That’s an excellent article by Gerard Howlin.
Exhibit 1 in Gerard Howlin's take down of @FineGael in @IrishTimes today
"In the absence of a moderate centre-right, Ireland is vulnerable to populism or even extremism"
Lending credibility to the person called to resign by France, Germany, Italy
@FineGaelBrux @higginsdavidw
Barry Murphy retweeted
I wish my nan had asked for my consent before she hugged and kissed me. I nearly swallowed her false teeth once.
This is a fantastic read!
I am a member of the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
There are five of us. Five people, appointed by a parliament most of the planet could not find on a map, who decide, once a year, which human being the world has agreed to call good.
I know. I know. I think about it on the tram.
We meet in a building on Henrik Ibsens gate, a street named after a man who wrote almost exclusively about people discovering they are frauds, which nobody on the committee finds funny except me. There is a room with a long table and the portraits of the dead laureates looking down, Mandela, the Dalai Lama, a great many earnest men in spectacles, and one portrait we do not discuss, which is Kissinger, 1973, awarded while the bombs were still falling, after which two of our predecessors resigned and the satirist Tom Lehrer said political satire was now obsolete. We keep him on the wall. A reminder. Every family has the uncle.
It is October in Oslo, which means the sun gives up around four in the afternoon like a civil servant, and it rains the particular Norwegian rain that isn’t quite falling, just hanging there, judging you. I arrive with wet shoes. I always arrive with wet shoes. There is coffee, because this is Norway and there is always coffee, we drink more of it per person than almost anyone alive, and someone’s wife has sent kanelboller, the cinnamon buns, and we sit, five Norwegians, damp, caffeinated, sugared, and we decide the moral standing of the entire species.
Let me tell you how it actually works, because the world imagines a cathedral and it is, I promise you, a book club with a mandate.
287 nominations this year. 208 people, 79 organizations. Anyone can nominate, that’s the secret nobody understands: a professor, a parliamentarian, a former laureate, so the “nominee” list is meaningless, it’s a suggestion box, and every autumn some congressman nominates his own golden retriever and the press writes “SHORTLISTED.” Nobody is shortlisted. There is no short list the public ever sees. There is us, and the coffee, and the rain, and the portraits, and a Norwegian stubbornness that is older than the prize itself.
We read reports. The institute’s advisers write them, thick dull documents, and we argue. Our chairman told the BBC once that in the final meeting “there is a high temperature.” High temperature, for a Norwegian, means someone slightly raised an eyebrow and then apologized for it. We don’t do high temperature. We do a long silence, and then Kristin says “well,” and everyone knows exactly what “well” meant, and it’s settled. That’s our shouting. “Well.” You’d have to be raised here to hear the violence in it.
Now. This year. I will not say the name, because we never say the name, but you know the name.
A certain head of state wanted this prize the way a child wants a thing in a shop window, which is to say loudly, and in public, and with the full belief that wanting it was itself the argument. He said he deserved it. He said he’d ended eight wars, a number that grew most times he said it, like a fish. He had other heads of state phone us. Israel’s prime minister posted it on the internet, “Give him the Nobel.” The leaders of Cambodia and Pakistan announced they’d nominated him, as though announcing it were part of it, as though we tally mentions. A man flew around the globe collecting endorsements for a Norwegian committee the way you’d collect signatures for a petition to the council about a noisy dog.
And here, uff da, is the detail I treasure, the one that makes me smile into my coffee. The nomination deadline is the 31st of January. He took office on the 20th. So for all the phone calls, all the posts, all the gilded lobbying, the only nominations that could possibly count for this year’s prize were filed in the first eleven days of his term, before he had, by his own arithmetic, ended a single one of the eight wars. He campaigned all year for a prize whose window had shut while he was still hanging up his coat. We didn’t have to reject him. The calendar did. We just watched. Norwegians are very good at watching. We have long winters.
People think we sit there weighing his deeds. We don’t. That’s the thing I can’t make the world understand. We’re not grading his homework. We don’t owe anyone the prize for a ceasefire, however real, however loud the announcement. “He made peace” is not a sentence that ends in a medal, the way he believes it does, the way he believes every good thing ends in his name on it. The will of a dead Swede says the prize goes to whoever did the most for fraternity between nations. A dead Swede, I should add, who made his entire fortune inventing dynamite and selling arms, and spent his last years horrified at his own obituary, which called him a merchant of death, and so bought his way to immortality as a man of peace. The whole prize is one guilty arms dealer’s attempt to launder his name. We are, all of us, administering a dead man’s public relations. I find this clarifying. It keeps me humble. It should keep everyone humble, and it keeps, by my count, no one humble at all.
