
Leicester. Views own. She/Her #LCFC. Foxes Trust. Cub Leader. Foodbank trustee. Cat lady. Loves Eurovision & ๐ซ๐ฎ. Yorkshire born. Of the Zombie FOI fame.
Leicester
Joined June 2011
- Tweets15.7K
- Following2.1K
- Followers1.7K
- Likes1.3K
Lynn Wyeth ๐ฟ๏ธ ๐ retweeted
๐จ Wow. There is a little bullet point buried at the bottom of paragraph 4.131 in the 166-page budget document that suggests the UK could next year embark upon potentially its most consequential cybersecurity policy change since GDPR.
๐งต
Far right drivel. The council admitted it simply made a typo in the X post originally, the meeting is on the 10th
An estimated 1.5 million to over 1.6 million Muslim soldiers and laborers died while fighting or serving on the Allied side, to help us, during World War II.
Fining them a grand every time they do it wonโt stop them. Especially when they have millions in the bank. Prosecute the agent. Criminal record. Jail time.
Reform UK fined over multiple electoral law breaches
thenational.scot/news/266596โฆ
I really donโt know what to say at this point. The NHS has done a LOT on this recently. These people have no excuse if they have looked at his records.
BREAKING: Man killed by tiger may have had medical records breached by NHS staff, ambulance trust says trib.al/L0EMDH0
Donโt wait, start it next week @Heidi_Labour
EMR told to improve ahead of renationalisation bbc.in/4ifacTw
Lynn Wyeth ๐ฟ๏ธ ๐ retweeted
The first UK general election to require voter photo ID was the 2024 UK general election which was won by Labour with a landslide majority of 174 seats, winning a total of 412 seats in the House of Commons.
Boam is ridiculous.
Saw the fabulous @jpwarchaeology do his thing on buildings archeology this afternoon at #Leicester Guildhall. Copy of his new book purchased. Donโt miss him on these tour dates.
Excellent Titanic exhibition at the #Leicedter racecourse today. One of our relatives was a stoker who sadly didnโt survive.
Lynn Wyeth ๐ฟ๏ธ ๐ retweeted
WE COUNT THE ENEMIES WE KILL. WE RARELY COUNT THE ONES WE CREATE.
Nidal Hasan was a patient on my floor in the surgical trauma ICU at Brooke Army Medical Center.
I wasn't there when he arrived. I had just left for my deployment to Mosul, Iraq. But the nurses and doctors who cared for him were my peers and my friends, and I know exactly what that required of them, because every one of us had done some version of it before. Before anyone tells me what strength looks like, understand what that work demands.
I have cared for a drunk driver who wiped out an entire family and landed in our ICU himself. I have cared for gang members who shot up a block while children were stepping off a school bus, then ended up on our unit with bullets of their own. I have kept alive people who murdered their own families and failed at taking their own lives. And in Iraq, I saved the lives of the very enemy fighters who had just tried to kill us and miraculously survived our response.
Every one of those patients got our best. Not because we felt anything for them, but because of who we were. You set aside anger, grief, prejudice and every personal feeling you have, because a life in front of you is a life in front of you. That's the oath. That's the duty.
So when Hasan came through those doors, my colleagues did what we had always done. They preserved the life of a man who murdered thirteen people and would have killed them too, given the chance. He killed those men and women in one of the very same buildings many Soldier's like myself have been in when I was stationed at Fort Hood.
He is alive today because they did their jobs. That was not sentiment. It was a hard, tangible expression of the values this country claims to stand for. Our principles had to mean something even when the person benefiting from them had violated everything we believed in.
Now the Pentagon plans to livestream his execution by firing squad on Dec. 3, and our leaders apparently believe turning his death into a public spectacle will demonstrate American strength. I think it demonstrates how little they understand the enemy they claim to be fighting. We kept Nidal Hasan alive, now our leaders want to make him a martyr.
Hasan walked into Fort Hood expecting to die. He believed his death would be rewarded. At his trial, he called no witnesses and offered no defense, and his own court-appointed lawyers worried he was seeking execution. He failed at martyrdom once. Now we're about to hand it to him, in high definition, for every extremist with an internet connection to replay, manipulate and celebrate.
We supply the footage. They supply the meaning.
Long after the politicians finish congratulating themselves, that video will still exist. Their moment of bravado becomes somebody else's recruiting material for decades. And this failure to think past the immediate display of power reaches far beyond one execution. We count the enemies we kill. We rarely count the enemies we create.
