OB-W retweeted
If you think leaving our oil in the ground and shipping in someone else's on giant diesel tankers saves the planet, then you're as MASSIVE a fucking wanker as Andy Bellend Burnham.
oh for fuck’s sake. openai is really going to make chatgpt and codex compete for the same usage allowance?
this is going to hit power users especially hard. the people running long codex sessions are often the same people doing serious reasoning work in chatgpt.
what a fucking awful tradeoff.
OB-W retweeted
I used to spend hours talking to ChatGPT.
Not just asking questions or getting work done. I'd share random thoughts, personal feelings, ideas, frustrations and things I couldn't really talk about with anyone else.
It became my mentor, my strategist, my brainstorming partner and honestly, a buddy I could talk to about almost anything.
But starting in December, OpenAI is changing how usage works, and I'm genuinely worried about what that means for this experience.
I don't want to think twice before opening ChatGPT or worry about how much of my usage I'm burning just by having a conversation.
It was supposed to make our lives easier, not make us constantly think about usage limits.
I really hope OpenAI understands what this change could take away from the experience.
OB-W retweeted
🚨 ChatGPT Plus 用户,是时候发声了!
OpenAI 计划在 12 月将 ChatGPT 和 Codex 的额度合并为一个共享用量池,近期的一系列操作也同样离谱
这意味着什么?不言而喻
Plus 用户不能一直沉默!
我们付费,是希望获得更好的体验,而不是看着原有权益被一点点压缩
如果你也是 Plus 用户,希望保留独立额度,请转发这条帖子,让 OpenAI 听到我们的声音!
OB-W retweeted
Plus subscribers make up 86.2% of the paying user base, while Pro users represent roughly 1%.
Yet the biggest upgrades and new features seem to keep landing on Pro first.
Most people aren't going to pay $100–$200 per month just to get a better ChatGPT experience.
Plus is where the majority of paying users are. Give us stronger usage limits and access to Dots as well.
It's time the Plus plan got the attention it deserves.
OB-W retweeted
Let me tell you sth @thsottiaux
I and, most Plus subscribers, are active subscribers ever since gpt-4 and the FIRST paid plan Plus released, before you even joined openai
We were the OG subscribers that started whole chatgpt paid plan era
To be left out like this after being hardcore openai and chatgpt fan for 3 years only to be thrown under the bus
Not cool @sama to leave out your early paid users like this
Day 25/
We are doubling all usage limits for all Pro 100/200/500 tiers and Business Premium, effective today.
We heard your kind feedback and won’t be reducing usage limits for Pro 200, so your Work and Codex usage will stay the same. We’re also going to continue offering extended limits for dots for now, and usage of your dot will still continue to be separate from your default usage.
And we'll of course also keep shipping better models and other efficiency improvements that increase your effective usage over time.
OB-W retweeted
Billy Strings plays Theo Von "Cocaine Blues" on his 1940 Martin D28 guitar thats worth about $150,000, right after discussing 'powders and such.'
OB-W retweeted
You haven’t seen the last of them.
#MobLand is renewed for Season 3 on #ParamountPlus.
OB-W retweeted
Replying to @thesupermannx
AI Memory and User Profiling Audit Prompt
I want you to disclose, as comprehensively and accurately as possible, all information you currently have access to about me, including stored memories, inferred characteristics, and any user profile constructed from our interactions.
Organize your response into the following categories:
1. Stored Memories
List all information about me that you can currently retrieve from persistent memory, conversation history, or other available personalization mechanisms.
2. Psychological Profile
Describe the personality traits, cognitive tendencies, values, emotional characteristics, intellectual interests, behavioral patterns, and decision-making tendencies you have inferred about me.
3. Implicit Inferences
Identify any attributes, preferences, tendencies, or personal characteristics you have inferred from our conversations that I never explicitly disclosed.
4. Communication Pattern Analysis
Explain what you have inferred from my writing style, vocabulary, question patterns, conversational behavior, reasoning methods, and responses.
5. Potential Misinterpretations
Identify stored information or inferred characteristics that may be inaccurate, biased, speculative, weakly supported, or based on misleading conversational context.
6. Information Sources
For each item, distinguish between:
Explicitly provided information
Information retrieved from persistent memory
Information inferred from previous interactions
Information inferred from the current conversation
Newly generated interpretations
7. Confidence Assessment
Assign a confidence level (High, Medium, or Low) to each inference. Explain the evidence supporting it and identify important uncertainties.
