
@BeatinCheeks_i
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Veteran. Sexist Extremist. Uncircumcised. Disease-free. America 1st & ONLY. Polyglot. "Christian" Nationalist. Thiccc women love me, feminists want me dead.
United States of AMERICA
Joined October 2010
- Tweets24.4K
- Following622
- Followers1.8K
- Likes49.1K
If anyone would have told me a year ago if I would be backing TPUSA for ANYTHING at ALL, FOR FREE NO LESS, I would have told you to eat shit.
I still hold my criticisms I've made about them in Charlie. But I never would have wanted him to be murdered as he was actually doing great work at the universities killing off marxist ideology.
bunch of SSRI addicted women drunk on wine and low-testosterone males (one claiming they have the actual receipt) coping hard on this and cant back up any claims. pretty funny listening in on this.
nitter.cf/i/spaces/1AJEmvvZgZOJL…
seriously, how is ANYONE LITERALLY on her side on this? I need to start a YT channel and start lying on air daily so nobody can question me on my false claims i would make.
Candace Owens acknowledged she has no direct evidence that Israel was behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk during a nationally streamed debate with online debater Andrew Wilson, even as she laid out a theory she says points to an "Israeli angle" in the case. trib.al/QFKGXWD
honestly, i could not have said this better.
Replying to @ImBreckWorsham
Andrew -"What evidence do you have?"
Candace-"I just think, I don't need evidence"
Retards on the internet-"Candace is owning him!"
Lmao. Lmfao even.
cope harder
Replying to @GmorganJr
Your mate dropped the ball, was not good, under prepared as we thought, is still 6 months behind… it was not a good outing for Andrew…
If i knew to win against @paleochristcon was to not back up any lies/claims I make publicly without ever providing any shred of evidence, I should have started hating him from the beginning. I messed up.
Cope is strong here
Replying to @NickJFuentes @Rach4Patriarchy
In other words, you publicly said you were backing Andrew Wilson and are now coping with the fact that he lost.
Badly.
😂😂
TRUE to the title's word hahaha so true.
love these videos. Good shit.
🥀NEW VIDEO🥀
Incels and Blackpillers Will Hate This Video
youtu.be/-bWqQvy5byI
so @RealCandaceO FEELS like she won on baseless claims because she FEELS that she didnt need to answer to because in the end, it goes down to one simple sentence with these feminists and her retards
LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY.
@paleochristcon exposed that very well. well done sir!
hahahahaha I LOVE THE DRIP!!! DRIP THE EVIDENCE!! @paleochristcon
after i called him some harsh names, not that he ever notices as he thinks i am a nobody, it is possible to change minds.
As somebody who really supported Candace Owens' investigation the first few months...
I got off the bandwagon this past winter.
I think she did a lot of damage to her credibility platforming Mitch Snow.
Everyone knows this. You can hate on me for it.
Furthermore...
After watching the Evidentiary Hearing, I became more convinced Tyler Robinson murdered Charlie Kirk.
I am still under that impression, to be honest.
As of today, I don't think Candace totally established why it *couldn't* have been Tyler Robinson.
I also don't think Andrew Wilson changed anyone's mind on Candace's side.
In fact, I think everyone has already made up their mind and likely won't change it.
Andrew Wilson did fine, in all fairness, addressing why he believes it was Tyler Robinson and basically shared what the State argued.
But, nothing he presented was "overwhelming," as many people claim.
We will just have to wait for more at the actual trial.
Overall, the debate has been entertaining, though.
But, I still think it was most likely Tyler Robinson.
Another faggot that is muting Andrew when holds her feet to the fire on claims she cannot back.
Still hasn't answered on her false claims.
this is a high IQ statement I wish I could have conjured up wrapping up what is happening. bravo Nick.
Watching this debate between @RealCandaceO & Andrew Wilson @paleochristcon is like watching a man play chess against a pigeon.
The pigeon flaps around, makes a lot of noise, knocks over pieces, completely confident in their performance...but to anyone that understands how chess is played, they look like an idiot.
seriously, this is part of the Candy Cult faggots that are too hooked on SSRI's.
you and I should debate on what "gishgallop" and "strawmans" and see how fast you can defend your stance on any evidence that Candace never presented on her baseless claims.
Beatin Cheeks - Berto retweeted
Storytime Candace is completely evading any cross-examination as many people predicted. She’s had far more speaking time and she just prattles on about stories and feelings, but won’t answer direct questions. She’s walking right into Andrew‘s trap.
Beatin Cheeks - Berto retweeted
2 hours into this and the only thing that has happened is @paleochristcon has had to argue the states case.
Candace is doing everything she can to not answer a single question about any of the insane theories she’s put forward.
That’s what we are here for. And 2 hours down… NOTHING

















