@MrHand46182i
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
“As a guilty man I knew the only way to hide was to act as though I were righteous” -Joss Whedon My words are like my memes: feel free to steal them.
Michigan
Joined September 2023
- Tweets51K
- Following954
- Followers1K
- Likes172K
Mr. Hand retweeted
On the topic of splitting up the MMR vaccine into 3 separate vaccines, everyone should know that in 2012, two Merck virologists came forward and explained that around 2005 when Merck sought to change the label on its MMR vaccine and approval for ProQuad (a combination MMR and varicella vaccine), it “falsely certified as having an efficacy rate that is significantly higher than it actually is.” (Complaint ¶ 1.)
As detailed in the whistleblower lawsuit, Merck obtained a license for its mumps vaccine in 1967. (Comp. ¶ 16.) In the late 1990s, to obtain approval for ProQuad and change the label on its MMR vaccine, Merck needed to reconfirm its claims of efficacy for its mumps vaccine made thirty years prior. (Comp.. ¶ 22.) Merck’s virologists working on testing the efficacy of the mumps vaccine revealed that after Merck could not demonstrate a 95% efficacy for its mumps vaccine, the results were simply fraudulently falsified to achieve this result. (Comp. ¶¶ 15-131.)
As explained by Merck’s virologists, Merck took blood samples pre-vaccinated with the mumps vaccine and then exposed them to the mumps virus. (Comp. ¶¶ 25-28.) When a test against a live strain of mumps would not yield a 95% efficacy, Merck tried to improperly obtain this rate using an attenuated strain of the mumps virus. (Comp. ¶¶ 29-30.) When this still would not achieve 95% efficacy, Merck tried different virus dilutions, different straining procedure, and even more liberal antibody counting techniques. (Comp. ¶¶ 31-32.) The Merck lab even improperly added animal antibodies to the blood samples and still could not achieve a 95% efficacy rate. (Comp. ¶¶ 33-39.)
When it was clear that even improper testing techniques could not produce the desired result, the test reports were simply falsified. (Comp. ¶¶ 40-51.) According to the Merck virologists, to document the desired efficacy rate, Merck destroyed result sheets and falsified various documents. (Id.) The Merck virologists claim this fraud was done with the direct authority and approval of Merck’s senior management. (Comp. ¶¶ 52-58.)
Now you know.
This may explain why outbreaks of mumps still regularly occur in highly vaccinated populations. See, e.g.:
cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/m…(317 cases; 89% had received at least 2 MMR doses); cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/m…(281 cases; high two-dose coverage among university-affiliated cases, with community spread); cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/m…(301 student cases; all patients with complications had received at least 2 doses); cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/m…(42 cases; all patients had ≥2 documented MMR doses; campus two-dose coverage exceeded 99%); cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtm…(29 cases; 76% had received the recommended 2 dose); cdc.gov/mumps/outbreaks/inde…(CDC: “experts aren’t sure why vaccinated people still get mumps…).
Complaint: icandecide.org/wp-content/up…
Mr. Hand retweeted
🧵So, no one from @freep reached out to me for comment. My comments follow here: 1/
Catholic conservative sues Dearborn, alleging city favors Muslims freep.com/story/news/local/m…
Mr. Hand retweeted
Nikole Hannah-Jones did not sacrifice her daughter's education for equity. That would be stupid.
No, NHJ sacrificed her daughter for vanity. And that's evil.
Let's stop pretending this woman has any moral authority. She's a huckster who wants the next byline, the next book deal, the next media hit.
Mr. Hand retweeted
Replying to @Bubblebathgirl @SenatorSlotkin
I’m old enough to remember when former CIA Analyst (then-candidate for U.S. Rep) Senator Slotkin, ran away when I asked her how she was involved with Obama’s secret pallets of cash he sent to Iran. 🇮🇷
Mr. Hand retweeted
BENSON'S SECRET EMAIL. TIME TO ADMIT OR DENY.
Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson did government business from a private email address. Including with the Southern Poverty Law Center, her former employer, now under FEDERAL INDICTMENT for wire fraud and money laundering.
Now she wants to be your next governor.
A private email for state business. You've heard this one before.
Former Michigan Attorney General @Mike_Cox, my client and co-counsel, asked for the records.
Her own Department BLACKED IT OUT. Refused to say why. For 49 days.
Then a city clerk in Rochester Hills produced this in TWO BUSINESS DAYS. An official election meeting with other states' election chiefs. Sent to her Gmail.
All of this is in court filings. Links at the bottom. Read them yourself.
Why does one address matter? Because state business done on a secret account is SECRET GOVERNMENT BUSINESS. Every email sent through it is a public record the public can't see and the state NEVER SEARCHED.
And that's the one we know about.
So today we asked a judge to rule: blacking it out with no explanation BROKE MICHIGAN'S PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. And to ORDER the Department to hand the blacked-out pages over to him so he can see for himself.
And she has 20 questions to answer. In her own name. By October 14. For example:
QUESTION 7: Is the blacked-out address the Gmail?
QUESTION 11: Has she used the Gmail to communicate with the Southern Poverty Law Center?
QUESTION 20: Has she DELETED state business from a private account since April?
Admit or deny. In writing. Filed with the court.
SILENCE COUNTS AS YES.
Benson could answer Question 7 today.
46 days to the election. Ballots go out in 6.
The motion: tinyurl.com/BensonSecretEmai…
The 20 questions: tinyurl.com/BensonAdmitOrDen…
Let's make Michigan safe, normal, and responsible again! 🇺🇸
@MIGOP @MI_Republicans @Th_Midwesterner @MINewsSource @stevegrubershow @MrJustinBarclay @JonathanTurley @RobGouveiaEsq @downi75 @RNCVoteProtect @MrAustinPredict @gatewaypundit @honestpollster @mifairelections @CraigDMauger
A FEDERAL INDICTMENT AND A SECRET EMAIL: Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has been using an email address that isn't her government account.
We know because her own department blacked it out. No exemption cited.
They blacked it out of records requested about Benson’s connections with Southern Poverty Law Center, which is under federal indictment on eleven counts including wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Their trial starts in October, the month before Michigan votes.
Former Attorney General @Mike_Cox asked for those records 113 days ago. He got thirty pages and a $5,154.97 bill. Unacceptable. What’s being hidden?
I joined Mike as co-counsel this week. Today we filed an amended complaint asking the Court of Claims to order the rest produced before ballots go out next month.
Read the amended complaint and every exhibit: tinyurl.com/BensonSPLC
The one-page fact sheet: tinyurl.com/BensonFactSheet
Let's make Michigan safe, normal, and responsible again! 🇺🇸
@MIGOP @MI_Republicans @RepMattHall @Th_Midwesterner @stevegrubershow @MrJustinBarclay @PattyLovesTruth @elonmusk @timlovesann @mifairelections @downi75 @DonnieDetroit19 @BobDinMI @MrAustinPredict @honestpollster
Mr. Hand retweeted
In response to the clip going around with the African lady saying 'WHAT WHITE CULTURE!?!'
Because I can explain it in more detail than anyone else... here are the main things that create western civilisation.
The principle, the law of nature that is an adaptation to and what operation it creates in our civilisation.
THE WESTERN CIVILISATION STACK
Western civilisation can be understood as a set of adaptations to the laws of nature that allow millions of people to cooperate, solve problems and innovate together.
1. SOVEREIGNTY — Let people act.
Law of nature: Knowledge and ability are distributed among individuals.
No ruler or institution can know everything everyone knows. Sovereignty gives people freedom to choose, experiment and solve problems for themselves. That creates millions of independent problem-solvers instead of waiting for one authority to find the answer.
