Alpha_Prime

AURA level ♾️

Muslim appeasement led to partition of India & creation of Pakistan. No new Jinnah Lites should be encouraged in the name of 'secularism' India has already been carved once. Never again. Rule of law supreme. Hopefully Uniform Civil Code would be discussed, debated & implemented.

There is one simple, straight-forward, historical answer to any of the 'points' of Sharjeel Imam - all talk of 'proportional representation' was settled with the creation of Pakistan. Anyone still seeking this may choose this option. It is available next door. And then if and when reunification happens, this can be discussed again. Till then, this discussion is meaningless. Simple. Straight.

This needs to go viral 👏🏻 Expose the reality behind the opposition’s false Vote Chori narrative 💯

What really happened at the Eiffel Tower? A fact-based look at the BAPS visit, the monks’ celibacy discipline, SETE’s staffing decisions, French law on equality & religious freedom. Facts before outrage. #baps #bapsparis #eiffeltower #paris #Hindutemple

Big Andhra govt move for Right to Education | 25% free admission likely in private schools @nagarjund with more details #AndhraPradesh #NChadrababuNaidu #RightToEducation #SoSouth

India needs BJP for next 100 years 🙌🏼

We are a prosperous community not frustrated- you envy us, and encroach our places of worship with malice intent. You have not read any of Jain Puranas, and just read yours - you will know how Rishabh Dev is revered in your texts. You are just a tool kit operating under fake name

Earlier, the approach to regulation was, “Prohibited unless permitted.” We are changing this approach to, “Permitted unless prohibited.” This means that if something is not legally prohibited, there is no need to seek permission at every step. The basic ideology is that the foundation of the relationship between the public and the government should not be suspicion, but trust. This thought is reflected in the Jan Vishwas Bill. That is why many offences were decriminalised. - PM @narendramodi

GTA 6 being leaked because they outsourced so much development to India is so fucking funny.

A 400-page evangelical handbook sold in Tamil Nadu says Murugan is Jesus. St Thomas brought him, the Tamils Indianised him, and the rest follows from there. - Devasena stands for Jewish Christians. - Valli stands for Gentiles waiting to be converted. - His twelve hands are the twelve apostles. - The kavadi is a forgotten reenactment of Christ carrying the cross John Samuel, then director of the Institute of Asian Studies, convened the first international conference on Skanda-Murugan in Chennai in 1998. He told scholars there that most researchers, himself included, believe Murugan was elevated from a historical person. In 2005, he went further and wrote that the Somaskanda icon, which shows Siva, Uma and the child Skanda together, is nothing but the revelation of the 'Christian Trinity'. And for all of this to work, one thing has to be true first. Murugan has to have started as a Tamil folk god or a dead chieftain, separate from Skanda, who was bolted on later by northerners. That is also the settled position in Tamil academia, and has been for fifty years. BUT here is the trouble with it. The six stars of the Pleiades are the Krittikas. They nurse the infant Skanda, which is why he has six faces and the name Karttikeya, son of the Krittikas. In Dravidian languages, 'min' means star and fish. So "six fish" on a Harappan seal also means "six stars". A Soviet Dravidian specialist read one four-sign group as aru-min-kaatalan, beloved son of the six stars. That is what Karttikeya means in Sanskrit. The seal reading is arguable. The Tamil epithet is not — it runs through Tamil literature for centuries. At Kalibangan, diggers found seven brick fireplaces on a ceremonial platform. Six in a row, one apart. That is exactly how Vedic ritual arranges the fires of seven priests. The Rigveda has the story before it has the name. A fire the gods did not light, found hidden in the waters, nursed by seven river-mothers who crowd around him like mares around a foal. The Mahabharata names him. The Krittikas see the blazing child, milk rises in them, each says 'esa mama putrah' (he is my son), and he takes six faces so all six can feed him. The Sangam-era Thirumurukattrupadai already gives Murugan six faces, the Pleiades and Agni. It describes Brahmins doing his puja and calls them men of clans of yore, so not new arrivals 1,700 years ago. The same literature records the shamanic priestess sacrificing roosters to him. Nobody was separating anything. The full piece has the Harappan buffalo-slaying seal, the kavadi on seals from 3250 BCE, the Rigveda hymn about a fire the gods did not light, John Samuel of the Institute of Asian Studies calling the Somaskanda icon a revelation of the Trinity, and the temple the 2004 tsunami uncovered. Aravindan Neelakandan (@arvindneela) writes — The Long, Insidious Campaign To Separate Skanda From Murugan swarajyamag.com/culture/the-…

