Phil Yanda (@PhilYanda) header
Phil Yanda (@PhilYanda) profile picture

Kryptō with Christ in God. Hubs to C. @JNDarbyquotes. Member: @hfbccypress @fgafree @pure_barre. Fan: @archetypeboys @houstondash @houstondynamo @warhammer 40K.

Cinco Ranch, TX
Joined October 2009
Photo by Phil Yanda (@PhilYanda)Photo by Phil Yanda (@PhilYanda)Photo by Phil Yanda (@PhilYanda)Photo by Phil Yanda (@PhilYanda)Photo by Phil Yanda (@PhilYanda)Photo by Phil Yanda (@PhilYanda)Photo by Phil Yanda (@PhilYanda)Photo by Phil Yanda (@PhilYanda)Photo by Phil Yanda (@PhilYanda)Photo by Phil Yanda (@PhilYanda)
“But love your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing in return, and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be sons of the Highest; for he is good to the unthankful and wicked (Luke 6:35 DARBY).”
5
3
1
48
One of those nights when I don’t want to go to sleep, but I absolutely need to go to sleep. lol. Hopefully this storm doesn’t take our power out. The thunder is awfully vocal tonight. 😅
1
6
99
Wordle 1,970 3/6 🟨⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟨⬛⬛🟨🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
101
“We can grieve what has changed while trusting that God is present in the chapter we are living today.” @HoustonsFirst @HFBCCypress houstonsfirst.org/GetFile.as…
1
2
41
Wordle 1,969 6/6 ⬛⬛⬛⬛🟩 ⬛🟩🟩⬛⬛ ⬛🟩🟩⬛🟩 ⬛🟩🟩⬛🟩 ⬛🟩🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
55
Phil Yanda retweeted
If you have kids, you need to watch this movie. If you don’t have kids, you need to watch this movie. 10/10 Movie. Great plot. Clean humor. Outstanding acting. Lovable characters.
21
18
2
253
13,059
Question: - Someone affirms that free will choice in necessary for receiving Christ. - They deny particular redemption. - They also affirm absolute eternal security (once saved, always saved). - They claim to reject Arminiansim. >>>>> What are they? 🤔
4
94
“Love consists in this: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the atoning sacrifice for our sins (1 John 4:10 CSB).”
1
1
5
170
Wordle 1,968 3/6 ⬛⬛🟨🟨⬛ 🟨⬛⬛🟨⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
58
From this afternoon’s sermon. We’re in Deuteronomy 4:9-14 tonight. 🤓📖
1
51
So, like, I don’t think the length of the millennium kingdom, the physicality of a chain to bind Satan, or other quibbles are exactly the main arguments for or against a millennial kingdom. Rather, the specific details of the text present a prophetic narrative, like the binding
1
3
153
Of Satan (20:2), what he’s prevented from doing and this brief release after 1000 years (3), what it means that “they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years (4), that there is a separate resurrection after the 1000 years (5), and, I’m sure some other details,
1
1
37
But I’m having a hard time understanding these things solely symbolically when they’re presented essentially in a timeline and narrative. 😅🕵🏻‍♂️ Yes, I say this as a Premil Dispie, but the way the text is laid out is important and the defining factor for explaining meaning.
2
30
Haven’t shaved in a bit. What do we think? Honestly, it’s itchy, doesn’t grow in thick, and I wanna cut it all off. lol. But I was curious how it would look if I waited. Probably gonna shave tomorrow. 🤭✌🏻
2
5
196
Overall, found this really helpful in understanding the position from a different perspective. Dr. Anderson told me one time that the more he read from different views, the more it actually drove him into most of the positions he already held. 🕵🏻‍♂️🤭🤓 audible.com/pd/B0F89MKGHS?so…
1
40
The idea that Satan can’t be chained because he’s a spirit being and therefore no physical chain could hold him, is certainly an interesting reading of the text. 🕵🏻‍♂️😅 Could God not craft a chain that could hold him? Are not all things possible with Him? audible.com/pd/B0F89MKGHS?so…
27
Wordle 1,967 5/6 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟨⬛🟩🟩🟩 ⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
1
69