Nathan Tankus (@NathanTankus) header
Nathan Tankus (@NathanTankus) profile picture

Shadowbanned but still posting. President of Notes on the Crises. email: crisesnotes@gmail(dot)com Signal: NathanTankus.01

New York, New York
Joined January 2013
Photo by Nathan Tankus (@NathanTankus)Photo by Nathan Tankus (@NathanTankus)Photo by Nathan Tankus (@NathanTankus)Photo by Nathan Tankus (@NathanTankus)Photo by Nathan Tankus (@NathanTankus)Photo by Nathan Tankus (@NathanTankus)Photo by Nathan Tankus (@NathanTankus)Photo by Nathan Tankus (@NathanTankus)Photo by Nathan Tankus (@NathanTankus)Photo by Nathan Tankus (@NathanTankus)
Nathan Tankus retweeted
Any Democrat who has said anything critical about AES in public since he clinched the nomination is objectively pro-Trump and should be treated as such going forward. If the shoe was on the other foot they'd be saying that about us, and they'd have a point.
55
194
35
1,813
59,687
Pretty amazing that its 2026 and prominent economists still say obviously false things about literature they cite and haven't read. The **title** of Phillips' paper is "The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1861-1957"
Is the Phillips curve useful to make sense of inflation? A.W.H. Phillips first postulated a negative empirical correlation between inflation and the level of economic activity. Looking at inflation in 2021-24---up and down---versus measures of unemployment---roughly unchanged---shows little correlation. Has the Phillips curve failed, yet again? No, it did not. Friedman and Phelps, almost 50 years ago, clarified that this correlation should only hold keeping expected inflation fixed. Almost every account of how firms choose prices or bargain wages with their workers predicts that expectations would show up in a Philips curve. Moreover, those models of behavior further add that increases in marginal costs (supply shocks) would further shift out this relation. The empirical Phillips curve has for many decades meant a negative relation between inflation and real activity, controlling for expected inflation and supply shocks. The left figure below shows on the vertical axis inflation, after controlling for expected inflation---mean and disagreement from a household survey---and for supply shocks---gas prices and global supply pressures. The horizontal axis shows a measure of slack in the labor market---the log of the ratio of unemployment to job vacancies. The Phillips curve held nicely and steadily throughout. A criticism of that figure is that its is looking in the rear view mirror: the measure of supply shocks and the measure of slack were developed in the last few years and the data has been revised. The right figure does instead an out-of sample exercise. Estimate a regression of inflation on (i) expected inflation, (ii) the difference between the unemployment rate and the CBO estimate of its non-cyclical component, and (iii) the PCE energy price index. Do it on data pre-pandemic: 1984Q1-2020Q1. Using that estimated equation, predict inflation in real time from then onwards using the data releases available at the time of the forecast. The Phillips curve was a pretty good predictor of inflation throughout. The Phillips curve was stable during the inflation surge, and it predicted well the movements in inflation, with expectations playing a key role in those predictions. Notes: it is important to include the right measure of expectations to understand inflation-activity dynamics at a business-cycle frequency: the short-horizon expectations of households and firms. (For instance, the long-horizon expectations from professionals, or the expectations from models in policy institutions, as in my previous two posts, are the wrong measure.) Sources: (i) Section 3 in Reis "Why Did Inflation Rise and Fall in 2021-24? Channels and Evidence from Expectations" (ii) The simple exercise on the left figure is inspired on the analysis of Bernanke and Blanchard “What Caused the US Pandemic-Era Inflation?” (iii) The simple exercise on the right figure is inspired on @jadhazell "Comment" in the NBER macro annual 2025, which in turn built on Beaudry, Hou, and Portier "The Dominant Role of Expectations and Broad-Based Supply Shocks in Driving Inflation"
2
19
111
9,709
Incredible
Sen. @tedcruz in March: "I don't believe that what is happening in Iran will be front and center in November. If it extends that long, we've done something wildly wrong... The president said at the beginning this is going to be a matter of several weeks."
