NowLookieHere

Senator, I have to be honest. I laughed at this one. Not a polite chuckle. A real one. Because you, Elizabeth Warren, LITERALLY wrote the book on this. And I mean "literally" the way we used it when we were kids. As in actually. Physically. There is a book, and your name is on the cover. Not the way my students use it, where "literally" means "kind of, sort of, vibes." "The Two-Income Trap." 2003. Co-written with your own daughter. Your thesis? The single-breadwinner family was the SAFER family. The parent at home was the "reserve earner," the shock absorber who could step into the workforce when disaster hit. Your research found dual-income couples going bankrupt at higher rates, because the second paycheck got swallowed by fixed costs. Bigger mortgage. Second car. And (sit with this one, Senator) CHILDCARE. You wrote the warning label. Then you lost the bottle. A few fries short of a Happy Meal, that move. Now, the parts your post skipped: o Oklahoma: Oklahoma Human Services reported 166 programs closed since November, and 78 NEW ones opened in that same stretch. The "400+" was a TV news number the state's own agency never matched. Somebody's calculator is a few batteries short. o Indiana: The STATE froze new vouchers and cut payment rates when its own budget ran dry. Gov. Braun is now proposing $200 million to reopen it. That is Indianapolis. Not Washington. Geography, like economics, seems to be one brick shy of a load in your office. o The fraud-verification freeze you are hinting at hit five states. Oklahoma and Indiana were not on that list. Asking providers to prove the kids actually exist is not a wrecking ball. It is a roll call. So what DID hit both states? The same thing that hit everyone: temporary COVID money running out. Oklahoma providers lost their COVID-era funding this April, about $5 per child per day. And who voted for that temporary money, @SenWarren? You did. American Rescue Plan Act, 2021. Roughly $39 billion in child care cash with an expiration date stamped right on the side. You built a cliff, hung a "TEMPORARY" sign on it, and now act shocked that people fell off. The lights are on, but nobody is home. That is like marching into your boss's office: "Last December you gave me a $1,000 Christmas bonus. This month you didn't. Why did you cut my pay, you heartless monster?" Nobody cut your pay. The bonus ended. That is what "temporary" means. Look it up. I hear there are books. Not the sharpest crayon in the Senate box, but surely someone on staff owns a dictionary. Quinn's Law #1 in action: liberalism delivers the exact opposite of its stated intent. Flood providers with one-time money, they build payrolls around it, the money ends, the doors close. Then the same senator who wrote the check blames the guy who didn't print it. Her train of thought derailed somewhere before the station. What is next, Senator? A book warning that pushing two-income families into subsidized daycare makes them financially fragile? ...wait. I was just told you already wrote it. Twenty-three years ago. Apparently the memory is running on dial-up. And government-run childcare from birth? That checks off Goal #41 of the 45 Communist Goals read into the Congressional Record on January 10, 1963: "Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents." 2003 Warren argued the opposite. Honestly, 2003 Warren would have made a decent senator. Pity the hamster stopped running. So here is my question. Over a decade in the Senate, what have you done for families besides write checks with MY name on them and an expiration date attached? A handout with a cliff is not help. It is a leash. Dependency is not a bug in your party's design. It is the product. Two sandwiches short of a picnic would be generous here. But what do I know? I am only a science teacher who actually read your book, Senator. Somebody had to. @TPUSA @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar #MAGA #Veterans #Trump