Fortissax (@FortySacks) header
Fortissax (@FortySacks) profile picture

Canadian Nationalist | Anglo Québécois 🍁⚜️ | Archeofuturist | Support my work! → https://nitter.cf/t.co/VcAiH0zgYk

Montréal, Québec
Joined April 2024
Photo by Fortissax (@FortySacks)Photo by Fortissax (@FortySacks)Photo by Fortissax (@FortySacks)Photo by Fortissax (@FortySacks)Photo by Fortissax (@FortySacks)Photo by Fortissax (@FortySacks)Photo by Fortissax (@FortySacks)Photo by Fortissax (@FortySacks)Photo by Fortissax (@FortySacks)
Fortissax retweeted
Sorry Annakin but the galaxy is too overpopulated for you to have children with Padme But yes, we are going to continue importing billions of Jawa's and Tuscan Sand people. Anyone can be a Jedi if they come here legally
67
1,006
18
14,414
141,463
Fortissax retweeted
"Anakin, we need H-1B droids for those jobs because the Galactic Republic does not have enough qualified citizens to meet the demand."
2
52
734
7,213
Fortissax retweeted
TRVKE I received this morning:
32
578
15
12,073
98,662
"Anakin, the Jedi have classified wanting a wife and children as far-right extremism."
21
446
14
5,161
36,012
Fortissax retweeted
“You killed the 70 IQ sand people that raped and killed your mom but you were angry when you did it. That’s the difference between you and me. When I wage war on an entire galaxy on behalf of a corrupt senate to help planets dodge their trade obligations all while completely failing to sense the one Sith Lord right under my nose, I do it with rainbow flags and diversity.”
72
1,027
38
12,619
169,980
La France importe des zillions de Traoré et de Mehra qui détestent le pays mais empêchent des patriotes européens qui aiment la France d'entrer sur son territoire. L'espace Schengen c'est juste pour les Africains en fait.
I was stopped at the airport in France. I will be deported tomorrow. Soon they will also take my phone. You can stop people but not ideas. Remigration will happen in spite of that. If you want to fight this injustice join us @SaveEuropeAct Bon courage a patriotes francais. Go on the streets and fight for your nation!
4
41
274
2,854
I was stopped at the airport in France. I will be deported tomorrow. Soon they will also take my phone. You can stop people but not ideas. Remigration will happen in spite of that. If you want to fight this injustice join us @SaveEuropeAct Bon courage a patriotes francais. Go on the streets and fight for your nation!
618
2,824
302
13,034
466,023
Fortissax retweeted
The other biggest point is that the Jedi code was so sacrosanct that it could never be violated whenever the code gave a negative outcome for Anakin, but suddenly, when the Jedi code was finally in his favor and dictated keeping Palpatine alive, instead, Palpatine was to be killed in blatant violation of the code. The Jedi all of a sudden were willing to throw the code out the window when it benefited them, but never when it benefited Anakin. Which is why Mace Windu, instead, ends up thrown out the window. I wonder why young guys relate to this story so much and find it so compelling.
“Anakin, my allegiance is to the political order that left your mother in slavery and then said you weren’t allowed to have any attachment to her or Padme!”
101
706
21
10,079
133,526
“Anakin, my allegiance is to the political order that left your mother in slavery and then said you weren’t allowed to have any attachment to her or Padme!”
87
501
32
6,970
202,233
Fortissax retweeted
“Anakin we are a GALAXY of IMMIGRANTS!”
6
25
2
207
2,317
Fortissax retweeted
“Anakin we are a GALAXY of IMMIGRANTS!”
62
622
27
10,970
161,471
Replying to @AuronMacintyre
The left: we want you dead. The right: let’s debate the merits of that and hopefully we can win at the ballot box.
2
5
76
770
Politics isn't a debate over procedural nuance, you got to pretend it was because you lived in a blessed aboration Politics is the existential struggle between competing groups for dominance and survival You need to stop deluding yourself, you need to know what time it is
this is not a small group of people on the left anymore, but a large, dominant faction without whom democrats can’t win elections. and there is no debating them, because they aren’t interested in changing your mind. they just earnestly want you to die.
