Nick Sortor
@nicksortor
Sep 1
🚨 JUST NOW: Utah prosecutors HIT BACK at Tyler Robinson's attorney for calling Charlie Kirk "HATEFUL," declaring the defense just SCREWED themselves "[Charlie] had an opinion that he would express on politics and religion. That DOES NOT make it 'HATE.' But the fact that [the defense] even CONSIDERED it as 'hate' MAKES THE CASE for the state," prosecutors said "The state takes GREAT exception with Mr. Novak attributing all of this 'HATE' to Mr. Kirk during his argument today." The defense just opened up a BIG can of worms, seemingly trying to argue kiIIing "hateful" people for their speech is NOT political assassination. Good luck with that!
Nick Sortor
@nicksortor
Sep 1
🚨 WTF?! Tyler Robinson's attorney is in court SLANDERING Charlie Kirk, arguing Kirk's murder can't POSSIBLY be politically-motivated because Kirk "SPOKE HATEFULLY" Defaming an assassination victim like this is EVIL. "Mr. Kirk spoke HATEFULLY of certain groups of people. He spoke HATEFULLY of people who don't have traditional norm-conforming gender identities. He spoke HATEFULLY of people who are not strictly heterosexual," Robinson co-counsel Richard Novak said "We all know, because we live in the real world, the kinds of things that Mr. Kirk said. Which some people find hateful."
138
3,191
40
16,925
483,275
The prosecutor is not reacting to a vibe. He’s pointing at the enhancement. If Novak frames Kirk’s speech as β€œhate,” the state uses that as proof the shooting was about political expression. That is the exact theory Graf left alive today. It’s why aggravated murder and the death penalty survived the hearing. You don’t beat a political targeting charge by agreeing the speech was the motive.
They’re translating β€œChristian” as hate. That’s not what he was doing. Charlie treated the act as a soul problem. You can think he was wrong. You can think he was right. What you don’t get to do is pretend love and hate are the same thing.

Sep 2, 2026 Β· 1:34 AM UTC

1
20
881