Jesus no wonder they're so terrified of letting @Docstockk speak. Everything I've seen from her these past few days she's absolutely nailed the core points in convincing, easy to understand points without getting bogged down in the weeds of the minutae
Stonewall will love that Kathleen Stock correctly calls them a "trans activist lobbying group". I love that Ms. Stock calls "self-ID" a "nuts policy". After all, no one claiming "transwomen are women" can/will answer the simple question "what is a woman?" #LGBWithoutTheT
It is absolutely nuts, and anytime it's explained properly to any sane and reasonable adult they will always agree so.
Most ppl who support this are under the mistaken impression that the vast majority of "trans women" are post surgery and taking hormones while the reality is that somewhere between 87-95% of trans identified males are fully intact males with very male penises.
@Docstockk This is the mindset of men identifying as women. These aren’t men suffering from gender dysphoria, at best these are transvestites, fetishists, autogynephiles, at worst predators. They have NO PLACE in women’s single sex spaces & sports
This was always the plan. Anyone who knows the history of queer theory, the intellectual leaders of the movement are overwhelmingly straight white pedophiles. From Michel Foucault (the Godfather of queer theory and noted pedophile) and John Money, to the present day intellectual thought leaders like these degenerates here, the movement itself is invariably geared towards making it easier for adult males to use society as a sex toy to gratify their fetishes.
So first they make in roads about it being just about "letting ppl live their lives as they see fit" (because what reasonable adult would disagree with that) and then once the ideological hook is set, they let the mask slip and now all of a sudden, no surgery is required, no hormones, and they demand unquestioned access into female only spaces.
And society is saying nah bro, fuck that. That's not what we signed up for.
You should see her at Cambridge, i discovered her there : youtu.be/VgcI4DBHUA4
Do trans- racial or Trans- age people need “protection” as a separate group?
Transgender is as illogical.
It's become clear there is a significant subset of white liberal men who have been just dying having to keep their deep hatred of women in check these past few decades. This movement is a godsent for them because it allows them to spew their misogynistic bile as much as they like while still retaining their "progressive" credentials
I think she’s going to have a tough time at Oxford. Dave with the pink and blue hair isn’t interested in intellectual debate, he just wants to get his cock out in the women’s changing room.
But that's the trap they've created for themselves. They let ppl like @Docstockk speak, and they lose because rational adults understand a persuasive argument when they hear one, OR they obey their base instincts and become violent, aggressive and hateful in front of the whole world to see, and they lose even worse, because that lays bare who these ppl really are. Either way, they lose.
Self ID is a reality in Canada, #justiintrudeau has erased womens sex based rights, removed safeguards , fair competition, based on a “feeling” no surgery , meds , psyc, any man anytime can declare they “feel” female have the legal right to enter F spaces.
Yes, and thats the reality all over the West right now. But you can feel the societal immune system kicking in as the intent (and more importantly than intent, the outcomes) of these policies becomes more clear every day.
The support of these stuff by non-ideolgues is almost entirely based on a low-information environment. The vast, vast majority of society rejects the tenets of this ideology completely when they're presented with what it actually claims (that trans women are ACTUALLY women) and the real world outcomes (men in women's sports, men in women's change rooms)
