HitHawk Research (@HitHawk_) header
HitHawk Research (@HitHawk_) profile picture

Short-biased activist targeting fraud, abuse & deception in European financial markets. For personal/ political views follow @gpv100xxx

Delaware
Joined June 2025
Photo by HitHawk Research (@HitHawk_)Photo by HitHawk Research (@HitHawk_)Photo by HitHawk Research (@HitHawk_)Photo by HitHawk Research (@HitHawk_)Photo by HitHawk Research (@HitHawk_)Photo by HitHawk Research (@HitHawk_)Photo by HitHawk Research (@HitHawk_)Photo by HitHawk Research (@HitHawk_)Photo by HitHawk Research (@HitHawk_)
HitHawk Research retweeted
On 6 November 2026, S&P Global Ratings took the following actions on Poland: And how the report can be politically misleading. Affirmed the long- and short-term foreign-currency sovereign ratings at A-/A-2. Lowered the long- and short-term local-currency sovereign ratings to A-/A-2 (from A/A-1). Revised the outlook on the long-term local- and foreign-currency ratings to negative (from stable). Overview S&P expects Poland’s economy to continue expanding by about 3% over the next two-to-three years, supported by robust domestic demand and exports. However, the fiscal position is projected to remain exceptionally weak: average general government deficits are expected to exceed 6% of GDP, and net general government debt is projected to reach 70% of GDP by the end of the decade. Political polarization is cited as a factor hindering fiscal consolidation. Outlook The negative outlook reflects the risk that elevated budgetary deficits and rising government debt could constrain policy flexibility in the face of future shocks. This could expose Poland to shifts in investor sentiment or necessitate a sharp fiscal adjustment that would weigh on economic growth. Downside scenario: Ratings could be lowered if lasting fiscal imbalances and sustained debt accumulation (complicated by political polarization) result in pronounced risks to GDP growth through weaker investor confidence, higher borrowing costs, or a sharp forced fiscal adjustment. Ratings could also be lowered if the Russia-Ukraine war escalated, placing greater pressure on public finances and growth prospects while heightening security risks. Upside scenario: The outlook could be revised to stable if the government took steps to sustainably and markedly curb large budgetary deficits, spurring a gradual reduction in government debt, while avoiding severe consequences for economic growth. Rationale The outlook revision reflects heightened risks that rapidly increasing debt could reduce the government’s ability to respond to shocks and weigh on economic growth. Net debt is projected to surpass 70% of GDP by 2029 (an increase of more than 20 percentage points over five years), described as one of the most significant fiscal deteriorations globally. Fiscal deficits averaged over 7% of GDP in 2025 and 2026, driven by high defense spending (4–5% of GDP), rising social expenditure, and a substantial public-sector wage bill. Meaningful consolidation is viewed as unlikely ahead of the 2027 parliamentary elections (projected deficits of 7.1% of GDP in 2027 and 6.2% in 2028). S&P notes the government might face sharp fiscal consolidation by 2029–2030 due to constitutional debt limits (or earlier if funding costs rise), with both scenarios described as likely to be recessionary. Policymaking is described as difficult. The government led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk faces constraints from the veto powers of President Karol Nawrocki (aligned with the opposition PiS party) and the lack of a three-fifths majority to override vetoes. Political divisions also include Poland’s relationship with the EU. Despite polarization, there is noted broad cross-party consensus on core security and foreign-policy objectives (including support for Ukraine and a strong NATO presence). S&P’s report can create the impression that Poland’s huge deficits are mainly the result of constitutional gridlock (presidential vetoes blocking the Tusk government from cutting spending). In reality the deficit has more than doubled under Tusk: • 2022: 3.4% of GDP • 2023: 5.2% • 2024: 6.4% • 2025: 7.2% Most of the rise happened after he took office. The report focuses on why it’s hard to reverse, not on who drove it higher. A key supporting factor for the ratings is the resilient economy, with real GDP growth projected to average approximately 3% from 2027–2029. Growth of 3.6% is expected in 2026, supported by the peak of EU-funded investment, recovering exports, and robust consumption. Strengths cited include a diversified economy, flexible labor and product markets, an educated workforce, and access to nondebt-creating external funding. Investment growth is expected to moderate after the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility winds down, though growth is still projected to remain solid relative to peers. The local-currency rating was lowered to equal the foreign-currency rating because of reduced institutional and fiscal flexibility. Large fiscal imbalances and institutional challenges to policymaking mean the government’s willingness and ability to service local-currency debt is now assessed as equal to foreign-currency debt. Fiscal projections are weaker than previously envisaged, with a track record of recent fiscal slippages. Additional points from the report include: High defense spending and past expansions in social spending continue to contribute to fiscal strain. EU funds (including the Recovery and Resilience Facility and the Security Action for Europe program) are important near-term growth drivers. Hybrid threats linked to Russia are noted as ongoing risks to NATO countries (including Poland), with the main impact so far on public finances rather than direct economic activity. External accounts are projected to remain manageable (modest current-account deficits and low net external leverage). spglobal.com/ratings/en/regu…
1
1
1
2
5,198
HitHawk Research retweeted
Most coverage of Poland’s tribunal standoff stops at the rule-of-law debate. The more interesting questions are monetary: the zloty’s constitutional status, the NBP’s gold reserves, and the timing of Lagarde’s exit. Read our take on Black Styx News: Gold, the Euro, and Globalism: The Strategic Subversion of Polish Independence
3
1
161
HitHawk Research retweeted
ECB verdict: Inflation says hike. The bond market says wait. The ECB will hold today. What matters is what Lagarde says after 14:45 CET/ 9:45 ET. Listen for “tools”, in whatever words she uses. That is if her words matter at all anymore today, given she's just resigned effective Feb 7th. We break down the 3 things that will actually move markets on Black Styx News.