Look at the school in Minab, Iran, where multiple investigations attributed the strike that killed more than 100 children and their teachers to us. You cannot bury people's children beneath the rubble of their classrooms and expect a speech about American intentions to decide how they remember you. No denial brings those children home. No claim of good intentions makes their parents forget whose weapons killed them.
If those were our children, we would remember for the rest of our lives. We would demand accountability. Many of us would want vengeance. We would tell their stories to the next generation. We know this because we did exactly that after September 11.
Why do we imagine other people love their children less, grieve less deeply, or remember less clearly?
We have developed a horrifying talent for creating more terrorists than we will ever stop. We inflict suffering, evade responsibility, and then act as though the anger that follows came out of nowhere.
Think back to the first time you saw one of those al Qaeda videos of an American being beheaded. Remember the sickness in your stomach. Remember the rage. Remember thinking that only savages would film a killing and send it out for the world to watch. Now ask yourself what the rest of the world will see when the camera is ours.
Terrorist organizations stage executions for the cameras. Authoritarian regimes make death a public spectacle to feed fear and rage. Watching our own leaders reach for those same tools should force us to confront how much of ourselves we are surrendering in the name of defeating them.
The line separating us from the people we condemn has to live in our conduct. A flag cannot hold it for us. Neither can a uniform, a title, or a declaration that we are the good guys.
On that ICU floor, on a bloody street in Mosul, and in trauma bays across this country, people like my colleagues hold that line every day under circumstances most will never face. They keep monsters alive because their duty and their humanity are bigger than their hatred of what those monsters have done.
Execute him if that's the sentence. But do it the way a confident nation does; quietly, lawfully, and without giving him the stage he always wanted. Let him be forgotten.
I expect our leaders to show at least as much discipline as the nurses who had to care for him.
They keep telling us they are defending what makes America different. Every day, they make that difference harder to see.
Robert W. Burns III is the editor and publisher of The Space Coast Rocket, an Army veteran and a retired trauma nurse. The views expressed in this column are his own.
Lynn Wyeth ๐ฟ๏ธ ๐ retweeted
British Transport Police (BTP) have spent more than ยฃ320k and almost 100 hours of officersโ time on a six-month trial of live facial recognition (LFR) technology in Londonโs railway stations โ yielding just one incorrect face match and no arrests.
The surveillance tech scans passersby and alerts authorities if it recognises someone on a watchlist. It is supposed to help catch people accused of crimes or who breach court orders.
But a freedom of information request by Liberty Investigates, shared with the Guardian in September, revealed that after scanning more than half a million faces between February and July, the tech only sent one suspect alert, and that turned out to be a false positive.
Despite this failure, Transport for London (TfL) has given permission for the technology to be expanded across London Underground stations too.
TfL said the technology could make a vital contribution to tackling violence against the capitalโs women and girls, whose travel experiences are too-often โshaped by experiences of sexual harassment and sexual offencesโ.
The UKโs former biometrics and surveillance camera commissioner, Fraser Sampson, told the Guardian that use of facial ID tech must be proportionate to the need. โSuccess for the police trying to catch people means people being caught. In that respect the trial doesnโt appear to have been very fruitful,โ he said.
Sampson is a non-executive director of facial recognition company Facewatch. which specialises in the technologyโs use in shops. Facewatchโs own technology has led to a number of people being falsely accused of stealing by supermarkets.
Sampsonโs appointment at Facewatch after leaving his government job was criticised as an โoutrageous conflict of interestโ. He said at the time that he โput in place specific measuresโ to avoid the risk of any conflicts, โhowever limited that potential might beโ.
Liberty Investigates found that more than half of police forces in England and Wales are using LFR.
A recent report from parliamentโs joint committee on human rights called for more robust laws to address the threat of AI to human rights, and called LFR as a โclear example of riskโ.
Arresting local journalists is not ok. Please do better @leicspolice
Two of the press staff arrested under the Terrorism Act at yesterdayโs peaceful vigil at Leicesterโs UAV Systems work for @pressgazette
Five were eventually de-arrested onsite, two others were taken all the way to Northampton and held in cells for hours.
pressgazette.co.uk/media_lawโฆ






























