Sir Real👁🗨 retweeted
The massive tech sell-off yesterday on fears around the Blue Wave delaying and disrupting the AI data center build out in the US was at a magnitude actually treating tech stocks and especially semis like this mid-term Democratic win will actually end the AI buildout in the US….and it will not! We would characterize this sell-off level and magnitude with the tech sell- offs we saw in March 2020 during Covid and the April 2025 Liberation Day sell-off…which were golden buying opportunities to own the tech winners and this one is the same 🐂🌊
Sir Real👁🗨 retweeted
.@Fundstrat's Tom Lee put AI fears into perspective on @CNBCClosingBell today.
He doesn't expect demand for AI to slow down, nor does he expect there to be some new competition that could potentially wipe out the industry.
What’s his outlook for 2027? He lays it out live Nov 30, 3PM ET:research.fundstratdirect.com…
Sir Real👁🗨 retweeted
the first 48 hours of Woke 2 has already produced more humor than the entire decade of Woke 1
Sir Real👁🗨 retweeted
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Morgan Stanley says the stock market correction is nearing its end.
Sir Real👁🗨 retweeted
This panic makes no sense.
Today's market crash looks like a massive overreaction when you look at what's actually happening.
Investors are worried that Democrats will use their control of Congress to impose major restrictions on AI, especially data centers.
But there are a few important things being overlooked.
1. AI is now a major part of the U.S. economy.
According to research from the St. Louis Fed, AI-related investment categories accounted for around 39% of U.S. economic growth during the first three quarters of 2025.
Now imagine what happens if the government suddenly introduces restrictions that force companies to cancel data centers, reduce spending and cut thousands of jobs.
It wouldn't just hurt Nvidia, AMD or other AI stocks. It could also slow down the entire U.S. economy.
And Democrats know this.
They have another election coming up in November 2028.
If their policies lead to slower growth, fewer jobs and a weaker stock market, voters could punish them in those elections.
That's why a complete shutdown of AI development seems highly unlikely.
2. Democrats can't simply pass whatever laws they want.
Republicans still control Congress until January 3, 2027.
Even after Democrats take over, Trump can veto legislation, and overriding him requires a two thirds majority in both chambers.
Democrats don't have enough votes to do that on their own.
They can block Republican legislation, but passing major new federal AI restrictions would require Trump's support or enough Republican votes.
Of course, state governments can still restrict data center development through permits, electricity rules and other regulations.
But regulating the industry and completely stopping its growth are two very different things.
3. Some of this selling could simply be profit taking.
Just yesterday, stocks rallied sharply as investors hoped the election results would bring more clarity and possibly improve the chances of ending the Iran war.
Now that optimism has disappeared almost overnight.
With AI valuations still high and companies spending billions on infrastructure, some investors may be using these rallies to reduce their exposure.
That doesn't necessarily mean the entire AI trade is collapsing.
4. Remember the Liberation Day crash in April 2025?
The S&P 500 fell around 11% in just two trading days as investors feared a recession and a prolonged trade war.
But Trump later paused many of the tariffs.
By April 24, the index had recovered more than 10% from its low.
And by May 21, it was up roughly 19% from the April bottom.
The economic risks hadn't disappeared. Investors simply realized the worst case scenario was becoming less likely.
A similar recovery could happen if the proposed AI restrictions turn out to be less severe than investors currently fear.
5. History also favors a recovery after midterm elections.
Since 1950, the S&P 500 has NEVER delivered a negative return in the 12 months following a U.S. midterm election.
That's 19 consecutive midterms with positive 12 month returns, averaging around 15%.
Of course, the Iran war, inflation and expensive AI valuations remain serious risks.
But nothing has fundamentally changed overnight to suggest that AI development is about to stop or the entire U.S. economy is heading for collapse.
Markets could recover much faster than people expect once there's more clarity about what Democrats actually plan to do.
Sir Real👁🗨 retweeted
What just happened?
The Nasdaq 100 just posted its largest daily drop since the 2020 Pandemic, with the S&P 500 erasing -$3 trillion today.
Just 24 hours ago, the Dow surged +1,600 points after the Democrats "swept" the Midterms.
So, what changed? Let us explain.
(a thread)
Sir Real👁🗨 retweeted
We were taught that Earth orbits the Sun in a closed circle. In reality, Earth has never returned to the same point in space once in 4.5 billion years.
Right now, the Sun is carrying Earth and every planet around the center of the Milky Way at 230 km/s (828,000 km/h), more than 18,000 kilometers every 80 seconds.
Because the Solar System is tilted 60.2° to the galactic plane and bobs up and down through the galactic disc roughly every 30 million years, the planets trace open 3D corkscrew helices across deep space rather than flat loops.
The last time the Sun stood where it stands today, one Galactic Year (230 million years) ago, the very first dinosaurs were only beginning to appear on Earth. Since forming 4.6 billion years ago, our Sun has completed only 20 laps.
Sir Real👁🗨 retweeted
British Columbia is now in its own special independent time zone, exclusive only to us and no one else on this continent, for reasons I still don't really understand.
Sir Real👁🗨 retweeted
Pride flag effectively banned from being displayed at Alberta schools, LGBTQ non-profit says theglobeandmail.com/canada/a…
Sir Real👁🗨 retweeted
Is Google $GOOGL a buy here at $293? Let's find out.
It just crashed 9.4% on a quarter where operating income grew 30% and Cloud revenue DOUBLED.
It's now 28% below its high.
Here’s why this is happening:
Revenue $127.6B, up 25%. Operating income $40.6B, up 30%. Cloud did $30.7B, up 103% and has accelerated every single quarter this year.
But EPS fell 26%.
The reason: an $8.66 BILLION loss on equity securities. Not the business. A mark on things they already own.
And that’s the same line where Alphabet carries its Anthropic stake. They own 14%. Anthropic filed to IPO on Monday at a last private valuation of $965B.
14% of that is about $135 billion. They paid $300 million for the first 10%.
They also hold an exclusive option to buy $10B more at the IPO price.
Warren Buffett personally initiated a $10B Alphabet position in June. His words to CNBC: "I initiated it." Berkshire's first net buying quarter in over 3 YEARS.
Keep the bear case in mind though. FCF was NEGATIVE $9B, debt is $125B, Search slowed to 12% growth, zero buybacks.
But at $293 you're paying 28% less than the high for a business compounding operating income at 30%.
I'm definitely a buyer here.
I've been an investor for more than 10 years, and I share all my moves in The Assembly, my private investing community with 3,700+ members.
If you're serious about investing, join today so you don't miss my next move. The link is in my bio.
If you don't join, you will regret it later…
Sir Real👁🗨 retweeted
WELL THIS IS AWKWARD: On eve of meetings in Montreal, EU reportedly rejects Canada as 'associate member,' will impose carbon tariffs on Canadian products
Check out our front page for Thursday, Oct. 29, 2026
Read more from @brianlilley here: torontosun.com/opinion/colum…
Plus: McKenna promoted to Leafs' top line after Marchenko injury torontosun.com/sports/hockey… Via @koshtorontosun
Sir Real👁🗨 retweeted
Every now and then you come across a gem on the Internet. In the end, Family is everything.
Sir Real👁🗨 retweeted
Shocking - New Liberal MAID bill would allow MAID/euthanasia to be administered in certain circumstances WITHOUT informing the patient of what is about to happen.
If someone signs an advance request, the practitioner would NOT be required to even talk to them before ending their life.

