1
1
1
261
HitHawk Research retweeted
What to expect tonight: FED + Big Tech earnings The S&P 500 is up ~2.3% since the September hike, with the VIX calm at ~17.5. Single-stock options tell a different story with i.e. Alphabet's implied volatility near 39. Underneath, the sector rotation is violent: The S&P ex-AI index rose ~6.6% in October while the full index slipped, and chips fell into a bear market before bouncing this week. Watch out for tonight’s earnings. Oil (~$115 on Iran risk) is pushing up inflation (CPI 3.7%) and yields (10-year above 5%). A hold is expected tonight, but Polymarket puts a December hike at ~79%, so Warsh's tone matters. Anthropic's IPO filing revived the AI trade and stopped the sell-off. But Meta's negative free cash flow last week helped drive a 6.7% one-day chip drop, so Microsoft’s and Alphabet’s earnings tonight could bring back more tech volatility this week.
1
1
1,554
HitHawk Research retweeted
BlackStyx stress-tested two energy producers at lower oil prices, looking for one thing: a business that keeps generating cash when the cycle turns. One cleared the bar. It covers its base dividend at $40–45 oil, runs on little debt, and keeps buying back its own stock. It's a defensive pick, and that's the point. Which one made the cut? It's our newest Investment Idea on Black Styx.
1
1
116
HitHawk Research retweeted
The web is awash with investment ideas. Hundreds of analysts, publishers and authors. From niche websites to Seeking Alpha, Investing.com and research aggregators like AlphaSense or (new) Bullpen. Paid or free, they flood you with research, recommendations and forecasts. Fundamental analysis, technical analysis, esoteric theories — sometimes hardly any analysis at all. But who is behind these ideas? What are their real interests and entanglements? And where are measurable results? We take a different approach: → Selective ideas, few, but often unconventional → Independent research → Quality over quantity → Transparent, measurable performance Four investment ideas this month. All in the green.
2
1
187
HitHawk Research retweeted
S&P 500 near record highs, yet more than half its stocks sit below their 200-day average (per Barchart). Sentiment isn't buying the rally either: the Fear & Greed Index reads 29 today, Fear, even near all-time highs. Fresh capital's telling the same story. SpaceX and Cerebras alone account for roughly 89% of the ~$90B raised by US tech IPOs this year: new money piling into the same trade, not spreading out. Sound familiar? Index at highs, gains concentrated in a handful of names, everyone chasing one technology story. We've seen this movie before: 1999. Go figure. And I haven't even touched government debt yet...
1
3
200
HitHawk Research retweeted
Is Raiffeisen ($RBI) sitting on €12.6B of cash it can't touch, while disclosing only €735M as restricted? We fact checked @ResearchGrizzly's 64 page short report ourselves, claim by claim. Verdict: mostly holds up, with real caveats. Full breakdown is available on our platform.
1
2
473
HitHawk Research retweeted
Replying to @michaeljburry
"3. IPOs need hype & puffery; "we are so awesome it could become dangerous" is hype & puffery" So this is the fear story again, right? Fear enables you to control people - or regulate in this case...
1
1
556
HitHawk Research retweeted
Calendar Week 37: Beneath the main macro headlines, the financial week saw notable market friction as Shortfinder’s campaign against DeFi Development ended in a sharp, squeeze-driven stop out. Simultaneously, Ragnarok Research launched a rare long activist campaign on TransAct Technologies, which underperformed immediately as persistent selling pressure forced the equity down 4.4% within its first 48 hours... read more on styx.capital/nl
1
1
167
HitHawk Research retweeted
Bessent trying to calm the bond market
142
858
105
7,117
463,051
HitHawk Research retweeted
Replying to @CodfishJohnny
🤣🤣🤣 It must be so comforting for your short-seller clients to know that their legal architect possesses such a deeply refined, sophisticated moral compass.