2. RECIPROCITY — Don’t impose your costs on others.
Law of nature: Cooperation survives when it benefits both sides.
Freedom cannot mean freedom to steal, defraud, injure or force others to carry your costs. Reciprocity means pursuing your interests while respecting the same right in others. It turns conflict into cooperation and makes peaceful life among strangers possible.
3. RESPONSIBILITY — Make people accountable for consequences.
Law of nature: Every action produces consequences.
Freedom works when the person making a decision also bears responsibility for its results. When people can keep the benefits of their choices while forcing the costs onto others, cooperation breaks down. Responsibility reconnects choice with consequence.
4. PROPERTY — Make control and consequences clear.
Law of nature: Resources are scarce and cannot satisfy every competing use at once.
Property establishes who controls something, who may use or exchange it, and who bears the consequences of those decisions. That reduces conflict, encourages people to improve what they possess, and makes investment and long-term planning possible.
5. TRUTH — Correct error faster than reality punishes you for it.
Law of nature: Reality does not change because we believe something false.
Truthful testimony, open criticism and evidence allow people to discover mistakes before those mistakes become catastrophes. A civilisation that can criticize and correct itself can learn faster than one that protects comforting falsehoods.
6. CONTRACT — Make cooperation possible across time.
Law of nature: Cooperation requires predictable future behaviour.
Promises backed by reputation and law allow strangers to trust one another enough to cooperate. Contract lets one person invest today because another can credibly promise performance tomorrow. That makes enormous networks of specialization, trade and investment possible.
7. RULE OF LAW — Replace arbitrary power with predictable rules.
Law of nature: People have conflicting interests, and power creates opportunities for predation.
Law provides a common procedure for resolving disputes without violence or personal rule. When rulers and citizens are both constrained by known rules, people can cooperate, invest and experiment without constantly fearing arbitrary interference.
8. DUE PROCESS — Test accusations instead of trusting authority.
Law of nature: Human beings are biased, mistaken and sometimes dishonest.
An accusation is not proof. Evidence, defense, confrontation, impartial judgment and appeal create an adversarial process for discovering error. Due process protects both society from wrongdoing and individuals from arbitrary punishment.
9. DECENTRALISATION — Let many solutions compete.
Law of nature: No one knows in advance which adaptation will work best.
Families, firms, towns, institutions and governments can try different solutions to different problems. Failures can remain local while successful solutions spread. Decentralisation therefore turns society itself into a continuous experiment.
10. MARKETS — Let reality select among competing solutions.
Law of nature: Evolution advances through variation, selection and retention.
Markets allow people to try different products, services and ways of organising resources. People select among them through voluntary choice. Successful solutions attract resources; unsuccessful ones disappear or improve. Markets turn millions of choices into continuous social learning.
11. SPECIALISATION — Let differences become advantages.
Law of nature: People differ in knowledge, ability, resources and circumstances.
Instead of everyone doing everything badly, specialization lets people become exceptionally good at different things and exchange the results. Cooperation converts human differences from a source of conflict into a source of increasing productivity.
12. SCIENCE — Institutionalise error correction.
Law of nature: A false model eventually fails when tested against reality.
Science turns doubt into a productive institution: observe, propose, test, criticize, replicate and correct. Knowledge therefore does not have to depend upon authority or tradition. Every generation can discover where the previous generation was wrong and build upon what it got right.
13. CAPITAL — Preserve successful adaptations.
Law of nature: Progress compounds only when successful adaptations survive.
Tools, businesses, infrastructure, institutions and knowledge allow yesterday’s successful experiments to become tomorrow’s starting point. Each generation does not begin again from zero. It inherits accumulated solutions and adds another layer.
14. EDUCATION — Transfer accumulated knowledge between generations.
Law of nature: Individuals die; knowledge does not have to.
Writing, schools, apprenticeships and universities allow discoveries to survive their discoverers. Instead of every generation rediscovering mathematics, engineering, medicine and law, it begins with thousands of years of accumulated learning.
