Law man XPLUS🔶

b14g published the attacker wallets the same day. You still haven’t published the ~69M CORE destination wallets disclosed in your own post-mortem, the Contributors allocation wallets, or a full treasury breakdown showing the movement of the original 199.5M CORE. “Network is secure” doesn’t replace financial transparency. Publish the wallets. Show the records.

The treasury is not Corefrontline’s money. It is also not @BrendonSedo’s or @richrines’ personal money. No one has the right to decide what we post on our handle. We supported @Coredao_Org project because we believed its motive was transparency and fairness. Once we noticed the gaps, we asked the same questions any holder can ask. The original treasury allocation was 199.5 million CORE. The visible balance is now much lower and there is still no full public breakdown. The wallets for the ~69 million CORE that Core’s own post-mortem said was moved before it could be reversed have not been published. The wallets for the 315 million CORE Contributors allocation are also not public. @BrendonSedo and @richrines are stepping down after three years. Asking how the chain was run and where those large allocations went is normal. Personal benefit, past posts, or “who knows your schemes” does not answer the numbers. If the records are fine, show them. Defending the people stepping down does not replace the on-chain proof that has been requested.

#BREAKING: 🇮🇹 Around 20,000 people joined marches in Turin as part of a national general strike over living costs, war and government policy. A group of protesters clashed with riot police in Piazza Castello after trying to reach a cordon around the prefecture. Police responded with charges and water cannons. The unrest follows recent violent protests in several Italian cities. These recurring clashes highlight ongoing tensions between demonstrators and authorities over economic pressures. How do you assess the balance between protest rights and public order in these situations?

#BREAKING: 🇳🇱🇪🇺 Shop owners in The Hague are boarding up storefronts today ahead of planned Gen Z protests. Businesses including Primark, Guess, Tommy Hilfiger and others have covered windows with plywood after social media calls to gather at Malieveld and threats of looting, amid fears that disorder seen in France, Italy, Belgium and Spain could spread. The precautionary measures reflect wider unease across parts of Europe as Halloween weekend coincides with cost-of-living demonstrations in multiple countries. How are preparations looking where you are?

#UPDATES: 🇯🇴🇸🇾 14 armed men were repelled by Jordanian border guards after attempting to cross into northern Jordan from Syria on Friday. The group tried to infiltrate under heavy covering fire and direct engagement; Jordan’s military said the response inflicted numerous casualties before the remaining members fled back into Syrian territory. The incident occurred days after the two countries reopened their main border crossing, following earlier Jordanian airstrikes in southern Syria that Damascus said killed civilians. How are you reading the latest border developments?

@FBI @FBIDirectorKash @BrendonSedo @richrines The treasury numbers need answers. It started with about 199.5 million CORE (9.5%). Now it shows around 33.6 million. That’s a big drop over roughly 4 years, and the full on-chain breakdown of where the money went is not public. About 69 million CORE from the August 2026 reward issue was also moved out before it could be reversed. Core said they are working with law enforcement, but the wallet list still isn’t public. The Maple partnership ended in a legal fight too. On top of that, the Contributors allocation is 315 million CORE (15%). That is a very large amount compared to the long 81-year mining schedule. The wallets for these allocations are not public. The community wants to know how much has already been taken and how much is still left. This is why we are demanding real accountability and full transparency. When the on-chain data is not available for everyone to check, people have the right to ask for answers. @FBI and @FBIDirectorKash should arrest @BrendonSedo and @richrines for questioning so they can be held accountable for how the chain was run and how the large token allocations were handled. #CoreDAO

#BREAKING: Approximately $3.3 billion left Binance hot wallets on Ethereum in under 40 minutes on 29 October, including roughly 195,000 ETH, 1.6 billion USDT and 780 million USDC sent to a fresh address funded through Tornado Cash. Etherscan has labeled the recipient “Binance Hot Wallet Exploiter.” Binance says it is investigating a potential security issue and that user funds are safe. Founder Changpeng Zhao said the activity “does look like a hack” and noted that Tether and Circle froze about $1.8 billion in stablecoins. The speed of both the outflows and the issuer freezes highlights how little time exchanges have once a hot wallet key is compromised. How should exchanges balance withdrawal liquidity against the risk of a single hot-wallet compromise?