1
100
HitHawk Research retweeted
What happens if you blindly trade short activist reports? We back-tested a naïve strategy from Jan 2026 to today (Aug 18). Peak returns hit +23%, currently sitting around +17.5%. Below are the rules and assumptions we used.
1
3
3
272
HitHawk Research retweeted
War risk insurance for tankers going through the Strait of Hormuz is now running 3%- 10% of hull value. Before the conflict it was around 0.25%. Daily transits are currently down about 95% from pre-war levels. As insurance and freight markets tend to move first, one should recognize that oil prices only adjust next, while CPI trails far behind. The calm inflation print today is really just a reflection of where things stood a few weeks ago, not where the economy stands atm. If you want an early read on a company's actual cost exposure, the freight and insurance markets usually get there long before guidance or CPI data do.
1
2
245
HitHawk Research retweeted
Fresh from Styx: Gotham City Research just shorted Sumitomo Pharma ($4506) and its parent Sumitomo Chemical ($4005), alleging 50–100% downside. Two-part campaign. Solid research, but not without analytical blind spots. (1/3)
1
1
5
24,176
HitHawk Research retweeted
MAJOR HEDGE FUNDS TARGETED IN WAVE OF ATTEMPTED CYBERATTACKS Major hedge funds including Citadel, Point72 and Two Sigma were targeted in a wave of sophisticated cyberattacks using AI-powered voice phishing (vishing) to trick employees into granting system access. Two Sigma said it successfully blocked the attack and found no evidence of a breach. Cybersecurity experts warn AI is making large-scale attacks cheaper and easier, raising risks across the financial industry.
100
192
99
1,450
448,824
HitHawk Research retweeted
🚨 Calling all activist short sellers & research platforms. I think we're overlooking a serious AI confidentiality risk. Like many others, we already use LLMs to process public short reports, for example, extracting tickers, exchanges, sectors and other structured data. It's fast, efficient, and incredibly useful. But as we prepare to let vetted users upload unpublished research to our platform, we realized something obvious in hindsight: before the market sees a report, the AI has to see it first. For activist short sellers, that pre-publication information can be worth millions. Assuming it can never be exposed, retained or otherwise misused seems dangerously optimistic. We learned this the hard way. While using Claude to optimize code, an API key was accidentally included in a prompt. It was subsequently abused, resulting in repeated unauthorized transactions until we identified the root cause. Anthropic ultimately acknowledged what had happened. Though such can happen with any provider. That experience fundamentally changed how we think about handling sensitive information with third-party LLMs. We are now redesigning parts of our workflow to protect our users' intellectual property—even though it comes with a significant efficiency penalty. Many activist short sellers openly discuss using AI in their research process. How are you protecting unpublished reports before they become public? I'd be genuinely interested to hear how others are approaching this.
3
2
204
HitHawk Research retweeted
The latest edition of our Weekly Styx Update is out: Performance was strong across activist campaigns this week, driven by a broad market decline and high activist activity: • Three new campaigns ($OWLT, $LYFT, $RXT) • Four campaign exit triggers ($SEGG, $GIL.TO, $HYLN, $EQPT) from the Black Styx risk system Read the full performance and catalyst breakdown here: styx.capital/nl/
2
3
534
HitHawk Research retweeted
Over the past few months, I've noticed a trend in activist short selling. Seeing J Capital's short report earlier today - which consisted of little more than an executive summary while the full report remained behind a paywall-brought me back to a question I'd been thinking about: where is activist short selling heading? The traditional activist short-selling model has been straightforward: publish a research report as widely as possible, ideally triggering an avalanche that the target company can no longer contain—or, at the very least, a market reaction that can be monetized. Yet an increasing number of established activist researchers now release only a brief public summary while reserving the full forensic analysis for paying subscribers. If market impact is the primary objective, why deliberately limit distribution? I can think of several possible explanations: • Research becomes a monetizable asset. A forensic report creates value not only through proprietary trading, but also through subscription revenue, institutional distribution, and licensing. • The target audience has changed. In an era of direct digital distribution, reaching a relatively small network of hedge funds, family offices, and professional investors may be more valuable than maximizing retail readership. • Scarcity increases perceived value.Restricting access reinforces the notion that the research contains proprietary intelligence worth paying for, strengthening both pricing power and brand positioning. • Controlled distribution reduces friction.Publishing only an executive summary while reserving detailed allegations for subscribers may reduce unnecessary public controversy and media noise. If this trend continues, we may need to rethink how we classify activist short sellers. Perhaps the distinction is no longer simply between different investment styles, but between firms that publish to maximize market impact and firms that monetize proprietary forensic intelligence through multiple channels. Do you see this as a structural shift in the industry, or are these simply isolated business model outliers?
2
5
314