
@Flapling1i
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Baby ptero Pride is a sin
Joined September 2022
- Tweets1.5K
- Following1.6K
- Followers65
- Likes52.4K
Flapling retweeted
This is, unreservedly, my favorite account of an ambassador behaving badly, from a diplomatic oral history site. I read this years ago and cannot forget it, and you won’t either. (If they made this a movie, it’d be R rated.)
adst.org/2015/06/this-woman-…
Flapling retweeted
“creampie” is the “demisexual” of sex. a say-nothing word that tries to kink-ify normalcy. I didn’t learn until my mid 20s it’s just a safe-horny way to slut up the radical act of having normal sex through completion. like you’re supposed to.
wow Stacy so you’re a “demisexual” (wants emotional bond before intimacy = normal) who enjoys “creampies” (he orgasms during the act, as God inteded). that’s so quirky and neurodivergent of you.
are you also an “empath” (I have feelings), an “ambivert” (I like people, sometimes), who’s “sapiosexual” (prefer he’s not an idiot) with a “breeding kink” (most profoundly normal thing a woman can have)?
the redditor class is so painfully unerotic they hide behind pseudo-kink to mask their horrifyingly unsexy ways.
Flapling retweeted
It gets worse. Here's another i came across at my local independent book shop
My kindergartener went to the school library for the first time at school yesterday and the book he checked out is about the importance of the first day wearing your hijab. He said he thought it was a book about an adventure on the ocean.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This entire image (not just the book cover) has been AI-generated, and is watermarked with OpenAI's SynthID. This book does not exist.
openai.com/research/verif…
Flapling retweeted
Replying to @AllanRicharz @cwamidon
To me this comes from martial cultures and values with military aristocracy
Military life requires broad range of skills and improvisation, command the plebes, run the hill, tend the horse, marshall supplies, skipper the boat, obey the order, coordinate the invasion etc etc
Flapling retweeted
Really love this video of someone on TikTok burning mail from Cornell College in Iowa instead of Cornell University. 500,000 likes
Flapling retweeted
Perhaps one of AI's greatest usecases is extinguishing the horde of useless parasites that incorrectly fashion the title "Artist" upon their empty meager lives. An entire swath of degenerate porn addict consumers, "self educated" by YouTube tutorials and a sparse year or two in adolescence spent doodling absentmindedly has created a generation of mediocre irritants.
They cling desperately to a DeviantArt here, an Instagram there, all dedicated to displaying forgettable content upheld by the shallow praise of likeminded flatulent "creators" all stuck inside the same bubble prison of insecurity. Bandied together out of a worker's union of scarcity, these people operating on a single vibrating frequency of unfulfilled hunger paired with delusion. They all mutually understand their own mediocrity, it's made self evident by the indifference they feel towards each other's work. Yet they grin and scream praise at their peers like fat office women around the watercooler, giving out compliments with the barest sheen of insincerity in hopes of a fair trade.
Ultimately, trading sentiments is the practice of the mediocre. In a world where you are an insignificant mote drifting in the stone floor cracks of an arena stomped on by giants, you make friends with the other flotsam out of mutual survival instinct. The premise of creativity would, on paper, demand a level of objective scale and hierarchy in denoting the quality and significance of one's work. Yet, among the unremarkable, this scale threatens total existential obliteration if fully comprehended by the creator. If you had dedicated your life and identity towards a practice that deems you unaccomplished, inferior, and mediocre by its accepted standards, you either would be forced to improve your own standing through hard work or face a crushing despair in having to face the reality of your work as the equivalent to a factory worker churning out a disposable product. The distractions of technology and pleasure have made it far too easy to ignore the harshness of truth, and thus a race of coping dilettantes is born.
These people look up to a select few greats and stand around in the audience pit, rubbing shoulders with one another, kicking stones and muttering about how one day they'll be up on stage to be seen by the world, yet simultaneously claiming how much better they are, how much COOLER it is to be an unknown, wearing their insignificance with pride until they encounter the barest morsel of wet shit to suck the moisture out of desperately, whether it be a few hundred dollars or one fleeting viral post they can latch advertisements of their "work" onto like parasitic barnacles.
