VOTE IN PRIMARIES Liberty - Love - Hope - Truth Liberty, NOT morality, should dictate Law. True Love is voluntary. Set goals. Gain knowledge. Christ is King!

Joined October 2024
You call customer service and it’s a SAHM picking up a few hours while her kids are at school, not some Indian on the other side of the world you can barely understand. You go to get gas, and it’s either a teenager or someone in his 20s in college working the register, no one in the Patel Cartel. You run into someone you know from church at the grocery store. You check in about her daughter who’s just been off to college. There are no women in hijabs and no junkies OD’ing outside the front door. You need a roof guy, her brother owns a roofing company, he and a bunch of white guys with maybe one or two Hispanics on the whole thing can do a great job. Everyone speaks English and has high quality workmanship. Your doctor is an intelligent white man with good moral formation in addition to good medical education and judgment, not some DEI hire or foreigner with questionable credentials, and CERTAINLY not an NP with an online education and a script pad who knows no more than what you yourself can google. You ask the man at GameStop what to play and it’s not some idiot with the third world stare, but a nerd who loves this stuff and will have a library in his head of games from which to choose based on what you say. The pharmacist is a white woman who speaks English and knows most of the docs who send over the scripts, and none of them have unpronounceable surnames. This is all possible btw. It’s what the boomers grew up in. It’s living memory. It sounds like a fantasy now, like a utopian joke. But it can be real. It’ll take a lot of making women, cucks, and foreigners sad, but we can achieve this.
Imagine how good it would feel to live in a society where everyone feels like your compatriot, speaks English, and you can make a deal with a handshake. That existed in living memory. People didn’t lock their doors because they wanted their grandkids to burst in and bring joy.
82
480
24
5,652
163,798
open your mail Write everything to ier @ usdoj dot gov Then, Google search for "DOLOIG Hotline form" and proceed to file a complaint. If you yourself were terminated in favor of a foreign hire, please file a charge to the EEOC. Do all three agencies at once if you were personally affected by this. If you have any material from your employer, showcasing a preference for foreign hiring. Please capture it, screenshot it with your phone and submit it to the government. You need to be doing this TODAY. These go to @AAGDhillon and @CivilRights
How can we report a company that’s laying off US citizens while outsourcing to India and maintaining/hiring H1Bs
7
315
3
828
24,393
As I study the Gospel of Jesus Christ, I'm continually reminded of how often I forget to Love as Christ does. God is a God of Justice AND Mercy. He urges us to be peacemakers. He urges us to Love even our enemies. In a world where our enemies threaten our total destruction, this is difficult to comprehend. But I have faith in God and in His promised blessings.
39
“Advocates for absolute religious freedom should yield to the reality that in a nation with citizens of many different religious beliefs or disbeliefs, the government must sometimes limit the right of some to act upon some of their beliefs when it is necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all.” —President Dallin H. Oaks, “Faith, Freedom, and the Common Good,” National Cathedral, Washington, D.C.
72
277
48
2,601
144,413
Replying to @mattvanswol
Islam is NOT a religion, it is a cult. No religion tells followers to kill those who do not believe... only cults. Federal ban on a cult is perfectly fine.
25
161
3
877
8,459
You can tell a lot about a person by how they react when someone dies.
3,885
62,599
6,104
257,761
Good men must die, but death can't kill their names.
1,977
45,116
2,930
183,987
The Archivist retweeted
Women were never oppressed. There was NO oppression. What women call oppression today was just PROTECTION. Let me break it down for you: 1. VOTING: Women say "we couldn't vote." But back then, voting was not a right, it was a RESPONSIBILITY. Only people who owned property, paid heavy taxes, held public office, or were drafted to DIE in wars could vote. 100% of the people dying in wars were men. You want to vote to send men to war, while you sit at home safe? Makes zero sense. Voting was linked to the DRAFT. You vote, you go to war. Men understood that. 2. BANKING: "You needed your husband's signature!" Yes, because by LAW, a woman was LEGALLY PROTECTED from debt. Her husband was the head of household and by law HE was 100% liable for ALL debts she made. If she borrowed and couldn't pay, THEY CAME FOR HIM, not her. Creditors went to jail or lost everything - the husband. So of course his signature was needed. He is the one who goes to prison if you don't pay. 3. PROPERTY - COVERTURE: They cry about coverture. Coverture meant when you marry, your property merges under ONE name, the husband's, because there was ONE tax filing per household, not two like today. ONE household, ONE name, ONE tax. It was not to steal from you. It was because the husband was legally responsible for you. If you got sued, he paid. If you owed taxes, he paid. He took your debts too. These men had mothers they worshipped and daughters they would die for. They were not oppressing women, they were covering them. 4. CONTROLLING WOMEN'S BODIES: The biggest lie. Back then there were NO abortion pills, NO condoms that worked, NO diapers, NO formula, NO government money to raise a child alone as a single mother, NO good jobs for women to survive alone. Who bears the most risk in unprotected sex? THE WOMAN. She gets pregnant for 9 months, she risks death during childbirth, which was very common then. So what did society do? They made sure women stayed virgins until marriage, and made sure men MARRIED them before sex. That is not oppression, that is PROTECTION from becoming a single mother with 3 kids and no food. And it WORKED. Single motherhood rate was less than 5%. Marriage rate was 90%. Children grew up with fathers. Today you have "freedom" - 40% single mothers, fatherless homes, abortions everywhere, and women crying that men don't want them. There was never oppression. There was a system that understood biology and protected women from the consequences of their own choices.