#BREAKING: b14g (@b14g_network) has just published the attacker wallets following the unauthorized withdrawal of ~97M CORE from its protocol: 0xc556ed208285406d71705927f92d4f4eaea579f1 0x27758c30f8e424fbd8ca605bf31e9496c26ce92c @Coredao_Org's response? Simply: “The network is secure.” But a chain without proper accountability and transparency poses a huge risk to investors. Look at Bitcoin. Even when Satoshi Nakamoto was actively leading its development, the network's transactions remained publicly verifiable. Transparency and verifiability helped build the trust that contributed to Bitcoin's global acceptance. Yet months ago, CoreDAO's own post-mortem admitted that ~69M CORE from the reward-accounting exploit had moved off-chain before the hardfork. It also said it was working with law enforcement, but never publicly disclosed the destination wallets. The treasury raises similar questions. Its original allocation was 199.5M CORE (9.5%). The visible DAO balance is now significantly lower, yet no complete public breakdown explains the fund movements. The wallets holding the 315M CORE Contributors allocation also remain unpublished. @richrines and @BrendonSedo stepped down days ago, citing decentralization. But decentralization must come with accountability from those responsible. If the records are clean, publish the 69M CORE destination wallets, the Contributors allocation wallets, and a complete treasury transaction history. Security without financial transparency leaves serious questions unanswered. Investors deserve more than assurances.

Hey @Coredao_Org Decentralization of block production is one thing. Handing the community a dried-up token while the same group that controlled the partnerships, the Maple litigation (settled with confidential terms and no public benefit to holders), the reward-issuance mess, and the remaining large allocations steps away is another. You’ve ignored basic questions on liquidity, token distribution, and accountability for months. Contributors quietly removing Core from their bios while the price sits near all-time lows doesn’t look like a planned handover, it looks like an exit. Independent validators running blocks doesn’t transfer control of the residual contributor, reserve, and treasury tokens that can still move the market. If this is truly community-led now, publish the wallet-level transparency on remaining allocations and stop treating silence + slogans as progress. Otherwise this is just the latest framing for walking away from the damage.

Core is called decentralized. But how transparent are its large token allocations and partner-selection decisions? If a small group has significant influence over these decisions, the community deserves to understand how that influence is exercised. A blockchain that fails to earn the trust of the community that helped build it faces a fundamental credibility problem. What should CoreDAO disclose to build trust? • Token allocations and recipient wallets • Criteria for selecting partners and rewarding contributors • Who makes these decisions and how they are approved • Clear accountability for how allocated tokens are used Decentralization should mean more than a slogan. Transparency must be verifiable. @Coredao_Org, will you publish the information the community needs to assess these decisions?

Some people with little publicly visible work received large token allocations and influential roles. Meanwhile, community members who invested their time, money, and data promoting Core feel they were overlooked. Contributors should be asked directly about how these decisions were made, especially initial contributors such as Mr. @BrendonSedo, who also serves as Head of Partners at CoreDAO. The community deserves to hear from him and his team about their role in running the chain and how the project reached its current state, particularly as many contributors now appear to be quietly disengaging from their activities within Core. That raises a legitimate question about fairness, transparency, and the value of community contributions. How should contributions be measured and rewarded in Core? 🤔

🚨 The 69M CORE question remains unanswered, and @Coredao_Org needs to address it. Some early contributors reportedly received substantial token allocations, yet some later removed CORE from their bios and went quiet as the price declined. Meanwhile, decentralization has become a convenient slogan in the debate. Many in the community believe selling pressure contributed to the price drop. But speculation is not proof. So, what happened to the 69M CORE? Where are the wallet addresses that received these tokens? Who controlled them, how much was moved or sold, and where did the tokens ultimately go? Why should the community be left guessing when on-chain records can help establish the facts? @Coredao_Org, the community deserves wallet-level transparency, verifiable evidence, and clear answers, not silence and decentralization slogan which is not healthy for the chain now. Show the wallets. Trace the tokens. Answer the 69M question.

