Mike Burton (@MikeBurton2000) profile picture

Father of 3, Pro EU, FD. Grassroots football, travel. 60's child, 70's music.

Beverley, England
Joined June 2012
Photo by Mike Burton (@MikeBurton2000)Photo by Mike Burton (@MikeBurton2000)
My 9 albums #my9albums my9albums.org/s/19511f6d1ffb It's difficult to keep it at only 9 artists but I've chosen those who I was fortunate to see live.
2
55
Mike Burton retweeted
1
6
19
981
Very good questions. I doubt @PippaCrerar will respond.
Pippa, where was the journalism? Louise Haigh has now publicly stated that plans for Andy Burnham's return were being discussed a full year before they came to fruition. If that is true, why was this not the biggest political story in Britain? Why was The Guardian not leading the investigation instead of merely commenting upon the consequences?This was never simply another Westminster story. It concerned the manner in which the Leader of the Labour Party, and therefore potentially the next Prime Minister, would come to office. The Guardian has long enjoyed unrivalled access to senior Labour figures, advisers and those at the very centre of political decision making. Are readers seriously expected to believe that a plan of such magnitude could have been in motion for an entire year without the newspaper hearing even the faintest whisper of it? That stretches credibility to its limits.If the Parliamentary Labour Party had effectively determined the outcome before Labour members were given any meaningful opportunity to influence the choice, then this was one of the most important democratic stories of recent years. Yet the newspaper that once built its reputation upon exposing what those in authority wished to conceal appeared content to observe events rather than investigate them. Thousands upon thousands of Labour members have since resigned because they believe their voice no longer matters. That alone should have prompted searching questions and sustained investigation. Instead there was silence where there should have been relentless scrutiny. So I ask a simple question. Did The Guardian fail to uncover one of the most significant political stories of modern times despite its exceptional access to the Labour Party, or did it know far more than it chose to publish while these events were unfolding? Either answer raises profound questions about the present state of political journalism. The Guardian once set the standard for holding power to account. Many readers are now entitled to ask whether that tradition has been abandoned when the story concerned those with whom it enjoyed its closest relationships.
6
202
The whole thing is an absolute disgrace. I joined the Labour Party when I was 17 in 1981. One of the key internal issues at the time was one member one vote. Completely ignored by the PLP.
Undermine the party leader for two years. Build a team of disgruntled insiders. Leak to the press. Bribe MPs to stand down. Don't announce cabinet positions so those you've strung along can't rebel. Profit.
1
13
1
94
1,441
It is disgraceful. They should have been backing Keir Starmer. Instead they went off in a sulk and spent the last 12 months plotting.
So Louise Haigh sacked from Cabinet has “been working on a plan for a year” with Andy Burnham. We paid her and him for that year to do their day jobs,support the Prime Minister and government. Not to plan a coup in the background. Outrageous. Resign! @LBC @SkyNews @BBCNews
1
15
1
64
1,335
Mike Burton retweeted
FULL timeline of the campaign to bring Balogun back, according to a half dozen U.S. government & soccer officials: - Wednesday after U.S.-Bosnia match: Andrew Giuliani alerted Trump to the red card (Trump & Giuliani had been talking multiple times/week since start of World Cup and regularly before that.) - Wed night: Giuliani, Lutnick and U.S. Soccer officials began activating on plans to challenge red card - That kicked off 4 days of coordinated lobbying, legal maneuvering & diplomacy that stretched from Oval Office to Zurich - On *Thursday* Trump dialed Gianni Infantino and asked abt FIFA’s rules around the red card decision and grounds for suspension. (They’ve known each other for 8 yrs.) - FIFA declined to confirm any specific discussions but reiterated to POLITICO that the decision to suspend the one-match ban was made by an independent disciplinary committee. - As U.S. Soccer’s legal team formally prepared & submitted its appeal to FIFA, Giuliani + Lutnick offered to make White House attorneys available to assist - At the same time, Giuliani and Scott Goodwin — a hedge-fund manager who had helped pay the salary of Mauricio Pochettino — zeroed in on the officiating history of referee Raphael Claus -Articles examining previous controversies involving Claus circulated among senior gov officials as they evaluated every argument that could bolster the appeal - On FIFA side, Emilio García, who oversees the legal affairs of FIFA, advised Infantino on the available procedural options - García + other FIFA officials worked to determine whether the circumstances of Balogun’s tackle met the narrow standards that would allow the disciplinary decision to be revisited - By Sunday, FIFA announced that Balogun’s one-match suspension would be suspended - FIFA insists that the decision was an independent one made by its 18-person disciplinary committee, but it would not say whether the decision was decided through a vote, and it has not published a report on the decision. politico.com/live-updates/20…
407
2,011
681
6,784
2,748,062
Agree on removing the triple lock but I don’t believe AB can change a key manifesto pledge (ie pensions, personal tax, NI or VAT increases) without a GE. He would get slaughtered by the press -(rightly in my opinion)
No economic credibility whatsoever. Cannot even take simple, obvious, evidence-based decisions. It’s completely unsustainable, every economist has said so. Crippling us. Even the great sage Gary Stevenson (🙄) - allegedly advising AB (🙄🙄) - says so.
