Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
One of the men in this picture is a politician currently serving 10 and a half years in prison for accepting Russian bribes. The other was his boss and doesn't think there's evidence of Russia interfering in UK politics.
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
Defrauded the UK taxpayer out of £120m
Not in prison
Never been prosecuted
Never paid back a penny
Still a peer
There's your two tier justice system
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
Reform: retrospectively changing the rules is outrageous
Also Reform: we are going to retrospectively remove the right of millions of people to stay in this country
bbc.co.uk/news/live/cre30znyā¦
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
As the Sunday Times breaks the news that Reformās bank froze its account during the General Election 2024 - likely because money laundering red flags were triggered- one has to ask again why have we had to wait ten fucking years for the authorities and most of the press seriously to scrutinise Nigel Farage ?
NEW: A convicted money launderer has operated at the highest level of UK politics for a decade. Why? Because Farage has enjoyed almost total impunity from the UK press.
In my new piece for @thenerve_news, I expose the decade of denial thatās enabled him to act with impunity
1/
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
āWe shall have a dictatorship without tears, a kind of painless concentration camp⦠where people will love their servitude.ā
Aldous Huxley (Brave New World), in 1961 - he could well have been talking about the Britain envisaged by Jenrick and Farage.
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
One of my longest-standing arguments is that we are not living in Orwellās 1984, where truth is centrally suppressed and censored by force (thatās former communist societies, modern-day China, Russia, North Korea).
We are living in something much closer to Huxleyās Brave New World.
The truth is not hidden - it is almost always readily available. But it is buried beneath an industrial quantity of noise: propaganda, outrage, half-truths, conspiracy theories, influencer theatre, algorithmic rage bait and an endless stream of content designed not to inform us, but to keep us emotionally stimulated.
The modern information system does not need to censor the truth when it can simply drown it in noise.
A fact no longer has to be disproven - it only has to be surrounded by a hundred competing claims, stripped of context and nuance, turned into partisan ammunition and pushed into the same feed as celebrity gossip, memes and 15 second videos engineered to deliver the fastest possible dopamine hit. By the time the truth reaches us, it appears as just another piece of content competing for our attention.
That is the more sophisticated form of control: not preventing people from knowing, but exhausting their capacity to care.
Orwell feared a world in which people would be deprived of information. Huxley feared a world in which they would be given so much distraction, stimulation and triviality that they would lose the desire to seek it.
The defining struggle of our age is therefore not simply between truth and censorship, but between truth and indifference.
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
Replying to @Gabriel_Pogrund
Gabriel, I am grateful for your work on this story. It is a vital piece of the puzzle that brings us closer to the truth.
However, many independent journalists who have been working on this for years are watching your sudden success with deep irony.
They are asking themselves what they did wrong. While they spent a decade uncovering these truths from the tireless work of @carolecadwalla and @peterjukes to the sharp investigations of @OneFinanceGuy, @nw_nicholas or @donmcgowan and many others, they were met with silence and isolation.
Now, it appears you and The Sunday Times are being hailed as the best journalists in the world for reporting what they have known, documented, and faced ridicule for so long.
As a citizen who has followed these independent voices for over a decade, I am compelled to ask a difficult question.
These journalists have been exposing the connections between @Nigel_Farage , the criminal underworld, US billionaires, the Epstein files, Trump, and Bannon for years.
They did not just face silence, they were actively gaslighted and portrayed as conspiracy theorists while holding onto hard, verifiable evidence.
The mainstream media did not just remain silent, they worked to conceal these facts and actively prevented the truth from reaching the public.
One must ask: if they were so deeply complicit in suppressing the truth for so long, are they not also part of the very circle they now report on?
Furthermore, Gabriel, I have a direct question for you: do you plan to investigate the role of Palantir and the situation in Cambridge?
These are key players who have surrounded Farage and were involved in recruiting for the Reform Party.
Why has this been kept in the dark?
Why is it that the mainstream media, which ignored and suppressed these findings for so long, has suddenly decided that this story is worth telling?
Was it the evidence itself, or did it simply take a green light from institutional authorities and media moguls like Murdoch for this narrative to become acceptable?
Let us be honest: a media mogul like Murdoch does not turn on a political asset like Farage unless there is a strategic shift.
If you try to tell me this is purely a matter of journalistic integrity and a commitment to the truth, please, do not make me laugh.
It is time to open the conversation about the true cost of Brexit. We see the results clearly now: the deliberate strategic goal to isolate the UK from the EU, particularly regarding our defence strategy.
It is time to hold accountable not only those who funded Farage and the Brexit campaign, but also those in the media and our institutions who not only remained silent but actively covered up these facts for ten years while the public was misled.
We must demand to know why it took so long for the truth to be treated with the seriousness it deserved, and who will answer for a decade of complicit silence.
Perhaps the @CountBinface could grace us with an answer, provided he can find his way out of the shadows to enlighten the British public.
#ReformUK #NigelFarage #Journalism #Accountability #Brexit #TheSundayTimes #TruthMatters #BylineTimes #TheNerve #PublicInterest #Transparency
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
Rather than a General Election, I think I'd favour a full investigation into Nigel Farage's finances.