Like reluctant prostitutes, you'll find that many of these self fashioned creators will resort to commissioned pornography if they truly can't find any income from a proper audience. With this imposition, they will choose between two paths: Shamefully hiding their work under an alt or embracing it fully. The latter choice will degenerate them into one of the many fallen products of modernity, fashioning bipoc queer flags and they/them handles onto their identity like communist dictators. The motifs of leftist philosophy offer many mental refuges from the shame of underachievement. Through this refuge, they can safely find comfort in their own poverty because "money is bad" and "everyone who who makes money is evil." The inexorable mathematic qualities of finance stab at the content creator with the discomfortable undeniable truth that the market numerically assigns value through revenue. Further delicious falsehoods are granted to them in this pathway of cope. Ugliness is deified, mediocrity is clever, sloth is justified into ideology through nihilism, bitterness is humorous, vice is virtue, and squalor is a palace to settle into until a quiet lonely death.
The worker's union of content creators is silent and unspoken. It is a cloudy hivemind monolith of mutual paypigging. Whatever sparse commissions are captured within several months of begging and aimless network wandering are doled out between rent, weed money, and a charity budget of paying it forward. You'll often find that people in the "artist" community spend a significant amount of their own money buying their peers work out of solidarity. The purchases are almost always a symbol of hope for their own financial success. To buy your loser friend's work when you yourself can barely afford to live is like a tithe paid towards a belief that one day, a much bigger paypig will come along and reward you for a life's lazy effort towards what historically has always been a cheap hobby, a side talent meant to be mastered in congruence with an actual study or field of mastery. The renaissance man was expected to have developed a significant competence in the skills of illustration as part of a necessity in journaling their work towards studies such as anatomy, biology, mathematics, astronomy, etc. The modern illustrator barely reaches the status of an errant doodler and expects not only significant income for their scribbles, but the same respect lauded onto actual artists in history. It is a delusion spurned on by low IQ inhibitions, an incapability of absolute basic observation of both themselves and the dense oversupply of similarly unremarkable work. It is an unsolved elementary equation of supply and demand, following around the insecure creator, haunting them behind unturned corners of introspection, a horror threatening to dissolve everything they hold dear in a ghastly haunting scream that echoes forever into time: Nothing special, nothing special, nothing special.
The greatest hypocrisies of the content creator are shouted most loudly by the worst of this classification. An almost mathematic law can followed: The more unsuccessful and insignificant a content creator, the harder they will screech about authorship. Unable to parse the shifting playing field which made itself apparent nearly three decades ago by the advent of the internet, these dying lepers will cling onto Byzantine laws developed by the lobbying of and solely for the benefit of the same monolithic corporations which they claim to despise.
AI is the eternal boogeyman to the content creator. Its existence and the impending holocaust of obsolescence it threatens like a storm cloud on the horizon is heralded by a horde of uncaring third worlders which, despite their own parasitic mediocrity worsening the network, at the very least acknowledge their own work as nothing more than rote production towards a meager salary. There is some slight dignity in the ESL elevenlabs voice narrated video essayist that cranks out endless YouTube shorts like a shrimp farmer siphoning advertisement pennies in his net. At least he understands he is a parasite. The self deluded content creator, mostly inhabiting the west, carries a degree of undue pride. Their arrogance prevents them from occupying that same status of the creative world's equivalent of an Uber driver. If they should stoop to doing Fiverr work, they carry a false dream of the temporary embarrassed Rembrandt waiting to be discovered. They seethe impotently at the unstoppable threat that a computer program could not only freely replicate but exceed what they spent years to do poorly. They cry out in defense of the nameless artists by which these algorithms pilfered building blocks to create their image generations, as if art itself wasn't merely the combination of prior elements passed down generation from generation.
The lowest IQ content creators lash out most fearfully, unable to admit their own inability to parse between created work and AI generated work (a phenomenon which becomes gated to higher levels of IQ with each iteration of technological improvement) because they truthfully cannot even quantify the difference between which creative works have soul and which ones don't. They have drowned in imposter syndrome, force fed the lie that art is subjective, anyone can be artist, and that anything created counts as art. These are the dying cries of a species soon to be extinguished. They will whimper into Discord chats, getting older, stupider, and more exhausted by the year as the absolute unescapable truth of fate tightens its stranglehold over them. They are akin to nomadic diseased refugees, diagnosed with an inescapable pestilence marked upon them like boils and sores in the mediocre soulless PFPs and banners of their own "work" worn like battle standards in the war against creativity itself.
