TRAs are trying to reduce women to a subset of our sex class by forcing people to use the prefix "cis". This implies that there are other types of women. Women don't need a prefix in the English language, as the primary category requires no modification. Imposing "cis" acts as an unnecessary retronym; it is illogical because every woman is a woman already. No one asks for "caffeinated coffee", "non-sparkling water", "cow's milk", or "alcoholic beer" when the context already makes the default clear. The qualifier is only needed to specify a non-default variant. Read the full piece below to explore how TRAs are trying to change the English language. We must resist.
5
29
1
146
2,510
Then why do you keep using 'biological'?
3
96
The term "biological woman" only got coined because trans people were claiming to have literally changed sex or even to have always been their "desired sex" from birth, but current medical technology was unable to detect it.
1
1
50
nah
1
34
That is precisely why the term exists whether you like it or not. It’s there to differentiate actual woman from men who claim to be women.
1
1
39
The post I replied to says you don't need a 'prefix'. You're all full of shit. Every one of you.
1
37
Hey it’s not me that’s claiming to be the opposite sex. Maybe concentrate your efforts on fully grown men claiming to be females.
1
1
55
Nah you suck. Die ignorant.
2
47
What am i ignorant of? That some people we understand to be male are somehow actually female? Here’s your chance to explain to me why I’m ignorant! The floor is yours.
1
1
50
Oh, it's my chance? Holy shit I really have a chance? To explain something to you? Fuck, what an incredible opportunity!
1
42
Yeah. Go on. Tell me how I’m wrong.
2
1
43
No.
1
31
It’s because you can’t without making yourself look even more stupid than you have done already.
1
1
33
Sure, whatever you say. Not because you're full of shit like I said earlier, it's totally the thing that you say it is.
1
27
So you even agree it will make you look even more stupid than you have done already. Literally making my argument for me. lol.
1
1
36
"So you XYZ..." Like fucking clockwork. Like a German train.
1
33
You could have spent your energy telling me why I was wrong in my assertion that male people can't be women.
1
1
47
You think this is costing me energy? You could have honestly answered the question about why you guys use 'biological' while arguing that 'actual women dont need adjectives' or whatever but you chose to cue up the terf greatest hits playlist instead.
2
43
I told you why the term “biological” was used, and I’ll say it once more if your having difficulty processing it: Because literal unambiguous males are claiming to be female.
1
30
And I don't believe you.

Sep 2, 2026 · 3:49 PM UTC

2
24
RelevantRecentLikes
Frank is not only telling the truth, but I have tweets of men saying they're literally women. One of the most stupid says he isn't even trans now because he became a woman. He's a crackpot of course, but men who say they are women usually are. I hope he's still getting his prostate checks.
1
15
Ok great you have an example of a tweet saying a thing you said it says. How would that show me that's the reason you shitheads all use 'biological'? And again, why do you use biological when you say you don't need a prefix?
1
8
View more replies