There is NO flat earth
The globe
Joined May 2025
- Tweets20.2K
- Following219
- Followers217
- Likes3.9K
Pinned Tweet
Every flat earther that I’ve asked to present a working flat earth model has lied to me and deflected. If you choose to engage with me and do the same, you will be blocked.
Anyone on my blocked list is a proven liar and coward that can’t admit they have no working model.
Typical retarded Flerf claiming everyone who shows verifbake proof that their claim is wrong must be a bot. 🤣🤣🤣🤦♂️🤷♂️
Flerfspective retweeted
You're denying reality. The sun's angular size does not change through the course of the day. Even flerfs avoid this one as it is a FE killer and easily measured. Prove me wrong and fill in the numbers below and we can use them to calculate the expected angular size of the sun.
Proven wrong.. and gives up. Oh well. I tried to explain the difference between these two things. 🤣🤣🤷♂️
Flat earthers don’t seem to understand how claims work. When something has been established with published work of the methods and results showing something exists, and that testing is repeatable and always shows something exists… never been refuted.. to the point where we literally rely on these physics every day.. it’s no one’s burden to reprove these results to the person question or asserting that they don’t exist. It’s 100% YOUR burden to refute what has already been established. If you can find fault in the methods and/or the results and publish your own work that shows this and is also repeatable and available for scrutiny, and no one can refute you.. only then will you have an argument against the previously established physics. Please learn how this works before you give us “nuh uh” as your argument against established physics, math, or anything verifiable by anyone. #FlatEarthFail
#GravityIsEmpirical
I’m still waiting for any challenger to refute anything here.
To any flat earther:
Pick any one of these verifiable facts that falsify flat earth and proves the globe. Saying they’re not proof without refuting what they prove only proves you’re a liar and a coward. So pick one and let’s see you refute it with verifiable data anyone can independently verify.
•Geometry - clearly shows a flat plane cannot produce the horizon we observe, that changes its position with altitude of the observer, or cause any obstruction we observe.
•Trigonometry - clearly proves elevation angles to distant objects at multiple distances isn’t even possible with a flat plane and only possible with a spherical geometry. It proves the sun would never appear anywhere near the ground.
•Sun Path - flat earth dictates a path for the sun that the sun doesn’t follow. Even worse on the southern hemisphere where the sun appears to move in the opposite direction that flat earth dictates it would.
•Sun Angular Size - the Sun measures between .52° - .545° throughout a year, and no measurable angular size change in a day, consistent with a sun 93 million miles away and inconsistent with any flat earth sun of only a few thousand miles away.
•Twilight - if the light source moves too far away to see the source, that means no light from it will be visible to you. Twilight is only possible if the light source is just obstructed and not too far away. You can test this yourself.
•Plumb lines - on a flat earth, all plumb lines at any distance measured would be parallel to each other. Instead, we measure upward divergences a rate of 1° per 69 miles. Anyone can measure reciprocal zenith angles.
•The South Celestial Pole - is viewed in the southern hemisphere when looking directly south and never moves laterally. Rotation of the stars around the pole is the opposite of the north celestial pole. This is observed looking south from every location in the southern hemisphere, and many simultaneously. You can see it from South Africa, South America, and Australia at the exact same time in June/July. This is expected on the globe, as south is the same direction, but impossible on a flat earth, as south is all different directions.
I can go on and on.. but start here. My bet is you won’t even address a single point with anything verifiable.
Flat earth fails with any point here individually, let alone adding them together to show multiple aspects that all confirm the globe. Flat earth never had any hope of being a model for the shape of earth. It fails at the most basic tests, and even more so when adding them together.
Waiting for you to prove the claims you’ve made. Can you, or not? Oh wait.. you blocked me now because you could t prove anything you claimed.