To those that occupy this category and have read to the very end here, scoffing at every word, I applaud your ability to wield your impotent rage against your own low attention span sloth. I hope you're angry, I hope you've sent this post to each of your sodomite pot smoking mutuals, I hope they read it and get angry too. You should apologize to the world for your existence. You should recognize that you are a walking imposition, a disease that haunts the lives of normal good people with the constant gatekeeping you do on behalf of corporations and state sponsored media that brainraped you into believing the dumbest ideologies, the worst memetics of authorship, and the undeserved applauding sentiments you grant yourself for incomplete work you mistakenly apply the name of "creation" upon. You are a blood sucking mosquito, sniffing out any opportunity to pilfer undeserved income from every source, including those you pretend to call friends. I can wholeheartedly encourage you to stop creating and go off to do something significantly more meaningful with your life, such as digging ditches or working in a factory, with no fear of having deprived the world of its next great artist. I know this because any true artist or talented creator who has read this will agree with me, and hates you even more.
Flapling retweeted
Anyone who has been around fraternities and sororities on a college campus knows what Jane Doe wanted. These guys are considered high-status. The fraternities provide networking into elite jobs, and some of these guys come from staggeringly wealthy families to begin with. Girls who affiliate with these high-status men enjoy high status on campus and a woman who ends up married to one of them is likely set for life.
Some women who aren’t being courted as a monogamous girlfriend by one of these guys try to affiliate themselves with the fraternity by being “friends” with guys in the house, which in many cases involves being available for casual sex.
So, did Jane Doe want squalid group sex in a dirty frat room? Maybe not. But she wanted these guys’ attention and she seems to have been basking in it when she thought that this would deepen her connection to the guys in the house.
Based on her statements and text messages in the days immediately following the event, which were published in the New York Times today, she seemed pleased with what happened. It was only when she realized that the guys she had sex with were spreading nasty gossip about her that her interpretation began to shift.
Ten days after the disputed event at the house, she wanted to attend the fraternity’s Halloween party, and she was extremely upset when the fraternity’s president (who was not one of the accused men) disinvited her. A few days later, she filed her complaint.
It seems pretty clear that her interpretation of what happened that night changed in the days following the event because of what happened afterward, which differed substantially from what she expected or hoped would happen.
But the fact that she felt used, lied to or mistreated later does not mean she did not consent at the time.
Fraternity presidents actually undergo training on how to avoid and protect their chapters from situations like this. The protocol is to have someone sober at every party watching for people who are visibly intoxicated.
If it is a brother, they are supposed to be sent to bed to keep them out of trouble, and if it is an outsider, especially a woman, they are supposed to be kicked out of the party (usually sent home with the sober escorts most large universities have).
Girls who get heavily intoxicated at frat parties are supposed to be banned from attending future events at the house, precisely to avoid the risk of her having intoxicated sex with a brother and subjecting the chapter or its members to punishment as a result.
But you’re supposed to ban them before something like this happens. Banning her after she had had sex with at least four brothers on the same night while high on ketamine that brothers gave her was a huge mistake.
They should have been doing everything they could at that point to keep her happy with them. The fraternity president needed to tell Newell or Ingalls (whichever of them first proposed the three-way), that Jane Doe was his girlfriend now and he had to marry her if necessary to protect the house.
If they’d done that, she likely never would have made a complaint.
Plenty of people have fun and consensual group sex. They don’t typically go to the police afterward. And if what Jane Doe and these men wanted was fun and consensual group sex, they could have arranged that for the next day when they were all sober. But let’s just be honest: Most sober and empowered 20-year-old women don’t want to have sex with more than a half-dozen men in a single night, and I suspect that the men in question knew that Jane Doe was not an enthusiastic participant but someone who had to be pressured and plied.
slate.com/life/2026/09/corne…
Flapling retweeted
This is so sad. The guy who took all those stock photos of wooden blocks with letters on them is having trouble making ends meet because of AI.
Flapling retweeted
Take an early look at the front page of The Wall Street Journal on.wsj.com/3VdLOsw
Flapling retweeted
The year is 2098. The Sino-American Empire has vanquished its last foes in the border regions of Éluōsī. The Two Emperors under Heaven proclaim a thousand years of prosperity. But in certain corners of the palace, machinations are in the air...
Flapling retweeted
I see this old vid going viral, and as usual the kids are drawing the wrong conclusions, so gather 'round and learn something.
Location wasn't silly or unimportant at the time: it was a core consumer app category, arguably more important than photo sharing. If you now assume you'll have a Google/Apple map full of rich location data, it's because of what that generation of apps built.