Opinions on Feminism that will leave you like this
466
5,067
287
28,046
1,177,627
The Archivist retweeted
Terence Tao made a very powerful point: “In most cases in pure mathematics, the problems are posed not because we desperately want the solution to these problems in and of themselves, but because we have seen from past experience that human-directed efforts to solve these problems tend to spur further development of the field through the efforts to solve such problems, and then to digest any partial or complete solutions that emerge for further insights. Prematurely solving the problem by purely AI-powered methods—particularly without full transparency into the solution process—can contaminate this process to the point where it actually becomes a net negative for the progress of mathematics as a whole.” I’ve been following Terence Tao for like 20 years, and I have always been impressed by the clarity of his thinking. This clarity stands out even more in this difficult moment, as AI labs turn mathematics into a battleground in their race for supremacy. In this race, they risk damaging one of humanity’s highest intellectual endeavours.
224
1,806
226
9,348
483,726
The Archivist retweeted
holy shit, its actually happening
I think the plan is to get researchers to start using their AI with a limited compute budget, then once they have all the academic data, they’ll basically steal all their ideas from underneath them and run the research internally with their unlimited compute budget!
191
7,739
58
79,380
2,548,877
The Archivist retweeted
>sam altman: "we tried this because there were rumor on the internet" >rumor: math professor close to solving navier-stokes >the professor: using codex for a year >openai: has all his logs >checked every codex session tagged to N-S >found the most promising one >spun up 10,000 agents to finish the proof where he couldn't >they got caught >told the guy if you say anything you'll destroy your own career >he ruins his career over this >openai: "we did not see his work" >also openai: "we cannot rule out that de-identified data from their usage helped improve our models" they stole it lmao
734
12,591
1,157
91,440
3,980,106
Lindsay Clancy did not plan her children’s murders the day she did it. She started laying the groundwork for a trial 5 months prior. How do I know? The evidence is clear if you look through a nurse’s eyes. As an RN, the first thing we’re taught is that “if you didn’t document it, it didn’t happen” in regards to patient care. Lindsay was an L&D nurse. She heard that line in school and on every unit she ever worked. Callan was only a few months old when she began “seeking treatment”. She told doctors she was depressed and anxious. She did not tell them she was suicidal or homicidal. She knew exactly what those words do. One statement of intent to harm herself or the kids and she is in a locked unit. If they even suspected she wanted to hurt anyone, it would have unleashed a chain reaction that would prevent her from completing her plan. She wanted freedom and she knew just what lines not to cross to reach that goal. What she did do was write it down. Diary entries. Texts. Conversations with her husband and her mother. Thoughts of harming herself and the children. That paper trail exists for a reason. It is the documentation she knew a future jury would see. For months the pattern held: disclose the dark thoughts to family and to a journal. Minimize or deny them to the people who could actually help. Cycle through providers. We call that “doctor shopping” in the medical world and it’s a clear indicator of someone who wants specific medicines or is trying to avoid coordination between doctors. She KNEW the system and exactly how to use it. Collect prescriptions. Zoloft, Prozac, Seroquel, Valium, Klonopin, Ativan, Lamictal, amitriptyline—thirteen medications, more than thirty prescriptions. A nurse knows which side effects to report to get a med changed or dose adjusted. The list itself became the evidence she wanted. We don’t know if she ever took any of them except on the day of the crime. As a mom, if I were having actual thoughts of hurting my kids, I’d be the first one screaming it to every doctor, every nurse. I’d make sure I was locked away where I couldn’t actually hurt them. But not Lindsay. She did all she could to not be locked away. When the Women & Infants postpartum program discharged her after one day because she didn’t fit the criteria, the calendar was not on her side. Callan was eight months old. The cleanest “postpartum psychosis” window was already gone. She had to execute sooner rather than later. She planned it to the minute. As a nurse, she knew exactly how long it would take to strangle each child—about six minutes. She sent her husband on errands that would keep him out of the house long enough to kill all three and stage what was supposed to look like a suicide attempt. Her medical education ensured she knew EXACTLY how deep and what direction to cut her wrists to ensure she wouldn’t bleed out. She knew EXACTLY how deep and where to cut her neck to avoid hitting the carotid arteries, the jugular veins, or compromise her airway. She even knew jumping out a 2nd story window wouldn’t be fatal but would look dramatic to a future jury. Every cut, every decision was calculated, cold, and with the medical training to execute the plan flawlessly (the injuries she sustained were a miscalculation from landing wrong, not the fall itself). Lindsay Clancy is not a woman who “snapped with no warning.” or even one who was failed by her family and the healthcare system. She is a woman who spent months building a file and setting the stage so she could blame her crime on those very people while she could live out the childless life she dreamed of living.