44
228
5
1,811
21,130
Fortissax retweeted
In three years on this platform, I think my biggest "called it" was immediately after Charlie Kirk's death, when I said that Right Wingers should not be engaging anyone in a university environment. It's not giving up or running away. It's not even a retreat. Universities are going through a crisis of legitimacy, and every engagement on a campus gives them legitimacy. At best, an on-campus event accomplishes nothing. At worst, it's all upside for them and all downside for you. Watch the video and tell me there was anything to be gained from this interaction, or any similar interaction. If you want to engage students, administrators, or formal academics in discourse, knock yourself out. But if it's in the physical world, it has to be in a venue that shows no reverence for the university system, even if it's just a rickety community center. If you want to engage a formal academic in online debate or discourse, there needs to be a moderator who awards zero points for academic credentials. It doesn't have to be one of our guys, but it needs to be someone like @BenjaminABoyce who shrugs at credentials instead of fawning over a PhD from Yale. And there are lots of people like that in our circle, including people who have those formal credentials.
The way he says "I'll pray for you" gives the game away He isn't refraining from putting her in her place out of Christian love, he just isn't allowed to - personal violence abolished by state violence He would be more capable of love if he were more capable of violence
12
19
5
231
14,678
Fortissax retweeted
Okay, enough with the theatre. If this summit were held anywhere else, the local premier would not be demanding to give a speech at the event and to run their own negotiations.
J’ai pris note aujourd’hui de la nouvelle offre de Mark Carney d’obtenir le droit de m’assoir à sa table d’honneur à titre de spectateur, sans droit de parole ni droit de négocier au nom du Québec. Cette proposition revient à demander au Québec de rentrer dans les rangs, avec la vassalisation et l’invisibilisation du Québec que cela implique, en échange d’obtenir de meilleurs sièges de spectateurs pour regarder la partie. Comme premier ministre, je refuserai toujours que le Québec soit réduit au rôle de spectateur lorsqu’il s’agit de représenter et protéger les intérêts économiques et politiques des Québécois. La réalité est que nous sommes devant une stratégie de marginalisation du Québec sur la scène internationale et de subordination des champs de compétence du Québec à la volonté du fédéral. Je note à cet effet que tous les chefs de partis de l’Assemblée nationale ont indiqué hier que s’ils étaient dans la position de premier ministre et devant un tel sommet sur le territoire du Québec, ils s’attendraient à prendre la parole et à participer à part entière. À Ottawa, le chef de l'opposition officielle ainsi que le chef du Bloc Québécois ont également appuyé notre demande. J’ai donc pris la plume et j’ai écrit aux représentants de l’Union européenne pour leur rappeler que des ententes qui impliquent l’Europe et le Québec doivent forcément passer par le gouvernement du Québec, et à plus forte raison si le sommet se tient sur notre territoire. Le refus de nous donner la parole à titre d’hôte pour souhaiter la bienvenue à nos invités y est également mentionné. Je lance donc l’invitation pour une discussion bilatérale dans un meilleur contexte qui permettrait au Québec de ne pas être exclu. À ce titre, j’enverrai le diplomate en chef du Québec, Pascal Paradis, pour ouvrir ces canaux de discussion pour la suite.
218
30
8
420
32,472
Fortissax retweeted
25
1,387
23
14,379
220,463
If NATO is concerned about the rise of "ethnonationalist groups" throughout the West, it would be well advised to consider the underlying cause. This is, very obviously, the relentless hammering of mass immigration being inflicted upon NATO member states. From a military standpoint mass immigration is a dire threat. It undermines social cohesion; it alienates native populations from their governments; it destroys the legitimacy of national governments; worst of all, it destroys national morale, making native populations deeply reluctant to volunteer for military service. Why fight for a country that hates its citizens? Why fight for a country that whose government is deliberately invading itself? If NATO was a serious military organization it would be treating the immigration policy of its member countries as a DEFCON 1 level threat. NATO is concerned about Russia; how the hell does NATO's high command expect to fight Russia with populations who despise their governments? Instead, we get undergrad term paper drivel like this, which quotes the opinion of an Antifa blogger as an authoritative source, and argues that the Great Replacement is conspiracy theory disinformation, not because low-fertility Western populations aren't being replaced, but because it's craaaaaazy to suggest that replacement is deliberate government policy. Meanwhile, in Canada, the Century Initiative pushes for mass immigration to increase Canada's population to 100 million by 2100. The Century Initiative is a lobbying group started by Dominic Barton, a former McKinsey executive and former Canadian ambassador to China. That's about as elite as it comes. Canadian immigration policy is on track to meet the Century Initiative goal. Furthermore, Canadian immigration policy is by definition elite policy. The Canadian government obviously wants to import so many third worlders that Canadians become a minority. Is the purpose to render Canadians a minority? Maybe not, but that's the inevitable outcome, and Canadian elites obviously don't care if that happens. Which part of this is a conspiracy theory, exactly? It's below NATO's dignity to engage in these virtue signaling, hair-splitting leftist frame games. Does NATO think that this kind of narrative engineering is going to make anti-immigration sentiment disappear? Maybe NATO thinks the answer is more Internet censorship. "Wow, now that NATO has shut down the Internet, I've realized that all these Indians pouring into my country aren't really here, it's all a Russian psyop. I will now go die fighting Russia because I'm really mad at Russia for convincing me that there are immigrants in my country." Is that how NATO thinks this goes? Again, a serious military treaty organization would be treating mass immigration as the existential threat that it is, not bending itself into pretzels to avoid giving the nice female colonels the sads. If NATO can't even do that, it's beyond ridiculous to imagine that it can prosecute a successful military campaign.
