ThatLeroy (@ImThatLeroy) header
ThatLeroy (@ImThatLeroy) profile picture

I have long eyes and sticky hair. I'm very friendly unless I'm not. I smell different and curious. I like. Peas and harm money. Subscribe me. Send Love Now.

Joined April 2022
Photo by ThatLeroy (@ImThatLeroy)Photo by ThatLeroy (@ImThatLeroy)Photo by ThatLeroy (@ImThatLeroy)Photo by ThatLeroy (@ImThatLeroy)Photo by ThatLeroy (@ImThatLeroy)Photo by ThatLeroy (@ImThatLeroy)Photo by ThatLeroy (@ImThatLeroy)Photo by ThatLeroy (@ImThatLeroy)Photo by ThatLeroy (@ImThatLeroy)Photo by ThatLeroy (@ImThatLeroy)
Rupert sums up the budget in eleven seconds.
35
638
12
3,750
98,957
🚨 BREAKING NEWS Andy burnham has said £30 billion will be used to regenerate asylum seeker accommodation. GET HIM OUT NOW!!!!
821
2,600
166
9,702
159,094
ThatLeroy retweeted
Following today’s announcement of new legal refugee routes, I’ve never been more convinced that a large number of people ‘working’ in the Home Office need to go to prison.
497
3,142
80
21,793
162,576
Healey Promised Breathing Space. The IFS Says He Delivered A Lost Decade John Healey's Budget came with a slogan, "breathing space now, fresh hope for the future." Judge it by the Chancellor's own measures. The IFS calculates that the package saves the average family £140 by next July. Over the same period, energy and fuel costs are expected to rise by £400. Subtract one from the other and £260 still lands on the household budget. Relief that covers a third of the bill is a discount on the damage. The slogan promised hope. The projection delivers a lost decade. Disposable income for the typical family will grow by about 2 per cent across the 2020s, the weakest of any decade since comparable records began in the 1950s. By 2029, families will have barely more spending power than in 2019. Helen Miller, the IFS director, says no temporary cost of living package can fix that, and the Budget offered nothing else. A VAT cut on electricity and £100 for council tax bands A to D were never going to bend a trend line a decade long. Then there is the headroom. Healey told the Commons he had left £15bn of room against his fiscal rules in 2029/30. The same IFS review identifies a £28bn hole in his spending plans, which would require deep cuts to some departments, cuts Miller doubts this government will make. A margin of safety that depends on reductions nobody expects to be delivered is not a margin. Britain has heard this arithmetic before, from his predecessor, and it did not survive contact with the forecasts. The £14bn rise in debt interest this year shows how quickly it can move. Kemi Badenoch had the measure of it in the chamber, dismissing the package as "4p off gherkins." Businesses were less theatrical and no more generous. Lord Cruddas of CMC Markets called the Budget "pretty useless" against rising bond yields. The Resolution Foundation, hardly a Conservative outpost, found it small beside the scale of the challenge. None of them described a Chancellor confronting the country's central problem, which is an economy that does not grow fast enough to pay for what the state promises. That failure belongs to Andy Burnham as much as to his Chancellor. He took office pledging to ease the squeeze on family finances. His first Budget leaves families facing a lost decade, pushes the hard choices beyond the next election, and bets the public finances on forecasts improving in time. Gilt investors, who have watched this approach before, will price the bet accordingly. Two questions need answering from Downing Street. Which departments will absorb the £28bn of cuts the plans imply, and will the Prime Minister name them before the next election? And if a family is still £260 worse off this winter after the Budget's help, what was the breathing space for? Andy Burnham and John Healey. One promised economic renewal, the other promised breathing space. Britain's families are still waiting for either.
56
165
9
464
10,693
Imported produce should be required to meet the same standards as produce made domestically.
37
189
3
2,027
29,646
ThatLeroy retweeted
Where is OUR money being spent? I go through the numbers...
162
1,397
34
5,925
68,486
ThatLeroy retweeted
Former Polish MEP Ryszard Legutko calls out EU Leaders to their faces: “The European Union has done a lot of damage. It has been sending a false message that it represents Europeans, but it doesn’t. The EU has become a vehicle of the Left. This is NOT democracy.” 🔥🔥🔥
233
3,162
148
11,971
153,661
ThatLeroy retweeted
John Healey resigned as Defence Secretary because the Government would not commit enough money to defence. Now, as Chancellor, he is telling us there is not enough money for defence.
37
386
10
1,741
14,580
ThatLeroy retweeted
30 separate countries have now told their citizens to prepare for a 3 day blackout. It’s ALL orchestrated. Be prepared.
246
1,291
55
7,722
251,311
ThatLeroy retweeted
ポストのリンクコピーにXの追跡用と思われるトラッカーが付くようになりました。 前は無かったと思うのですが... 恐らく誰がいつコピーしたのかを認識する為と思われます。 気になる人は「?」から後を消しましょう。 ちなみにs=は端末の認識で 19はAndroid、20はiPhone、46はPCのブラウザです。 こちらも消してもポストはそのまま開けるので、気になる人はまとめて消しちゃって大丈夫です。
778
17,478
1,335
94,386
4,506,137
People who work for a living are being outnumbered by people who vote for a living.
Rupert sums up the budget in eleven seconds.
2
26
118
949
🚨BREAKING: A British man stated on social media that he does not want to see Palestinian flags displayed all across the UK. Police officers came to his house at 4am and arrested him. Am I crazy, or has the UK officially fallen?
