Helen Whately MP (@Helen_Whately) header
Helen Whately MP (@Helen_Whately) profile picture

MP for Faversham and Mid Kent. Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions.

Joined April 2010
Photo by Helen Whately MP (@Helen_Whately)Photo by Helen Whately MP (@Helen_Whately)Photo by Helen Whately MP (@Helen_Whately)Photo by Helen Whately MP (@Helen_Whately)Photo by Helen Whately MP (@Helen_Whately)Photo by Helen Whately MP (@Helen_Whately)Photo by Helen Whately MP (@Helen_Whately)Photo by Helen Whately MP (@Helen_Whately)Photo by Helen Whately MP (@Helen_Whately)Photo by Helen Whately MP (@Helen_Whately)
Millions of people on benefits is unaffordable and a sign that our culture has changed. More people looking to the state to fix things no matter what. Fewer people standing on their own two feet. Britain cannot be a force in the world with a culture like this.
541
49
42
316
41,139
"As soon as we possibly can" was yesterday Prime Minister, in the budget. You had the chance but you chose to do NOTHING. No one is buying this.
50
20
6
58
1,693
There you have it, the Chancellor has now corrected himself ⬇️
U-turn complete. What a rollercoaster...
46
35
2
113
3,739
Helen Whately MP retweeted
It’s no surprise John Healey’s do-nothing Budget has failed to calm business fears. He has failed to meet the moment. 👇 We desperately need a government that backs business. Cut red tape, cut the cost of hiring and cut taxes. We Conservatives will.
Business groups are sharply criticising John Healey’s budget “This budget lacks the bold moves that would have made it easier for firms to invest, hire and grow,” CBI boss Rain Newton-Smith says “There is nothing concrete to provide breathing space for the vast majority of businesses who are already dealing with energy bills a third higher than their European counterparts.” The budget had “nothing to ease sky-high energy bills and nothing to make hiring someone more affordable,” the Federation of Small Businesses says. The British Chambers of Commerce says Healey’s package lacks “the big calls that would really shift the economic dial” and that “many firms will have been hoping for a greater impact.” Make UK says the budget “failed to address any of the fundamental costs holding back investment and growth in manufacturing.” Via @Joe_Mayes @JacobReid02 @sabahmeddings: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
20
27
3
107
3,143
If you’re working flat out to get welfare down…. why is no 10 scrambling to reassure everyone that benefits won’t be cut this side of an election? 🤔You are saying one thing on the media and your officials are saying another… It makes me think you want the public to believe you’re going to cut welfare - while desperately trying to reassure labour backbenchers that you won’t.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham has been speaking to reporters on a post-budget visit to Rolls-Royce. Burnham said: "We want to get the welfare bill down as quickly as possible, and we're working flat out to that end."
71
15
5
70
2,921
Just when you thought he’d seen sense… It’s not just the treasury “correcting the record” after the chancellor’s flat-footed interview this morning… no 10 too. Desperately reassuring labour backbenches that they won’t be cutting welfare any time soon.
NEW: No 10 clarifying that despite the Chancellor saying he would cut the welfare bill by the next election there is no commitment to do so
32
8
1
50
1,698
Helen Whately MP retweeted
This is astounding. The government's own figures show working-age welfare will go up by £60 BILLION by 2030, yet the Treasury has to rush out and correct the Chancellor to say there is no timetable for cutting the benefits bill. Looks like foot in mouth syndrome is spreading. John Healey couldn't even find £10 billion to get defence spending to 3% of GDP - the thing he quit over. Don't let anyone tell you this was a 'do no harm budget'. In doing so little, Labour have harmed our economic security and they've harmed our national security.
156
480
17
2,449
48,723
When will Labour realise they can’t just say the ‘welfare bill will come down’, they have to actually do it. @patmcfaddenmp can you clear this up for us?
Uh oh… after John Healey clearly promised on @BBCr4today that the benefits bill will be cut before the next election, @ChrisMasonBBC tells listeners the Treasury have since been on the phone disputing he said this and that he wasn’t putting a timeline on welfare reductions.
83
8
3
54
2,089
Helen Whately MP retweeted
Today's #Budget had to meet the moment. It didn't. Here's why👇
99
17
10
79
4,748
If you think attack is your best form of defence Pat, it’s not going to work. Under Labour, NEETs are up, youth unemployment is up, welfare claimants are up, welfare spending is up… And what did your Chancellor announce today in the budget to tackle this? NOTHING.
Kemi spent most of her response attacking the Tory welfare record. A reminder that under their watch: Neets up 250k between 2021 and 2024; Welfare spending rose twice as fast as in this Parliament; Millions signed off and written off on sickness and disability benefits.
78
30
4
205
5,542
Pat McFadden wants to talk about NEETs. Fine. The number topped 1 million earlier this year for the first time since 2013 and is up 130,000 since they took office. Labour's jobs tax and red tape hit young people hardest. Own it Pat.
Kemi spent most of her response attacking the Tory welfare record. A reminder that under their watch: Neets up 250k between 2021 and 2024; Welfare spending rose twice as fast as in this Parliament; Millions signed off and written off on sickness and disability benefits.
3
27
4
82
2,991
Today's #Budget had to meet the moment. It didn't. Here's why👇
99
17
10
79
4,748
What you won’t find in the Chancellor’s speech… Around 210,000 pensioners just above state pension income will face a 53% marginal tax rate. What’s going on here? He announced the new Pension Tax Allowance so people just on the state pension won’t have to pay income tax. Sounds sensible. But the devil is in the detail… 👉 For every £3 of income above the full State Pension, you’ll lose £1 of the allowance. That means for every extra £3 of income: •60p goes in normal income tax (20%) •£1 of allowance is lost £1.60 out of £3 = a 53% marginal tax rate This hits people with modest private pensions or savings and robs them of the benefit of doing the right thing.
66
98
6
354
23,327
Exactly this ⬇️…the kicking the can down the road budget.
Here's the real story of this Budget, the can being kicked down the road. This Labour government is apparently planning spending cuts on most areas of public service spending of 2.6% per year between 2028-29 and 2031-32. Pull the other one. It's got bells on.
24
3
21
1,140
Nothing to cut the £183 billion benefits bill. Nothing on jobs for the 1 million NEETs. Nothing on *how* we’ll fund 3% of GPD on defence. Today was the Chancellor’s big day, shame the plan was missing in action.
190
33
16
124
6,373
There we have it from the Chancellor. NO WELFARE SAVINGS in the budget. Labour are kicking the can down the road, again. Legislation next year. As for savings…🤷‍♀️
235
53
21
280
11,563
Helen Whately MP retweeted
Today is the day the Chancellor can do the right thing. Use his Budget to help fix the broken welfare system and help people into work by reducing the cost of employment.
Britain can’t be a strong country with our broken welfare system. Former defence secretary - now Chancellor - John Healey knows this. That’s why he resigned, surely. Will he use his budget today to cut welfare and invest in defence? Or will he bottle it?
10
2
12
778
Britain can’t be a strong country with our broken welfare system. Former defence secretary - now Chancellor - John Healey knows this. That’s why he resigned, surely. Will he use his budget today to cut welfare and invest in defence? Or will he bottle it?
234
20
21
96
7,646
Helen Whately MP retweeted
If you were Chancellor, what would you do?
301
11
22
73
10,173
Helen Whately MP retweeted
Darren Jones admits John Healey is following the same defence plan as Rachel Reeves! What was the point of his resignation? If Healey fails to properly fund 3% defence spending by 2030, he must resign.
17
62
3
223
15,246