H (@ParisSpringTime) profile picture
Joined May 2022
Photo by H (@ParisSpringTime)Photo by H (@ParisSpringTime)Photo by H (@ParisSpringTime)Photo by H (@ParisSpringTime)Photo by H (@ParisSpringTime)Photo by H (@ParisSpringTime)Photo by H (@ParisSpringTime)Photo by H (@ParisSpringTime)Photo by H (@ParisSpringTime)Photo by H (@ParisSpringTime)
Replying to @KaskaJessica
Sounds like you admit that social media and phones is the way that kids can become trans. Interesting. Like a vampire angry that people are wearing crosses around their necks.
4
1
16
432
Women forced the state to recognise sex in the Equality Act, allowing us to sue service providers for discrimination. Now the state is retaliating by CRIMINALISING refusal to recognise gender, punished by up to five years in jail! We must #BinTheConversionPracticesBill #BinTheBill
2
82
3
262
4,017
Islamists are literally beheading Christians in Nigeria.. I wonder why the activists who care so much about innocent people dying rarely talk about this..
1,732
17,868
908
45,615
827,732
Rapists, murderers&general haters of women.You'll be glad to know there is no Open Season on Women & Girls.You can rape,torture&murder us anyday of the year.Exemplified by ZERO JAIL TIME for Cirencester teenager-stabbed a teenage girl ++times,6"knife
39
A teenage boy from Cirencester stabbed a girl TEN TIMES with a 6 INCH KNIFE. No jail time because "jail is the last place for someone like you". ARE YOU KIDDING ME?? ITS THE FIRST & ONLY PLACE FOR AN ATTEMOTED MURDERER.
1
45
But I forget. Teenage boys & men are routinely rewarded for raping & murdering girls & women. WHAT ABOUT THE GIRL WHO WAS TERRIFIED FOR HER LIFE?? Attacks on girls & women rarely get to court because of "lack of evidence". The attacks on video!
1
21
That teenage attempted murderer *admitted* to "wounding with intent". Why? Well, it's on video for a start! I also suspect he was told that if he pleads to the flaming obvious he would avoid a custodial sentence.
5
I don’t care if someone calls me a ‘transphobe’. In fact, I’ve reached the point where I take it as a compliment. Because it’s increasingly used to describe women who stand up for their sex-based rights. And the men who support them. Why would I be insulted by that? But while I’m not offended by the word, I am wary of people who use it. Because it tells me something about their priorities. That they believe men’s identities and feelings matter more than the safety, privacy and dignity of women and girls. And that’s not someone whose judgement I’d be inclined to trust.
120
376
23
2,394
43,149
Rowling is correct. It IS a men's rights campaign. One based on sexual fantasy and threat.
Jo Rowling framing trans advocacy as "men's rights" isn't deluded - it's strategic - she's trying to activate the progressive egregore against trans advocacy because it is "bad for women" The prog hive mind works by repetition and she's got a platform that will let her keep repeating her message Her effort is doomed though because her flavor of progressivism is badly out of date and progressivism always has to advance since its spiritual payoff to adherents is that they get to be on the vanguard opposing an oppressive society
1
49
What I find so nauseating about this clip is how seriously Watson takes herself. The members of the progressive woke supremacist cult seriously believe they are disciples of righteousness; that it’s impossible they could be wrong. And so, with astonishing narcissism, Watson - a mediocre actress not overburdened with insight - portrays herself as bearing an overflowing heart, and carrying terrible burdens of conflicting emotions. Let’s remember what this is about. @jk_rowling has been fighting for sex-based rights that have underpinned safeguarding for decades to be maintained and protected. Watson, meanwhile, has placed the demands of trans-identifying men ahead of her own biological sex, and utterly betrayed Rowling, who has been subjected to horrific abuse and death threats for daring to speak up for women. Yet Watson portrays herself here as a saintly figure who somehow, within her unimpeachable soul, may be able to find it in herself to acknowledge some of the debt she owes to a mentor without whom she’d be nothing. It’s a shame she was ever cast in the Harry Potter movies. Had she been passed over, we wouldn’t now have to endure this painful, self-regarding garbage.