15. COMMONS — Build things that make everyone more capable.
Law of nature: Cooperation can produce benefits no individual could produce alone.
Courts, roads, standards, security, scientific knowledge, infrastructure and trustworthy institutions multiply everyone's ability to act. A successful civilisation does more than protect private interests: it continually creates shared capital that makes future cooperation cheaper and more productive.
THE RESULT
These principles form a system:
Sovereignty creates experimentation.
Reciprocity makes it peaceful.
Responsibility makes it sustainable.
Property makes interests clear.
Truth corrects error.
Contract creates trust across time.
Law suppresses predation.
Decentralisation preserves alternatives.
Markets select successful solutions.
Specialisation multiplies productivity.
Science accelerates discovery.
Capital preserves what works.
Education transmits it.
Commons multiply everyone's capabilities.
That is the deeper logic of the Western stack:
Stable rules + distributed freedom + relentless error correction = cooperation at scale and accelerating innovation.
Mr. Hand retweeted
Trump just said gas prices are "very inexpensive."
There are no words. There are just no words anymore.
He's either completely delusional or he's mocking us right to our face.
America is suffering and he simply doesn't care.
Mr. Hand retweeted
Psst! Walter wants to share his news! 🐾📚
"Walter Doesn’t Live Here" can land on your doorstep and is available for purchase at:
🐱 Amazon.com
🐱 Walmart.com
🐱 BarnesandNoble.com
Direct links are below in the comments! Choose your favorite retailer, order your copy and join Walter on his neighborhood adventure!
Thank you for your support!❤️ ~Katie
P.S. When you have a moment, leave a review on the site where you purchase the book to help others find out about Walter's adventures.
Mr. Hand retweeted
[RG911Team] Can someone explain this?
What is the glowing yellow substance dripping from the side of the South Tower on 9/11?
Aluminum does not glow like this in daylight… but thermite does.
Mr. Hand retweeted
From today's Detroit News. Public notice regarding Consumers Energy. A rate increase hearing is soon to follow
Mr. Hand retweeted
I would like to applaud whoever keeps putting these bog witches in front of a camera and asking them to elaborate on their views.
A female juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial described her actions towards her three children as “altruistic filicide.”
Follow: @AFpost
Controlled. Demolition.
Replying to @alexboge
This simulation is total bullshit--here is the actual video of Building 7's collapse:
youtube.com/watch?v=KitPimk7…
Mr. Hand retweeted
My dad ran into the arms of Jesus last night. ❤️
He slipped out of his earthly body around 11pm. I am so incredibly sad, but I know my dad is not sad today. He is full of joy. His pain is gone. And I like to imagine those poor, feeble legs that could no longer carry him here—completely healed as he ran to Jesus.
And God gave me the sweetest little reminder in the middle of my grief.
We had lost power around 8pm. When I got the call at 12:19am that Dad had passed, I hung up the phone—and at that very moment, the power came back on and the light on my nightstand illuminated the room.
A flash of light in the darkness.
I’ll receive that as a God-wink: We’re going to be okay. Keep your eyes on the Light of the World.
And a big hug from my dad, too. ❤️
Thank you to the many people here who prayed for my dad and our family after my last post. Your prayers carried us through some incredibly difficult days.
My dad is home.
“I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.” — John 8:12
💔❤️🩹❤️
#GriefDebrief #HeavenistheGoal
Mr. Hand retweeted
This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works:
1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance.
2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely.
According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits.
The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024.
Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025.
And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well.
What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)?
3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself.
It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one.
4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?
Mr. Hand retweeted
Replying to @laralogan
The same management at Fox News that fired Bartiromo thought it was a good idea to put the lawsuit against them by Dominion up for summary judgment. The judge ruled against them.
Mike Lindell fought a lawsuit against him by Dominion in court and didn't have to pay Dominion a penny.