#BREAKING 🇺🇸🇷🇺 President Trump said Russia agreed to release diesel into the U.S. and global market after a call with Vladimir Putin: more than 300,000 tons immediately, 500,000 tons in November, and 1 million tons after that. A further 3 million tons is tied to the condition of Russian refineries. If every tranche is delivered, the total is about 4.8 million tons. The announcement sits on top of last week’s order opening tax-free red-dyed diesel to highway use through year-end. The later volume is not locked in, and the stated aim is lower prices for farmers and truckers, not a measured drop yet. Does the Russian schedule matter more for diesel prices, or the dyed-diesel tax waiver?

You can post a staking video in under an hour. You still cannot post the wallets that received the ~69M CORE you said you could not reverse. On 5 September you wrote that those tokens were moved to many outside addresses and that you were working with partners and police. That was 24 days ago. Reply with one of these, not another clip: 1. The wallet list / tx hashes 2. Frozen vs free vs on exchanges 3. “We will not publish the wallets” If 3 is the answer, say it. Silence plus ads is also an answer.

This video is not an update CoreDAO. 24 days ago, you said 69M CORE had already left the addresses you could reverse, and that recovery was with partners and police. No wallets. No freeze split. No recovered total. Stake-and-earn copy does not answer it. The question is here:

Decentralization is not a slogan you quote when the questions get hard. Satoshi Plus is three inputs. Transparency is one output you still owe. 5 Sep post-mortem: • ~255M CORE issued early • ~186M removed on-chain • ~69M already moved off the addresses you could reconcile Community ask since mid-September: addresses, frozen vs free, CEX vs OTC, recovered since 5 Sep. Silence + staking clips is not Bitcoin alignment. It is a foundation running the story. Post the list or say you will not. Tripartite consensus does not replace a money trail.

Core said the fix can be checked on-chain. So check it. Open scan.coredao.org Block 38376795 Date: 3 Sep 2026, 13:00 UTC Name: CoreRewardFix That block is the proof of the upgrade. Not a video. scan.coredao.org/block/38376…

Last week holders asked one simple thing: show the wallets that still hold the ~69M $CORE you said you could not reverse. You went silent. Today you posted a staking ad. That is the problem. In plain words, this is what you already told us: • About 255 million CORE came out early • About 186 million was later taken back • About 69 million had already moved to outside wallets • You said those wallets are many • You said you are working with partners and police Saying “we are working on it” is not the same as showing the wallets. Until you publish that list, nobody can check: • which wallets got the 69M • how much is frozen • how much reached exchanges • how much can still be sold • who takes the hit if it never comes back A chain that says it fixes Bitcoin and Ethereum limits is a joke if the inner team still runs the story and will not show the money trail. @Coredao_Org @CoreEcosystem @richrines @BrendonSedo, post the wallet list. Post what was frozen. Post what was recovered. If you cannot, say that clearly. If this is really with law enforcement, then let investigators look at who moved the tokens and whether the public story matches the chain. Holders do not need another promo. They need proof. What would settle this for you, the wallet list, or another marketing video?

#BREAKING: 🇮🇱🇱🇧 The IDF released new footage from a Hezbollah tunnel and bunker system under the Ali al-Taher Ridge in southern Lebanon. The video shows body-camera views of rock-cut passages, wiring, doors, and rooms that Israeli officials describe as part of a long-built underground complex used as command and fighting infrastructure. The ridge has been one of the most closely watched sites in southern Lebanon after months of operations against the underground network. The footage is detailed, but independent confirmation of remaining capacity is still limited. What part of the complex stands out most from the clips?

JUST IN 🇺🇸🇵🇸 An NYC firefighter confronted a pro-Palestinian protester in an Elmo costume near Ground Zero on the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. In video circulating from the scene, the man called the protester “anti-American,” told him to “go back to Palestine,” and said to take Mayor Zohran Mamdani, Gov. Kathy Hochul, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez with him. It is not clear whether he is a current or retired firefighter. The clip landed on a charged day: memorials a few blocks away, and political tension already high over who should be at Ground Zero and how protests are handled around it. Does a confrontation like this change the argument over protest near the memorial, or just capture a mood that was already there?