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
I demand you have a fight to the death with a large grizzly bear with anger management issues
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
People are calling Sarah Pochin āKu Klux Nanā and Iām personally absolutely fucking living for it.
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
You might think this looks like a good news story that should cheer everyone up amid all the terrible stuff that happens in this world, but you'd be wrong.
Just read the torrent of angry responses by anti-vaccine activists in the replies.
Cervical cancer deaths fall to zero in young women given vaccine bbc.in/4ovjOLq
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
Anyone still following this disinformation account or liking any of its tweets is either stupid or gullible. Which is it?
šØNEW: Green party-led Bristol city council has banned residents from flying the England flag during the World Cup because its "making migrants feel uncomfortable"
[@LBC]
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
The fact that your government has made it illegal for me to answer yes is a damning testament to your flagrant disregard for civil liberties.
This may be targeted at those taking action against the genocide, but it sets a very dangerous precedent that puts everyone at risk.
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
Excellent news for Britain. He's a shit-stirring gobshite.
Sir Trevor Phillips will be leaving Sky News this summer to take up a new role in the US.
Executive Chairman @davidgrayrhodes said: "Sir Trevor Phillips has brought audiences insightful conversations every Sunday - at Sky News weāre grateful for all that he has contributed.
I know Trevor will bring the best of that to America with this exciting new opportunity. We wish him every success"
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
Just in case you werenāt aware, the so called āpatriotsā are now calling Henry Nowakās sister a āmud shark race traitorā because she has a mixed race child.
The āprotestsā in Southampton arenāt about his death.
Theyāre about rabid racism and male violence.
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
Your ICE agents shot an unarmed US citizen in the head. A mother.
Then they shot another man for standing in the street.
The US government murders its own citizens.
Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.
Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he wonāt be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper responseāthe only responseāis righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.
It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobodyānobodyāshould ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.
Andy Ecelsonš“āā ļø retweeted
The cowardly anonymous racist US-based account @RitualofLuv pushes disgusting explicitly racist, accelerationist, white-nationalist propaganda: it posts almost exclusively obsessive anti-non-white content.
It uses repeated slurs ("brown sub race," "3rd world subhuman," "cunt," "phagget"), calls for whites to "embrace our racism" because "we are better," and frequently posts graphic violent fantasies including multiple "swinging from the end of a rope" lynching-style threats: textbook accelerationist white supremacist ideology.
The tone is compulsive and repetitive, as if the user is locked in a feedback loop of scrolling, seething, and discharging venom - much like Trump, who the account holder supports.
Likely traits of the user include chronic online radicalisation, possible real-life social/sexual frustration, and a need to feel powerful through anonymous cruelty. It's a sad, isolated figure channeling personal failures into racial hatred.
No prominent cases exist of an American @X user being criminally held accountable in the UK for racist threats, such as lynching references, made against a British citizen. There is no publicly documented evidence of a low-profile American X user being fully identified, prosecuted, and convicted in the UK for this type of content.
Such posts cause significant harms by inflicting direct emotional distress, fear, and anxiety on the targeted individual, particularly when invoking graphic racial violence like lynching against a named British citizen; for public figures such as journalists, they heighten personal safety concerns, disrupt daily life, and contribute to long-term mental health impacts including trauma and hypervigilance.
This creates a chilling effect on public speech when fear of further harassment or violence leads targeted individuals and others in similar positions to self-censor, avoid certain topics, or withdraw from platforms altogether, which is precisely what these evil cowardly anonymous racists want.
Such content may also encourage copycat harassment, amplify racial intimidation, deepen community divisions, and erode trust in online spaces.
UK authorities have issued general warnings about pursuing overseas online offenders, including potential extradition, but no high-profile successful actions have occurred in this specific category.
UK law does allow for extraterritorial application in theory for offences affecting British citizens, yet enforcement against US-based anonymous users remains rare due to legal, practical, and diplomatic barriers.
The most effective immediate steps continue to be preserving evidence, reporting the post and account to X for violent threats, and submitting a formal hate crime report to UK police via True Vision or 101, which can trigger data requests to the platform.
Full identification and prosecution of low-profile anonymous accounts is possible but uncommon in practice for this type of content, with prosecutions for online racist threats happening in the UK but overwhelmingly against UK residents, while cross-border enforcement against low-impact US accounts remains theoretical.
Elon Musk bought a social media platform and turned it into a racist hate amplification machine - not because he believes in free speech, but because the rich and powerful have always depended on ordinary people being divided.
The rich and powerful have long used "divide and rule" because it effectively maintains control at low cost. By pitting ordinary people against each other along lines of race, religion, ethnicity, class, or ideology, elites prevent unified collective action against them, distract from wealth concentration and systemic issues, and position themselves as arbiters.
This political strategy succeeds by exploiting natural in-group/out-group psychology, being cheap to sustain through propaganda and selective policies, and becoming self-reinforcing: while unity of the many threatens elite power, engineered division preserves it.



































