Pinned Tweet
.SI HOLDERS:
The Domain Industrial Complex (DIC) won't tell you what it doesn't want you to know.
These DICs won't acknowledge .si's moonshot potential until they've positioned themselves and hedged their .ai portfolios.
Higher .si floors are likely near term.
Fractionalize.Domains retweeted
"Sometimes I walk down the street singing like nobody's watchin'. Just lean in and go for it! Listen to my latest track "La Da Da Da" that is part 1 of 2." - Blockie.lfg 😼
#Blockie #cyberpunk #music #web3
We embrace labels like “altTLD” and “alternative TLD.”
Alternative = cool.
Alternative is The Velvet Underground.
.com is Taylor Swift.
Agreed. It's not literally zero-sum. One TLD succeeding doesn't require another to fail.
But the industry's .com-first mentality creates a quasi-zero-sum game, treating alternatives as threats rather than opportunities to grow the market.
@atomhq seems to understand this, and their front end is the best in the game. Credit where it is due.
Fractionalize.Domains retweeted
Another solid five-figure close! 💰
bin.si just sold for $10,000 on Sedo.
You dismissed .ai, then top ticked it in the bull run.
Now you're dismissing .si because of your .ai bags.
You don't have a thesis. You have a reaction function.
Fractionalize.Domains retweeted
Replying to @DomainGang
🤣 Only a salty hater would find the delta more interesting than the six-figure sale itself.
Fractionalize.Domains retweeted
Replying to @MediaOptions
In five, ten or twenty years, the domain landscape may look nothing like it does today.
Imagine paying tomorrow's premium based on yesterday's assumptions.
Fractionalize.Domains retweeted
Many of you trashed .ai early, only to go all in later.
You're welcome to do the same with .si.
Just don't expect your credibility to survive unscathed.
#si #domains #superintelligence
🎧 Sunday Sets:
Fatboy Slim
Big Beach Boutique II, Brighton (2002)
youtu.be/ET-hf8B-tI4?si=HFmv…
A small step in the right direction from @Dynadot.
Respect for moving quickly to bring these appraisals closer to market reality.
Worth checking your .si appraisals to see what's changed.
Replying to @Dynadot
@Dynadot is one of our top 3 registrars, but its valuation model is somehow worse than @atomHQ, just for a different reason.
runtime.si sold for $28,888. Dynadot values it at $1,181.
That's 4.1% of the actual sale price.
If we're going to nitpick, we'd still argue that $27K for staffing.si is far too low.
Fractionalize.Domains retweeted
Feels good man.
A small step in the right direction from @Dynadot.
Respect for moving quickly to bring these appraisals closer to market reality.
Worth checking your .si appraisals to see what's changed.
Fractionalize.Domains retweeted
Replying to @PeakDigital01 @Dynadot
We lean heavily on semantics when valuing domains and trust our own models over anything we've seen from third parties.
Outside of .si, we wouldn't dream of feeding our highest-conviction, thesis-driven names into third-party appraisal tools. We don't want that data sitting on someone else's infrastructure.
Let the market sort it out. Scared money doesn't make money.
Nobody knows how high .si prices can go until holders of strong names start testing the ceiling. If nobody pushes, nobody discovers what buyers will pay.
Some will overreach. That's price discovery.
Replying to @blueslesson
somebody was out here yelling at everybody to raise their si prices and now too many dudes priced themselves out.
;-)
im playing… but it is true these cats are leaning a little heavy on that dollar sign like this extension has twenty years of use and consistency.
Fractionalize.Domains retweeted
We just ran an institutional valuation of the entire 1,281-domain SI Holdings portfolio (.si + one-word .ai + SI-era .com) using Gemini 4 Argon High.
Why now:
The .si market has entered a new phase — 469,531 domains registered (+171% YTD), 1,403 tracked .si sales ($2.30M+ volume), a new $84,000 all-time ceiling (chain.si), and 28+ venture-backed companies already live on .si (including a $1.02B unicorn).
How it was modeled:
Every asset was scored against 1,403 realized .si sales, 33,460 NameBio .ai sales (anchored by our own honey.ai $150,000 sale), 24-TLD registration saturation, live corporate usage on .com/.ai/.io, and our 5-model appraisal ensemble.
What we found (1,281 domains):
• Today: $10.26M end-user ($2.53M wholesale floor)
• +1 Year: $14.26M
• +2 Years: $19.22M
• +5 Years: $30.01M
Breakdown by collection (end-user today → 5Y):
• 1,249 Premium .si (429 one-words, 434 LLL/NNN): $8.08M → $23.96M
• 9 Category-Killer 1-Word .ai (deals.ai, coupons.ai, streaming.ai, bro.ai…): $1.75M → $4.35M
Today, equivalent one-word .si names still clear at 10–25% of .ai prices. As the AI → SI transition compounds, that gap closes fast.
Full report & methodology:
siholdings.si/valuation/
A political backlash against .ai would be an unnecessary complication and frankly a bit stupid.
There are stronger reasons for .si to gain traction.
1) It’s more descriptive of the stage we're rapidly heading towards.
2) For many names it simply sounds and brands better.
3) Startups may also use it to signal technological advancement and attract VC interest, as .ai did before it.
What if using .ai becomes a political liability for American startups? 😳
Imagine @realDonaldTrump brands .ai as a threat to America
Would the public boycott these startups?
I think some absolutely would.
Especially patriotic Americans who put their flag, country and national interests first 🇺🇸


















