those that make complex systems understandable without removing the challenge. Fomopoly has an opportunity to explore that balance as its world develops.
Wealth💥 retweeted
From Launch to CoinGecko in Hours. The Speed Run is Real
Getting listed on CoinGecko usually takes weeks of vetting, liquidity checks, and bureaucracy. @RebateLaunch launched this morning, and they are already live and tracked on CoinGecko.
Let that sink in.
Why This is a Massive Flex:
CoinGecko does not list vaporware or unverified contracts. This is instant, institutional-grade validation that their tech, liquidity, and on-chain volume are 100% legitimate.
The Momentum is Undeniable:
• Morning: Official Launch
• Afternoon: Gate Alpha tracking
• Now: Live on CoinGecko
• All while distributing $78K+ in bonus tokens and pushing hourly payouts to holders.
This isn't "roadmap promises." This is execution at light speed.
If you are still grinding the @starlisting Round 2 campaign (ends Nov 2), this is your ultimate confirmation. You aren't farming points for a ghost chain; you are backing a protocol that delivers real visibility and utility from Minute 1
When a project goes from launch to CoinGecko in hours, imagine where it will be in a month.
Don't fade real execution.
NFA DYOR
🔗 starlist.world/r/EMEF0815
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
Wealth💥 retweeted
just visited a website and saw it create better ads in seconds. didn’t expect it to be that fast 😭 fastlane is onto something here.
🤝 Paid partnership
Wealth💥 retweeted
A stock on a blockchain is still just a stock.
Tokenizing solved who can buy it. It didn't build anything around it, and that gap is why I joined the @2FactorFinance Points Program.
Two terms first. Capital structure is how risk and cost get split between holders. A tranche is a slice of an asset's risk with its own rules.
→ Access is solved. As of September 19, Coinbase's tokenized stocks had crossed $1 billion in decentralized exchange volume over 30 days, per 2Factor's announcement.
→ Structure isn't. Who carries which risk, and who pays for the leverage?
→ 2Factor splits an asset's volatility into two perpetual tranches: a senior side with deep downside protection, and a leveraged junior side with no liquidation risk and no external hedging counterparty. The junior side pays the senior side a premium for the leverage.
The mismatch shows up in sizing. A fixed 2x or 3x ignores volatility. At Bitcoin's volatility the range where leverage helps compounding closes early, so the junior targets about 1.33x for cbBTC, and calmer assets get more room. Cost is the other half: conventional leverage is priced against the cost of shorts, and 2Factor prices it against the cost of stable capital.
2Factor is on Base and works together with Coinbase to bring Kelly-optimized leverage onchain, a good use case for Coinbase's tokenized stocks ecosystem. It's live on Base as a capped-liquidity beta, Bitcoin first, with tokenized securities a later phase. The exposure still carries risk.
I joined the Points Program. Season 1 rewards completed actions: social activities, education and referrals. Marks come only from verified actions, so buying, depositing or holding earns none, and Marks have no cash value. The top 10 on the leaderboard split 1 BTC, paid in cbBTC, subject to eligibility checks. Join with my link if you want in. I may earn Marks if you do. 18+, not open in the US or other restricted regions, terms apply.
points.2factor.finance/r/289…
My view: tokenized assets will be judged by the structure around them, not by how many people can buy them. If tokenized stocks need more than access, what's the first piece of structure you'd add?
Wealth💥 retweeted
Exploring opportunities in crypto is one thing. Being able to access your funds quickly and conveniently is just as important.
Bitget Wallet's Bank Transfer feature helps bridge the gap between crypto and everyday banking, allowing users to convert supported assets like USDT into NGN and transfer directly to a Nigerian bank account.
What impressed me most was the speed. ⚡
During my transaction, the money landed in my bank account in less than 1 minute! No lengthy waiting, just a straightforward cash-out experience.
In this video, I walk through the entire process, from reviewing the exchange rate and confirming the transaction to receiving the bank credit alert.
Whether you're exploring Web3, participating in the Meme Trade Quest, or simply managing your crypto, convenient cash-out options make a real difference.
A smooth crypto experience shouldn't end at trading. Accessing your funds matters just as much.
Watch my experience below. 👇
@BitgetWalletAF @BitgetWallet
#CashOutWithBW #MemeTradeQuest
Wealth💥 retweeted
$10M bankroll and a $70K race?
rolly just went live and they didn't come empty handed.
season 1 is here, limits are up and beta players have rewards waiting.
if you played during beta, go check yours now.
🤝 Paid partnership
Rolly is officially live!
$10M added to our Public Bankroll on @arbitrum
Season 1 starts now with a $70,000 race.
Roll in now 👉 rolly.io?r=PLAY
Wealth💥 retweeted
Your ₦45,000 concert ticket says ABUJA.
The organizer moves the show to LAGOS and insists nothing has changed because the event wasn’t cancelled.
But what if your booking terms promised a refund for venue changes?
A smart contract can hold your money, but it cannot read the updated event page, interpret the refund policy, or determine whether the agreement was violated.
It needs an oracle to report the outcome.
That’s the gap @GenLayer’s Intelligent Contracts address.
Written in Python, they can access the live web and use language models to evaluate available evidence against the agreed conditions.
One validator proposes a verdict. Others independently execute the contract using their own models. Disagreement triggers another round, while appeals allow further review.
Misleading evidence remains a risk, but the decision no longer depends solely on one external reporter.
The interesting distinction? An event can happen exactly as scheduled and still violate what someone paid for.
Now settle this dispute:
The organizer says the concert happened. The buyer says the agreement was broken.
Who deserves the ₦45,000?
Pick a side, identify TWO pieces of evidence you’d require, and explain what could change your verdict.
I want to see whether your standard would protect both parties when their stories conflict.
Wealth💥 retweeted
He says I pocketed his $15. I say I didn't see a penny.
We're both telling the truth.
He visited my shop to gossip, then asked me to purchase something the next day. Three days afterwards: "Where's the item?" I informed him I had received no cash. "You even put it in your pocket," he replied.
No transfer. No message. No bystander. I purchased it
personally to finish it.
What that experience taught me:
• Lock the $15 in code and the deposit is recorded, so nobody can contest receiving it
• Yet the network cannot confirm the errand took place
• A middleman must
guarantee it, and trust walks out with him
Intelligent Contracts on @GenLayer make him unnecessary. They open the order confirmation unprompted, then ask an AI: did he go shopping?
My memory failed once, so one AI alone won't decide it. A committee of validators, every one on an independent model, examines that very page and has to match. If it splits, a fresh leader attempts another run, and the losing side can appeal to a larger collective. A fabricated receipt might yet deceive them, but confidence settles no argument.
Remember your last dispute with zero proof. Which one document, agreed beforehand, would have ended it inside sixty seconds? Reply with yours; I'll say whether the panel could read it.