Sam ultimately failed with Loopt because he made two big wrong-way bets:
1. He bet on carriers rather than Apple/Google being who controlled the mobile experience, spending years doing deals with Sprint, Boost, etc. Then the App Store launched (yes, there was no app store for a long time), and he was caught wrong-footed.
2. Loopt's UX concept was too early and wrong. Like Find My or Snap Map now, he assumed users would be constantly sharing their location as a key part of the social experience. But most phones didn't even have GPS, or if they did 3p apps couldn't access location in the background, so the experience sucked.
Foursquare and Gowalla (acq. by Facebook) actually imposed work on the user, having them 'check in' to locations, and using 'game mechanics' (for a while the hottest UX paradigm) to want you to be the 'mayor' of your favorite bar. That eventually provided the rich data the social networks needed (and which Facebook and Google eventually rolled out to everyone).
Why did Dennis Crowley at Foursquare get it right and Sam wrong? Because Crowley had created Dodgeball, an app that let you check in via text and he understood the right UX. As with Twitter, the initial UX concepts often appear in texting but eventually succeed as a standalone app (consider what that means for AI app Instinct now).
Sam has a scene at the Loopt office in my memoir 'Chaos Monkeys' as he was assigned as our mentor during YC (my co-founders were too rattled by his intense style, and I'd go alone). He absolutely saved our ass by doing us a big favor once, something I'm still grateful for.
After Loopt's failure, Sam was mostly known for racing his Nissan GT-R up and down El Camino and writing $5k checks as a Sequoia scout. Even some YC founders snickered at PG's characterization of him as a founder comparable to Jobs.
Amnesiac tech loves retconning history, considering our present configuration of pixels and people as fated, created by providential men who arrived at the right time with the right idea and rode off into history. Those who lived through it realize that if we rolled the dice 100 times, in very few scenarios did we end up where we are today.
The way to cure whatever belief you have in 'great man' theories is to meet the man before the world had deemed him great. There were a lot of Sams running around doing demos like this then.
And BTW, that isn't a diner. That's Tres Amigos taqueria in Half Moon Bay. Scoble was the biggest consumer tech influencer of the time, and every consumer founder had to make their pilgrimage there to pitch him since he lived there.
This is Sam Altman at 25 years old, pitching Loopt to a person in a diner
It’s strange to watch now because he runs one of the most influential companies in the world
The app was a location-sharing app but nobody thinks about it when they think of Sam
It got me wondering how many founders are probably in their Loopt era rn?
The company they’re working on may not be the one they become known for
It might just be the company that teaches them how to sell, hire, raise money, and keep going long enough to find "it"
But at the time, it looks like a kid trying to explain a weird location app to a stranger over lunch
Flapling retweeted
“I am an Effective Altruist. The precautionary principle says we should act before catastrophe is certain. Given AI’s potentially irreversible downside, even a small existential risk demands restraint (Bostrom, 2014, Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, pp. 115–119; Ord, 2020, The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity pp. 167–170)”
“I am not an Effective Altruist. The precautionary principle cuts both ways. On a value pluralist account expected-utility reasoning must consider the enormous benefits of AI too; we shouldn’t impose massive opportunity costs on the basis of highly uncertain risks (Miller, 2007, National Responsibility and Global Justice, pp. 27–30; MacIntyre, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd ed. pp. 216–225)”
“But moral uncertainty gives us reason to hedge when the stakes are existential. If we cannot confidently rule out catastrophe prudence demands slowing down (MacAskill, 2022, What We Owe the Future: A Million-Year View, pp. 95–105)”
“Sophist that you are, your view transforms prudence into paralysis: treating the mere possibility of catastrophe as sufficient reason to suppress potentially transformative benefits. A rational precautionary policy weighs probabilities and opportunity costs, it doesn’t fear the worst case scenario by default (Dennet, 2017, From Bacteria to Bach and Back, pp. 350-55). The United States will NEVER be an Effective Altruist country”
Flapling retweeted
So the opening acts cancelled and his own band quit. Ed Sheeran says hold my beer. 😉
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Ed Sheeran has not performed since his opening acts all canceled on September 17th - his last concert was September 5th and his next will be September 19th. This performance was from his "Loop Tour" earlier the same year.
pastdates.edsheeran.com
edsheeran.com/#tour
Flapling retweeted
Replying to @TheZvi
I've got a few candidates for the next in case they're in need of some creativity:
- THE ONLY ALIGNMENT WE NEED IS WITH AMERICA
- YOUR NEIGHBOR COULD BE UPDATING HIS PRIORS
- ARE YOU NOW, OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN, AN EFFECTIVE ALTRUIST?