So who did we give it to?
An eighty-five-year-old woman. A judge. Born in Durban, under apartheid, granddaughter of a Tamil man who came to South Africa as indentured labor, a bus driver’s daughter from the poor Indian quarter, who became the first non-white woman to run a law practice in her province, who defended Mandela’s people when defending them was dangerous, who sat on the Rwanda tribunal and the court at the Hague, and who, at eighty-five, is right now a judge weighing whether a genocide is a genocide. When we told the world, our chairman said the rule of law “underpins the system we have set up to ensure peace,” and that “peace requires justice.” She wasn’t even in Oslo. She was in Nuremberg. In courtroom 600. The actual room where they tried the Nazis. You cannot stage that. God staged that, and God, it turns out, is a better satirist than any of us.
She did not phone us. She did not post. No prime minister demanded it for her on the internet. She had, as far as our deliberations are concerned, the one qualification the loud man could never manufacture, which is that she wanted the work and not the medal. The medal finds those people. It flees the ones who chase it. This is not a rule we wrote. It’s just the only pattern the hundred-odd years of our mistakes has ever shown.
The reaction from across the ocean was immediate. His spokesman posted that we “place politics over peace.” Ja. Perhaps. We’re five damp pensioners in a rainy city; of course it’s political, it was always political, it was political when we gave it to a sitting American president nine months into his first term for the promise of things he had not yet done, and we have been quietly embarrassed about that one for fifteen years, so believe me, we had a particular reason this year to prefer a woman with fifty years of verdicts behind her over a man with eight wars in front of him and a deadline already behind him.
Here is what he will never understand, the thing I’d tell him on the tram if he ever took one. We are the one prize he cannot buy, cannot post his way to, cannot have a friendly dictator phone in for him. Not because we’re incorruptible, nei, we’re as vain and wrong and human as the portraits on our wall. But because the entire point of the thing, the only power a small cold country’s book club has ever held, is that it goes to the person not performing the wanting. The moment you demand it, you’ve proven you don’t understand what it’s for, and proving that is itself the disqualification. He ran the most expensive campaign in the history of the prize and the campaign was the reason. He was never losing to Navi Pillay. He was losing to the concept.
It’s dark now. Four o’clock dark. The buns are gone. Kristin said “well” an hour ago and we all went home. I’m on the tram with my wet shoes, and somewhere across the water a very powerful man is explaining to a camera that the prize is rigged, that we’re corrupt, that he’ll win it next year, and he genuinely might, we’re only five idiots and we’ve been wrong before, Kissinger is still on the wall.
But not this year. This year an old woman in Nuremberg, in the room where the law once stared down the exact kind of man who thinks wanting a thing loudly enough should make it his, got a phone call she didn’t ask for.
That’s the job. We don’t reward the man who ends the war and announces it.
We reward the woman who spent fifty years deciding what a war was.
He’ll never see the difference. That’s rather the whole point of him.
Takk for i dag. I have to change trams.
The next recession in Ireland will be the worst we have ever seen. Public spending is totally out of control. No value for money. No strategy. Huge spending by the state driving up inflation. A huge state & huge welfare state funded by vulnerable tax receipts. Disaster looms
Barry Murphy retweeted
Ireland since independence has always rejected the political extremes. Communism and fascism were rejected in the 20th century and militant ultranationalism during the Troubles was overwhelmingly rejected by voters.
Opinion polls show that middle Ireland does not support the extreme obsession of a minority with one of the world’s many awful conflicts. That so many politicians (and most media) are so detached from the average voter is a real cause for concern. The political class has shown itself to be out of touch on other issues, eg the referendums of 2023. Some self reflection by politicians on the obsession with one of the Middle East’s conflicts is needed more than even after tonight’s game.
Barry Murphy retweeted
Tonight has been utter humiliation for the #stopthegame lot and the Irish sports media. To the extent, of course, that those can be considered different things.
Barry Murphy retweeted
This week we have seen what real bullies do
They go after the vulnerable. And when they can’t take them down, they’ll single out a few and then try to target them individually.
They’ll tell you everyone agrees with them even though that couldn’t be further from the truth
And when they know they’ve lost, they’ll try to double down all over again
We see you
Because you showed us.
