Replying to @heyyeah_ch @azoxrage
I would gladly buy this game on PC but they have to rip the customer off with the decades old playbook of creating a new console every two years. How is it that the PlayStation or XBox have a much longer lifespan than the usual Nintendo console. It’s just lazy man
Replying to @BerndKacke @DieMilitante
Legalität ist bei moralischen Fragen immer behindert reinzubringen
Replying to @funbeachcpl13
I didn’t lock anything you stupid retard. OP was locking the thread. How dumb are you?
Replying to @TyKeynes
Keynes solution to all these problems: "print more paper"
Replying to @mtaushb
Warum hat dieser Spast so eine Bismarck Obsession? Ist jetzt nicht das erste Mal wo er so nen Müll über dieses Thema fabriziert
Replying to @nikolarokvic00 @Felix_Public
Ein Mensch hat von Geburt an die Fähigkeit zur Konzeptbildung selbst mit geistigen Einschränkungen. Diese nicht zu haben ist gleichzusetzen mit dem Tod und Tote haben keine Rechte. Beim Hirntoten hängt es davon ab ob er das Potential hat wieder aufzuwachen, wenn dieses bewiesenermaßen (Beweislast wäre hier extrem hoch angesetzt) nicht möglich ist dann ist er tot und hat keine Rechte mehr.
Tiere haben niemals das Potenzial zur Konzeptbildung und können deshalb keine Rechte haben.
Replying to @mrQwhiplash
This was not in fucking japan but in brazil and the perpetrator was her ex. retarded fake news
Literally go ask AI simply "who is contradicting himself in this thread" with a link to this thread, maybe you get it then
It's useless discussing with you anyway, you don't get the point and why your standard is inconsistent even though I showed it to you multiple times. "You just have to apply it consistently" bro it's literally impossible hahahahaha
Which reason? How do you resolve the contradiction with the given standard?
If he were reasonable, he would just focus on the depiction of child characters and not the arbitrary number attached to it. This would be a consistent standard that can be applied. His rule leads to absurdity and I showed it pretty clearly.
But yeah keep yourself in the closet pedophile
And now you only use "Sexualizing a character established as a minor is sexualizing a minor" rule meaning you are for drawing 300 year old loli vampires you fucking pedophile.
It's so funny how you don't see how inconsistent your standard is xDDD
You started with “visual youth-coding or canon age.” You ended with only the number. That’s the flip.