As a nurse, I’ve been around thousands of psychotic people and none of them would have had the mental capacity to carry out one murder like this, much less 3. Think about what happened in those final moments. Lindsay Clancy calmly wrapped her rubber exercise band around 8 month old Callan’s chubby neck as her two other children looked on. As she pulled the band tighter and tighter, he couldn’t understand what was happening. For about 15 seconds, the pain was localized to his neck as his airway was crushed and his skin painfully pinched. 15 seconds later, his little lungs felt intense burning due to the build up of carbon dioxide. As he gasped for air and struggled to escape, the blood trapped in his skull started pounding, causing excruciating pressure and his eyes began to bulge. She continued to squeeze while he endured unimaginable pain and terror until he finally lost consciousness after 3 tortured minutes. Once he finally stopped fighting, his mother kept the pressure on his neck for 2-3 more minutes until she thought she’d finished the job. One body down in 6 minutes. Little Dawson, 3, must’ve sensed what was about to happen to him because he ran to his father’s office, likely seeking a safe space. That’s where Lindsay caught him and wrapped an exercise band around his neck. A three year old is stronger than an infant and she’d have had to use much greater force to subdue him even though the timeline would have remained similar. Three minutes of horrific pain and terror until a loss of consciousness then 3 more minutes of pressure to finish the job. Two kids down in 12 minutes. It would have been even more difficult to with her only daughter, Cora, 5. The little girl would have witnessed one, if not both of her brothers, being systematically strangled by her mother. But fight as she might, she was no match for her mother. Lindsey Clancy caught her, held her down, and began the killing ritual. As the band went around her neck and the life was squeezed out of her over the next 6 minutes, she’d wondered why her mommy was hurting her. Imagine the pain, the confusion, the horror the little one endured in her final moments. It took Lindsay 18 minutes to kill all three of her children. Death by strangulation isn’t a fast or painless death, as she well knew since she was an RN. It is an up close and personal killing and she’d have witnessed every moment of pain and terror in their helpless eyes as the life faded from their bodies. She CHOSE how her children would die. Notice how she didn’t try to hang herself because she knew what a horrific death that would be. She tried to give herself the easy death she denied her children. Whatever her mental state, she is a cold blooded killer who wiped out her family with less mercy than a serial killer. Lindsay Clancy is a monster who deserves to die exactly as her children did- afraid and in pain. God can have mercy on her soul because I certainly won’t.
645
4,152
269
14,620
916,358
A truth that is not usually openly talked about, but is important for everyone to understand.
Women: stop believing this shit. It doesn’t matter if you’re violent or not. Men: 1. 35% stronger on average and at the margins 60+%. 2. 40% more cardiovascular 3. 10-20x more testosterone 4. Better eye hand coordination 5. Better target tracking 6. Men are 10x more represented at 130+ IQ where innovation occurs. 10. Men work on average 9.4 hours more a week even if the woman has no children and at the margins 17 hours more. Women cannot defend themselves against men. And they cannot build machines to help them defend themselves against men either. Physics, engineering, math are almost entirely men (over 90%). The average woman couldn’t strip down a gun to clean it. The average man has done it. You’ve been lied to your entire life because every man that you ever play fought with was holding back so he didn’t hurt you. What you don’t grasp is that the average man can kill a woman basically instantly if he chose to with one swing. At the very least you’ll be unconscious and then he’ll finish the job (probably after raping you) All of women’s rights are granted voluntarily by men and voluntarily defended by men. You are entirely dependent upon men to protect you and protect your rights and you’d do well to understand this: you have freedom because good men choose to give it to you and even more importantly because good men kill bad men whom would take it from you. All good men have to decide is that it isn’t worth fighting for women’s rights anymore and you’ll quickly fall victim to the entire religion that wants to rape you and sell you as sex slaves while keeping your covered and beaten if you misbehave. Meanwhile women keep voting to empower bad men and constrain good men whom would kill the bad men. See the invasion of Europe by Islam going on right now: entirely enabled by women voters while tens is not hundreds of thousands of women and girls are raped, hooked on drugs, and sold into sex slavery. And the women keep voting for the bad men doing it.