Barry Murphy retweeted
The irony is that an Irish defeat would have been much better for the Paddystinian weirdo obsessives in the media... camp rattled...internal discord... players didn't want to play...big bad FAI to blame.
Players just shut them all up. A delight to see.
7 articles in the Independent this morning all arguing in favour of boycotting a soccer match. None against. How can they called themselves Independent. There is only one side to every story in Ireland.
Barry Murphy retweeted
The Right to Privacy is being removed by the EU.
That old despotic mantra, “what about the children?!” is being used to strip adults of privacy online so wrongthink and wrongspeak can be criminalised.
Orwell didn’t have a patch on these guys.
EU’s new social media child protection rules to require all social media accounts to produce state ID buff.ly/77MwTKp
Barry Murphy retweeted
Everyone is up in arms about Michael O'Leary using the word "Rapist"
Yet, I see very little commentary on yesterday's horrific gang rape trial of two Jordanian asylum seekers who raped a vulnerable Irish girl in a Galway car park.
All of the usual NGOs were straight out of the blocks to criticise Michael O'Leary this morning...
"The National Women's Council of Ireland executive director Corrinne Hasson said the remarks about rape are "completely inappropriate and deeply offensive to survivors of sexual violence".
But where is the NGO campaigning to change the identity law that protects violent sexual offenders simply because they are international protection applicants?
Where is the brave politician connecting the dots on how Jamey Carney was brutally murdered by her Jordanian asylum seeker husband in Kerry,
Or Masuma Sohrabi who was practically beheaded by her Iranian asylum seeker husband in Galway...
But no,
Michael O'Leary, Ireland's single biggest individual tax payer, who employs 26k people across the EU....
He's the problem.
Talking to Newstalk Breakfast this morning, Tánaiste Simon Harris said "a significant line has been crossed" in relation to Michael O'Leary calling his competitors “high-fare rapists”.
Also, in response to Trump's Ireland visit, the Fine Gael leader said it is "more important to turn up when there are points of disagreement".
🎧Listen to the interview in full on the GoLoud app now.
100% agree…if you raised any questions in the last few years about immigration you were called racist and far right. All politicians (with one or two notable exceptions) completely ignored the concern of those who voted for them. We see you
They didn’t ’not hear’ their communities
They told us all to shut up and don’t be a racist.
They told us no one gets a veto as to who moves into our towns and villages.
They told us to shut up, sit down and don’t you dare raise your head
They told us diversity was our strength.
They told us we have legal and moral obligations
They told us we needed to double our population
They told us the new Irish would write the future history of Ireland
And they told us there is no such thing as an indigenous Irish person
We see you @MaryLouMcDonald
We see you @MichealMartinTD
We see you @SimonHarrisTD
We see all of you.
Barry Murphy retweeted
🙄The paradox of the modern Irish liberal...🙄
🎯Poverty and a lack of education is the root of crime, except for when it's poor uneducated men coming here from (insert country here).
🎯We want open borders, but Brits out.
🎯Indigenous land to be returned to indigenous people - except the Jews.
🎯Two-state solution there - but one state here.
🎯Neutrality here - picking sides in wars over there. 🎯Freedom of speech for Kneecap - but they then sign letters cancelling the Mise Eire festival.
🎯All about ‘culture’, then at music festivals gleefully celebrating the people who attack music festivals and murder cartoonists's while also blinding writers they don’t agree with.
🎯Women’s rights except for women who believe men can’t be women.
🎯We want women to run the world - but not Maggie Thatcher
🎯‘No-one is illegal on stolen land’ - except for Israeli settlers and Elon Musk.
🎯‘We have been victims for 800 years’ but we also have white privelege.
🎯Driving the wrong way down the road and maiming a family and killing yourselves is appalling - except if you are from a minority group we like.
🎯We can't assume that just because you come from a culture that doesn't let women get educated, kills you for leaving a religious faith, or where rape of certain groups isn't seen as being that bad that you will ever behave that way here, your mind gets rewired once you enter European air space.
🎯My body my choice, but don't criticize oppressive forced covering up of women in certain countries who can get eyes gouged for daring to not cover up.
Barry Murphy retweeted
Revenue sent my tax return back this year because apparently I answered one of the questions incorrectly…
Question: “Do you have anyone dependent on you?”
I wrote:
145,100 unemployed,
1.7 million on state benefits
33,000+ people in IPAS accommodation,
5,800 prisoners,
174 TDs,
60 Senators, an army of advisers, and consultants,
281,000 employed NGOs pushing the woke government agenda.
