Richard of the secular realm (@LatFilosof) header
Richard of the secular realm (@LatFilosof) profile picture

🇸🇪 I call myself an atheist simply because I believe no God exists, but I am at large, regarding many questions, very undecided. 🏳️‍🌈 Ally

Sverige
Joined September 2014
Photo by Richard of the secular realm (@LatFilosof)Photo by Richard of the secular realm (@LatFilosof)Photo by Richard of the secular realm (@LatFilosof)Photo by Richard of the secular realm (@LatFilosof)Photo by Richard of the secular realm (@LatFilosof)Photo by Richard of the secular realm (@LatFilosof)Photo by Richard of the secular realm (@LatFilosof)Photo by Richard of the secular realm (@LatFilosof)Photo by Richard of the secular realm (@LatFilosof)Photo by Richard of the secular realm (@LatFilosof)
Me reading philosopher A: ”yeah this makes total sense” Me reading philosopher B absolutely ripping A to shreds: ”wow I can’t believe A is such an idiot” Me reading A again: ”yeah this makes total sense”.
132
1,769
167
32,731
409,652
A friendly reminder that if you ever come across a paper you really want to read but it's behind a paywall. Try to contact one of the authors, optimally the primary one. Scientists are desperate to get people to know things, they will very likely send you a free copy!
4
6
36
1,254
I dislike that I’m now reflexively pasting every new Philosophy of Religion paper I read into Pangram
1
1
11
456
@matt_olma I posted again after two weeks, are you proud?
37
Richard of the secular realm retweeted
🤨
Atheists will say religion is all fiction when their entire worldview is literally Animorphs.
13
27
1
323
3,442
Richard of the secular realm retweeted
10
15
2
128
2,622
Richard of the secular realm retweeted
5+7=12 cannot be an a priori synthetic judgment because then calculators would be conscious.
12
6
5
65
3,938
It's commendable that you corrected your earlier claim about transitional fossils, but your revised argument still has a fundamental problem. Just because evidence can be interpreted differently doesn't mean those interpretations are equally well supported.
The biggest issue with evolution
3
5
25
703
How do you distinguish a truth you've arrived at through reason from a conclusion you've merely become extraordinarily good at defending?
4
9
112
2,802
Magic: The Gathering quite literally saved my life when I was actually mentally ill. Without it I likely would have ended my life in my early 20s. This game isn’t yours. This game is for everyone. Trans people including. Being trans is not a mental illness.
Perfect! Even more mentally ill people flocking to my game.
2
17
501
”Wind back the tape of life to the early days of the Burgess Shale; let it play again from an identical starting point, and the chances become vanishingly small that anything like human intelligence would grace the replay” - Stephen J Gould, A Wonderful Life (1989)
Replying to @LyingWrongAgain
I agree. Quick question: If the evolutionary process were rebooted, would the same emergent properties arise?
3
1
3
387
Unless determinism is true, which would make our repeat emergence trivially true, then I think Gould is right. Evolution is shaped by chance event, it is historically contingent. What if the meteor that killed all non-avian dinosaurs never hit? Would we be around? Hard questions
2
1
85
Evolutionary psychology gets too much hate.
What philosophical opinion will get you like this?
4
1
24
965
How do Christians explain the existence of Surströmming and salted licorice? This amount of evil contradicts a tri-omni God.
5
9
507
@SimonSimplicio How do Thomists deal with this? Both are directly in opposition to the faculty of... well... everything. Looks like shit, smells like shit, tastes like shit.
2
3
101
This meme only works if you have no idea at all what illusionism actually is. It is *not* the idea that consciousness itself is an illusion. That would indeed be silly. Dennett is rolling over in his grave.
30
2
3
64
7,586
This is ahistorical. The first individuals who initially proposed a very ancient earth were almost exclusively men of religion and faith. The statement also confuses methodological naturalism with ontological naturalism. Science is based on the former, not the latter.
Replying to @AiG
Millions of years is based on the presupposition of naturalism, a secular worldview. Any evidence is interpreted through that lens.
4
3
1
29
2,349
Richard of the secular realm retweeted
Philosophy of mind is cool because no matter what your view is there will be a large portion of people who think you’re a fucking lunatic
37
91
20
950
33,446
But I won’t lose. Let me explain. I can’t force myself to believe something is true if I already believe it’s false. If God exists, I don’t think such a person would appreciate dishonesty.
Dear atheist, What if, after you die, you find out that God is real all along? You lose.
20
1
1
62
3,596
If God finds it fitting to punish a person who cannot find it in their mind or heart to believe in them then.. yeah, I guess I will lose. But what kind of God is that in the first place? Not the God I am constantly told is perfectly loving and moral.
1
11
180
(And, of course, this is completely ignoring the numerous issues any kind of punishment in hell has.)
4
7
180