Pinned Tweet
Do as adversaries do in law, strive mightily, but eat and drink as friends.
William Shakespeare, The Taming of the Shrew, Act I, sc. 2
For over a decade, Reddit never missed an opportunity to preen about so-called “net neutrality.” It virtue-signaled that the company was “built on the premise of letting individuals decide what content they find interesting. We believe the same basic principle should apply to the internet as a whole.” It launched multiple “Days of Action,” trying to scaremonger people into believing that the internet as we knew it was about to end—obviously wrong then and now. Without utility-style internet regulation, Reddit warned that corporations would take actions solely “for their own profit.”
How times have changed. Reddit is now making its own “open” platform a walled garden. Specifically, it’s unilaterally decided to block consumers from accessing Reddit content unless they log in—what it calls a “logged-in-only experience.” (So much for letting “individuals decide what content they find interesting.”) That’s because corporate-controlled access yields more consumer-specific information that benefits Reddit’s own advertising and data businesses. All this despite the company being enormously profitable already—it’s made over $740 million this year, a record by far.
Far be it from me to suggest that Reddit must be regulated or prohibited from doing what they think is a key driver of “monetization on Reddit.” Assuming no violations of law or regulation, my views here are clear—and they don’t change, even when corporate leadership previously accused me of corruption and called repealing FCC regulations “un-American.” But when a company that has constantly and vitriolically demanded regulation of its perceived rivals—to prevent alleged harms to consumer from conduct that was purely hypothetical—now explicitly boasts about giving consumers a less-open Internet to benefit its bottom line, it should get the public scrutiny and mockery it richly deserves.
Daniel Lyons retweeted
This amazing moment was 25 years ago tonight.
We Americans were indivisible that night.
It feels like a lifetime ago.
Daniel Lyons retweeted
In 1952, an English teacher named Cecil Dormand secretly paid for a dirt-poor 11-year-old to take a drama course.
He never told him and the boy didn’t find out until decades later.
By then, he was a knight, that little boy’s name was Patrick Stewart.
He was born into a poor family in Mirfield, a small mill town in Yorkshire and his father came home from World War II a violent man, and he was violent toward Patrick’s mother.
Young Patrick learned exactly when to step between his father’s fist and his mother.
An English teacher put a copy of Shakespeare in his hand and told him to get up and perform.
He never stopped and left school at 15.
By 19 he was completely bald... most agencies told him he'd never make it because of that.
In 1987, the LA Times called him an “unknown British Shakespearean actor” when he was cast as Captain Picard.
Then he became one of the most famous faces on Earth.
You’ve probably heard that part.
Here’s the part you haven’t:
He spent decades as a patron of Refuge, sheltering women and children from domestic violence.
But he never stopped trying to understand his father.
He dug up a 1940 newspaper clipping that said his dad had come home with severe shell shock.
He went to France and walked the ground where his father’s unit was pinned down under bombing for hours.
He learned his father had PTSD, and nobody ever helped him.
So Patrick became an ambassador for Combat Stress, a charity that helps veterans.
In 2013, a young woman at a Texas convention told him she was a survivor of domestic violence.
He asked, “My dear, are you okay?”
Then he hopped off the stage, held her, and told her: “You never have to go through that again, you’re safe now.”
At Dragon Con, a Make-A-Wish girl dressed as Spock came to meet him.
2,000 people were waiting for him to speak... he sat down and talked with her for 15 minutes, making all of them wait.
He told her that since they were friends now, whenever she saw him on screen she could wave and say, “Hello Patrick.”
After 9/11, he felt helpless, so he brought his one-man A Christmas Carol back to Broadway for a full week of charity shows.
He played every character himself and donated every cent.
In 2019 he did it again, and every dollar went to feeding hungry New Yorkers.
In 2017, he fostered a pit bull named Ginger, who had been rescued from a dogfighting ring.
She was his first dog in more than 50 years.
He couldn’t bring her home to England, so he found her a family.
Then he kept fostering more.
When he said he was done with Star Trek so many people told him the show had gotten them through the hardest times of their lives.
So he wanted to see if Picard could do it one more time.
Rest in Peace, Sir Patrick 🖖
Tough week for @StarTrek
Live television. What can you do?
Daniel Lyons retweeted
Justice Antonin Scalia’s now 15-year-old majority opinion in the violent video game case of Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association stands as a formidable bulwark against the temptations of today’s lawmakers and litigators to erode First Amendment safeguards for new communications technologies.
From @ProfClayCalvert:
aei.org/domestic-policy/spee…
I mean, Simpsons went after Phantom Menace within weeks of its release.
A fun essay to celebrate the addition of The Prisoner to the @Criterion collection. Such a great show.
“Everyone agrees that *The Prisoner* (1967), the unclassifiable British television show that Criterion recently added to its streaming collection, is an allegory. But of what? If you watched it in 1967, unaware that you’re enjoying a soon-to-be cult classic, a singularity in its medium, you’d probably place it as a spy show. Or perhaps you’d view it as spy-fi, that subgenre of the spy thriller defined mostly by the fact that the spy’s gadgets are all absolutely sick and the film stock has the colors of a childhood dream.” —Phil Christman
plough.com/articles/i-am-not…
Daniel Lyons retweeted
Five news networks jointly suspended coverage in protest. An antitrust investigation followed.
@RBenSperry in @usatodayopinion on the First Amendment’s protection of editorial choices, including what to cover and publish, and how it applies when networks act together. 🔗⬇️
There should be some kind of training course when you become a public official, and it should include a unit on moral hazard.
Daniel Lyons retweeted
“Collusion via Government: The Meta Settlement’s End Run Around Antitrust Law”
New from @ProfDanielLyons:
aei.org/domestic-policy/coll…
Daniel Lyons retweeted
“In a market economy, collusion is an ever-present temptation. Even Adam Smith, perhaps capitalism’s most illustrious forefather, wrote that “people of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.” Antitrust law is the government’s answer, equipping federal and state officials to punish competitors who coordinate.
But what happens when the government itself becomes the tool of collusion?”
Continue reading @ProfDanielLyons's latest:
aei.org/domestic-policy/coll…
Daniel Lyons retweeted
FACT: The annual funding Israel receives from the US amounts to less than one-tenth of 1% of the federal budget. Less than 1/10th of 1%.
FACT: That annual funding would cover only a few hours of federal health care spending. A few hours.
Yet politicians who specialize in scapegoating would have you believe that Israel is responsible for America’s affordability crisis.
Like every form of scapegoating before it, it is a dangerous lie.
Daniel Lyons retweeted
That's what genocide looks like
This 260-year demographic timeline of Poland’s Jewish population reveals the devastating scale of the Holocaust. Source: buff.ly/MEHJWla
Daniel Lyons retweeted
Some thoughts today in @CJR re: Trump sitting for a deposition in his $10 billion lawsuit against the @BBC . . . @AEItech @AEI . . . cjr.org/the_media_today/how-…


