2
32
271
11,977
TFW when a well known economist makes it very clear he has never read the General Theory
I agree. But Keynes’ GT is intellectually incoherent when viewed through the lens of General Equilibrium theory … it has no intelligible answer to the question: When faced with persistent unemployment why don’t firms offer lower wages and why don’t unemployed workers accept those offers? When the N. American Keynesians ... based in Cambridge Massachusetts … accepted Friedman’s argument that high unemployment is caused by a temporary deviation of wages and prices from their equilibrium levels … they gave up the Keynesian Baby with the Monetarist Bathwater. The Cambridge England Keynesians resisted but they did not have a coherent explanation for the persistence of long-term unemployment as an equilibrium phenomenon that could answer the questions of the General Equilibrium theorists. My entire body of work has been devoted to providing an answer to the question: How can high unemployment persist? that reconciles General Equilibrium Theory with the Keynesian proposition that Walrasian Equilibrium is one of many potential resting points of a dynamical system. The answer is what I call Keynesian Search Theory. static1.squarespace.com/stat…
5
13
125
8,728
Nathan Tankus retweeted
A whole lot of "Leninists" out here who think we need a mass party by and for the entire working class, rather than a close-knit vanguard of professional revolutionaries. I happen to agree with them on that! But I regret to inform you that it is Menshevism
I find it funny when people unironically call themselves Marxist, Stalinist, Trotskyist or Maoist, but then aren’t able to articulate what it really means to be said thing and why it matters. Sometimes just feels like a clothing brand and not actual ideologies
16
10
8
315
19,781
As @felixsalmon points out, is this related to her father making potentially 20 billion dollars with the Anthropic IPO?
News: Rest of World, the nonprofit newsroom focused on the impact of technology outside the West founded by Sophie Schmidt, tells donors in an email it will “cease publishing as a standalone entity” at the end of January.
2
1
14
3,918
Nathan Tankus retweeted
This is almost verbatim
Israeli election debate Candidate 1: "I have killed SO MANY Arabs" Candidate 2: "Liar, he is lying! He has not killed NEARLY enough Arabs. He even spares the children!" Candidate 1: "FALSE! I've killed countless Arab children and I WILL KILL EVEN MORE if you vote for me"
3
229
1
1,803
143,528
Nathan Tankus retweeted
I normally just tell Piero "I am going to eat you. I am going to gobble up up like breakfast" and then lightly chew on his ears. He tolerates it. Cute aggression is big in this house
(holding my cat) i love you so much. i would kill anyone for you (remembering that that’s a reactionary violent right wing coded way to express love) i mean i would build a hundred cities for you
3
1
64
2,344
"I think also that TV played a very major role. Because now you were having brought into every living room in America the brutality of the situation. So I think if we had television fifty years earlier, we would have gotten rid of lynching fifty years earlier."- Bayard Rustin
The Jews who went to Mississippi didn’t take selfies and post tweets of performative stunts to gain notoriety and virtue signal. They actually put their lives at risk to protect truly oppressed people. Comparing the two just highlights how detached you are from reality.
1
51
330
10,076
A paper I presented at the EEA conference in 2002. Did I miss anything? tools.bard.edu/wwwmedia/reso…
3
16
1
54
4,323
Seems like the solution is to gather a dozen journalists from across the political spectrum and show them your donor rolls and they can confirm or deny that the allegations are off-base. So how about it @neeratanden ? Unless you are just lying.
We stopped posting our donors because we didn’t want Trump to come after them simply because they gave to CAP and lo and behold in August he attacked our donors by name on Truth Social. It just turned out to be a wrong list because we didn’t publish them. In retrospect a smart move for our sustainability.
2
16
1
242
6,142
Ultimately works of art can't be created assuming the stupidity of the viewer. That's only going to lead to bad art and has no positive political potentiality. "You Can See Everything" will likely be the most thought provoking media many viewers consume this year.
36
3,425
Guy who devoted himself to speechwriting for awful Republican presidents and various right wing sinecures (as a right wing sinecure Nepobaby) thinks other people are "acting on behalf of evil and therefore ignoble" . And that's without even covering that he's a Genocide denier
Replying to @dwallacewells
It’s noble to do things for the greater good without first considering remuneration. Except these people are acting on behalf of evil and therefore ignoble.
1
5
100
4,335
Nathan Tankus retweeted
Three important "marginalized and influential" macroeconomic thinkers died this year. I knew all of them personally and this is as much (or more) a personal reflection than a discussion of their work (though there's that too). I hope others get something out of it.
4
41
1
175
14,248