More than a year after Marka-e-Haq, India refuses to face the harsh reality. Instead of conceding defeat in a failed venture, India has decided to colour history in her preferred hues. To achieve this mutilation of history, Indian content creators have produced a highly dramatised, coloured and factually inaccurate account of so-called Operation Sindoor, packaged as a documentary featuring senior political and military leadership of India. For its lack of nuance and seriousness, the documentary can be characterised as a tragedy and a comedy at the same time. Selectively edited interviews, emotional narration and cinematic Bollywood style reconstruction have been used to alter established facts and rewrite the operational outcome. Tellingly, the documentary’s account contains fundamental contradictions, exposing a belated attempt to manufacture a domestically palatable version of events. The documentary attempts to establish a deliberate linkage between an address by the Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff on 16 April 2025 and the Pahalgam incident of 22 April 2025, conjuring a conspiracy theory out of nothing. More significantly, India subsequently claimed that the three alleged perpetrators of Pahalgam were identified and eliminated on 28 July 2025, 82 days after so called Operation Sindoor. Yet the documentary presents so called Operation Sindoor as the punishment for those responsible for Pahalgam. If the alleged perpetrators were eliminated on 28 July, India must explain, who it claims to have punished on 7 May 2025. The claim of “100 percent mission success” is equally detached from operational record. During Marka-e-Haq, Pakistan’s Armed Forces successfully thwarted Indian aggression and shot down 8 military aircraft. Pakistan subsequently conducted Operation Bunyanum Marsoos, employing Fatah precision-guided rockets & missiles, PAF precision munitions, long-range loitering munitions and precision artillery against 26 military targets, including facilities used to target Pakistani citizens, and entities involved in fomenting terrorism against Pakistan. The documentary itself further undermines its claim of clear Indian dominance. Indian military leadership acknowledges extensive Pakistani missile, drone and air activity, sustained engagements along the Line of Control and the activation of Indian air-defence systems. Such admissions are difficult to reconcile with its repeated portrayal of Pakistan being decisively defeated. The documentary’s account of the cessation of hostilities is no less revealing. Its own narration confirms that hostilities ended through communication between the two DGMOs and an agreed cessation of military action. This alone contradicts the attempt to portray Op Sindoor as a unilateral Indian military triumph. A cessation of hostilities, facilitated by US, cannot subsequently be repurposed as evidence of unconditional victory. The documentary also contradicts itself on escalation dynamics. It repeatedly emphasises surprise, precision, deep strikes and escalation dominance, while simultaneously claiming that India deliberately limited the conflict and provided Pakistan an “exit window”. These competing claims expose the production as a carefully constructed domestic narrative rather than an objective military account. India has not declassified the truth. It has cobbled together a propaganda video to project a military blunder as a successful endeavour. No amount of cinematic reconstruction can change the chronology, erase aircraft losses, conceal military casualties, alter the military engagements that actually took place or convert a battlefield defeat into a self-proclaimed victory. Pakistan has no need to manufacture a narrative around Marka-e-Haq. The operational record, battlefield evidence, diplomatic exchanges and India’s own subsequent statements speak for themselves and are widely acknowledged by international community. Pakistan remains committed to regional peace and stability. At the same time, the Armed Forces of Pakistan remain fully prepared and capable of defending the country’s sovereignty, territorial integrity and national interests. Any future military misadventure will be met with a firm, decisive and disproportionate response, after which no amount of cinematic perjury will be able to provide any face-saving to India.

A former full-time RSS pracharak has written to Amit Shah and Priyank Kharge demanding that the RSS, VHP and Bajrang Dal be declared terrorist organisations. Yashwant Sahdev Shinde served the Sangh for 25 years. He says he quit after being asked to join a bomb-preparation and training team. In 2022 he filed a sworn affidavit in the Nanded CBI court detailing alleged bomb-making camps in 2003 under VHP leader Milind Parande, weapons training linked to Indresh Kumar, and a coordinated plan of blasts meant to polarise and help the BJP electorally. He has now gone further. He wants Mohan Bhagwat, Indresh Kumar and Parande investigated and arrested for their alleged roles in the string of 2000s blasts that were repeatedly blamed on “fringe elements” or Muslims. The same organisations that lecture the nation on nationalism and patriotism face a demand for ban from one of their own long-time workers. The same ecosystem that weaponises every allegation against opponents has no answer when the allegation comes from inside. Courts closed many of those cases. Acquittals followed. The questions Shinde raises did not disappear with the verdicts. When an insider who spent decades in the organisation calls it what he does, the burden of explanation shifts. Silence is no longer an option. A lot is here to conclude from. It’s now or never. #RSS #BanRSS #BJP

"Revenue Sharing had reached a point where its incentives were misaligned. Creators should be focused on bringing net new content to the platform instead of maximizing payouts" Absolutely 100% yes. Day in and day out of garbage ragebaiting racebaiting posts to maximize $$ Hope the new program rewards those who actually *create* meaningful & interesting content