Flapling retweeted
Top 100 schools suck all the oxygen out of room when it comes to College Demographic Cliff discourse, but none of them are going anywhere. The mountain of red flags are around non-competitive LACs and regional schools like this.
Here's my absolute favorite genre of public relations spin.
When a university HAS to release it's 10th day enrollment numbers.
But, those numbers are catastrophically bad.
So they issue a 1,000 word press release that is full of nothing but fluff.
They released the first version of the article on September 3, which didn't contain the actual enrollment number.
Then they update that exact same press release a week later that buries the most important number at the bottom.
Actual enrollment.
I highlighted it in the screenshot below. You can barely see it.
And they also don't include previous year's enrollment numbers so a person has to go Googling to see actually how bad it is.
Western Illinois had 5,337 students enrolled in the Fall of 2025.
This year, it's 4,447.
That's a 16.7% decrease. Which is, like I said above, catastrophically bad.
In 2008, WIU's enrollment was 13,175.
They have lost two-thirds of their students in less than 20 years.
Flapling retweeted
It's hard to imagine a world where we get back to replacement fertility.
Consider:
Due to infertility, homosexuality, and disability, a lot of people aren't having kids. Throw in voluntary childlessness, and the remainder will need at least two kids, and 80% will need three!
Flapling retweeted
Asians who want to distinguish themselves from the herd can consider Arcticism theory. it is still fringe & low status among normies & negative status among lib majority. Be an early intellectual trendsetter. its like wearing Supreme when it was a dingy skateshop in NYC
It's not so much as insight as I am describing what I think is happening. Warning: This tweet contains a lot of words but it ultimately says nothing.
Most of the ABC "hate" is rephrasing something to the effect of "why do Asian Americans all conspicuously do/experience the same things?" The smelly lunch experience, the college applications, etc. all fit in this category of sameness; even if this caricature doesn't map exactly to reality it sort of feels more true than e.g. white people not seasoning their food.
So perhaps a combination of "it feels true" and that people feel comfortable about mocking them as a group is why I think they dominate the discourse from time to time and make it a bigger deal than what it is. For the latter reason this is certainly reinforced by self-aware/deprecating ABCs that are among the most critical of this group. But these are not especially good reasons to care so much about something.
"You guys ever NOTICE Asian Americans drink boba while playing hero shooters?" OK, so what? I agree it's probably not worth writing a Netflix show about it and maybe it's annoying to see, but revealed preference shows that people like dunking on Asian women starting their novels with the words My White Boyfriend, so it obviously can't just be that it annoys you.
And in any case, what would you even want them to do, start doing other things to signal they are not like other Asians, signals that would be completely lost online because we don't tend to discern what someone does at an individual level unless it's extremely baffling? "I just want a 2nd gen Chinese American who speaks Arabic and lives like a wigger who posts online about his experience with the opioid crisis" yeah sure, people will surely not make fun of you then.
I don't have a recommendation or anything. I think Valorant Asian twitter harassment, so to speak, is approximate to making fun of stan twitter or edtwt, there's just like a racial element to this and I think it's fine to point that out too. Valorant Asians do be playing val and women do be shopping. Once you turn this observation into pathological hatred it gets weird though, so don't do that.
Flapling retweeted
Pretty good strike from Anthropic. Handwringing about distillation is futile; "we get your sensitive data, and we hate your guts, you ok with that?" is a genuine threat to companies listed. They'll have problems *in China* now.
We're publishing our most detailed threat intelligence report to date.
It covers how people tried to misuse Claude—for cyberattacks, influence operations, surveillance, biology, and building weapons—and how we found and stopped them.
We disrupted every operation in the report, and used the lessons from them to strengthen our safeguards. Where appropriate, we also shared what we found with authorities and other AI companies.
These cases are not typical: we’re highlighting some of the most sophisticated misuse we’ve seen. But they’re especially important to discuss, because they show us where AI misuse is headed, where our safeguards work, and where they need to improve.
We’re publishing this report so others can spot the same activity on their own platforms, and so we can give the public a clearer view of how emerging threats develop.
Read the report: anthropic.com/threat-intelli…














