This is painful to watch. You can almost see the cogs moving. An absolutist has realised her original position was built on toxic sand and tries to head for decent solid ground. And fails.
147
403
13
4,266
190,029
Replying to @boudicasarmy
Sexual offenders don't get better, they get worse. It may start with stealing ladies panties off washing lines, but the addictive urge for more sexual stimulation takes it to rape, and murder. Sexual perversion should not be taken lightly.
4
45
591
Replying to @boudicasarmy
In all fairness there should be a mandatory minimum sentence for a first offence.
2
40
344
The Women’s Rights Network stand by the women and girls of Afghanistan. We expect UN Women, Amnesty and the rest of the international community to do the same.
Afghan women are erased from the society and they are ignored by UN and UN Women!
2
65
156
1,854
2/ As for “…our trans friends and family are facing an especially relentless level of hostility...” Sky might want to turn down the hyperbole and speak to the girls and women threatened with losing their college places and careers if they spoke up against men in their squads and changing rooms. Alternatively, Sky could speak to Melissa Bishop, Joanna Jóźwik and Lynsey Sharp who missed out on placing at the 2016 Rio Olympics as three men stood on the women’s 800m podium. They could even do a deep dive into how a men came to be punching women in the boxing ring at the 2024 Paris Olympics. We feel sorry for Sky’s staff who hold sex realist or gender critical views. However, if Sky are looking for genuine relentless hostility, speaking to the women of Afghanistan would give them a true insight.
1
11
26
430
1/ We would love to know which groups Sky believe are ‘bigoted’ and ‘extraordinarily funded’ because they “exclude trans people from sport”. In fair and safe sport nobody is excluded and everyone can compete in the category for their sex. If Sky did anything in the way of investigation, they would see that many of the groups that campaign for saving women’s sport are grassroots volunteer led organisations. If only Sky knew any journalists worthy of the name.
“LGBTQ+ people are being targeted. Our rights, our identities and our existence are being debated and attacked.” These are the words of a senior legal counsel at Sky, who co-chairs its LGBTQ+ staff group. According to The Sunday Times, an internal video also attacked “extraordinarily well-funded bigots” campaigning to exclude trans people from sport and shared spaces. Presumably that includes women campaigning for single-sex spaces and fair sporting categories? Gender-critical beliefs are protected under the Equality Act. So what message does this send to Sky employees who hold those beliefs? And what does it tell us about the culture inside one of Britain's biggest news broadcasters? Read below 👇
1
21
87
1,347
As the trial proceeds of the men accused of raping Joanne Young while she was drugged, we want to highlight that this is not an isolated case. Drug assisted rape is happening as part of an organised global ecosystem. The 'Motherless' pornography site facilitates this. It is STILL operating. Hear more: womensrightsnetwork.substack…
60
1
107
1,908
We share the concern of these women outside the court and applaud their solidarity 👏 Men are accused of raping this poor woman at the invitation of her husband, who had drugged her. He has already pleaded guilty. How many more cases will we see? We are sickened and we are angry.
A few of us outside Winchester Crown Court this morning to show support for Joanne Young. #ShameMustChangeSides #ADruggedWomanNeverConsents
3
114
343
2,877
Replying to @BrainsinNo
Gender Identity activists could have accepted her criticism (that sex is a useful classification and should be preserved) instead they subjected her to a torrent of abuse, death threats, SA threats and unwanted pornographic images.
1
1
70
Replying to @BrainsinNo
Your narrative is disingenuously false. To suggest someone campaigns for men to be kept out of women-only spaces because they have something against a particular cohort of men is absurd. If women want women-only spaces to be women only, that is a strong enough reason in itself.
2
1
67
846
Replying to @BrainsinNo
Except they don’t criticise, they harass they try to ruin and take their livelihoods and jobs and they are relentless. Then they try to act the victim. JK is funding women who can’t afford the legal battle that have occurred because of harassment from trans. The is a hero and stands up for what is right.
3
4
63
914