1,230
2,606
193
8,630
134,295
ThatLeroy retweeted
Visited London for the first time in quite a while. Harrowing experience… 1. They’re lying about the numbers. The next census is going to be absolutely barbaric reading. 2. Things are far worse than most people outside of London could possibly imagine. The entire city has been turned into a middle Easter bazaar and a sub continental slop market.
485
1,232
57
10,725
550,189
ThatLeroy retweeted
In 2001 a man was convicted of indecently assaulting and abducting a 13-year-old girl in his private hire car. He served 18 months in prison. In 2005 Oldham Council handed him a taxi licence. Oldham Council let him drive children for ten years before it eventually evoked his licence in January 2015. No one knows how many children he abused before the council was eventually forced to act. This example is not unique. The same council licensed another man in 2003, two years after he was convicted of indecent assault. In September 2014 the council's head of licensing reported five licensed drivers to the Labour cabinet member responsible. The report set out their previous convictions, including sexual offences. After a screening exercise with Greater Manchester Police and the safeguarding board, one man was sent to a licensing panel and lost his licence. The other four kept driving. The next year one of those four men sexually assaulted a child in his taxi. When he was convicted in 2017, the judge asked why he had ever been given a licence. I'll tell you why he had been given a license. 1. Pakistani taxi drivers are protected by Pakistani politicians that sit on the licensing committees. In many instances, due to the clan based structure of this community, both councillor and child rapists are related. What is distant to you and I by western norms is close kin to them. 2. These Pakistani taxi drivers are organised. In every town and city across the land, they control tens of thousands of votes. Politicians do deals with them just as Labour do a deal with the unions. 3. Intervene unless you have been forced to and you open a can of worms. It is likely tens of thousands of taxi drivers will have their licenses removed. And the ethnic correlation of the drivers who have lost their licenses will be unavoidable. Almost no council in England and Wales will act against the Pakistani Taxi Rape Gang Ring because they are effectively held to ransom by it. Which is why the government must intervene. And for those of you who are asking, no, I am not going to let this go. If we want to stop the rape gangs, and protect our children, we need to take drastic action in both how our children's homes are run and how taxis operate. Now tell me something. Where is Jess Phillips? Were is Shabana Mahmood? Where is our government? _________ You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account. And yet, despite every attempt to stop us, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away. But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again. Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers. It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me means when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it. It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down. But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable. I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers. 🔴 SIGN UP HERE 👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. Sign up for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work. If you can afford the £3 a month or £30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber. We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next. Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way. The paid subscriptions have stalled. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it. Over a million people engaged in my content this week. Only a small fraction followed up with a subscription to my newsletter This is becoming impossible to sustain. 🔴 SIGN UP HERE 👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk Have a look around you. No on else in this country is doing the work that I do, never mind for nearly a decade. All I'm asking in return is that you sign up to a newsletter and add weight to our ability to take on the government. Is that too much to ask? Raja Miah MBE
33
815
22
1,878
23,220
ThatLeroy retweeted
👏 Brilliant from Sophy Ridge as she told the Chancellor to his face: your budget does NOTHING. The Chancellor walked in expecting soft questions on @RidgeandFrost about “change”. What he got was a direct challenge over the gap between the big promises and the empty budget he just delivered. Sophy didn’t let him hide behind spin for a second: “When Andy Burnham came in he promised change, not just any change, big change! He promised to end 40 years of neo-liberalism. Don’t take this the wrong way, but that wasn’t a budget to end 40 years of neo-liberalism, right?” Chancellor: “I would say that is wrong.” He claimed he’d set out decisions that would change Britain’s energy system and market for good. Sophy: “Like what?” Chancellor: “Like an end to levies on household bills.” She cut him off: “Come on! You’ve been talking about nationalisation of our utilities and ending 40 years of Thatcherism.” Chancellor: “He’s talking about bringing energy bills down and in line with Europe.” Sophy wasn’t having it: “You’re talking about levies on bills, this is a different order of magnitude.” Then the line that finished him: “Give me one thing in this budget that Rachel Reeves wouldn’t have done as chancellor?” He had nothing. This is a big nothing burger. Starmer 2.0. No fundamental change. Absolutely nothing in there for the working men and women who get up and graft all day for nothing. Nothing to incentivise work. Nothing to reward effort over dependency. Is it any wonder people are happy to sit on their backsides and get paid by the state? This government shows no sign at all of addressing that. They promised to end 40 years of the status quo. They delivered more of it.
148
478
18
2,409
174,313
ThatLeroy retweeted
What’s going on here?
This is one of the videos British Home Secretary Shabana Mahmoud deleted from her website. One she would like you to forget about.
64
582
11
1,740
31,392
And suddenly all the pictures only have white men in them.
758
2,808
130
19,489
281,214
ThatLeroy retweeted
Farage says he was ‘surprised’ by the immediate extra £10bn of war funding pledged in the budget to Ukraine for this Winter but that he is ‘Ok with it’ Are you ‘Ok’ with Farage’s cavalier attitude to taxpayers money and war ? Is it time to check the laundering ?
341
486
69
1,807
25,440
ThatLeroy retweeted
Remember the names of those that chose to destroy our nation.
Today we’re announcing a new £10bn package of support for Ukraine. This funding will help Ukraine meet its immediate needs, support economic resilience, and help defend its sovereignty from Russia’s illegal invasion. We will stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes.
29
150
877
8,118