Around €1.8 BILLION a year going on overseas development aid…
464,000 public and civil servants
…plus a Government that seems to think the Irish taxpayer has an unlimited credit card.”
Revenue said my answer was “UNACCEPTABLE.”
So I wrote back:
“Why? WHO DID I LEAVE OUT???” 🇮🇪😂
Barry Murphy retweeted
As crime spirals out of control in Ireland..
its important everyone understands which NGO shapes Govt policy on criminal punishment,
"The Irish Penal Reform Trust"
Below is its management team.
They get €755k in multi-annual State funding...
including €492k directly from the Dept of Justice.
They are hardcore believers in social justice theory. Their main goal is to "make prison a last resort”.
So basically the Dept pays these people to lobby for:
• fewer people in prison
• Early release
• Easier sentencing
• No new prisons EVER!!
• Justice for Travellers
They regularly meet, host & mingle with Ministers & Opposition TDs.
Their own annual report boasts:
“we shaped the thinking of many political representatives who went on to be elected.”
So this is how the policy sausage is made:
1: Dept funds the NGO.
2: NGO develops woke policy.
3: NGO lobbies same Dept.
4: NGO then also lobbies the Opposition.
5: NGO enters Govt working groups.
6. Woke policy becomes Govt policy.
Hats off to this team, they are brilliant at what they do,
All funded by you! 👏🏻
Barry Murphy retweeted
Extracts from article in Spectator 16th August by Brendan O’Neill:
Behold the human wreckage of the cult of diversity. The tragedy of Jason Arday is that he was both built up and destroyed by the ruthless machinery of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion). The academy made him into the golden boy of its philistine project of ‘decolonisation’ and gave not one thought to what the consequences might be if his thin story unravelled, as it inevitably would. No one can deny it now: wokeness makes false gods and real tragedies. . .
This is the poison chalice of the state religion of diversity. It lays traps for the very people it celebrates. It handpicks members of ‘the oppressed’ for moral anointment and institutional gushing while leaving them open to exposure as others start to query their credentials. That’s the toxic bargain of identity politics: it builds teetering pedestals for ethnic-minority thinkers, meaning their fall from grace is often twice as fatal.
And what a pedestal they made for Arday. They worshipped him as ‘the best in the world’. They beatified him as a black wunderkind whose very presence in a place like Cambridge might help to wash away its sins of whiteness. They canonised him as a living monument to ‘decolonisation’. It was precisely this, their giddy, narcissistic desire to manufacture a kind of black saviour, that made them turn a blind eye to the questionable elements of Arday’s CV and life story. They sacrificed their due diligence to the god of decolonisation.
And Arday suffered. He was both poster boy and sacrificial lamb of the diversity crusade. Even as he gained from it – reaching the dizzying heights of a Cambridge professorship – he was being damned by it. The foundation of myth and sand his starry career was built on was untenable. Its collapse was a given. It is a testament to the ideological blindness of the inhabitants of our ivory towers that none of them foresaw it. . . .
The Faustian ruthlessness of it all is mindblowing.
. . . The media is the only institution in this entire tragic scandal that did its job properly. Journalists found a story and they told it. It was the academy and Arday’s colleagues who failed to do their jobs. Who failed to prize merit over identity, and failed to foresee the public embarrassment that would befall their falsely promoted friend. They ignored the truth – the media found it.
I and others have been arguing for years that the politics of identity is a disaster for all, black and white alike. White kids are overlooked, black kids are patronised. Whites are branded ‘privileged’, blacks ‘oppressed’. Whites are seen as the beneficiaries of historic crimes who must atone for past sins, blacks as history’s perma-victims who require the gracious helping hand of the state. We are demonised or infantilised according to the accident of our race.
Enough. Let our monument to Jason Arday be the restoration of the true ideal of equality. We couldn’t save Jason but we can save merit from the monstrous jaws of identity.
100%
On Arday, if it is as claimed…
The only thing that kept the horrible sorry saga going was the wilfully blind defence offered up and the vicious smears on anyone questioning the very obvious.
Cambridge and its guilty defenders could have investigated this all months ago, but instead turned the cops on journalists and dug in.
They had zero regard for a duty for care in what was obviously a deeply disturbed situation and just focused on fighting their culture war.
These are incredible statistics. Complete & utter incompetence and dereliction of duty by our government. Without a doubt this will absolutely come back to haunt them
























