…
Colorado, USA
Joined April 2022
- Tweets17.6K
- Following422
- Followers243
- Likes66.2K
Dominus Clarus retweeted
The key to fixing public education is to bring back something we’ve lost: standards. If you can’t read by the end of 3rd grade, you shouldn’t move on to 4th grade. Make algebra competence the default before high school. Knowledge of U.S. civics should be a condition for graduation.
Dominus Clarus retweeted
This cartoon is ideal when liberals ask me why I don’t believe in democracy.
You already agree, I explain. You’ve just been taught to call democracy (the rule of everyone) “populism,” and oligarchy (the rule of experts) “democracy.” Orwell much
Dominus Clarus retweeted
Reminder that many "autism" cases are people who would've been classified as "retarded" in earlier decades.
We just wrongly classify them as having a different condition today, largely because the autism label gives greater access to services and it's less 'stigmatizing'.
Dominus Clarus retweeted
This is Britain.
A man who shouted "who the f**k is allah" was just sentenced to 30 months prison for "violent disorder".
Looks like blasphemy laws are back?
Dominus Clarus retweeted
Eye-opening chart, European largest stocks index is today where it was 25 years ago.
Really good visualization of what happens when overregulation and left redistribution mindset replace free market, innovation and entrepreneurialism.
Dominus Clarus retweeted
A lot of people are insinuating conspiracy because they're unfamiliar with autist or theater kid text communication patterns. It's completely normal that someone with this personality and self-concept would be both a meme obsessive and write with dispassionate self-importance.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Dominus Clarus retweeted
It is completely natural for a student who successfully LARPs at being a political assassin, would default to Jason Bourne-speak in describing what he did.
Dominus Clarus retweeted
I'm on team "I think the texts were genuine" because I've spent years watching autistic shut-in Redditors talk to each other.
Dominus Clarus retweeted
Bad advice.
A woman who desires you fundamentally wants to be sexually objectified by you.
"Beautiful" can be overused because it is too generic. But praising her virtue instead of her looks is not going to ignite her femininity or make her feel sexy.
It's the same as if a wife tells her husband "I love how nice you are" instead of saying "I love how strong you are."
Men obviously prefer to hear the latter and it's not even close.
Doesn't mean it's a bad idea to mix it up and create some contrast at times. Admiring her courage or patience will make her feel good, especially if it's out of the ordinary.
But you should keep those kind of character compliments to 20%.
Stick to talking about her ass and tits the other 80%.
Recipe for a happy marriage.
Dominus Clarus retweeted
We have to get this stupid bitch away from microphones at any cost
Dominus Clarus retweeted
Not many gay fury bangers that hate Charlie Kirk on the Right. Maybe let’s stop with the mental gymnastics.
Dominus Clarus retweeted
I don’t agree with “the way to a man’s heart is through his stomach.”
You win a man on your knees first
kitchen comes next.
Dominus Clarus retweeted
We already have the term “incitement”. Stop calling it hate speech you absolute moron. Just go after incitement. Stop acting like hate speech is a real legal concept.
Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence is NOT protected by the First Amendment. It’s a crime. For far too long, we’ve watched the radical left normalize threats, call for assassinations, and cheer on political violence. That era is over.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c), it is a federal crime to transmit “any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another.” Likewise, 18 U.S.C. § 876 and 18 U.S.C. § 115 make it a felony to threaten public officials, members of Congress, or their families.
You cannot call for someone’s murder. You cannot swat a Member of Congress. You cannot dox a conservative family and think it will be brushed off as “free speech.” These acts are punishable crimes, and every single threat will be met with the full force of the law.
Free speech protects ideas, debate, even dissent but it does NOT and will NEVER protect violence.
It is clear this violent rhetoric is designed to silence others from voicing conservative ideals.
We will never be silenced. Not for our families, not for our freedoms, and never for Charlie. His legacy will not be erased by fear or intimidation.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The US Constitution protects most violent speech.
The Supreme Court ruled it legal to "justify" or celebrate violence or "advocate or teach the duty, necessity, or propriety" of it; but not "incitement" to "imminent" violence (eg telling a mob with weapons to kill someone).
supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/…