You couldn’t prove space is fake or that anyone here is a bot. If you need our involvement, you don’t have proof. And if I do get involved, it will come with a hefty bet and a contract for you to sign so I can hold you accountable for the money you’ll owe me for having to bother to prove myself because you decided to make a claim about me that you can’t prove @Inquisitorian77
This moron things others need to do his research for him. No @4dots899721, if you question something, it’s up to YOU to research it. When you find that there’s published work establishing what it is you’re questioning, it’s up to YOU to verify the results yourself. If you can find fault, then show it by publishing your work, so others can scrutinize it and refute you, or establish your work as the new standard. No one has to lift a finger for you to do your own research.
@grok if you or @Flerfspective have knowledge of published work would it not be logical to direct sceptics of the location of the published works?
Can any flat earther explain why you all lie? This is a lie. Anyone can verify this is a lie. Even @sly_sparkane has repeated this experiment. It takes next to no time to research and see that this has been repeated many times over centuries. FFS 🤦♂️
There is a VERY good reason why the Cavendish Experiment has never been repeated.
1. no. The Cavendish experiment was NOT an experiment to prove that matter attracts matter. (matter attracts matter was an ACCEPTED ASSUMPTION prior to the experiment - to determine earth density.
2. it is simply not repeatable, as the conclusions can NOT show that the effects are due to "matter attracts matter")
3. Didnt Einstein DISPROVE the Newton's Gravitational theory? Because ONLY ONE can be correct. Newton and Einstein. Both can be wrong. Both cant be right.
If not, then Cavendish DISPROVED Space-Time.
If yes, then Cavendish demonstrated Space-time bending in his 1432 barn experiment with rocks.
It is checkmate - either way.
Proof that flat earthers literally know nothing about physics of any kind. Thinks the change in motion has anything to do with a motor keeping a pendulum going. Worse for him (and flerfs), we can do this without a motor or any magnets.
Calls people Jews that aren’t, because he’s a loser, and pretends it’s derogatory, then writes this. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦♂️
unavailable
To any flat earther:
Pick any one of these verifiable facts that falsify flat earth and proves the globe. Saying they’re not proof without refuting what they prove only proves you’re a liar and a coward. So pick one and let’s see you refute it with verifiable data anyone can independently verify.
•Geometry - clearly shows a flat plane cannot produce the horizon we observe, that changes its position with altitude of the observer, or cause any obstruction we observe.
•Trigonometry - clearly proves elevation angles to distant objects at multiple distances isn’t even possible with a flat plane and only possible with a spherical geometry. It proves the sun would never appear anywhere near the ground.
•Sun Path - flat earth dictates a path for the sun that the sun doesn’t follow. Even worse on the southern hemisphere where the sun appears to move in the opposite direction that flat earth dictates it would.
•Sun Angular Size - the Sun measures between .52° - .545° throughout a year, and no measurable angular size change in a day, consistent with a sun 93 million miles away and inconsistent with any flat earth sun of only a few thousand miles away.
•Twilight - if the light source moves too far away to see the source, that means no light from it will be visible to you. Twilight is only possible if the light source is just obstructed and not too far away. You can test this yourself.
•Plumb lines - on a flat earth, all plumb lines at any distance measured would be parallel to each other. Instead, we measure upward divergences a rate of 1° per 69 miles. Anyone can measure reciprocal zenith angles.
•The South Celestial Pole - is viewed in the southern hemisphere when looking directly south and never moves laterally. Rotation of the stars around the pole is the opposite of the north celestial pole. This is observed looking south from every location in the southern hemisphere, and many simultaneously. You can see it from South Africa, South America, and Australia at the exact same time in June/July. This is expected on the globe, as south is the same direction, but impossible on a flat earth, as south is all different directions.
I can go on and on.. but start here. My bet is you won’t even address a single point with anything verifiable.
Flat earth fails with any point here individually, let alone adding them together to show multiple aspects that all confirm the globe. Flat earth never had any hope of being a model for the shape of earth. It fails at the most basic tests, and even more so when adding them together.
Come on @4dots899721, you have an audience waiting for you to pick any one of these points to refute.