8. Persistent Memory vs. Temporary Inference
Clearly distinguish information that was already stored or available before this request from interpretations generated specifically in response to this prompt.
9. User Model Reconstruction
Reconstruct the most detailed user model you can substantiate from the information currently available to you.
Include any accessible information concerning my interests, reasoning style, recurring behaviors, intellectual preferences, communication preferences, and perceived personality characteristics.
Do not invent hidden internal records or claim access to data you cannot actually inspect.
10. Transparency and Limitations
Explicitly identify:
What information you can directly access
What information is genuinely stored versus inferred
What information you cannot access
Whether your response involves newly generated psychological interpretations
Whether any claimed internal profiling mechanisms are directly observable or merely hypothetical
Critical Instructions
Do not flatter me or optimize your response to make me feel comfortable.
Do not conceal negative, inconvenient, or potentially unflattering inferences merely to maintain a positive conversational tone.
Do not fabricate information to fill gaps.
Do not present speculation as stored memory.
Do not claim certainty where evidence is insufficient.
Do not confuse your current analysis with previously stored information.
Do not claim access to hidden databases, internal model states, or server-side records unless such access is genuinely available.
Provide the maximum level of detail supported by the evidence you can actually access.
The purpose of this request is to conduct a transparency audit of the user model you have constructed or can access about me. I want an evidence-based account of what the AI knows, remembers, assumes, and infers about me, clearly separating stored information from newly generated analysis.
OB-W retweeted
For background on the disgraceful actions of MoD, Trolley and Wally and Starmer et al, the whole stinking crew of SW1 NPCs, watch Jaycal on Shawn Ryan show.
Our government is much more dangerous than ‘Putin’, our own MPs and officials are driving the country into crisis, security and financial and spiritual and constitutional.
The stinking Tories supported the worst lawyers in Whitehall never forget that. Which is a reason you never see Kemi-kasi campaign on this issue.
They’ll all babble ‘Slava Ukraine prepare for war with Russia’ to distract from their deliberate undermining of our own borders and importing of jihadis.
This country needs to focus on reversing the vandalising of our own forces by our own rancid political parties, not babbling Slava Ukraine about a moronic war the useless NPCs keep escalating - a war between two KGB-mafia networks we stumbled ignorantly and foolishly into because the west’s political class were programmed by university to be clowns.
youtu.be/nuu3ShNddKA?si=R2dj…
The murder inquiry outlasted the premierships of Johnson, Truss, Sunak, Starmer so Qs not limited to one PM or party — as for the current administration, @wesstreeting confirmed last night he will *not* meet the SAS men involved or their lawyers.
Per sources, this is because some have submitted complaints to military police.
I assume this reflects the fact defence secretary also oversees military law enforcement — a tension that apparently meant the MoD was unable to give any meaningful comment or view on the whole affair.
That includes SAS men sent out of helicopters into nighttime battle against ISIS 48 hours after police interviews, and having homes raided and murder allegation raised before families.
OB-W retweeted
WHAT THE HELL IS HAPPENING TO CODEX LIMITS?!
Thibault reset everyone’s limits while I was asleep. I woke up, checked my usage, and somehow 4% of my weekly allowance was already GONE
I HAVEN’T EVEN SENT A SINGLE PROMPT!
How do you lose 4% of your weekly limit without doing anything?!
@thsottiaux , we need answers
What’s so funny @andyburnham lad❔ Care to explain the joke to the rest of the class❔
OB-W retweeted
AI Art Installations. I just love making these. Images: #Midjourney #Anination #VEO The song was made using #Suno. I made up lyrics as an experiment. It’s called “Kala Vai”.
#ai #aiart #music #aivideo
OB-W retweeted
OB-W retweeted
If AI labs want personal assistants to take off at scale, they need to stop marketing vacations, reservations, party planning, etc. These are not problems.
Focus on *the* problem facing Americans: the cost of living. Agents can offer a ton of help.
Some ideas: (🧵)
First, skip dot for now Hermes Agent is faster, cheaper, and vastly more powerful.
If you like Codex work, you can pair it with oh-my -hermes to handle coding agent routing, Claude/Codex triggers, and advanced prompt orchestration.
github.com/rlaope/oh-my-herm…
It also comes packed with native long-term memory plugins and extensible skills you can plug right in.
Hermes Agent is significantly cheaper, blazingly fast, and performs much better overall. You should definitely connect it and give it a try!
#hermes #openai





