2
1
10
620
When Powell, Rayner, Haigh etc should have been highlighting the achievements of the Labour government they went off in a sulk and spent the last 12 months or so plotting to remove the PM.
Things are becoming clearer - day by day. Lucy Powell is no longer hiding that she & others were planning to depose PM Starmer & install Burnham over a year ago. When Burnham appoints his Cabinet - will be interesting to see how many of the existing members were also complicit.
1
66
1
236
2,561
Agree, it is disgraceful. Powell, Rayner, Haigh etc should have been highlighting the achievements of the Labour government, instead they went off in a sulk and plotted to remove the PM
So it’s all been planned for months- Deputy Leader plotting to remove the elected leader- total disgrace
1
22
128
1,229
It is unbelievable that they are getting away with this.
What an unusual coup. You do a deal with a local MP where you get his job with the prospect he can then work for you, causing £5m in by elections. You then topple the Prime Minister, and decide - before you're even in charge - to move the country's seat of power to... your own back yard in a *£1 billion* campus you and two of your friends have 'been working' on 'for a long time'. And the friends you worked on that with? One of them was deputy to the guy you just toppled, with the full inside track, and the other you're currently trying to help into your old job.
1
4
27
566
Similar, I joined as a 17 year old in 1981. Feel betrayed
Replying to @Hepworthclare
God knows how Keir must feel about this but even I feel deeply betrayed. A supporter since I was 14 and a member for 46 years, now just disillusioned. I truly thought we were better than this.
2
37
100% agree.
Replying to @KarlTurnerMP
Total Rubbish , I was there , this period in history will be remembered as one of the worst , treachery , thuggery and arrogance of one man and followed by sheep , called MPs and you are one of them , people will never forgive what , Burnhan, Nandy and Streeting have done
1
22
Replying to @KarlTurnerMP
Total Rubbish , I was there , this period in history will be remembered as one of the worst , treachery , thuggery and arrogance of one man and followed by sheep , called MPs and you are one of them , people will never forgive what , Burnhan, Nandy and Streeting have done
4
1
26
176
Replying to @wesstreeting
Wes, this strikes me as yet another attempt to weaken Sir Keir Starmer's authority whilst he remains Prime Minister. The constitutional position is perfectly clear. Until there is a new Leader of the Labour Party and a new Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer alone decides who serves as ministers. That is his prerogative. By confirming that Mike Tapp will remain in post, he has made it unmistakably clear that the decision rests with him and with no one else. Yet, instead of respecting that authority, you have chosen to intervene publicly in a manner that, to many, appears designed to undermine the serving Prime Minister. You were widely reported as a potential leadership contender, yet in the end you did not stand. If you could not secure sufficient support from your parliamentary colleagues to mount a credible challenge, it is difficult to understand why you now seek to influence decisions that are solely for the Prime Minister to make. In my view, you reached the pinnacle of your political career under Sir Keir Starmer. You may well continue to hold ministerial office in future, but I doubt you will ever again be entrusted with one of the great offices of state. Politics is built upon judgement, loyalty and trust. Once those qualities are called into question, they are seldom restored in the eyes of either party members or the wider electorate.
16
91
1
270
2,187
Have Labour MP's made a spectacular short-term mistake - panicked in the face of Farage who could be in jail, out of Parliament or completely discredited long before the next general election?
98
110
14
688
46,368
The blog post dedicated to the #1977singlespoll is online! Thank you to everyone who contributed. I'm taking a break for a while now, but please help me spread the word by sharing a link to the blog on your SM channels. I hope you enjoy reading. kindredspiritfanzine.blogspo…
21
36
4
174
4,190
There’s still chance to enter. I shall be picking the winner tonight. All you have to do is like and repost. If the winner is someone who has already purchased the 4️⃣0️⃣ anniversary issue I’ll send one of the original fanzines instead.
My last ever “Jam Scrapbook” will be online later this week. To celebrate I’m giving away a copy of my 4️⃣0️⃣ anniversary fanzine. All you have to do to be in with a chance to win is like & repost this post. I shall pick a winner on Thursday. Good luck! ebay.co.uk/itm/226529384407?…
13
1
20
3,169
“Of all the hills to die on this is got to be the most ridiculous” Writer, George Monbiot says the government have no intention of implementing the Rwanda Policy, but instead are using it as a distraction #bbcqt bit.ly/4a85rVU
187
1,096
232
3,548
403,044
If you found this thread useful, then please share it with others. The easiest way is to retweet the first tweet of the thread (reproduced below for convenience). Thank you. nitter.cf/edwinhayward/status/16…
THREAD: The Benefits of EU Membership Let's remind ourselves of some of the things Brexit took from us when we left the EU. (Not an exhaustive list.) 1. No barriers to trade with the world's largest trading bloc. (Bristol, Berlin, Barcelona all equally accessible.)
41
167
11
361
17,928
one person followed me // automatically checked by fllwrs.com
4
122