2
170
The Archivist retweeted
Replying to @CynicalPublius
3
33
249
3,018
The Archivist retweeted
Last September it was finding out which of your family, friends, and coworkers would be okay with you being killed for having opinions they disagreed with. This year it's finding out which ones would be okay with killing their own children under the right circumstances.
25
334
8
3,378
29,773
The best way to control large numbers of people is to influence their beliefs and their perceptions. This can only be done through mass media. Before mass media, control of the masses was mostly done through force. If your enemy is influencing the beliefs and perceptions of your people, the only way to fight this is to get rid of the enemy. You cannot wake up people who have been brainwashed. You cannot unbrainwash them unless you get control over the tools that were used to brainwash them. We need to own tiktok and YouTube and all of the TV channels and whoever publishes books for schools and so on.
134
339
15
4,041
50,290
Sexual duty in marriage does not mean a husband owns his wife’s body. It means a wife cannot treat the erotic life of the marriage as irrelevant and then insist nothing important has been neglected.
20
33
1
710
10,278
Did I stutter?
470
1,297
125
11,158
107,137
The Archivist retweeted
Investors like Paul want the immigration debate to be strictly polar because it is the only way their traitorous ideas might seem reasonable. They paint one side as racist, backwards, economically illiterate absolutists and the other as enlightened, growth-minded cosmopolitian realists. Support for laws that protect American citizens can be dismissed as uneducated, anyone who hires immigrants or foreigners in any capacity a hypocrite. American law should, and does, advantage American citizens. We should not have to compete on an even playing field with billions of people who almost universally don't share our values or respect our institutions, even if they are "the most qualified" or willing to work double the hours for the same wages. The men running Operation Paperclip did not think Americans should have to compete with the entire Third World, they understood that a carefully controlled amount of highly-skilled expert immigration is net good for America even when allegience is in question. It is worth noting that even on a purely economic level, ignoring all burdens of loyalty or allegiance to your countrymen and treating America as nothing but an economic activity zone, it still doesn't make sense to say without qualification that foreigners should get any job where they are more qualified than their American counterpart. As just one easy example out of dozens, about 20% of immigrants return home after less than five years, taking all their savings and vested shares with them. Another 20% will leave within ten years, doing the same. All the while, they will wire, on average, ~15% of their wages out of the United States economy every month. Some occupations and origins average 30%! The idea that this should be completely ignored with regard to employment and immigration policy is rampant among the same people who tell you with a straight face that limits on immigrants will destroy the American economy, that the dumb rednecks need to be saved. I lean very libertarian and have strongly supported immigration to America for many years with countless public examples. That doesn't put me on the same side as the men who want to sell out America, and no amount of long-past accomplishment obliges any of us to listen to their lectures from the other side of the Atlantic.
Replying to @PalmerLuckey
Why did you give these jobs to foreigners instead of Americans?
855
3,079
404
32,106
3,701,176
Retaining identifiable data without opt-in, heavily regulated, permission, needs to be criminalized. And the punishment shouldn't be fines. It should be jail time.
I really recommending reading this. In summary, a company which does ID verification for in-person interactions (hotels, car rentals, ID verification for alcohol or marijuana, etc) has some how exposed over 153,000,000 drivers licenses for people in the United States and Canada. It is a catastrophic data breach, probably one of the worse I've ever seen. If you're in the United States and have traveled, gotten a hotel, purchased marijuana or alcohol, there is a high probability you're in this. Unlike other breaches, this includes a photo of the person (from the license), making verification you've identified the person significantly easier. This poses a significant threat to celebrities (musicians, YouTubers, streamers, adult entertainers, actors, etc), politicians, lawyers, wealthy people (CEOs, investors, people of public interest), Law Enforcement Officers, etc Krebs himself, and several other security researchers, have already confirmed they're in the data leak. tl;dr gah damn dawg this company is going to be sued into oblivion krebsonsecurity.com/2026/09/…
2
123