A Canadian ethnonationalist group is echoing the rise of its European counterparts. In this article, Dorigen Gray traces how disinformation is fueling calls for “remigration,” and what the rise of political groups championing these narratives could mean for NATO.
14
129
5
958
24,599
>undergrad term paper drivel Did I call it or what
If NATO is concerned about the rise of "ethnonationalist groups" throughout the West, it would be well advised to consider the underlying cause. This is, very obviously, the relentless hammering of mass immigration being inflicted upon NATO member states. From a military standpoint mass immigration is a dire threat. It undermines social cohesion; it alienates native populations from their governments; it destroys the legitimacy of national governments; worst of all, it destroys national morale, making native populations deeply reluctant to volunteer for military service. Why fight for a country that hates its citizens? Why fight for a country that whose government is deliberately invading itself? If NATO was a serious military organization it would be treating the immigration policy of its member countries as a DEFCON 1 level threat. NATO is concerned about Russia; how the hell does NATO's high command expect to fight Russia with populations who despise their governments? Instead, we get undergrad term paper drivel like this, which quotes the opinion of an Antifa blogger as an authoritative source, and argues that the Great Replacement is conspiracy theory disinformation, not because low-fertility Western populations aren't being replaced, but because it's craaaaaazy to suggest that replacement is deliberate government policy. Meanwhile, in Canada, the Century Initiative pushes for mass immigration to increase Canada's population to 100 million by 2100. The Century Initiative is a lobbying group started by Dominic Barton, a former McKinsey executive and former Canadian ambassador to China. That's about as elite as it comes. Canadian immigration policy is on track to meet the Century Initiative goal. Furthermore, Canadian immigration policy is by definition elite policy. The Canadian government obviously wants to import so many third worlders that Canadians become a minority. Is the purpose to render Canadians a minority? Maybe not, but that's the inevitable outcome, and Canadian elites obviously don't care if that happens. Which part of this is a conspiracy theory, exactly? It's below NATO's dignity to engage in these virtue signaling, hair-splitting leftist frame games. Does NATO think that this kind of narrative engineering is going to make anti-immigration sentiment disappear? Maybe NATO thinks the answer is more Internet censorship. "Wow, now that NATO has shut down the Internet, I've realized that all these Indians pouring into my country aren't really here, it's all a Russian psyop. I will now go die fighting Russia because I'm really mad at Russia for convincing me that there are immigrants in my country." Is that how NATO thinks this goes? Again, a serious military treaty organization would be treating mass immigration as the existential threat that it is, not bending itself into pretzels to avoid giving the nice female colonels the sads. If NATO can't even do that, it's beyond ridiculous to imagine that it can prosecute a successful military campaign.
7
15
584
13,270
I read the poll and didn’t see any mentions of the methodology used to field participants. The poll was funded with help from the Ted Rogers School of Management and the Diversity Institute-Century Initiative associates. I think the pollsters cherry-picked participants to create a false narrative that Immigrants are more against immigration than Canadians. Probably only polled in places with lots of bureaucratic jobs.
1
1
7
250
If there’s anything Brazil has taught us over the last four years, it’s that Leftists will rig elections, call themselves defenders of democracy while they’re doing it, hijack the courts after they’ve won, use them to convert the country into a soft dictatorship, and then arrest their political enemies, ban free speech, and attack social media platforms they can’t control in order to guarantee that they never lose power ever again. And with that power they will construct an inverted hierarchy that places troons, third worldists, criminals, drug addicts, and mentally ill lunatics at the top of the social pyramid, all while acting like they’re fighting for equality and just being a heckin’ decent human being.
145
1,353
41
9,134
115,629